JNK1 in hematopoietically derived cells contributes to diet-induced inflammation and insulin resistance without affecting obesity.

Obesity-induced insulin resistance is a major factor in the etiology of type 2 diabetes, and Jun kinases (JNKs) are key negative regulators of insulin sensitivity in the obese state. Activation of JNKs (mainly JNK1) in insulin target cells results in phosphorylation of insulin receptor substrates (IRSs) at serine and threonine residues that inhibit insulin signaling. JNK1 activation is also required for accumulation of visceral fat. Here we used reciprocal adoptive transfer experiments to determine whether JNK1 in myeloid cells, such as macrophages, also contributes to insulin resistance and central adiposity. Our results show that deletion of Jnk1 in the nonhematopoietic compartment protects mice from high-fat diet (HFD)-induced insulin resistance, in part through decreased adiposity. By contrast, Jnk1 removal from hematopoietic cells has no effect on adiposity but confers protection against HFD-induced insulin resistance by decreasing obesity-induced inflammation.

Fructose improves the ability of hyperglycemia per se to regulate glucose production in type 2 diabetes.

The ability of hyperglycemia per se to suppress endogenous glucose production (GP) is blunted in type 2 diabetes. This could be due in part to decreased glucose-induced flux through glucokinase (GK). Because fructose activates hepatic GK, we examined whether catalytic amounts of fructose could restore inhibition of GP by hyperglycemia in humans with type 2 diabetes. Glucose fluxes ([3-(3)H]glucose) were measured during euglycemia (5 mmol/l) and after abrupt onset of hyperglycemia (10 mmol/l; variable dextrose infusion) under fixed hormonal conditions (somatostatin infusion for 6 h with basal insulin/glucagon/growth hormone replacement). A total of 10 subjects with moderately controlled type 2 diabetes and 7 age- and BMI-matched nondiabetic subjects were studied on up to three separate occasions under the following conditions: without fructose (F(-)) or with infusion of fructose at two dosages: 0.6 mg/kg center dot min (low F) and 1.8 mg/kg center dot min (high F). Although GP failed to decrease in response to hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes, the coinfusion of both doses of fructose was associated with comparable decreases in GP in response to hyperglycemia (low F = -27%, high F = -33%; P < 0.01 vs. F(-) at both dosages), which approached the 44% decline in GP observed without fructose in the nondiabetic subjects. GP responses to hyperglycemia were not altered by the addition of fructose in the nondiabetic group (low F = -47%, high F = -42%; P > 0.05 vs. F(-)). Thus, the administration of small amounts of fructose to type 2 diabetic subjects partially corrected the regulation of GP by hyperglycemia per se, yet did not affect this regulation in the nondiabetic subjects. This suggests that the liver's inability to respond to hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes, likely caused by impaired GK activity, contributes substantially to the increased GP in these individuals.

Fructose amplifies counterregulatory responses to hypoglycemia in humans.

Glucokinase (GK) is required for cellular glucose sensing, although there is a paucity of data regarding its role in the counterregulatory response to hypoglycemia in humans. Because fructose has been shown to modulate GK activity, we examined the effects of an acute infusion of fructose on hypoglycemia counterregulation in seven lean nondiabetic subjects. Using stepped hypoglycemia clamp studies (5.0, 4.4, 3.9, and 3.3 mmol/l target plasma glucose steps, 50 min each), subjects were studied on two separate occasions, without (control) or with co-infusion of fructose (1.2 mg.kg(-1).min(-1)). Fructose induced a resetting of the glycemic thresholds for secretion of epinephrine (3.8 +/- 0.1 mmol/l) and glucagon (3.9 +/- 0.2 mmol/l) to higher plasma glucose concentrations (4.0 +/- 0.1 mmol/l [P = 0.006] and 4.1 +/- 0.1 mmol/l [P = 0.03], respectively). In addition, the magnitude of increase in epinephrine and glucagon concentrations was higher after administration of fructose (48 and 39%, respectively, P < 0.05 for both). The amplification of these hormonal responses was specific because plasma norepinephrine, growth hormone, and cortisol were comparable in both sets of studies. Endogenous glucose production, measured with [3-(3)H]glucose, increased by 47% (P < 0.05) in the fructose infusion studies compared with 14% (P = NS) in the control studies. In addition, glucose uptake was more suppressed with fructose infusion (by 33%, P < 0.05). In concert with these effects of fructose on glucose kinetics, average glucose infusion rate was markedly reduced in the fructose infusion studies during the 3.9-mmol/l glucose step (4.6 +/- 0.9 vs. 7.4 +/- 1.1 micromol.kg(-1).min(-1), respectively, P = 0.03) and during the 3.3-mmol/l glucose step (0.5 +/- 0.1 vs. 5.2 +/- 1.2 micromol.kg(-1).min(-1), respectively, P < 0.001), suggesting more potent glucose counterregulation and improved recovery from hypoglycemia with fructose infusion. We conclude that infusion of a catalytic dose of fructose amplifies the counterregulatory response to hypoglycemia by both increases in hormonal activation and augmentation of glucose counterregulation in humans.