Everolimus plus early tacrolimus minimization: a phase III, randomized, open-label, multicentre trial in renal transplantation.

There is increasing interest in tacrolimus-minimization regimens. ASSET was an open-label, randomized, 12-month study of everolimus plus tacrolimus in de-novo renal-transplant recipients. Everolimus trough targets were 3-8 ng/ml throughout the study. Tacrolimus trough targets were 4-7 ng/ml during the first 3 months and 1.5-3 ng/ml (n = 107) or 4-7 ng/ml (n = 117) from Month 4. All patients received basiliximab induction and corticosteroids. The primary objective was to demonstrate superior estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR; MDRD-4) at Month 12 in the tacrolimus 1.5-3 ng/ml versus the 4-7 ng/ml group. Secondary endpoints included incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR; Months 4-12) and serious adverse events (SAEs; Months 0-12). Statistical significance was not achieved for the primary endpoint (mean eGFR: 57.1 vs. 51.7 ml/min/1.73 m(2)), potentially due to overlapping of achieved tacrolimus exposure levels (Month 12 mean ± SD, tacrolimus 1.5-3 ng/ml: 3.4 ± 1.4; tacrolimus 4-7 ng/ml: 5.5 ± 2.0 ng/ml). BPAR (months 4-12) and SAE rates were comparable between groups (2.7% vs. 1.1% and 58.7% vs. 51.3%; respectively). Everolimus-facilitated tacrolimus minimization, to levels lower than previously investigated, achieved good renal function, low BPAR and graft-loss rates, and an acceptable safety profile in renal transplantation over 12 months although statistically superior renal function of the 1.5-3 ng/ml tacrolimus group was not achieved.

[Kidney transplantation at the Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine]. / Transplantace ledviny v IKEM.

BACKGROUND: Kidney transplantation represents the method of choice of end stage renal disease. METHODS AND RESULTS: The program of kidney transplantation was established in 1966 in our centre. In recent years, roughly 200 patients have undergone kidney transplantation annually, and 20-30 of them have received a graft from the living donor. Triple immunosuppressive regimen based on tacrolimus, MMF and steroids is given to majority of patients, in a case of high rejection risk; patients have received the induction protocols with polyclonal or monoclonal antilymphocyte globulins. Acute rejection is not a frequent finding in recent years and has occurred in 15% of cases in the first 3 months, the use of induction immunosuppression has decreased the rejection risk. Valgancyclovir has been used as prophylactic agent to prevent and treat cytomegalovirus infection. The usage of this strategy reduced the incidence of CMV infection below 10%. Kidney transplant recipients suffer from similar comorbidities as other renal patients in the long term, as cardiovascular complications, infections and malignancies. Anemia is a frequent complication in patients with graft dysfunction and erythropoesis stimulating agents have been used in its therapy. The median kidney graft survival is 8 years. CONCLUSIONS: Kidney transplantation is associated with better long-term results when compared with dialysis therapy and thus this method should be offered to all of suitable end stage renal disease patients.

[Long-term follow-up of the first 500 liver transplant recipients transplanted at the Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine in Prague]. / Výsledky dlouhodobého sledování prvních 500 pacientu po transplantaci jater provedených v institutu klinické a experimentální medicíny v Praze.

