Directional Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson's Disease: Results of an International Crossover Study With Randomized, Double-Blind Primary Endpoint.

OBJECTIVE: Published reports on directional deep brain stimulation (DBS) have been limited to small, single-center investigations. Therapeutic window (TW) is used to describe the range of stimulation amplitudes achieving symptom relief without side effects. This crossover study performed a randomized double-blind assessment of TW for directional and omnidirectional DBS in a large cohort of patients implanted with a DBS system in the subthalamic nucleus for Parkinson's disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Participants received omnidirectional stimulation for the first three months after initial study programming, followed by directional DBS for the following three months. The primary endpoint was a double-blind, randomized evaluation of TW for directional vs omnidirectional stimulation at three months after initial study programming. Additional data recorded at three- and six-month follow-ups included stimulation preference, therapeutic current strength, Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) part III motor score, and quality of life. RESULTS: The study enrolled 234 subjects (62 ± 8 years, 33% female). TW was wider using directional stimulation in 183 of 202 subjects (90.6%). The mean increase in TW with directional stimulation was 41% (2.98 ± 1.38 mA, compared to 2.11 ± 1.33 mA for omnidirectional). UPDRS part III motor score on medication improved 42.4% at three months (after three months of omnidirectional stimulation) and 43.3% at six months (after three months of directional stimulation) with stimulation on, compared to stimulation off. After six months, 52.8% of subjects blinded to stimulation type (102/193) preferred the period with directional stimulation, and 25.9% (50/193) preferred the omnidirectional period. The directional period was preferred by 58.5% of clinicians (113/193) vs 21.2% (41/193) who preferred the omnidirectional period. CONCLUSION: Directional stimulation yielded a wider TW compared to omnidirectional stimulation and was preferred by blinded subjects and clinicians.

Motor Evoked Potential Recordings During Segmented Deep Brain Stimulation-A Feasibility Study.

BACKGROUND: Segmented deep brain stimulation (DBS) leads, which are capable of steering current in the direction of any 1 of 3 segments, can result in a wider therapeutic window by directing current away from unintended structures, particularly, the corticospinal tract (CST). It is unclear whether the use of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) is feasible during DBS surgery via stimulation of individual contacts/segments in order to quantify CST activation thresholds and optimal contacts/segments intraoperatively. OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility of using MEP to identify CST thresholds for ring and individual segments of the DBS lead under general anesthesia. METHODS: MEP testing was performed during pulse generator implantation under general anesthesia on subjects who underwent DBS lead implantation into the subthalamic nucleus (STN). Stimulation of each ring and segmented contacts of the directional DBS lead was performed until CST threshold was reached. Stereotactic coordinates and thresholds for each contact/segment were recorded along with the initially activated muscle group. RESULTS: A total of 34 hemispheres were included for analysis. MEP thresholds were recorded from 268 total contacts/segments. For segmented contacts (2 and 3, respectively), the mean highest CST thresholds were 2.33 and 2.62 mA, while the mean lowest CST thresholds were 1.7 and 1.89 mA, suggesting differential thresholds in relation to CST. First dorsal interosseous and abductor pollicis brevis (34% each) were the most commonly activated muscle groups. CONCLUSION: MEP threshold recording from segmented DBS leads is feasible. MEP recordings can identify segments with highest CST thresholds and may identify segment orientation in relation to CST.

Association of Subthalamic Deep Brain Stimulation With Motor, Functional, and Pharmacologic Outcomes in Patients With Monogenic Parkinson Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Importance: Comparative outcomes among different monogenic forms of Parkinson disease after subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN DBS) remain unclear. Objective: To compare clinical outcomes in patients with the most common monogenic forms of Parkinson disease treated with STN DBS. Design, Setting, and Participants: Systematic review and meta-analysis in which a PubMed search of interventional and noninterventional studies of Parkinson disease with LRRK2, GBA, or PRKN gene mutations published between January 1, 1990, and May 1, 2018, was conducted. Among the inclusion criteria were articles that reported the Motor subscale of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Part III (UPDRS-III) before and after STN DBS treatment, that involved human participants, and that were published in the English language. Studies that used aggregated data from patients with different genetic mutations were excluded, and so were studies with assumed but not confirmed genetic data or incomplete follow-up data. Main Outcomes and Measures: Changes in UPDRS-III scores and levodopa equivalent daily dose (LEDD) were analyzed for each monogenic form of Parkinson disease. Additional end points included activities of daily living (UPDRS-II), motor complications (UPDRS-IV), and cognitive function. Results: Of the 611 eligible studies, 17 (2.8%) met the full inclusion criteria; these 17 studies consisted of 8 cohort studies (47.1%), 3 case series (17.6%), and 6 case reports (35.3%), and they involved a total of 518 patients. The UPDRS-III score improved by 46% in LRRK2 (mean change, 23.0 points; 95% CI, 15.2-30.8; P < .001), 49% in GBA (20.0 points; 95% CI, 4.5-35.5; P = .01), 43% in PRKN (24.1 points; 95% CI, 12.4-35.9; P < .001), and 53% in idiopathic Parkinson disease (25.2 points; 95% CI, 21.3-29.2; P < .001). The LEDD was reduced by 61% in LRRK2 (mean change, 711.9 mg/d; 95% CI, 491.8-932.0; P < .001), 22% in GBA (269.2 mg/d; 95% CI, 226.8-311.5; P < .001), 61% in PRKN (494.8 mg/d; 95% CI, -18.1 to -1007.8; P = .06), and 55% in idiopathic Parkinson disease (681.8 mg/d; 95% CI, 544.4-819.1; P < .001). Carriers of the PRKN mutations showed sustained improvements in UPDRS-II and UPDRS-IV, whereas LRRK2 mutation carriers sustained improvements only in UPDRS-IV. Carriers of the GBA mutation showed worse postsurgical cognitive and functional performance. Conclusions and Relevance: Treatment with STN DBS for patients with Parkinson disease with LRRK2, GBA, or PRKN mutations appears to be associated with similar motor outcomes but different changes in dopaminergic dose, activities of daily living, motor complications, and cognitive functions.

