Subscription-based and open access dermatology journals: the publication model dilemma.

Medical journalism and the dissemination of peer-reviewed research serve to promote and protect the integrity of scholarship. We evaluated the publication models of dermatology journals to provide a snapshot of the current state of publishing. A total of 106 actively-publishing dermatology journals were identified using the SCImago Journal Rankings (SJR) citation database. Journals were classified by publication model (subscription-based and open-access), publishing company, publisher type (commercial, professional society, and university), MEDLINE-indexing status, and SJR indicator. Of these, 65 (61.32%) dermatology journals were subscription-based and 41 (38.68%) were open-access. In addition, 59 (55.66%) journals were indexed in MEDLINE and most were subscription-based (N=51) and published by commercial entities (N=54). MEDLINE-indexing status was significantly different across publisher types (P<0.001), access-types (P<0.001), and the top four publishers (P=0.016). Distribution of SJR indicator was significantly different across publisher types (P<0.001) and access-types (all journals, P=0.001; indexed journals only, P=0.046). More than 91% of MEDLINE-indexed titles were published by commercial entities, and among them, four companies controlled the vast majority. Discontinuation of access to any one of the top publishers in dermatology can significantly and disproportionately impact education and scholarship.

An Evaluation of the Content of Canadian and American Nuclear Medicine Fellowship Websites.

BACKGROUND: Radiology trainees frequently use the Internet to research potential fellowship programs across all subspecialties. For a field like nuclear medicine, which has multiple training pathways, program websites can be an essential resource for potential applicants. This study aimed to analyze the online content of Canadian and American Nuclear Medicine fellowship websites. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The content of all active Canadian and American Nuclear Medicine fellowship websites was evaluated using 26 criteria in the following subdivisions: application, recruitment, education, research, clinical work, and incentives. Fellowships without websites were excluded from the study. Scores were summed per program and compared by geographic region and ranking. RESULTS: A total of 42 active Canadian and American Nuclear Medicine fellowship programs were identified, of which 39 fellowships had dedicated fellowship websites available for the analysis. On average, fellowship websites contained 34.4% (9 ± 3.3) of the 26 criteria. Programs did not score differently on the criteria by geographical distribution (P = .08) nor by ranking (P = .18). CONCLUSION: Most Canadian and American Nuclear Medicine fellowship websites are lacking content relevant to prospective fellows. Addressing inadequacies in online content may support programs to inform and recruit residents into fellowship programs.

Evaluating Radiology Result Communication in the Emergency Department.

PURPOSE: To assess the pattern of result communication that occurs between radiologists and referring physicians in the emergency department setting. METHODS: An institutional review board-approved prospective study was performed at a large academic medical center with 24/7 emergency radiology cover. Emergency radiologists logged information regarding all result-reporting communication events that occurred over a 168-hour period. RESULTS: A total of 286 independent result communication events occurred during the study period, the vast majority of which occurred via telephone (232/286). Emergency radiologists spent 10% of their working time communicating results. Similar amounts of time were spent discussing negative and positive cross-sectional imaging examinations. In a small minority of communication events, additional information was gathered through communication that resulted in a change of interpretation from a normal to an abnormal study. CONCLUSIONS: Effective and efficient result communication is critical to care delivery in the emergency department setting. Discussion regarding abnormal cases, both in person and over the phone, is encouraged. However, in the emergency setting, time spent on routine direct communication of negative examination results in advance of the final report may lead to increased disruptions, longer turnaround times, and negatively impact patient care. In very few instances, does the additional information gained from the communication event result in a change of interpretation?

Novel Geographic Thematic Study of the Largest Radiology Societies Globally: How Is Gender Structure Biased Within Editorial Boards?