BACKGROUND: Between April 1995 and November 2005, 500 liver transplantations were performed in 476 patients of age from 3, till 70, at the Transplantation center of the Institute of Clinical and Experimental Medicine (IKEM) in Prague. The most common indications for liver transplantation were alcoholic liver cirrhosis (23%), hepatitis C cirrhosis (17%), and cholestatic cirrhosis (PBC and PSC, 9% each). Mean MELD score of recipients at the transplantation was 15-18 for each year of transplantation. Ten-years patient survival was 79.1 +/- 2.2%, and graft survival 74.1 +/- 2.1% respectively. Best patient and graft survival was achieved among patients transplanted for autoimmune liver diseases, the worst in group of patients with alcoholic cirrhosis. Malignancies were the most common cause of death during the period of follow-up (17 patients). METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients were followed longitudinally at the Department of hepatogastroenterology IKEM according to prospective protocol included protocol biopsies. Hypertension (in 71% of recipients), and overweight or obesity (in 56.3%), were the most prevalent medical complications among long-term survivors. Diabetes was found in 28.6%, of which 14.7% was de-nove diabetes after transplantation. Renal insufficiency (S-creatinin > 150 micromol/l) was present in 61 of 348 (17.6%) survivors. Out of these, 16 needed chronic hemodialysis, and 12 underwent kidney transplantation subsequently. Protocol biopsy at 5 years after transplantation was evaluated in a sample of 102 unselected liver transplant recipients. Normal liver was found in 4% of recipients, minor non-specific changes in 36% of them. Disease recurrence was present in all of 16 recipients transplanted for HCV cirrhosis, in one third of them graft cirrhosis was already present. Disease recurrence was found in patients transplanted for autoimmune disease frequently, PBC in 40%, PSC in 25%, and autoimmune hepatitis in 60% of recipients. Graft steatosis greater than 33% was present in 13% of recipients. CONCLUSIONS: Liver transplantation is highly effective method of treatment of end stage liver disease. Despite frequent medical complications, and disease recurrence on histological examination almost 80% of recipients transplanted in the liver transplantation program in IKEM survived more than 10 years after procedure. The survival achieved was far above that of the European liver transplant registry.

Reduced exposure to calcineurin inhibitors in renal transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Immunosuppressive regimens with the fewest possible toxic effects are desirable for transplant recipients. This study evaluated the efficacy and relative toxic effects of four immunosuppressive regimens. METHODS: We randomly assigned 1645 renal-transplant recipients to receive standard-dose cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil, and corticosteroids, or daclizumab induction, mycophenolate mofetil, and corticosteroids in combination with low-dose cyclosporine, low-dose tacrolimus, or low-dose sirolimus. The primary end point was the estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR), as calculated by the Cockcroft-Gault formula, 12 months after transplantation. Secondary end points included acute rejection and allograft survival. RESULTS: The mean calculated GFR was higher in patients receiving low-dose tacrolimus (65.4 ml per minute) than in the other three groups (range, 56.7 to 59.4 ml per minute). The rate of biopsy-proven acute rejection was lower in patients receiving low-dose tacrolimus (12.3%) than in those receiving standard-dose cyclosporine (25.8%), low-dose cyclosporine (24.0%), or low-dose sirolimus (37.2%). Allograft survival differed significantly among the four groups (P=0.02) and was highest in the low-dose tacrolimus group (94.2%), followed by the low-dose cyclosporine group (93.1%), the standard-dose cyclosporine group (89.3%), and the low-dose sirolimus group (89.3%). Serious adverse events were more common in the low-dose sirolimus group than in the other groups (53.2% vs. a range of 43.4 to 44.3%), although a similar proportion of patients in each group had at least one adverse event during treatment (86.3 to 90.5%). CONCLUSIONS: A regimen of daclizumab, mycophenolate mofetil, and corticosteroids in combination with low-dose tacrolimus may be advantageous for renal function, allograft survival, and acute rejection rates, as compared with regimens containing daclizumab induction plus either low-dose cyclosporine or low-dose sirolimus or with standard-dose cyclosporine without induction. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00231764 [ClinicalTrials.gov].).

Primary liver transplantation for autoimmune hepatitis: a comparative analysis of the European Liver Transplant Registry.