Safety and tolerability of intraputaminal delivery of CERE-120 (adeno-associated virus serotype 2-neurturin) to patients with idiopathic Parkinson's disease: an open-label, phase I trial.

BACKGROUND: There is an urgent need for therapies that slow or reverse the progression of Parkinson's disease (PD). Neurotrophic factors can improve the function of degenerating neurons and protect against further neurodegeneration, and gene transfer might be a means to deliver effectively these factors to the brain. The aim of this study was to assess the safety, tolerability, and potential efficacy of gene delivery of the neurotrophic factor neurturin. METHODS: In this phase I, open-label clinical trial, 12 patients aged 35-75 years with a diagnosis of PD for at least 5 years in accordance with the UK Brain Bank Criteria received bilateral, stereotactic, intraputaminal injections of adeno-associated virus serotype 2-neurturin (CERE-120). The first six patients received doses of 1.3x10(11) vector genomes (vg)/patient, and the next six patients received 5.4x10(11) vg/patient. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00252850. FINDINGS: The procedure was well tolerated. Extensive safety monitoring in all patients revealed no clinically significant adverse events at 1 year. Several secondary measures of motor function showed improvement at 1 year; for example, a mean improvement in the off-medication motor subscore of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) of 14 points (SD 8; p=0.000121 [36% mean increase; p=0.000123]) and a mean increase of 2.3 h (2; 25% group mean increase; p=0.0250) in on time without troublesome dyskinesia were seen. Improvements in several secondary measures were not significant, including the timed walking test in the off condition (p=0.053), the Purdue pegboard test of hand dexterity (p=0.318), the reduction in off time (p=0.105), and the activities of daily living subscore (part II) of the UPDRS (p=0.080). (18)F-levodopa-uptake PET did not change after treatment with either dose of CERE-120. INTERPRETATION: The initial data support the safety, tolerability, and potential efficacy of CERE-120 as a possible treatment for PD; however, these results must be viewed as preliminary until data from blinded, controlled clinical trials are available. FUNDING: Ceregene; Michael J Fox Foundation for Parkinson's Research.

Proceedings of the Third Annual Deep Brain Stimulation Think Tank: A Review of Emerging Issues and Technologies.

The proceedings of the 3rd Annual Deep Brain Stimulation Think Tank summarize the most contemporary clinical, electrophysiological, imaging, and computational work on DBS for the treatment of neurological and neuropsychiatric disease. Significant innovations of the past year are emphasized. The Think Tank's contributors represent a unique multidisciplinary ensemble of expert neurologists, neurosurgeons, neuropsychologists, psychiatrists, scientists, engineers, and members of industry. Presentations and discussions covered a broad range of topics, including policy and advocacy considerations for the future of DBS, connectomic approaches to DBS targeting, developments in electrophysiology and related strides toward responsive DBS systems, and recent developments in sensor and device technologies.

Gene delivery of AAV2-neurturin for Parkinson's disease: a double-blind, randomised, controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: In an open-label phase 1 trial, gene delivery of the trophic factor neurturin via an adeno-associated type-2 vector (AAV2) was well tolerated and seemed to improve motor function in patients with advanced Parkinson's disease. We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of AAV2-neurturin in a double-blind, phase 2 randomised trial. METHODS: We did a multicentre, double-blind, sham-surgery controlled trial in patients with advanced Parkinson's disease. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) by a central, computer generated, randomisation code to receive either AAV2-neurturin (5·4 × 10¹¹ vector genomes) injected bilaterally into the putamen or sham surgery. All patients and study personnel with the exception of the neurosurgical team were masked to treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was change from baseline to 12 months in the motor subscore of the unified Parkinson's disease rating scale in the practically-defined off state. All randomly assigned patients who had at least one assessment after baseline were included in the primary analyses. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00400634. RESULTS: Between December, 2006, and November, 2008, 58 patients from nine sites in the USA participated in the trial. There was no significant difference in the primary endpoint in patients treated with AAV2-neurturin compared with control individuals (difference -0·31 [SE 2·63], 95% CI -5·58 to 4·97; p=0·91). Serious adverse events occurred in 13 of 38 patients treated with AAV2-neurturin and four of 20 control individuals. Three patients in the AAV2-neurturin group and two in the sham surgery group developed tumours. INTERPRETATION: Intraputaminal AAV2-neurturin is not superior to sham surgery when assessed using the UPDRS motor score at 12 months. However, the possibility of a benefit with additional targeting of the substantia nigra and longer term follow-up should be investigated in further studies. FUNDING: Ceregene and Michael J Fox Foundation for Parkinson's Research.