Central Nervous System Lymphoma.

Central nervous system lymphoma (CNSL) is a rare and aggressive malignancy that primarily affects the brain, spinal cord, and meninges. This article provides a comprehensive overview of the current understanding of CNSL encompassing its epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis, treatment modalities, and prognosis. Although the main focus is on primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL), ocular lymphoma, primary leptomeningeal lymphoma, and secondary CNS lymphoma are also discussed. The pathobiology of CNSL involves the infiltration of malignant lymphocytes within the CNS parenchyma or leptomeninges. Various risk factors and immunological mechanisms contribute to its development, including immunodeficiency states, chronic inflammation, and genomic alterations. Accurate diagnosis is crucial for appropriate management, given the heterogeneous clinical presentation. The neuroimaging, systemic imaging, and other modalities for diagnosis and evaluation for extent of disease involvement will be discussed. Additionally, the importance of histopathological examination, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis, and molecular testing in confirming the diagnosis and guiding treatment decisions are highlighted. The treatment landscape for CNSL has evolved significantly. Therapeutic approaches encompass a multimodal strategy combining high-dose methotrexate-based chemotherapy, consolidation with whole-brain radiation therapy, and high-dose chemotherapy with stem cell rescue. Recent advancements in targeted therapies and immunomodulatory agents offer promising avenues for future treatment options. We review the clinical outcomes and prognostic factors influencing the survival of CNSL patients, including age, performance status, disease stage, and genetic abnormalities.

Neurologic complications of melanoma.

Neurologic complications are common in patients with melanoma and are often associated with a poor prognosis. In an era with new, effective treatments, patients are living longer, and this has resulted in an increase in complications of both the disease and the therapy. A multidisciplinary approach to neurologic complications in patients with melanoma, with involvement from medical oncology, neuro-oncology, radiation oncology, and often neurosurgery, is necessary. In this review, neurologic complications of melanoma, including clinical implications and treatment strategies, are described.

Novel therapeutic agents in the management of brain metastases.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review aims to highlight the novel therapeutic agents in the management of brain metastases which are in various stages of clinical development. We review the results from recent clinical trials, publications and presentations at recent national and international conferences. RECENT FINDINGS: Several new systemic treatment options for brain metastases are in early or advanced clinical trials. These drugs have good intracranial and extracranial activities. As lung cancer, breast cancer, and melanoma are the three most common causes of brain metastases, most agents in clinical development are focused on these tumor types. Several of these therapies are small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors or monoclonal antibodies against the tyrosine kinase receptors. Another exciting development in brain metastases management is the use of immunotherapy agents. The anti-CTLA-4 and\or anti-PD-1 antibodies have shown promising intracranial activity in melanoma and nonsmall cell lung cancer patients with brain metastases. SUMMARY: Contemporary clinical trials have shown encouraging intracranial activity of newer tyrosine kinase inhibitors, monoclonal antibodies against tyrosine kinase receptors and immunotherapy agents in select group of patients with brain metastases. Further studies are needed to develop therapeutic strategies, in order to improve survival in patients with brain metastases.

Stereotactic radiosurgery in the treatment of adults with metastatic brain tumors.

Brain metastasis is the most common type of intracranial tumor affecting a significant proportion of advanced cancer patients. In recent years, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has become commonly utilized. It has contributed significantly to decreased toxicity, prolonged quality of life and general improvement in outcomes of patients with brain metastases. Frequent imaging and advanced treatment techniques have allowed for the treatment of more patients with large and numerous metastases extending their overall survival. The addition of targeted therapy and immunotherapy to SRS has introduced novel treatment paradigms and has further improved our ability to effectively treat brain lesions. In this review, we examined in detail the available evidence for the use of SRS alone or in combination with surgery and systemic therapies. Given our developing understanding of the importance of primary tumor histology, the use of different treatment strategies for different metastasis is evolving. Combining SRS with immunotherapy and targeted therapy in breast cancer, lung cancer and melanoma as well as the use of preoperative SRS have shown significant promise in recent years and are investigated in multiple ongoing prospective trials. Further research is needed to guide the optimal sequence of therapies and to identify specific patient subgroups that may benefit the most from aggressive, combined treatment approaches.

Central Nervous System Metastasis in Patients With Urothelial Carcinoma: Institutional Experience and a Comprehensive Review of the Literature.