The principal aim of this study was to compare the probability of and potential risk factors for death and graft loss after primary adult and pediatric liver transplantation in patients undergoing transplantation for autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) to those in patients undergoing transplantation for primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC; used as the reference group) or alcoholic cirrhosis (used as an example of a nonautoimmune liver disease). The 5-year survival of patients undergoing transplantation for AIH (n = 827) was 0.73 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.67-0.77]. This was similar to that of patients undergoing transplantation for alcoholic cirrhosis (0.74, 95% CI = 0.72-0.76, n = 6424) but significantly worse than that of patients undergoing transplantation for PBC (0.83, 95% CI = 0.80-0.85, n = 1588). Fatal infectious complications occurred at an increased rate in patients with AIH (hazard ratio = 1.8, P = 0.002 with PBC as the reference). The outcome of pediatric AIH patients was similar to that of adult patients undergoing transplantation up to the age of 50 years. However, the survival of AIH patients undergoing transplantation beyond the age of 50 years (0.61 at 5 years, 95% CI = 0.51-0.70) was significantly reduced in comparison with the survival of young adult AIH patients (0.78 at 18-34 years, 95% CI = 0.70-0.86) and in comparison with the survival of patients of the same age group with PBC or alcoholic cirrhosis. In conclusion, age significantly affects patient survival after liver transplantation for AIH. The increased risk of dying of infectious complications in the early postoperative period, especially above the age of 50 years, should be acknowledged in the management of AIH patients with advanced-stage liver disease who are listed for liver transplantation. It should be noted that not all risk factors relevant to patient and graft survival could be analyzed with the European Liver Transplant Registry database.

Interchangeability of ciclosporin formulations in stable adult renal transplant recipients: comparison of Equoral and Neoral capsules in an international, multicenter, randomized, open-label trial.

The cost of immunosuppression following transplantation can be reduced by using generic ciclosporin (for example, Equoral) rather than innovator ciclosporin drugs such as Neoral. Thus, this study aims to evaluate the interchangeability, safety, and tolerability of Equoral, a generic ciclosporin, with Neoral in stable adult renal transplant recipients. This was a multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-group clinical trial in stable renal transplant patients, comparing 6 months of treatment with Equoral with the same treatment period on Neoral. The primary end point was the between-treatment comparison of the total daily ciclosporin dose at the end of the study. A total of 99 patients were enrolled and constituted the full analysis/safety population, and 78 patients forming the per-protocol population were assessed for efficacy. Equoral was found to be equivalent to Neoral with regard to the primary end point of daily dose at the end of the study. This was supported by comparable serum ciclosporin levels at the end of the study. There were no renal transplant rejection incidents, but there was one death (in the Neoral group). Drug tolerability and incidence of adverse events were comparable between the treatment groups. In conclusion, Equoral and Neoral are interchangeable in stable renal transplant patients, and both drugs are associated with a similar safety and tolerability profile.

Acute rejection in low-toxicity regimens: clinical impact and risk factors in the Symphony study.

The Symphony study assessed whether mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)-based regimens containing reduced doses of adjunct immunosuppressants could reduce toxicity while maintaining efficacy. Here, we examined the impact of acute rejection and associated risk factors. The incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection in the low-dose tacrolimus group was approximately half that of the standard-dose cyclosporine and low-dose cyclosporine groups, and a third of that in the low-dose sirolimus group. The low-dose cyclosporine group had more severe rejection episodes (≥grade II) compared with other groups. Acute rejection was associated with a 10 mL/min glomerular filtration rate (GFR) reduction and a 5.3% absolute increase in graft loss at 12 months. Overall, the highest GFR was found in both rejecters and non-rejecters receiving low-dose tacrolimus, both in an intent-to-treat analysis and in patients successfully treated according to the protocol. In Cox regression models, human leukocyte antigen (HLA) mismatches and expanded criteria donors increased the acute rejection risk, while recipient age, living related donor, and MMF dose were associated with a reduced risk. Acute rejection was associated with worse outcome but did not entirely explain the differences among the treatment groups. The 2 g MMF plus low-dose tacrolimus combination appears to be the most efficient of all regimens examined regardless of acute rejection.

Tacrolimus combined with two different corticosteroid-free regimens compared with a standard triple regimen in renal transplantation: one year observational results.