OBJECTIVE. Radiology has traditionally been a male-dominated medical specialty, and this is also reflected in the authorship of radiology publications and the composition of radiology journal editorial boards. The purpose of this study was to quantify the extent of the gender disparities reflected within the journal editorial boards of the largest international radiologic societies. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Methods were crafted to generate a geographically based gender analysis of the editorial boards of the largest general radiologic societies globally. All editorial board members of journals that were published by societies included in the study and that had an impact factor of 1 or greater were assessed to determine the gender composition of the board and the research productivity and career advancement of its members. Analyzed metrics included gender, academic rank, departmental leadership positions, subspecialty, total number of peer-reviewed publications, total number of citations, the h-index, and total number of years of active research. RESULTS. Significant gender disparity was noted across the six journal editorial boards included. Overall, 80.87% of editorial board members were men and 19.13% were women. Men were more prevalent than women across all academic ranks. Male editorial board members had longer publishing careers (22.5 vs 18 years; p = 0.015), a higher total number of publications (110 vs 65 publications; p < 0.001), and a higher h-index (25 vs 19; p < 0.001) than their female counterparts. Female editorial board members at higher academic ranks were less represented on editorial boards and were also less likely to have formal departmental leadership titles. CONCLUSION. Editorial boards have significant gender disparities, with no specific geographic regional variation noted. Male editorial board members published more, had higher h-indexes, and held more departmental leadership positions than their female counterparts.

Current Clinical Practice Patterns of Self-Identified Interventional Radiologists.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess patterns of procedural, clinical evaluation and management (E/M), and diagnostic imaging services rendered by self-identified interventional radiologists (IRs) across the United States. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Recent Medicare Physician and Other Supplier Public Use and Physician Compare national downloadable files were linked. IRs were defined as physicians self-identifying interventional radiology as their primary specialty on Medicare claims or as a specialty during Medicare enrollment. The primary outcome measure was percentage of work (in work relative value units [WRVU]) attributed to interventional services (both procedural and E/M) per IR. Secondary outcome measures included sociodemographic factors per interventional WRVU quartile and percentage of E/M service units per IR. Statistical analysis included chi-square and t tests and logistic regression. RESULTS: Overall, 3132 physicians nationally self-identified to Medicare as IRs. The distribution of WRVU attributed to interventional services was strongly bimodal. Procedures and E/M together accounted for ≥ 91% and ≤ 5% of total work for the most and least intervention-oriented quartiles, respectively, but were widely distributed in the middle two quartiles. The most intervention-oriented self-identified IRs were more likely out of medical school ≤ 30 years (odds ratio [OR], 2.5; p < 0.0001), men (OR, 2.2; p < 0.0001), and in academic practice (OR, 4.3; p < 0.0001). E/M accounted for only 1.4% of all billed services. CONCLUSION: Although most self-identified IRs perform both interventional and diagnostic imaging services, the subspecialty distribution is strongly bimodal, one-quarter each focusing ≤ 5% and ≥ 91% of work on interventional services. Despite ongoing emphasis on clinically focused interventional radiology, E/M services remain rarely reported.

JOURNAL CLUB: Radiologists' Online Identities: What Patients Find When They Search Radiologists by Name.

OBJECTIVE: Patients are increasingly seeking online information regarding their health and their health care providers. Concurrently, more patients are accessing their electronic medical records, including their radiology reports, via online portals. Thus, this study aims to characterize what patients find when they search for radiologists online. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All Medicare-participating U.S. radiologists were identified using the Physician Compare National Downloadable File dataset obtained from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). Using a custom application, the top 10 Google search results for each radiologist in the national dataset were retrieved, and 90.5% of website domains with more than one occurrence were categorized as follows: physician or institution controlled, third party-controlled physician information systems, social media, or other. Aggregate and subgroup analyses were performed. RESULTS: Of all U.S. health care providers recognized by CMS, 30,601 self-identified as radiologists. There was at least one search result for 30,600 radiologists (99.997%), for a total of 305,795 websites. Of all the domains, 69.8% were third party-controlled physician information systems, 17.7% were physician or institution controlled, 1.0% were social media platforms, 2.1% were other, and 9.5% were not classified. Nine of the top 10 most commonly encountered domains were commercially controlled third-party physician information systems. CONCLUSION: Most U.S. radiologists lack self-controlled online content within the first page of Google search results. Opportunities exist for individual radiologists, radiology groups, academic departments, and professional societies to amend their online presence, control the content patients discover, and improve the visibility of the field at large.