INTRODUCTION: Central nervous system (CNS) metastasis in patients with urothelial carcinoma (UC) is uncommon and poorly understood. We aimed to explore the clinical behavior and outcomes of this unique patient population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with UC and CNS metastasis, treated in our institution (2006-2018), along with an exploratory patient-point meta-analysis of a similar patient population derived from a comprehensive literature review. Data regarding diagnosis, management, and outcomes were extracted. Overall survival, time to CNS metastasis (TTCM), and residual survival (RS) from CNS involvement to death were calculated (Kaplan-Meier method). Cox regression was used for testing key clinicopathologic associations. RESULTS: We identified 20 "institutional" and 154 "literature" patients with adequate data granularity for analysis. Median TTCM was 17.7 (institutional cohort) and 10 (literature cohort) months. Most patients who developed CNS metastases had previous non-CNS metastasis (15/20 [75%] and 103/154 [67%], respectively). CNS lesions without previous history of metastasis were identified in 5/20 (25%) and 33/154 (21%) cases and those patients had a shorter TTCM. CNS lesions in the absence of known UC history were also documented in 18/154 (12%) literature cases. Multifocal CNS disease was associated with shorter RS in both cohorts in univariate, but not multivariate, analysis. CONCLUSION: We observed a variability in disease presentation and course, with a subset of patients showing an early predilection for CNS insult, potentially reflecting a diverse underlying biology. Genomic profiling studies, elucidating the molecular landscape, and driving future treatments should be considered in this setting.

The Judicious Use of Stereotactic Radiosurgery and Hypofractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy in the Management of Large Brain Metastases.

Brain metastases are the most common intracranial malignant tumor in adults and are a cause of significant morbidity and mortality for cancer patients. Large brain metastases, defined as tumors with a maximum dimension >2 cm, present a unique clinical challenge for the delivery of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) as patients often present with neurologic symptoms that require expeditious treatment that must also be balanced against the potential consequences of surgery and radiation therapy-namely, leptomeningeal disease (LMD) and radionecrosis (RN). Hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (HSRT) and pre-operative SRS have emerged as novel treatment techniques to help improve local control rates and reduce rates of RN and LMD for this patient population commonly managed with post-operative SRS. Recent literature suggests that pre-operative SRS can potentially half the risk of LMD compared to post-operative SRS and that HSRT can improve risk of RN to less than 10% while improving local control when meeting the appropriate goals for biologically effective dose (BED) and dose-volume constraints. We recommend a 3- or 5-fraction regimen in lieu of SRS delivering 15 Gy or less for large metastases or resection cavities. We provide a table comparing the BED of commonly used SRS and HSRT regimens, and provide an algorithm to help guide the management of these challenging clinical scenarios.

Impact of EGFR mutation and ALK rearrangement on the outcomes of non-small cell lung cancer patients with brain metastasis.

BACKGROUND: The impact of activating alterations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (epidermal growth factor receptor [EGFR] mutation/anaplastic lymphoma kinase [ALK] translocation) in prognosticating patients with brain metastasis (BM) is not well defined. This study was sought to identify this impact in NSCLC patients with BM accounting for the known validated variables. METHODS: Among 1078 NSCLC-BM patients diagnosed/treated between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2015, three hundred and forty-eight with known EGFR/ALK status were analyzed. Overall survival (OS) and intracranial progression-free survival (PFS) were measured from the time of BM. RESULTS: Ninety-one patients had either ALK (n = 23) alterations or EGFR (n = 68) mutation and 257 were wild type (WT; negative actionable mutations/alterations). Median age of EGFR/ALK+ NSCLC BM patients was 60 years (range 29.8-82.6 y) and ~50% (n = 44) had Karnofsky performance status (KPS) score >80. Median number of BM was 2 (1 to ≥99). The median OS for the ALK/EGFR+ NSCLC BM was 19.9 versus 10.1 months for the WT (P = 0.028). The number of BM in the EGFR/ALK+ group did not impact OS (BM = 1 with 21.1 months vs 2-3 with 19.1 months and >3 with 23.7 months, P = 0.74), whereas fewer BM in the WT cohort had significantly better OS (BM = 1 with 13.8 mo, 2-3 with 11.0 mo and >3 with 8.1 mo; P = 0.006) with the adjustment of age, KPS, symptoms from BM and synchronicity. CONCLUSIONS: Number of BM does not impact outcomes in the EGFR/ALK+ NSCLC patients, implying that targeted therapy along with surgery and/or radiation may improve OS irrespective of the number of BM. Number of BM, extracranial metastasis (ECM), and KPS independently affected OS/PFS in WT NSCLC BM, which was consistent with the known literature.

