Cervical sagittal balance: a biomechanical perspective can help clinical practice.

PURPOSE: In this article, we summarize our work on understanding the influence of cervical sagittal malalignment on the mechanics of the cervical spine. METHODS: Biomechanical studies were performed using an ex vivo laboratory model to study the kinematic and kinetic response of human cervical spine specimens in the setting of cervical sagittal imbalance. The model allowed controlled variations of C2-C7 Sagittal Vertical Alignment (C2-C7 SVA) and T1-Slope so that clinically relevant sagittally malaligned profiles could be prescribed, while maintaining horizontal gaze, and their biomechanical consequences studied. RESULTS: Our results demonstrated that increasing C2-C7 SVA caused flexion of lower cervical (C2-C7) segments and hyperextension of suboccipital (C0-C1-C2) segments to maintain horizontal gaze. An increase in C2-C7 SVA increased the lower cervical neural foraminal areas. Conversely, increasing T1-slope predominantly influenced subaxial cervical lordosis and, as a result, decreased cervical neural foraminal areas. Therefore, we believe patients with increased upper thoracic kyphosis and radicular symptoms may respond with increased forward head posture (FHP) as a compensatory mechanism to increase their lower cervical neural foraminal area and alleviate nerve root compression as well as reduce the burden on posterior muscles and soft and bony structures of the cervical spine. Increasing FHP (i.e., increased C2-C7 SVA) was associated with shortening of the cervical flexors and occipital extensors and lengthening of the cervical extensors and occipital flexors, which corresponds to C2-C7 flexion and C0-C2 extension. The greatest shortening occurred in the suboccipital muscles, suggesting considerable load bearing of these muscles during chronic FHP. Regardless, there was no evidence of nerve compression within the suboccipital triangle. Finally, cervical sagittal imbalance may play a role in exacerbating adjacent segment pathomechanics after multilevel cervical fusion and should be considered during surgical planning. CONCLUSIONS: The results of our biomechanical studies have improved our understanding of the impact of cervical sagittal malalignment on pathomechanics of the cervical spine. We believe this improved understanding will assist in clinical decision-making.

Dimensions of the cervical neural foramen in conditions of spinal deformity: an ex vivo biomechanical investigation using specimen-specific CT imaging.

PURPOSE: Patients with cervical spondylosis commonly present with neck pain, radiculopathy or myelopathy. As degenerative changes progress, multiple factors including disc height loss, thoracic kyphosis, and facetogenic changes can increase the risk of neural structure compression. This study investigated the impact of cervical deformity including forward head posture (FHP) and upper thoracic kyphosis, on the anatomy of the cervical neural foramen. METHODS: Postural changes of 13 human cervical spine specimens (Occiput-T1, age 50.6 years; range 21-67) were assessed in response to prescribed cervical sagittal malalignments using a previously reported experimental model. Two characteristics of cervical sagittal deformities, C2-C7 sagittal vertical alignment (SVA) and sagittal angle of the T1 vertebra (T1 tilt), were varied to create various cervical malalignments. The postural changes were documented by measuring vertebral positions and orientations. The vertebral motion data were combined with specimen-specific CT-based anatomical models, which allowed assessments of foraminal areas of subaxial cervical segments as a function of increasing C2-C7 SVA and changing T1 tilt. RESULTS: Increasing C2-C7 SVA from neutral posture resulted in increased neural foraminal area in the lower cervical spine (largest increase at C4-C5: 13.8 ± 15.7 %, P < 0.01). Increasing SVA from a hyperkyphotic posture (greater T1 tilt) also increased the neural foraminal area in the lower cervical segments (C5-C6 demonstrated the largest increase: 13.4 ± 9.6 %, P < 0.01). The area of the cervical neural foramen decreased with increasing T1 tilt, with greater reduction occurring in the lower cervical spine, specifically at C5-C6 (-8.6 ± 7.0 %, P < 0.01) and C6-C7 (-9.6 ± 5.6 %, P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: An increase in thoracic kyphosis (T1 tilt) decreased cervical neural foraminal areas. In contrast, an increase in cervical SVA increased the lower cervical neural foraminal areas. Patients with increased upper thoracic kyphosis may respond with increased cervical SVA as a compensatory mechanism to increase their lower cervical neural foraminal area.