How Much Do Common Imaging Studies Cost? A Nationwide Survey of Radiology Trainees.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to gauge the knowledge of radiology trainees regarding the costs of common imaging services and to assess their perceptions of current relevant education. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: During mid-2014, an online survey of 5325 U.S. residents and fellows who were members of the American College of Radiology was conducted. Respondents were asked to provide information about year of training, relevant advanced degrees (e.g., Master of Business Administration or Master of Public Health), number of hours of formal education in health care economics provided annually by their training program, self-perception of knowledge of health care economics, and desire to learn more about the costs of imaging. Respondents were asked to estimate Medicare-allowable fees for five commonly performed imaging examinations: two-view chest radiography, contrast-enhanced CT of the abdomen and pelvis, unenhanced MRI of the lumbar spine, complete abdominal ultrasound, and unenhanced CT of the brain. Responses within ± 25% of published allowable amounts in the Medicare fee schedule were deemed correct. RESULTS: A total of 1066 of 5325 trainees (20.0%) returned surveys that were sufficiently complete for analysis. Only 17.1% of all responses were correct; 65.3% of responses were overestimations of actual costs, and 17.6% were underestimations. Almost half of the trainees (45.1%) incorrectly estimated the cost of every examination. Overall, knowledge of costs of examinations did not improve with advancing years of training, hours of education in health care economics, or attainment of a relevant advanced degree. Only 9.3% of trainees considered their knowledge of imaging costs to be adequate. An overwhelming 89.7% of trainees desired more focused education. CONCLUSION: Radiology trainees have limited knowledge of the costs of commonly performed imaging studies. Effective training program curricula currently appear to be lacking. Targeted education and integration of cost information into clinical decision support tools are probably warranted.

The Use of Facial CT for the Evaluation of a Suspected Simple Dentoalveolar Abscess in the Emergency Department.

INTRODUCTION: Facial computed tomography (CT) is often performed in the emergency department as a part of the diagnostic workup for patients presenting with the signs and symptoms of dentoalveolar abscess (DA). This investigation evaluated the diagnostic yield of the facial CT and its effects on management change in patients suspected of DA. Furthermore, we assessed secondary consequences of routine facial CT use in this population by using turn-around time (TAT), cost, and radiation exposure as the key parameters. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed records of suspected DA patients over a 5-year period, from June 2008 to June 2013. TAT was calculated for patients from the time the examination was ordered by the emergency department physician, to the time the report was finalized by the attending radiologist. Effective radiation dose for facial CT was calculated by multiplying dose length product by the standard conversion coefficient K (K = 0.0021 mSv/mGy x cm). CT cost was included for reference but was not analyzed extensively due to the lack of standardization of costs across the various institutions. RESULTS: Our investigation consisted of 117 patients; 75 males of average age 41 (±12) years and 42 females of average age 44 (±17) years. Out of the total 117 patients that underwent CT for the suspicion of a simple DA, only a single individual (0.85%) underwent a management change. Mean TAT of facial CT was 110 (±63) minutes, and a median TAT was 87 (±71) minutes. Average effective radiation dose for a facial CT was 2.4 (±0.4) mSv. Approximate estimated cost of a contrast enhanced facial CT was $253 and non-contrast facial CT was $209. CONCLUSION: Our study shows that routine use of facial CT has a very limited diagnostic value in the workup of simple DA and rarely results in management change. The overall impact on patient management is miniscule in the context of prolonged TAT, radiation exposure, and adding to the rising medical costs.

Benefits of sonography in diagnosing suspected uncomplicated acute diverticulitis.

