Acute intoxication caused by three common synthetic cannabinoids: The experience of a large, urban, tertiary care hospital.

BACKGROUND: Synthetic cannabinoids (SC) are chemical substances, which activate cannabinoid receptors in a similar fashion to tetrahydrocannabinol, but with increased efficacy, and are used as illicit recreational drugs. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to characterize the clinical manifestations and management of three specific, common SC exposures in a cohort of patients presenting to the emergency department of our institution. METHODS: Retrospective case series of patients admitted to an urban tertiary care center between August 1, 2018 and December 31, 2021, with confirmed SC use and positive urinary immunoassay testing for AB-FUBINACA, 4F-MDMB-BUTINACA and ACHMINACA. RESULTS: 58 patients met inclusion criteria during the 3-year study period; median age was 35 years, 60% were male, 31% patients were exposed to >1 substance, and 31% needed hospital addition. The most common physical signs were cardiovascular (54%) and neuropsychiatric (45%). Severe outcomes included coma and seizures, necessitating intubation in 4 patients, and acute renal injury in 7 patients. CONCLUSION: SC are potentially harmful drugs of abuse which can lead to life-threatening complications. Acute care personnel should be aware of the broad range of signs and symptoms of SC use. Testing with short turn around times is available to assess SC use.

Cannabis use is associated with lower retention in methadone maintenance treatment, but not among schizophrenic- and other chronically psychotic patients.

The findings of studies on cannabis use and retention in methadone maintenance treatment (MMT) are inconsistent.To study cannabis use and its relationship to patients' outcomes in MMT with/without lifetime DSM-IV-TR schizophrenia/chronic-psychosis diagnosis.Since June 1993, 877 patients with available lifetime DSM-IV-TR psychiatric diagnosis were followed-up until December 2017. Urine drug screens on admission and after one year were analyzed.Lifetime schizophrenia/psychosis was diagnosed in 50 (5.7%) patients. They did not differ from the other 827 by admission cannabis use (18.0% vs. 12.3%) and had similar 1-year retention rates (76.0% vs.77.0%, respectively). Cumulative retention of the cohort excluding schizophrenia/chronic-psychosis was longer for the 667 patients who did not use cannabis after 1-year (9.1 years, 95%CI 8.4-9.9) compared with the 118 cannabis-users after 1-year (6.0 years, 95% CI 4.8-7.2, p<.001). Among the schizophrenia/chronic-psychosis group, cannabis was not related to retention (38 non-users, 7.9 years 95%CI 5.2-10.5 vs. 9 cannabis-users, 9.9 years, 95% CI 3.8-16.0, p=.5). Survival was shorter for the 41 schizophrenia/chronic-psychosis non-users (15.2 years, 95% CI 12.8-17.7) than for the 719 non-schizophrenia/chronic-psychosis non-users (18.5, 95%CI 17.9-19.2, p = 0.009). However, survival was comparable among the 9 cannabis-users with schizophrenia/chronic-psychosis (20.1, 95% CI 16.2-24.1) and 101 other cohort users (18.6, 95% CI 16.9-20.4).Cannabis use is associated with decreased retention among MMT patients, however the effects of cannabis on schizophrenia/psychosis patients on retention and survival cannot be verified due to the small sample size and the limited data regarding chronicity of cannabis use. Future larger, prospective studies are needed.

Profiles of criteria and non-criteria anti-phospholipid autoantibodies are associated with clinical phenotypes of the antiphospholipid syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Specific anti-phospholipids antibodies (aPLs) are used as classification criteria of the antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). These aPLs, although essential for diagnosis, do not predict disease phenotypes, which may require specific therapies. Non-criteria aPLs are rarely evaluated and their role is yet to be defined. In the current study, we aimed to examine the association between criteria and non-criteria aPLs and APS phenotypes. METHODS: Serum samples from 188 subjects, 130 APS patients and 58 controls were analyzed for the presence of 20 aPLs (IgG and IgM isotypes to cardiolipin (CL), beta2-glycoprotein1 (ß2GP1), phosphatidic acid (P-acid), phosphatidylcholine (PC), phosphatidylethanolamine (PE), phosphatidylglycerol (PG), phosphatidylinositol (PI), phosphatidylserine (PS), annexin-5 (AN) and prothrombin (PT) using a line immunoassay (GA Generic Assays, Germany). Sero-positivity to the different aPLs/aPLs profiles was correlated to APS phenotypes (i.e. arterial thrombosis, CNS manifestations, venous thrombosis, relapsing disease, obstetric morbidity). RESULTS: In this cohort, arterial thrombosis was associated with accumulative number of ≥ 7/20 aPLs evaluated (OR 4.1; CI 95% 1.9-96, p = 0.001) as well as the sole presence of aPT (IgG) (OR 2.3;CI 95% 1.1-5.1, p = 0.03). CNS manifestations were linked with a profile of 4 aPLs (IgG): aPT, aPG, aPI and aAN (OR 2.6;CI 95% 1.1-6.3, p = 0.03). Symptom-free period of ≥ 3 years was linked with lower number of aPLs and the presence of aPI (IgG) (OR 3.0;CI 95% 1.08-8.1, p < 0.05) or aAN (IgG) (OR 3.4;CI 95% 1.08-10.9, p < 0.05). APS related pregnancy morbidity correlated with a profile of 2 aPLs (IgG): aCL and aPS (OR 2.9; CI 95% 1.3-6.5, p < 0.05) or the sole presence of aAN (IgG) (OR 2.8; CI 95% 1.02-8, p = 0.05). CONCLUSION: In this study, we observed an association between specific criteria/non-criteria aPLs or aPLs profiles and clinical phenotypes of APS. Our data suggest that examination of a wider variety of aPLs may allow better characterization of APS.