Melanoma brain metastasis: the impact of stereotactic radiosurgery, BRAF mutational status, and targeted and/or immune-based therapies on treatment outcome.

OBJECTIVE The goal of this study was to investigate the impact of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), BRAF status, and targeted and immune-based therapies on the recurrence patterns and factors associated with overall survival (OS) among patients with melanoma brain metastasis (MBM). METHODS A total of 366 patients were treated for 1336 MBMs; a lesion-based analysis was performed on 793 SRS lesions. The BRAF status was available for 78 patients: 35 had BRAF mut and 43 had BRAF wild-type ( BRAF-WT) lesions. The Kaplan-Meier method evaluated unadjusted OS; cumulative incidence analysis determined the incidences of local failure (LF), distant failure, and radiation necrosis (RN), with death as a competing risk. RESULTS The 12-month OS was 24% (95% CI 20%-29%). On multivariate analysis, younger age, lack of extracranial metastases, better Karnofsky Performance Status score, and fewer MBMs, as well as treatment with BRAF inhibitors (BRAFi), anti-PD-1/CTLA-4 therapy, or cytokine therapy were significantly associated with OS. For patients who underwent SRS, the 12-month LF rate was lower among those with BRAF mut lesions (6%, 95% CI 2%-11%) compared with those with BRAF-WT lesions (22%, 95% CI 13%-32%; p < 0.01). The 12-month LF rates among lesions treated with BRAFi and PD-1/CTLA-4 agents were 1% (95% CI 1%-4%) and 7% (95% CI 1%-13%), respectively. On multivariate analysis, BRAF inhibition within 30 days of SRS was protective against LF (HR 0.08, 95% CI 0.01-0.55; p = 0.01). The 12-month rates of RN were low among lesions treated with BRAFi (0%, 95% CI 0%-0%), PD-1/CTLA-4 inhibitors (2%, 95% CI 1%-5%), and cytokine therapies (6%, 95% CI 1%-13%). CONCLUSIONS Prognostic schema should incorporate BRAFi or immunotherapy status and use of targeted therapies. Treatment with a BRAF inhibitor within 4 weeks of SRS improves local control without an increased risk of RN.

Targeted Therapy in Brain Metastases: Ready for Primetime?

Brain metastasis is a serious complication of cancer that causes significant morbidity for patients. Over the last decade, numerous new driver somatic mutations have been recognized and targeted therapies are changing the landscape of treatment in lung cancer, breast cancer, and melanoma, which are also the three most common cancers that result in brain metastases. The common actionable mutations include the EGFR mutation and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) translocations in non-small cell lung cancer, the HER2 mutation in breast cancer, and the BRAF mutation in melanoma. However, most of the early trials with targeted agents excluded patients with brain metastases. With a better understanding of the biology, several recent trials of targeted therapy that focus on brain metastases have been reported and others are ongoing. Novel agents with better penetration across the blood-brain barrier are currently being investigated for patients with brain metastases. In this review, we discuss the current state of use and future directions of targeted therapies in brain metastases.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Brain Metastases: From Biology to Treatment.

Cancer immunotherapy has been a subject of intense research over the last several years, leading to new approaches for modulation of the immune system to treat malignancies. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (anti-CLTA-4 antibodies and anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies) potentiate the host's own antitumor immune response. These immune checkpoint inhibitors have shown impressive clinical efficacy in advanced melanoma, metastatic kidney cancer, and metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)-all malignancies that frequently cause brain metastases. The immune response in the brain is highly regulated, challenging the treatment of brain metastases with immune-modulatory therapies. The immune microenvironment in brain metastases is active with a high density of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in certain patients and, therefore, may serve as a potential treatment target. However, clinical data of the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in brain metastases compared with extracranial metastases are limited, as most clinical trials with these new agents excluded patients with active brain metastases. In this article, we review the current scientific evidence of brain metastases biology with specific emphasis on inflammatory tumor microenvironment and the evolving state of clinical application of immune checkpoint inhibitors for patients with brain metastases.