Parametric and cadaveric models of lumbar flexion instability and flexion restricting dynamic stabilization system.

PURPOSE: Development of a dynamic stabilization system often involves costly and time-consuming design iterations, testing and computational modeling. The aims of this study were (1) develop a simple parametric model of lumbar flexion instability and use this model to identify the appropriate stiffness of a flexion restricting stabilization system (FRSS), and (2) in a cadaveric experiment, validate the predictive value of the parametric model. METHODS: Literature was surveyed for typical parameters of intact and destabilized spines: stiffness in the high flexibility zone (HFZ) and high stiffness zone, and size of the HFZ. These values were used to construct a bilinear parametric model of flexion kinematics of intact and destabilized lumbar spines. FRSS implantation was modeled by iteratively superimposing constant flexion stiffnesses onto the parametric model. Five cadaveric lumbar spines were tested intact; after L4-L5 destabilization (nucleotomy, midline decompression); and after FRSS implantation. Specimens were loaded in flexion/extension (8 Nm/6 Nm) with 400 N follower load to characterize kinematics for comparison with the parametric model. RESULTS: To accomplish the goal of reducing ROM to intact levels and increasing stiffness to approximately 50 % greater than intact levels, flexion stiffness contributed by the FRSS was determined to be 0.5 Nm/deg using the parametric model. In biomechanical testing, the FRSS restored ROM of the destabilized segment from 146 ± 13 to 105 ± 21 % of intact, and stiffness in the HFZ from 41 ± 7 to 135 ± 38 % of intact. CONCLUSIONS: Testing demonstrated excellent predictive value of the parametric model, and that the FRSS attained the desired biomechanical performance developed with the model. A simple parametric model may allow efficient optimization of kinematic design parameters.

Biomechanical evaluation of a low profile, anchored cervical interbody spacer device in the setting of progressive flexion-distraction injury of the cervical spine.

INTRODUCTION: Anterior cervical decompression and fusion is a well-established procedure for treatment of degenerative disc disease and cervical trauma including flexion-distraction injuries. Low-profile interbody devices incorporating fixation have been introduced to avoid potential issues associated with dissection and traditional instrumentation. While these devices have been assessed in traditional models, they have not been evaluated in the setting of traumatic spine injury. This study investigated the ability of these devices to stabilize the subaxial cervical spine in the presence of flexion-distraction injuries of increasing severity. METHODS: Thirteen human cadaveric subaxial cervical spines (C3-C7) were tested at C5-C6 in flexion-extension, lateral bending and axial rotation in the load-control mode under ±1.5 Nm moments. Six spines were tested with locked screw configuration and seven with variable angle screw configuration. After testing the range of motion (ROM) with implanted device, progressive posterior destabilization was performed in 3 stages at C5-C6. RESULTS: The anchored spacer device with locked screw configuration significantly reduced C5-C6 flexion-extension (FE) motion from 14.8 ± 4.2 to 3.9 ± 1.8°, lateral bending (LB) from 10.3 ± 2.0 to 1.6 ± 0.8, and axial rotation (AR) from 11.0 ± 2.4 to 2.5 ± 0.8 compared with intact under (p < 0.01). The anchored spacer device with variable angle screw configuration also significantly reduced C5-C6 FE motion from 10.7 ± 1.7 to 5.5 ± 2.5°, LB from 8.3 ± 1.4 to 2.7 ± 1.0, and AR from 8.8 ± 2.7 to 4.6 ± 1.3 compared with intact (p < 0.01). The ROM of the C5-C6 segment with locked screw configuration and grade-3 F-D injury was significantly reduced from intact, with residual motions of 5.1 ± 2.1 in FE, 2.0 ± 1.1 in LB, and 3.3 ± 1.4 in AR. Conversely, the ROM of the C5-C6 segment with variable-angle screw configuration and grade-3 F-D injury was not significantly reduced from intact, with residual motions of 8.7 ± 4.5 in FE, 5.0 ± 1.6 in LB, and 9.5 ± 4.6 in AR. CONCLUSIONS: The locked screw spacer showed significantly reduced motion compared with the intact spine even in the setting of progressive flexion-distraction injury. The variable angle screw spacer did not sufficiently stabilize flexion-distraction injuries. The resulting motion for both constructs was higher than that reported in previous studies using traditional plating. Locked screw spacers may be utilized with additional external immobilization while variable angle screw spacers should not be used in patients with flexion-distraction injuries.