Side effects of steroid use have led to efforts to minimize their use in transplantation. Two corticosteroid-free regimens were compared with a triple immunosuppressive therapy. Data from the original intent-to-treat (ITT) population (153 tacrolimus/basiliximab [Tac/Bas], 151 tacrolimus/MMF [Tac/MMF], and 147 tacrolimus/MMF/steroids [control]) were analyzed in a 12-month follow-up. Percentage of graft survival were 92.8%, 95.4%, and 95.9% (KM estimates 89.9%, 95.3%, 95.9%), percentage of surviving patients were 98.7%, 98.0%, and 100% (KM estimates 95.9%, 92.8%, and 100%). During months 7-12, graft loss occurred in 3 Tac/Bas, 2 Tac/MMF, and zero control patients, patient deaths in 1 Tac/Bas, 2 Tac/MMF, and zero control, and biopsy-proven acute rejection episodes in 4 Tac/Bas, 3 Tac/MMF, and zero control. Mean serum creatinine at month 12 was 141.9 +/- 69.6 microM, 144.0 +/- 82.1 microM, and 134.5 +/- 71.2 microM (ns). New-onset insulin use in previously non-diabetic patients at month 12 was 1/138, 6/127, and 4/126. Patient and graft survival as well as renal function at 12 months were not different between patient groups, despite considerably higher rates of acute rejection occurring within the first six months after transplantation in both steroid-free patient groups. Tac/Bas therapy might offer benefits in terms of a trend for a more favorable cardiovascular risk profile.

Conversion to sirolimus of patients with chronic allograft nephropathy--a retrospective analysis of outcome and influencing factors.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to analyse the outcome and its influencing factors in patients whose therapy was converted from calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) to sirolimus (SRL) due to chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Therapies of 78 patients (44 men) with CAN from three European transplant centres were converted from CNI therapy to SRL and followed 24 months. Slopes for creatinine clearance before and after conversion were calculated. Influencing factors were analysed by a multivariance analysis. RESULTS: The slope of the creatinine clearance improved significantly (-0.90 vs. -0.34 ml min(-1) month(-1); p < 0.01). In patients whose therapy was converted from cyclosporine A (CyA) to SRL, the slope improved significantly, whereas conversion from Tacrolimus (Tac) to SRL did not affect the slope. The benefit was more pronounced in (1) patients with low or moderate baseline creatinine clearance, (2) patients receiving SRL after conversion without additional mycophenolate mofetil and (3) patients with low or moderate proteinuria. CONCLUSION: Conversion from CyA to SRL but not from Tac to CRL is associated with a reduced loss of renal allograft function in patients with CAN.

Early bone mineral density loss after renal transplantation and pre-transplant PTH: a prospective study.

BACKGROUND: Post-transplant osteopathy is a known complication of kidney transplantation (KTx). The aim of this study was to assess bone mineral density (BMD) in a large cohort of patients with treatment depending on pre-transplant parathormone (PTH) and baseline BMD. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 347 consecutive KTx recipients (222 M, 125 F) finished all follow-up measurements of BMD at lumbar spine, femur and radius using DEXA Lunar (at baseline and at 6 and 18 months). RESULTS: Bone loss with a T-score below -2.5 affected 37.2% of patients before KTx. A negative correlation between baseline PTH and BMD was found (p < 0.01). Patients with high levels of PTH had more bone loss than patients with low PTH values (p < 0.01). In the lumbar spine, a decline of BMD was found in the first 6 months, and after 18 months an improvement was found in all subgroups (p < 0.001). In femur, significant changes were found only in low-PTH patients after 6 months (p < 0.001); the others did not reach significant results. There was no improvement after 18 months in low-PTH patients. In radius, bone loss was not found. CONCLUSION: A relationship between differences in progression of BMD after transplantation and PTH level at baseline was found.

Asymmetric dimethylarginine in obesity after renal transplantation.