OBJECTIVES: Despite evidence demonstrating equivalent accuracy of sonography and computed tomography (CT) in the workup of mild/uncomplicated acute diverticulitis, CT is overwhelmingly performed as the initial diagnostic test, particularly in the acute setting. Our study evaluated potential radiation and turnaround time savings associated with performing sonography instead of CT as the initial diagnostic examination in the workup of suspected uncomplicated acute diverticulitis. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed medical records from January 2010 to December 2012 for patients presenting with clinical symptoms of acute diverticulitis. Patients were categorized as a whole and subgrouped by age (>40 and <40 years). A modified Hinchey classification (Am Surg 1999; 65:632-636) was used to stage the severity of the disease. The effective radiation dose was calculated by multiplying the dose length product from the scanner by the standard conversion coefficient (k= 0.0021 mSv/mGy × cm). The turnaround time for patients was calculated as the time the examination was ordered by the emergency department physician or staff to the time the report was finalized. RESULTS: Our study included 253 patients (172 male and 81 female; mean age ± SD, 50.2 ± 11.7 years; 132 >40 years and 121 <40 years). The distribution of patients by the modified Hinchey classification was 210 (stages 0 and 1a), 26 (stages 1b and 2), 17 (stages 3 and 4), 0 (fistula), and 0 (obstruction). The estimated CT radiation dose per patient was 21 ± 5.2 mSv. Mean turnaround times for CT and sonography were 138.5 ± 76.9 and 51.3 ± 44 minutes, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Sonography is a lower-cost, faster, and radiation-free alternative that measures up to the diagnostic standards of CT for management of suspected mild or uncomplicated acute diverticulitis.

Factors affecting patient compliance in the acute setting: an analysis of 20,000 imaging reports.

The aim of this study was to identify the risk factors associated with noncompliance of recommendations made by emergency radiologists. Between March 2012 and August 2012, our team retrospectively reviewed 20,000 consecutive emergency department (ED) patients receiving imaging to assess how often emergency radiologists made recommendations, how often they were followed, and what factors were associated with noncompliance. Faculty (Radiology or Emergency Medicine) were considered senior if they had been practicing for >5 years post residency/fellowship training. Faculty practicing <5 years were considered junior physicians. The following data was extracted from the electronic medical records and the hospital information system: recommendation in imaging report, age, gender, race (Caucasian, African-American, and others), insurance status, primary care contact, distance from the hospital to patient residence, and primary language. Recommendations were categorized as follows: (1) immediate follow-up, (2) follow-up 1-4 weeks, (3) follow-up 1-3 months, (4) follow-up 4-6 months, (5) follow-up 7-12 months, and (6) clinical/laboratory follow-up recommendations irrespective of time. We identified 1,650 recommendations (1,650/20,000 = 8.25 %). Using a one-to-one logistic regression analysis, the following factors were significant (P < 0.05) when evaluating noncompliance: increasing age, no primary care physician, lack of insurance, primary language other than English, increased distance from hospital, and extended follow-up interval. Noncompliance with recommended additional imaging (RAI) is multifactorial. Primary and/or referring physicians should take notice of the aforementioned compliance trends and mitigating factors, adopt systematic safety measures and create interdepartmental dialogue with radiology to ensure compliance, and counsel and educate patients about the importance of imaging recommendations.

The diagnostic utility of rib series in assessing rib fractures.

Rib series rarely add information to the posteroanterior (PA) film for the diagnosis of rib fractures. In this investigation, we evaluated the utility of rib X-rays using turnaround time (TAT), radiation exposure, and cost-efficiency as the key parameters. This investigation was conducted from January 2008 to December 2012. We included patients who had rib series performed for suspected rib fractures. TAT for patients was calculated from the time exam was ordered by the emergency department (ED) physician/staff to time the report was finalized by the attending radiologist. Effective radiation dose for rib series was calculated as a summation of radiation dose from the standard rib series images for each patient. Cost-efficiency was determined based on the number of interventions that took place as a result of a complicated study. Our investigation consisted of 422 patients, 208 females aged (57 ± 20.8) and 214 males aged (48 ± 17.3). A total of 74(17.5 %) abnormal findings were noted, out of which only 1(0.23 %) underwent management change. The mean turnaround time for patients undergoing rib series had a value of 133.5 (±129.8) min as opposed to a single chest PA of 61.8(± 64) min. Average effective radiation dose for a rib series was 0.105 (±0.04) mSv, whereas average effective radiation dose of a single chest PA was 0.02 mSv. Dedicated rib series has a low-yield diagnostic value as it pertains to management change. The overall impact on patient care based on our findings is small when compared to the risks associated with prolonged TAT, repeated exposure to radiation, and extensive medical costs.

