Management of Velopharyngeal Dysfunction (VPD) Following Cleft Palate Repair: A Comprehensive Decision-Making Process Based on Severity and Structural Deficiencies.

OBJECTIVE: To describe a comprehensive decision-making process for surgical correction of structural Velopharyngeal Dysfunction (VPD) following cleft palate repair and evaluate its efficacy. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: Tertiary care hospital. PATIENTS: 300 consecutive patients with unilateral or bilateral cleft lip and palate (CLP) or isolated cleft palate (CP) diagnosed with clinical VPD following cleft palate repair between 2009 and 2014. Of these 206 patients had structural VPD and underwent surgical correction. INTERVENTIONS: Surgical corrections were carried out according to the comprehensive two stage decision making process developed by the investigators. Step 1 of decision-making involved visualisation of the VP sphincter function by nasoendoscopy. This was followed by step 2 which involved per-operative identification of scarring, tissue loss, hypoplasia and other structural deficiencies in the soft palate and septal mucoperiosteum. The choice of operation was then made from a repertoire of interrelated and escalating surgical procedures consisting of palate revision and pharyngoplasties ranging from most anatomical to the least. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Evidence of postoperative restoration of VP function on nasoendoscopy, evaluation of speech for hypernasality, understandability, acceptability and symptoms of obstructive sleep apnea. RESULTS: Complete VP closure was demonstrated in 94% of patients treated using this algorithm. There was significant improvement in all speech parameters (p < 0.00001). CONCLUSION: Our comprehensive decision-making process is designed to effectively correct structural VPD according to the severity of structural and functional deficiencies in the soft palate and avoid over treatment.

The First Hybrid International Educational Comprehensive Cleft Care Workshop.

OBJECTIVE: Describe the first hybrid global simulation-based comprehensive cleft care workshop, evaluate impact on participants, and compare experiences based on in-person versus virtual attendance. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey-based evaluation. SETTING: International comprehensive cleft care workshop. PARTICIPANTS: Total of 489 participants. INTERVENTIONS: Three-day simulation-based hybrid comprehensive cleft care workshop. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Participant demographic data, perceived barriers and interventions needed for global comprehensive cleft care delivery, participant workshop satisfaction, and perceived short-term impact on practice stratified by in-person versus virtual attendance. RESULTS: The workshop included 489 participants from 5 continents. The response rate was 39.9%. Participants perceived financial factors (30.3%) the most significant barrier and improvement in training (39.8%) as the most important intervention to overcome barriers facing cleft care delivery in low to middle-income countries. All participants reported a high level of satisfaction with the workshop and a strong positive perceived short-term impact on their practice. Importantly, while this was true for both in-person and virtual attendees, in-person attendees reported a significantly higher satisfaction with the workshop (28.63 ± 3.08 vs 27.63 ± 3.93; P = .04) and perceived impact on their clinical practice (22.37 ± 3.42 vs 21.02 ± 3.45 P = .01). CONCLUSION: Hybrid simulation-based educational comprehensive cleft care workshops are overall well received by participants and have a positive perceived impact on their clinical practices. In-person attendance is associated with significantly higher satisfaction and perceived impact on practice. Considering that financial and health constraints may limit live meeting attendance, future efforts will focus on making in-person and virtual attendance more comparable.

Simulation-Based Comprehensive Cleft Care Workshops: A Reproducible Model for Sustainable Education.

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate simulation-based comprehensive cleft care workshops as a reproducible model for education with sustained impact. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey-based evaluation. SETTING: Simulation-based comprehensive cleft care workshop. PARTICIPANTS: Total of 180 participants. INTERVENTIONS: Three-day simulation-based comprehensive cleft care workshop. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Number of workshop participants stratified by specialty, satisfaction with the workshop, satisfaction with simulation-based workshops as educational tools, impact on cleft surgery procedural confidence, short-term impact on clinical practice, medium-term impact on clinical practice. RESULTS: The workshop included 180 participants from 5 continents. The response rate was 54.5%, with participants reporting high satisfaction with all aspects of the workshop and with simulation-based workshops as educational tools. Participants reported a significant improvement in cleft lip (33.3 ± 5.7 vs 25.7 ± 7.6; P < .001) and palate (32.4 ± 7.1 vs 23.7 ± 6.6; P < .001) surgery procedural confidence following the simulation sessions. Participants also reported a positive short-term and medium-term impact on their clinical practices. CONCLUSION: Simulation-based comprehensive cleft care workshops are well received by participants, lead to improved cleft surgery procedural confidence, and have a sustained positive impact on participants' clinical practices. Future efforts should focus on evaluating and quantifying this perceived positive impact, as well reproducing these efforts in other areas of need.

A Technical Innovation in Midface Advancement With the External Frame Distraction Device.