OBJECTIVE: We have assessed in obese renal transplant recipients a course of selected proinflammatory factors liable to influence the long-term outcome of transplant patients and kidney grafts. DESIGN AND PATIENTS: In a prospective cohort study, we examined a total of 68 obese renal transplant recipients (body mass index [BMI] >or= 30 kg/m(2)) for a period of 12 months (Group I). A control group consisted of 72 comparable non-obese renal transplant recipients (Group II). RESULTS: Significant differences were found in plasma 12 months after renal transplantation (Group I versus Group II) in asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA; 3.68 micromol/L +/- 0.42 micromol/L vs 2.10 micromol/L +/- 0.34 micromol/L; P < .01), adiponectin (ADPN; 15.1 microg/mL +/- 6.0 microg/mL vs 22.80 microg/mL +/- 7.2 microg/mL; P < .01), leptin (50.4 ng/L +/- 10.2 ng/L vs 22.0 ng/L +/- 8.4 ng/L; P < .01), solubile leptin receptor (ObRe; 23.6 U/mL +/- 7.4 U/mL vs 47.2 U/mL +/- 10.7 U/mL; P < .01), resistin (21.2 microg/mL +/- 10.2 microg/mL vs 15.0 microg/mL +/- 6.2 microg/mL; P < .025) and triglycerides (3.9 mmol/L +/- 1.6 mmol/L vs 2.8 mmol/L +/- 1.6 mmol/L; P < .01). There were significant correlations between ADMA and BMI (r = 0.525, P < .001), ADPN and BMI (r = -0.574, P < .001), and ADMA and ADPN in visceral fat (r = -0.510, P < .001). Correlation between ADMA and Cin was weak, but significant (r = -0.190, P < .05). CONCLUSION: The results indicate that obesity after renal transplantation was associated with increased plasma ADMA and decreased ADPN in plasma and in fat tissue and may represent a risk factor for renal transplant recipients.

Asymmetric dimethylarginine and adiponectin after renal transplantation: role of obesity.

BACKGROUND: In obese renal transplant recipients, we assessed the course of selected proinflammatory factors liable to influence long-term outcomes of transplant patients and kidney grafts. METHODS: In a prospective cohort study, we examined a total of 140 renal transplant recipients for a period of 12 months. Based on body mass index (BMI), patients were divided into Group I (BMI > or = 30 kg/m2, 68 patients) and Group II (BMI < or = 30 kg/m2, 72 patients). RESULTS: Twelve months after renal transplantation, significant differences were found between Group I versus Group II in plasma levels of asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) (3.65 [SD +/- 0.47 micromol/L] versus 2.01 [SD +/- 0.36 micromol/L], P < .01), adiponectin (ADPN) (15.4 [SD +/- 6.6 microg/mL] versus 22.3 [SD +/- 8.2 microg/mL], P < .01), leptin (51.3 [SD +/- 11.2 ng/L] versus 21.3 [SD +/- 9.2 ng/L], P < .01), soluble leptin receptor (24.6 [SD +/- 8.4 U/mL] versus 46.1 [SD +/- 11.4 U/mL], P < .01), resistin (20.8 [SD +/- 10.1 microg/mL] versus 14.6 [SD +/- 6.4 microg/mL], P < .025), and triglycerides (3.9 [SD +/- 1.6] versus mmol/L 2.8 [SD +/- 1.6 mmol/L], P < .01). There were significant correlations between ADMA and BMI (r = 0.520; P < .001), and ADPN and BMI (r = -0.570, P < .001). The correlation between ADMA and inulin clearance (Cin) was weak (r = -0.185, P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Obesity after renal transplantation is associated with increased ADMA and decreased ADPN in plasma, and this may represent a risk factor for renal transplant recipients.

Soluble CD30 in patients with antibody-mediated rejection of the kidney allograft.

