RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: We developed a Web-based, blinded, prospective, randomized, multicenter trial, using standardized digital photography to clinically evaluate hand burn depth and accurately determine wound area with digital planimetry. METHODS: Photos in each center were taken with identical digital cameras with standardized settings on a custom backdrop developed at Wake Forest University containing a gray, white, black, and centimeter scale. The images were downloaded, transferred via the Web, and stored on servers at the principal investigator's home institution. Color adjustments to each photo were made using Adobe Photoshop 6.0 (Adobe, San Jose, Calif). In an initial pilot study, model hands marked with circles of known areas were used to determine the accuracy of the planimetry technique. Two-dimensional digital planimetry using SigmaScan Pro 5.0 (SPSS Science, Chicago, Ill) was used to calculate wound area from the digital images. RESULTS: Digital photography is a simple and cost-effective method for quantifying wound size when used in conjunction with digital planimetry (SigmaScan) and photo enhancement (Adobe Photoshop) programs. The accuracy of the SigmaScan program in calculating predetermined areas was within 4.7% (95% CI, 3.4%-5.9%). Dorsal hand burns of the initial 20 patients in a national study involving several centers were evaluated with this technique. Images obtained by individuals denying experience in photography proved reliable and useful for clinical evaluation and quantification of wound area. CONCLUSION: Standardized digital photography may be used quantitatively in a Web-based, multicenter trial of burn care. This technique could be modified for other medical studies with visual endpoints.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: This article reports the first application of subatmospheric pressure management to a deep, partial-thickness human thermal burn. METHODS: After cleaning the wound, the decision was made to treat the hand and distal forearm with subatmospheric pressure (V.A.C., KCI, Inc, San Antonio, Tex). The sponge was applied directly to the burned skin without additional interface at approximately 6 hours after injury. The dressing was maintained at a continuous negative pressure of 125 mm Hg over the next 40 hours, with interruption only for routine clinical evaluation at 5, 16, and 24 hours after initiation of treatment. This was accomplished by opening the dressing without completely changing it. The treatment was tolerated well by the patient, requiring no excessive pain medication. After the subatmospheric pressure treatment was stopped, the wound appeared to be of indeterminate depth and the patient was started on twice daily applications of silver sulfadiazine. RESULTS: The clinical impression at this time was that the hand burn had not progressed but had stabilized and had minimal edema. He was followed as an outpatient and returned to work by 8 weeks. At approximately 4 weeks postinjury, his skin not only was functional but also appeared more normal, with less hyperemia than adjacent areas treated with topical antibacterials. CONCLUSION: The present case does not prove that subatmospheric pressure treatment prevents burn wound progression. However, when combined with the previously reported laboratory studies it suggests the need for further research. Currently, a prospective, randomized, blinded, controlled multicenter trial is underway to evaluate the clinical importance of these observations.