Deep Learning Automated Segmentation for Muscle and Adipose Tissue from Abdominal Computed Tomography in Polytrauma Patients.

Manual segmentation of muscle and adipose compartments from computed tomography (CT) axial images is a potential bottleneck in early rapid detection and quantification of sarcopenia. A prototype deep learning neural network was trained on a multi-center collection of 3413 abdominal cancer surgery subjects to automatically segment truncal muscle, subcutaneous adipose tissue and visceral adipose tissue at the L3 lumbar vertebral level. Segmentations were externally tested on 233 polytrauma subjects. Although after severe trauma abdominal CT scans are quickly and robustly delivered, with often motion or scatter artefacts, incomplete vertebral bodies or arms that influence image quality, the concordance was generally very good for the body composition indices of Skeletal Muscle Radiation Attenuation (SMRA) (Concordance Correlation Coefficient (CCC) = 0.92), Visceral Adipose Tissue index (VATI) (CCC = 0.99) and Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue Index (SATI) (CCC = 0.99). In conclusion, this article showed an automated and accurate segmentation system to segment the cross-sectional muscle and adipose area L3 lumbar spine level on abdominal CT. Future perspectives will include fine-tuning the algorithm and minimizing the outliers.

Image based prognosis in head and neck cancer using convolutional neural networks: a case study in reproducibility and optimization.

In the past decade, there has been a sharp increase in publications describing applications of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) in medical image analysis. However, recent reviews have warned of the lack of reproducibility of most such studies, which has impeded closer examination of the models and, in turn, their implementation in healthcare. On the other hand, the performance of these models is highly dependent on decisions on architecture and image pre-processing. In this work, we assess the reproducibility of three studies that use CNNs for head and neck cancer outcome prediction by attempting to reproduce the published results. In addition, we propose a new network structure and assess the impact of image pre-processing and model selection criteria on performance. We used two publicly available datasets: one with 298 patients for training and validation and another with 137 patients from a different institute for testing. All three studies failed to report elements required to reproduce their results thoroughly, mainly the image pre-processing steps and the random seed. Our model either outperforms or achieves similar performance to the existing models with considerably fewer parameters. We also observed that the pre-processing efforts significantly impact the model's performance and that some model selection criteria may lead to suboptimal models. Although there have been improvements in the reproducibility of deep learning models, our work suggests that wider implementation of reporting standards is required to avoid a reproducibility crisis.

Clinical evaluation of automated segmentation for body composition analysis on abdominal L3 CT slices in polytrauma patients.

INTRODUCTION: Sarcopenia is a muscle disease that involves loss of muscle strength and physical function and is associated with adverse health effects. Even though sarcopenia has attracted increasing attention in the literature, many research findings have not yet been translated into clinical practice. In this article, we aim to validate a deep learning neural network for automated segmentation of L3 CT slices and aim to explore the potential for clinical utilization of such a tool for clinical practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A deep learning neural network was trained on a multi-centre collection of 3413 abdominal cancer surgery subjects to automatically segment muscle, subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissue at the L3 lumbar vertebral level. 536 Polytrauma subjects were used as an independent test set to show generalizability. The Dice Similarity Coefficient was calculated to validate the geometric similarity. Quantitative agreement was quantified using Bland-Altman's Limits of Agreement interval and Lin's Concordance Correlation Coefficient. To determine the potential clinical usability, randomly selected segmentation images were presented to a panel of experienced clinicians to rate on a Likert scale. RESULTS: Deep learning results gave excellent agreement versus a human expert operator for all of the body composition indices, with Concordance Correlation Coefficient for skeletal muscle index of 0.92, Skeletal muscle radiation attenuation 0.94, Visceral Adipose Tissue index 0.99 and Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue Index 0.99. Triple-blinded visual assessment of segmentation by clinicians correlated only to the Dice coefficient, but had no association to quantitative body composition metrics which were accurate irrespective of clinicians' visual rating. CONCLUSION: A deep learning method for automatic segmentation of truncal muscle, visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue on individual L3 CT slices has been independently validated against expert human-generated results for an enlarged polytrauma registry dataset. Time efficiency, consistency and high accuracy relative to human experts suggest that quantitative body composition analysis with deep learning should is a promising tool for clinical application in a hospital setting.