UNLABELLED: The aim of our retrospective study was to evaluate the clinical significance of measurement of the soluble CD30 (sCD30) molecule for the prediction of antibody-mediated (humoral) rejection (HR). Sixty-two kidney transplant recipients (thirty-one C4d-positive and thirty-one C4d-negative patients) were included into the study. Soluble CD30 levels were evaluated before transplantation and during periods of graft function deterioration. The median concentrations of the sCD30 molecule were identical in C4d-positive and C4d-negative patients before and after transplantation (65.5 vs. 65.0 and 28.2 vs. 36.0 U/ml, respectively). C4d+ patients who developed DSA de novo had a tendency to have higher sCD30 levels before transplantation (80.7+/-53.6 U/ml, n=8) compared with C4d-negative patients (65.0+/-33.4 U/ml, n=15). Soluble CD30 levels were evaluated as positive and negative (>or=100 U/ml and <100 U/ml respectively) and the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of sCD30 estimation with regard to finding C4d deposits in peritubular capillaries were determined. The sensitivity of sCD30+ testing was generally below 40%, while the specificity of the test, i.e. the likelihood that if sCD30 testing is negative, C4d deposits would be absent, was 82%. C4d+ patients who developed DSA de novo were evaluated separately; the specificity of sCD30 testing for the incidence of HR in this cohort was 86%. CONCLUSION: We could not confirm in our study that high sCD30 levels (>or=100 U/ml) might be predictive for the incidence of HR. Negative sCD30 values might be however helpful for identifying patients with a low risk for development of DSA and antibody-mediated rejection.

Intrarenal cytokine and chemokine gene expression and kidney graft outcome.

AIMS: Proinflammatory cytokines are thought to play an important role in various kidney graft diseases resulting in interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy frequently found in case biopsies. To explore the role of various cytokines and chemokines in the long-term graft outcome, the transcription patterns of their genes in kidney allograft biopsies were evaluated. METHODS: The real-time RT-PCR was used to identify intragraft mRNA expression of cytokines and chemokines in 74 kidney graft recipients and the results were correlated with histological and clinical parameters and long-term graft outcome. RESULTS: We observed up-regulated IL-10 (p < 0.001), TGF-beta1, IL-6, MCP-1, RANTES (p < 0.01) and TNF-alpha (p < 0.05) mRNA expression in patients with chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) as compared to controls. There were positive correlations between the mRNA expression of IL-6 (p < 0.001), IL-10 (p < 0.01), TNF-alpha, MCP-1 (p < 0.05) and the proteinuria. The up-regulation of intrarenal MCP-1 in patients with CAN increased the risk for the graft failure within the next 42 months (OR 5.1, p < 0.05). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed that proteinuria and higher intragraft expression of TGF-beta1 and MCP-1 predict a poor kidney graft outcome. CONCLUSION: Expression patterns of intrarenal proinflammatory genes might discriminate patients at a higher risk for the earlier allograft failure.

Two corticosteroid-free regimens-tacrolimus monotherapy after basiliximab administration and tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil-in comparison with a standard triple regimen in renal transplantation: results of the Atlas study.

BACKGROUND: The side effects associated with corticosteroids have led to efforts to minimize their use in renal transplant patients. In this study we compared two corticosteroid-free tacrolimus-based regimens with a standard triple therapy. METHODS: This was a 6-month, phase III, open-label, parallel-group, multicenter study. The total analysis set comprised 451 patients, randomized (1:1:1) to receive tacrolimus (Tac) monotherapy following basiliximab (Bas) administration (n=153), Tac/mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) (n=151), or, Tac/MMF/corticosteroids triple therapy as a control (n=147). RESULTS: The study was completed by 91.2% (triple therapy), 94.7% (Tac/MMF), and 82.4% (Bas/Tac) of patients. Patient baseline characteristics were similar in all groups. The incidences of biopsy-proven acute rejection were 8.2% (triple therapy), 30.5% (Tac/MMF), and 26.1% (Bas/Tac), p<0.001 (multiple test for comparison with triple therapy); Bas/Tac vs. Tac/MMF, p=ns. The incidences of corticosteroid-resistant acute rejection were 2.0%, 4.0%, and 5.2%, p=ns. Graft survival (95.9%, 96.7%, and 94.7%, p=ns) and patient survival (100%, 99.3%, and 99.3%, p=ns) were similar in all groups. Median serum creatinine at month 6 was 123.0 micromol/L (triple therapy), 134.7 micromol/L (Tac/MMF) and 135.8 micromol/L (Bas/Tac). The overall safety profiles were similar; differences (p<0.05) were reported for anaemia (24.5% vs. 12.6% vs. 14.5%), diarrhoea (12.9% vs. 17.9% vs. 5.9%), and leukopenia (7.5% vs. 18.5% vs. 5.9%) for the triple therapy, Tac/MMF, and Bas/Tac group, respectively. The incidences of new-onset diabetes mellitus were 4.6%, 7.1%, and 1.4%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Corticosteroid-free immunosuppression was feasible with the Bas/Tac and the Tac/MMF regimens. Both corticosteroid-free regimens were equally effective in preventing acute rejection, with the Bas/Tac therapy offering some safety benefits.