Coronary anomalies encountered in the acute setting: an imaging review.

A broad spectrum of congenital coronary anomalies may be discovered on imaging and sometimes in the emergency setting on computed tomography (CT). Most coronary artery anomalies are of academic interest; however, a minority can cause morbidity and mortality and symptoms such as angina, myocardial infarction, or arrhythmias. These anomalies are usually discovered as an incidental finding on CT examinations as part of the diagnostic workup for other pathology or on dedicated coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) as part of the evaluation for a coronary cause of chest pain. The purpose of this pictorial review is to demonstrate the types of coronary anomalies and to enhance the clinicians' understanding of the imaging classifications and clinical implications.

4D CT Parathyroid for the General Radiologist: A Pictorial Essay of Illustrative Cases.

Primary hyperparathyroidism is a morbid disease that affects multiple organ systems and causes a multitude of debilitating symptoms if not properly diagnosed and treated. Minimally invasive parathyroidectomy is now the standard of care for the treatment of primary hyperparathyroidism. In the hands of experienced high-volume surgeons, the success rate of this treatment is approximately 95%. Preoperative planning with 4-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) is becoming increasingly common as a first line imaging modality. It is important for general radiologists to become familiar with this type of study in order to better assist their surgical colleagues. This image-rich review will discuss hyperparathyroidism, benefits, and weaknesses of different imaging modalities, 4DCT imaging protocol, relevant anatomy, expected appearance, and location of parathyroid adenomas, ectopic and atypical appearances, multigland disease and important mimics.

On-call radiology 2020: Where trainees look for help in a high stakes and time sensitive environment.

BACKGROUND: The radiology trainee on-call experience has undergone many changes in the past decade. The development of numerous online information sources has changed the landscape of opportunities for trainees seeking information while on-call. In this study, we sought to understand the current on-call information seeking behaviors of radiology trainees. METHODS: We surveyed radiology fellows and residents at three major metropolitan area academic institutions. Survey topics included demographic information, on-call volumes, on-call resource seeking behaviors, preferred first and second line on-call resources and rationale for particular resource usage. RESULTS: A total of 78 responses from trainees were recorded, 30.5% of the entire surveyed population. 70.5% of trainees preferred Radiopaedia as their first line resource. 26.9% of trainees preferred StatDx as their second line resource. 75.6% of respondents preferred their first line resource because it was easiest and fastest to access. 70.3% of respondents assigned a rating of 4 out of 5 when asked how often information they look for is found while on-call. There was a statistically significant difference according to gender (p = 0.002) with a higher percentage of males listing Radiopaedia as their first line resource compared to females. DISCUSSION: The radiology trainee on-call experience is influenced by various factors. Over the past decade, online resources, particularly the open access resource Radiopaedia and the paid service StatDx, have overwhelmingly become the preferred first and second line options, as demonstrated by our study results.

Business and publication models of radiology journals.