Effect of prosthesis endplate lordosis angles on L5-S1 kinematics after disc arthroplasty.

OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that L5-S1 kinematics will not be affected by the lordosis distribution between the prosthesis endplates. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twelve cadaveric lumbosacral spines (51.3 ± 9.8 years) were implanted with 6° or 11° prostheses (ProDisc-L) with four combinations of superior/inferior lordosis (6°/0°, 3°/3°, 11°/0°, 3°/8°). Specimens were tested intact and after prostheses implantation with different lordosis distributions. Center of rotation (COR) and range of motion (ROM) were quantified. RESULTS: Six-degree lordosis prostheses (n = 7) showed no difference in flexion-extension ROM, regardless of design (6°/0° or 3°/3°) (p > 0.05). In lateral bending (LB), both designs reduced ROM (p < 0.05). In axial rotation, only the 3°/3° design reduced ROM (p < 0.05). Eleven-degree lordosis prostheses (n = 5) showed no difference in flexion-extension ROM for either design (p > 0.05). LB ROM decreased with distributed lordosis prostheses (3°/8°) (p < 0.05). Overall, L5-S1 range of motion was not markedly influenced by lordosis distribution among the two prosthesis endplates. The ProDisc-L prosthesis design where all lordosis is concentrated in the superior endplate yielded COR locations that were anterior and caudal to intact controls. The prosthesis with lordosis distributed between the two endplates yielded a COR that tended to be closer to intact. CONCLUSIONS: Further clinical and biomechanical studies are needed to assess the long-term impact of lordosis angle distribution on the fate of the facet joints.

Would an anatomically shaped lumbar interbody cage provide better stability? An in vitro cadaveric biomechanical evaluation.

STUDY DESIGN: A biomechanical cadaveric study of lumbar spine segments. OBJECTIVE: To compare the immediate stability provided by parallel-shaped and anatomically shaped carbon fiber interbody fusion I/F cages in posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) constructs with posterior pedicle screw instrumentation. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Few biomechanical data are available on the anatomically shaped cages in PLIF and TLIF constructs. METHODS: Twenty human lumbar segments were tested in flexion-extension (FE) (8 N m flexion, 6 N m extension), lateral bending (LB) (± 6 N m), and torsional loading (± 5 N m). Each segment was tested in the intact state and after insertion of interbody cages in one of 3 constructs: PLIF with 2 parallel-shaped or anatomically shaped cages and TLIF with 1 anatomically shaped cage. All cages received supplementary pedicle screw fixation. The range-of-motion (ROM) values after cage insertion and posterior fixation were compared with the intact specimen values using analysis of variance and multiple comparisons with Bonferroni correction. RESULTS: All constructs significantly reduced segmental motion relative to intact (P < 0.001). The motion reductions in FE, LB, and axial rotation were 85 ± 15%, 83 ± 18%, and 67 ± 6.8% for the PLIF construct using parallel cages, 79 ± 5.5%, 87 ± 10%, and 66 ± 20% for PLIF using anatomically shaped cages, and 90 ± 6.8%, 87 ± 12%, and 77 ± 22% for TLIF with an anatomically shaped cage. In FE and LB, the reductions in the ROM caused between the 3 constructs were equivalent (P > 0.05). In axial rotation, the TLIF cage provided significantly greater limitation in the ROM compared with the parallel-shaped PLIF cage (P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The parallel-shaped and anatomically shaped I/F cages provided similar stability in a PLIF construct. The greater stability of the TLIF construct was likely due to a more anterior placement of the TLIF cage and preservation of the contralateral facet joint.

Anatomic considerations in headaches associated with cervical sagittal imbalance: A cadaveric biomechanical study.