Interleukin 18 (IL-18) upregulation in acute rejection of kidney allograft.

Interleukin 18 (IL-18) is a potent proinflammatory cytokine involved in the host defence by upregulating both innate and acquired immune responses and may be of particular importance also in mechanisms of kidney allograft rejection. Immunohistochemical staining of protocol biopsies showed constitutive IL-18 expression in the epithelium of distal tubules with the induction of immunoreactivity in acute rejection patients where also proximal tubules, infiltrating leukocytes, and endothelium were strongly positive. Furthermore, serum levels of IL-18 were significantly elevated in patients with acute rejection of kidney allograft (1247+/-389 pg/l) as compared to patients with uncomplicated outcome of kidney transplantation (444+/-164 pg/l) and subjects with acute tubulointerstitial nephropathy (385+/-155 pg/l, p<0.0001 for both comparisons). Tissue culture model of renal epithelial cells expressed IL-18 mRNA constitutively and released mature IL-18 in response to TNF-alpha and IFN-gamma. We assume that upregulation of epithelial IL-18 plays an important role in immune and immunopathological reactions in renal parenchyma and contributes to rejection mechanisms of kidney allograft.

Soluble CD30 and HLA antibodies as potential risk factors for kidney transplant rejection.

Recent literary data suggest that high pre- and post-transplant serum levels of the soluble CD30 (sCD30) molecule may be a risk factor for acute rejection and worse prognosis of the transplanted kidney. The aim of our study was to correlate the concentrations of sCD30 and the presence of HLA antibodies as defined by flow cytometry and ELISA with the clinical course and graft prognosis after transplantation. One hundred and seventeen kidney transplant patients were included into the study. The incidence of rejection episodes, graft function and graft survival for up to 1 year post-transplant were evaluated. Soluble CD30 levels before transplantation were virtually the same in patients who experienced rejection and in non-rejecting patients. In both patient groups, a significant decrease of sCD30 was detected 2 weeks after transplantation (104.4 U/ml before vs. 37.0 U/ml post-transplant, P < 0.001). However, there was a substantial difference in the level of decrease of sCD30 between rejecting and non-rejecting patients. Patients without rejection had lower sCD30 values (31.2 U/ml post-transplant) compared to patients who experienced rejection episodes (62.9 U/ml), P < 0.04. Multifactorial analysis showed that antibodies to HLA class II antigens and elevated concentrations of sCD30 shortly after transplantation were associated with increased risk for acute rejection in the first post-transplant year. Measurement of soluble CD30 after transplantation, taken into consideration with the presence of HLA class II antibodies, might be helpful for evaluating the potential risk for acute rejection.

Everolimus (Certican) 12-month safety and efficacy versus mycophenolate mofetil in de novo renal transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Everolimus is a proliferation inhibitor designed to target chronic rejection, including prevention of acute rejection. Everolimus blocks growth factor-mediated transduction signals, preventing organ rejection by a mechanism different than that of calcineurin inhibitors and of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). METHODS.: Everolimus (1.5 mg or 3 mg daily) was compared with MMF (2 g daily) in a randomized, multicenter, multinational, 12-month double-blind, double-dummy and 2-year open-label, phase 3 trial in de novo renal allograft recipients (n = 588) who also received cyclosporine and corticosteroids as part of a triple immunosuppressive regimen. RESULTS: At 12 months, there were no statistically significant differences between doses of 1.5 and 3 mg/day everolimus and MMF (2 g/day) in incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection (23.2%, 19.7%, and 24.0%, respectively), graft loss (4.6%, 10.6%, and 9.2%), or death (5.2%, 4.0%, and 2.6%), respectively. Everolimus 1.5 mg/day and MMF were generally equally well tolerated. Both were better tolerated than everolimus 3 mg/day. The incidence of cytomegalovirus infection was significantly lower in patients receiving either 1.5 or 3 mg/day everolimus than in those receiving MMF (5.2% and 7.6% vs. 19.4%, respectively) (P = .001). CONCLUSIONS: Everolimus is effective in preventing acute rejection and graft loss in de novo renal allograft recipients receiving a triple immunosuppressive regimen. Prevention of acute rejection, along with reduction in cytomegalovirus infection, addresses two factors known to contribute to chronic rejection in such patients.