OBJECTIVE: Traditional and open-access publication models have been increasingly scrutinized, particularly in light of the recent impasse regarding cost and access between Elsevier and the University of California. Peer-reviewed publications are the main source through which science is disseminated, yet the industry remains an enigma to most. Our aim was to determine radiology publisher market-share, access type, geographic distribution and relative research impact in order to better understand the traditionally opaque realm of academic publishing. METHODS: During April 2020, Scopus was queried to extract all entries in the "Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging" subcategory of "Medicine." Journal name, publisher, SCImago Journal Ranking (SJR) score, country and publication model were cataloged. Publishers were grouped by their ownership type and journals were grouped by their publication model. Overall trends were assessed across publisher type, publication model, and geographic location. RESULTS: Commercial publishers are used by 82% (239 of 293) of radiology journals. Elsevier and Springer Nature together published 40% (118/293) of journal titles within the category. Approximately one fourth (77/293) of radiology journals were open-access. On average, SJRs were highest for journals published commercially. Mean SJR across the top 10 publishers and publication model were similar (p = 0.06 and p = 0.48, respectively). DISCUSSION: Radiology journal publication is heavily consolidated amongst a few global commercial organizations. Most radiology journals were subscription-based, but their impact did not differ significantly from open-access counterparts. Further disputes between universities and publishers could influence future manuscript submission, review, and citation, which has the potential to destabilize traditional publication models.

Evaluation of Pediatric Radiology Fellowship Website Content in USA and Canada.

PURPOSE: Prospective radiology fellows often rely on the internet to obtain valuable information regarding the application process as well as the unique qualities and aspects of different fellowship programs. The aim of this study was to analyze the content of Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) Pediatric Radiology Fellowship websites within the USA and Canadian Accredited Pediatric Radiology Fellowship program websites. METHODS: All active ACGME Pediatric Radiology fellowship websites as of October 2018 were evaluated using 26 criteria in the following domains: application process, recruitment, program structure, education, research, clinical care, and incentives. Fellowships without websites were excluded from the study. Canadian programs were compiled from a list obtained as of October 2018 from the Canadian Association of Radiologists fellowship directory. Each fellowship program was evaluated using the same 26 criteria as the US programs. RESULTS: 45 active ACGME Pediatric Radiology fellowship programs and 9 Canadian programs were identified. 43 of the US fellowships (96%), and 8 of the Canadian fellowships (89%) had dedicated fellowship websites available for analysis. For US data, websites on average contained 8 out of the 26 data points (31%). Whereas, in Canada, websites on average contained 11 out of the 26 data points (41%). CONCLUSION: Most fellowship websites demonstrate several information deficiencies. This presents an actionable opportunity for individual programs to better inform trainees, promote Pediatric Radiology, and attract the highest quality applicants.

Canadian and American Emergency Radiology Fellowship Websites: An Evaluation of Content.

PURPOSE: The internet is commonly employed by Radiology trainees to investigate and learn about potential fellowship programs. As a new and emerging subspecialty, Emergency Radiology requires strong internet presence and training program website content. This is vital to ensure good exposure of the fellowship programs to inform medical students, radiology trainees, and program directors, highlight unique aspects of a fellowship and raise awareness of the discipline at large. METHODS: To assess the standard and depth of information available online, Canadian and American Radiology fellowship websites were evaluated for content. Thirty-six criteria related to application process and recruitment, departmental structure, incentives, education, and research and clinical training were evaluated for presence or absence. RESULTS: Sixteen Emergency Radiology fellowship program websites were assessed from the United States and Canada for 36 criteria across 5 individual areas; application process and recruitment, departmental structure, incentives, education and research, and clinical training. Overall there was an absence of information found across all 5 areas. In particular areas for improvement were identified in education and research, and incentives both with median values of 12.5% of criteria present. CONCLUSION: Most Emergency Radiology fellowship program websites demonstrate several information deficiencies. This relative lack of comprehensive information represents an actionable opportunity for individual programs and the field to better educate trainees, program directors and the public about the unique training of Emergency Radiologists.

Learning from COVID-19: Sub-specialty radiologists should maintain general radiology skillset.

The recent COVID-19 pandemic has impacted every facet of life and placed a significant strain on healthcare resources worldwide. One of the emerging themes of medicine's response to the outbreak is doing more with less. In certain parts of the world, the toll on healthcare workers has been immense, and practicing outside one's traditional scope and comfort zone has become the rule rather than the exception. For Radiology as a discipline, the stress of COVID-19 may be comparatively small when measured against the frontline physicians and nurses in the Emergency Department and Intensive Care Unit. Still, it is incumbent upon all disciplines to learn and grow from the challenges encountered during this crisis.