The ultimate tryptophan residue of neprilysin 2 is not involved in protein maturation and enzymatic activity.

Modeling the three-dimensional structure of neprilysin 2 (NEP2) using the crystal structure of neprilysin as template revealed that their active sites share many common features, though slight differences therein cannot completely account for their specific pharmacological profiles. Recent evidence also suggest that residues outside the active site can play crucial functions in the maturation and enzymatic activity of these metalloproteases. To further explore the functions of amino acids in the acquisition and maintenance of the NEP2 structure, site-directed mutagenesis of conserved residues involved in the enzymatic activity of ECE-1 was performed. In particular, the ultimate tryptophan residue of ECE-1 was recently shown to be important in its activation. This residue was thus mutated in the secreted isoform of NEP2, as were proline residues located in its vicinity. Expression of these mutants in AtT20 cells and study of their secretion and catalytic activities shows that while the ultimate tryptophan residue of the NEP2 sequence is not essential to its proper and activity, structural changes in its vicinity can have a severe impact on the maturation processes involved in the activation of NEP2.

A three-dimensional model of the neprilysin 2 active site based on the X-ray structure of neprilysin. Identification of residues involved in substrate hydrolysis and inhibitor binding of neprilysin 2.

Neprilysin 2 (NEP2), a recently identified member of the M13 subfamily of metalloproteases, shares the highest degree of homology with the prototypical member of the family neprilysin. Whereas the study of the in vitro enzymatic activity of NEP2 shows that it resembles that of NEP as it cleaves the same substrates often at the same amide bonds and binds the same inhibitory compounds albeit with different potencies, its physiological role remains elusive because of the lack of selective inhibitors. To aid in the design of these novel compounds and better understand the different inhibitory patterns of NEP and NEP2, the x-ray structure of NEP was used as a template to build a model of the NEP2 active site. The results of our modeling suggest that the overall structure of NEP2 closely resembles that of NEP. The model of the active site reveals a 97% sequence identity with that of NEP with differences located within the S'(2) subsite of NEP2 where Ser(133) and Leu(739) replace two glycine residues in NEP. To validate the proposed model, site-directed mutagenesis was performed on a series of residues of NEP2, mutants expressed in AtT20 cells, and their ability to bind various substrates and inhibitory compounds was tested. The results confirm the involvement of the conserved Arg(131) and Asn(567) in substrate binding and catalytic activity of NEP2 and further show that the modifications in its S'(2) pocket, particularly the presence therein of Leu(739), account for a number of differences in inhibitor binding between NEP and NEP2.

Cell-specific activity of neprilysin 2 isoforms and enzymic specificity compared with neprilysin.

Neprilysin (NEP) 2 is a recently cloned glycoprotein displaying a high degree of sequence identity with neprilysin (EC 3.4.24.11), the prototypical member of the M13 subfamily of metalloproteases. Whereas NEP is involved in the metabolism of several bioactive peptides by plasma membranes of various cells, the enzymic properties and physiological functions of NEP2 are unknown. Here we characterize the cell-expression modalities and enzymic specificity of two alternatively spliced isoforms of NEP2 in Chinese hamster ovary and AtT20 cells. In the two cell lines, both isoforms are type II glycoproteins inserted in the endoplasmic reticulum as inactive precursors. Maturation detected by Western-blot analysis of glycosidase digests was cell-specific and more efficient in the endocrine cell line. The enzymic activity of both isoforms semi-purified from AtT20 cells reveals comparable specificities in terms of model substrates, pH optima and inhibitory patterns. NEP2 activity was compared with that of NEP regarding potencies of transition-state inhibitors, modes of hydrolysis, maximal hydrolysis rates and apparent affinities of bioactive peptides. Although all transition-state inhibitors of NEP inhibited NEP2 activity, albeit with different potencies, and many peptides were cleaved at the same amide bond by both peptidases, differences could be observed, i.e. in the hydrolysis of gonadotropin-releasing hormone and cholecystokinin, which occurred at different sites and more efficiently in the case of NEP2. Differences in cleavage of bioactive peptides, in cell-trafficking patterns and in tissue distribution indicate that NEP and NEP2 play distinct physiological roles in spite of their high degree of sequence identity.