Exposure-response relationships for everolimus in de novo kidney transplantation: defining a therapeutic range.

BACKGROUND: Exposure, safety, and efficacy data from the two everolimus randomized, double-blind phase 3 trials were evaluated to identify a therapeutic concentration range applicable in de novo kidney transplantation. METHODS: A total of 695 evaluable everolimus-treated patients received either 0.75 or 1.5 mg bid in addition to corticosteroids and cyclosporine (troughs 150-400 ng/ml in month 1 and 100-300 ng/ml thereafter). A total of 3355 everolimus trough levels (Cmin) were obtained in weeks 1 and 2 and months 1, 2, 3, and 6 after transplantation. Each patient's average Cmin was calculated and the values were divided into quintiles: 1.0-3.4, 3.5-4.5, 4.6-5.7, 5.8-7.7, 7.8-15.0 ng/ml (139 patients per quintile). Efficacy was freedom from biopsy-confirmed acute rejection. Safety measures were maximum total cholesterol and triglyceride levels and minimum leukocyte and platelet counts. A sigmoid exposure-response model was used to test the significance of these Cmin-efficacy and Cmin-safety relationships. RESULTS: Freedom from acute rejection was significantly related to Cmin with an incidence of 68% at 1.0-3.4 ng/ml, 81-86% at 3.5-7.7 ng/ml, and 91% at 7.8-15.0 ng/ml (P=0.03). The incidence of hypercholesterolemia, defined as >6.5 mmol/liter, ranged from 76 to 87% over the exposure range without a significant relation to Cmin (P=0.37). The incidence of hypertriglyceridemia, defined as >2.9 mmol/liter, rose from 59 to 77% across the exposure groups (P=0.02). Leukocytopenia, defined as <4x10(9)/liter, occurred in 11-19% of patients across the exposure quintiles showing no relationship to Cmin (P=0.76). The incidence of thrombocytopenia, defined as <100x10(9)/liter, occurred in

Association of methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase T677 allele with early development of chronic allograft nephropathy.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of genetic polymorphisms on the development of chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN). DESIGN AND METHODS: Using the polymerase chain reaction (PCR), polymorphisms of methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR C677T), interleukin-6 (IL-6 G-174C) and CD14 (C-260T) were evaluated in 92 kidney transplant recipients with stable renal graft function and no signs of acute rejection in a protocol that included graft biopsy at 12 months after kidney transplantation. A normal population sample (n = 365) was also included. Multivariate analysis was used to evaluate the effect of different variables on the CAN appearance. RESULTS: There were no differences in alleles and genotypes distribution between transplant group and normal population sample. The CAN+ group (n = 69) significantly differed from CAN- (n = 23) in both MTHFR (P < 0.05) and IL-6 (P < 0.01) genotype distribution. Using logistic regression multivariate analysis, MTHFR T677 allele (OR: 3.91, CI: 1.11-13.8; P < 0.05), patient age (OR: 0.94, CI: 0.88-0.98; P < 0.01) and proteinuria (OR: 3.63, CI: 1.25-10.6; P < 0.05) were associated with CAN. Although the IL-6 G-174 allele was shown to be associated with CAN development in univariate analysis (P < 0.01), the multivariate analysis did not show an association. There was no relation between CD14 gene polymorphism and CAN. CONCLUSION: The MTHFR T677 allele is associated with the presence of CAN in kidney graft biopsies 12 months after transplantation.