BACKGROUND: Maxillary advancement with a rigid external distractor (RED) II is a commonly performed procedure for correcting midface hypoplasia. While there are various methods of anchoring the osteotomized maxillary segment to the halo device, the looped transpyriform wire is the simplest and most cost-effective. However, a common complication with this is the cutting through of the stainless steel traction wire across the pyriform buttress during distraction. The patient with cleft undergoing midface distraction is particularly vulnerable since the force needed for distraction is higher due to scarring from previous operations. INNOVATION AND DESIGN: A single-hole titanium plate is introduced as an interface between the bone of the pyriform buttress and the looped stainless steel traction wire attached to the external frame device. EVALUATION: Twenty-four patients with cleft who underwent midface advancement using the external frame distractor before the introduction of the innovation were compared with 26 patients who underwent the same procedure after its introduction. The former group had 12.5% complication in the form of cut through of the traction wire, while the latter group had only 3.8% complication rate. CONCLUSION: Introduction of the titanium eyelet as an interface between the traction wire and the bone is a simple technical addition for a more reliable distraction using the RED II device in patients with cleft even in the presence of extensive scarring.

A multi-centric, single-blinded, randomized, parallel-group study to evaluate the effectiveness of nasoalveolar moulding treatment in non-syndromic patients with complete unilateral cleft lip, alveolus and palate (NAMUC study): a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Cleft lip and palate (CLP) are among the most common congenital anomaly that affects up to 33,000 newborns in India every year. Nasoalveolar moulding (NAM) is a non-surgical treatment performed between 0 and 6 months of age to reduce the cleft and improve nasal aesthetics prior to lip surgery. The NAM treatment has been a controversial treatment option with 51% of the cleft teams in Europe, 37% of teams in the USA and 25 of cleft teams in India adopting this methodology. This treatment adds to the already existing high burden of care for these patients. Furthermore, the supporting evidence for this technique is limited with no high-quality long-term clinical trials available on the effectiveness of this treatment. METHOD: The NAMUC study is an investigator-initiated, multi-centre, single-blinded randomized controlled trial with a parallel group design. The study will compare the effectiveness of NAM treatment provided prior to lip surgery against the no-treatment control group in 274 patients with non-syndromic unilateral complete cleft lip and palate. The primary endpoint of the trial is the nasolabial aesthetics measured using the Asher McDade index at 5 years of age. The secondary outcomes include dentofacial development, speech, hearing, cost-effectiveness, quality of life, patient perception, feeding and intangible benefits. Randomization will be carried out via central online system and stratified based on cleft width, birth weight and clinical trial site. DISCUSSION: We expect the results from this study on the effectiveness of treatment with NAM appliance in the long term along with the cost-effectiveness evaluation can eliminate the dilemma and differences in clinical care across the globe. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov CTRI/2022/11/047426 (Clinical Trials Registry India). Registered on 18 November 2022. The first patient was recruited on 11 December 2022. CTR India does not pick up on Google search with just the trial number. The following steps have to be carried out to pick up. How to search: ( https://ctri.nic.in/Clinicaltrials/advsearch.php -use the search boxes by entering the following details: Interventional trial > November 2022 > NAMUC).

Reducing the burden of orthodontic care for children with clefts: evaluating the effectiveness of pre-alveolar bone graft orthodontics in unilateral non-syndromic cleft patients (PABO study)- A study protocol for a multicentric randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: An alveolar cleft commonly affects 75% of cleft lip and palate patients. While it is common practice to provide a course of orthodontic treatment before alveolar bone grafting, there are no previous high-quality studies reporting on the benefits of this type of treatment. AIM: The aim of the study is to evaluate the effectiveness of pre-alveolar bone graft orthodontics for unilateral non-syndromic cleft palate patients. METHOD: The PABO trial is a multicentric, parallel, two-arm, single-blinded randomised controlled trial. The inclusion criteria include unilateral cleft alveolus patients requiring bone graft and between the age group of 8 and 13 years with erupted upper central incisors. Participants will be recruited at three centres across India. Participants will be randomised to orthodontic treatment or no orthodontic treatment group. Both groups of participants will have alveolar bone graft surgery and will be followed up for 6 months after surgery. The primary outcome will be the success of the alveolar bone graft measured by anterior oblique radiograph and secondary outcomes include quality of life, cost analysis and quality of the dento-occlusal outcome. Data analysis will be carried out by an independent statistician at the end of the study. DISCUSSION: This study is the first to evaluate the effect of orthodontics on alveolar bone graft success. The increased burden of care for these patients with multiple treatments required from multiple specialists from birth to adult life highlights the need for reducing unnecessary treatment provision. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trials Registry - India, CTRI/2020/10/028756 . Trial prospectively registered on 29 October 2020. .