Chronic Forward Head Posture is associated with headaches, neck pain, and disability, though few studies have investigated the effects it has on the suboccipital triangle. The objective of this study was to quantitatively assess whether the biomechanical changes in the suboccipital triangle help explain the clinical manifestations of Forward Head Posture. Specifically, this study aimed to identify whether the Greater Occipital Nerve or C2 nerve root may be compressed in Forward Head Posture. Three-dimensional, specimen-specific computer models were rendered from thirteen cadaveric cervical spine specimens. The spines transitioned from neutral to Forward head posture while motion data was collected. This data was synced with the computer models to make precise measurements. In Forward Head Posture, occiput-C1, C1-C2, and occiput-C2 segments extended by 10.7 ±â€¯4.6 deg, 4.6 ±â€¯4.3 deg, and 15.3 ±â€¯2.3 deg, respectively. The Rectus Capitis Posterior Major and Minor and Obliquus Capitis Superior muscles shortened by 20.0 ±â€¯4.6%, 15.0 ±â€¯7.6%, and 6.6 ±â€¯3.3%, respectively. The Obliquus Capitis muscle inferior length did not change. The suboccipital triangle area decreased by 18.7 ±â€¯6.4%, but the protective gaps surrounding the C2 nerve root and the Greater Occipital Nerve did not reveal clinically significant impingement. The C2 nerve root gap decreased by 1.0 ±â€¯1.3 mm and the Greater Occipital Nerve gap by 0.2 ±â€¯0.18 mm. These results demonstrate that the C2 nerve root and the Greater Occipital Nerve are protected by the bony landscape of the cervical spine. However, there is likely persistent contraction of the rectus muscles in Forward Head Posture, which suggests a secondary tension-type etiology of the associated headache.

Motion response of a polycrystalline diamond adaptive axis of rotation cervical total disc arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Cervical fusion is associated with adjacent segment degeneration. Cervical disc arthroplasty is considered an alternative to reduce risk of adjacent segment disease. Kinematics after arthroplasty should closely replicate healthy in vivo kinematics to reduce adjacent segment stresses. The purpose of this study was to assess the kinematics of a polycrystalline diamond cervical disc prosthesis. METHODS: Nine cadaveric C3-T1 spines were tested intact and after one (C5-C6) and two level (C5-C7) arthroplasty (Triadyme-C, Dymicron Inc., Orem, UT, USA). Kinematics were evaluated in flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation. FINDINGS: Prosthesis placement at C5-C6 and C6-C7 was 0.5 mm anterior and 0.6 mm posterior to midline respectively. C5-C6 flexion-extension motion was 12.8° intact and 10.5° after arthroplasty. C6-C7 flexion-extension motion was 10.0 and 11.4° after arthroplasty. C5-C6 lateral bending reduced from 8.5 to 3.7° after arthroplasty and at C6-C7 from 7.5 to 5.1°. C5-C6 axial rotation decreased from 10.4 to 6.2° after arthroplasty and at C6-C7 from 7.8 to 5.3°. Segmental lordosis increased by 4.2°, and middle disc height by 1.4 mm after arthroplasty. Change in center of rotation from intact to arthroplasty averaged 0.9 mm posteriorly and 0.1 mm caudally at C5-C6, and 1.4 mm posteriorly and 0.3 mm cranially at C6-C7. INTERPRETATION: The cervical disc arthroplasty evaluated restored flexion-extension motion to intact levels and moderately increased segmental stiffness. Disc height increased by up to 1.5 mm and segmental lordosis by 4.2°. The unique prosthesis design allowed the axis of rotation after arthroplasty to closely mimic the native location.

Biomechanical Analysis of Stand-alone Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Adjacent Segment Disease.

