Fecal levels of SCFA and BCFA during capecitabine in patients with metastatic or unresectable colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Gut bacteria-derived short-chain fatty acids (SCFA) and branched-chain fatty acids (BCFA) are considered to have beneficial metabolic, anti-inflammatory as well as anti-carcinogenic effects. Previous preclinical studies indicated bidirectional interactions between gut bacteria and the chemotherapeutic capecitabine or its metabolite 5-FU. This study investigated the effect of three cycles of capecitabine on fecal SCFA and BCFA levels and their associations with tumor response, nutritional status, physical performance, chemotherapy-induced toxicity, systemic inflammation and bacterial abundances in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). METHODS: Forty-four patients with metastatic or unresectable CRC, scheduled for treatment with capecitabine (± bevacizumab), were prospectively enrolled. Patients collected a fecal sample and completed a questionnaire before (T1), during (T2) and after (T3) three cycles of capecitabine. Tumor response (CT/MRI scans), nutritional status (MUST score), physical performance (Karnofsky Performance Score) and chemotherapy-induced toxicity (CTCAE) were recorded. Additional data on clinical characteristics, treatment regimen, medical history and blood inflammatory parameters were collected. Fecal SCFA and BCFA concentrations were determined by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). Gut microbiota composition was assessed using 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing. RESULTS: Fecal levels of the SCFA valerate and caproate decreased significantly during three cycles of capecitabine. Furthermore, baseline levels of the BCFA iso-butyrate were associated with tumor response. Nutritional status, physical performance and chemotherapy-induced toxicity were not significantly associated with SCFA or BCFA. Baseline SCFA correlated positively with blood neutrophil counts. At all time points, we identified associations between SCFA and BCFA and the relative abundance of bacterial taxa on family level. CONCLUSIONS: The present study provided first indications for a potential role of SCFA and BCFA during capecitabine treatment as well as implications for further research. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The current study was registered in the Dutch Trial Register (NTR6957) on 17/01/2018 and can be consulted via the International Clinical Trial Registry Platform (ICTRP).

Prognostic impact of isolated tumor cells in breast cancer axillary nodes: single tumor cell(s) versus tumor cell cluster(s) and microanatomic location.

In breast cancer, it has been shown that pN0(i+) and pN1mi have a comparable negative impact on disease-free survival, compared with pN0. However, pN0(i+) is considered to be a heterogeneous group. We determined the effect of metastatic size and microanatomic location within the pN0(i+) group on breast cancer recurrence. We included all Dutch breast cancer patients diagnosed in 1998-2005 with favorable primary tumor characteristics and a final nodal status of pN0(i+). For this analysis, only patients without adjuvant systemic therapy were eligible (n = 513). Presence of single tumor cells versus cell clusters, metastatic size and microanatomic location were recorded. Primary endpoint was disease-free survival. Analyses were adjusted for age at diagnosis, tumor size, tumor grade, axillary treatment and hormone receptor status. The 5-year disease-free survival of patients with single tumor cell(s) (n = 93) was 78.6% and with tumor cell cluster(s) (n = 404) 77.1%. The hazard ratio for disease events was 1.05 (95% CI 0.63-1.76) for cell cluster(s) compared with single cell(s). In a Cox regression model, doubling of metastatic tumor size corresponded to a hazard ratio of 1.21 (95% CI 1.02-1.43). The adjusted hazard ratio was 0.90 (95% CI 0.54-1.50) for parenchymal (n = 112) versus sinusoidal location (n = 395). Single tumor cells bear similar prognostic information as small tumor cell clusters, even though results do suggest that within the pN0(i+) group, increasing size of nodal involvement is associated with reduced survival. Microanatomic location does not seem to have prognostic relevance.

Safety of avoiding routine use of axillary dissection in early stage breast cancer: a systematic review.

Physicians are moving away from routine axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in clinically node-negative breast cancer. We conducted a systemic review on the safety of this policy. Pubmed and Cochrane library were searched for. Sixty-eight studies were included: studies of clinically node-negative patients in the pre-sentinel node (SN) era; observational studies of SN-negative patients, without ALND; comparative studies of SN-negative patients, with a non-ALND and an ALND group; SN-positive studies, of patients without ALND. Primary endpoint was the pooled axillary recurrence rate (ARR) of each category; secondary endpoint was overall survival (OS) rate. In pre-SN studies, with larger tumors and less systemic therapy, ARR without ALND after 5-10 years follow-up was 12-18%, with 5% reduced OS. In the observational SN-negative studies, with median follow-up of 36 months, the pooled ARR was 0.6% (95% CI 0.6-0.8). In the comparative SN-negative studies, pooled ARR was 0.4% (95% CI 0.2-0.6) without ALND versus 0.3% (95% CI 0.1-0.6) with ALND at 31 and 47 months, respectively, and no survival disadvantage. In SN-positive studies, ARR was up to 1.7% (95% CI 1.0-2.7) at 30 months. For patients with an H&E positive SN the ARR without ALND was 5% after 23 months, which may imply rates as high as 13 and 18% after 5 and 8 years. In conclusion, this systematic review confirms the safety of omitting ALND in SN-negative patients. There is a potential role for avoiding ALND in selected SN-positive patients, but eligibility criteria and the role of systemic therapy need further to be elucidated.