Study design Biomechanical cadaveric study  Objective To compare biomechanical properties of a single stand-alone interbody fusion and a single-level pedicle screw construct above a previous lumbar pedicle fusion. Summary of background data Adjacent segment disease (ASD) is spondylosis of adjacent vertebral segments after previous spinal fusion. Despite the consensus that ASD is clinically significant, the surgical treatment of ASD is controversial. Methods Lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) and posterior spinal fusion (PSF) with pedicle screws were analyzed within a validated cadaveric lumbar fusion model. L3-4 vertebral segment motion was analyzed within the following simulations: without implants (intact), L3-4 LLIF-only, L3-4 LLIF with previous L4-S1 PSF, L3-4 PSF with previous L4-S1 PSF, and L4-S1 PSF alone. L3-4 motion values were measured during flexion/extension with and without axial load, side bending, and axial rotation. Results L3-4 motion in the intact model was found to be 4.7 ± 1.2 degrees. L3-4 LLIF-only decreased motion to 1.9 ± 1.1 degrees. L3-4 LLIF with previous L4-S1 fusion demonstrated less motion in all planes with and without loading (p < 0.05) compared to an intact spine. However, L3-4 motion with flexion/extension and lateral bending was noted to be greater compared to the L3-S1 construct (p < 0.5). The L3-S1 PSF construct decreased motion to less than 1° in all planes of motion with or without loading (p < 0.05). The L3-4 PSF with previous L4-S1 PSF constructs decreased the flexion/extension motion by 92.4% compared to the intact spine, whereas the L3-4 LLIF with previous L4-S1 PSF constructs decreased motion by 61.2%. Conclusions Stand-alone LLIF above a previous posterolateral fusion significantly decreases motion at the adjacent segment, demonstrating its utility in treating ASD without necessitating revision. The stand-alone LLIF is a biomechanically sound option in the treatment of ASD and is advantageous in patient populations who may benefit from less invasive surgical options.

Biomechanics of an Expandable Lumbar Interbody Fusion Cage Deployed Through Transforaminal Approach.

BACKGROUND: A novel expandable lumbar interbody fusion cage has been developed which allows for a broad endplate footprint similar to an anterior lumbar interbody fusion; however, it is deployed from a minimally invasive transforaminal unilateral approach. The perceived benefit is a stable circumferential fusion from a single approach that maintains the anterior tension band of the anterior longitudinal ligament. The purpose of this biomechanics laboratory study was to evaluate the biomechanical stability of an expandable lumbar interbody cage inserted using a transforaminal approach and deployed in situ compared to a traditional lumbar interbody cage inserted using an anterior approach (control device). METHODS: Twelve cadaveric spine specimens (L1-5) were tested intact and after implantation of both the control and experimental devices in 2 (L2-3 and L3-4) segments of each specimen; the assignments of the control and experimental devices to these segments were alternated. Effect of supplemental pedicle screw-rod stabilization was also assessed. Moments were applied to the specimens in flexionextension (FE), lateral bending (LB), and axial rotation (AR). The effect of physiologic preload on construct stability was evaluated in FE. Segmental motions were measured using an optoelectronic motion measurement system. RESULTS: The deployable expendable transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) cage and control devices significantly reduced FE motion with and without compressive preload when compared to the intact condition (P < .05). Segmental motions in LB and AR were also significantly reduced with both devices (P < .05). Under no preload, the deployable expendable TLIF cage construct resulted in significantly smaller FE motion compared to the control cage construct (P < .01). Under all other testing modes (FE under 400N preload, LB, and AR), the postoperative motions of the 2 constructs did not differ statistically (P > .05). Adding bilateral pedicle screws resulted in further reduction of range of motion for all loading modes compared to intact condition, with no statistical difference between the 2 constructs (P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: The ability of the deployable expendable interbody cage in reducing segmental motions was equivalent to the control cage when used as a standalone construct and also when supplemented with bilateral pedicle screw-rod instrumentation. The larger footprint of the fully deployed TLIF cage combined with preservation of the anterior soft-tissue tension band may provide a better biomechanical fusion environment by combining the advantages of the traditional anterior lumbar interbody fusion and TLIF approaches.

Biomechanics of an Articulated Screw in Acute Scapholunate Ligament Disruption.

Background An injury to the scapholunate interosseous ligament (SLIL) leads to instability in the scapholunate joint. Temporary fixation is used to protect the ligament during reconstruction or healing of the repair. Rigid screw fixation-by blocking relative physiological motion between the scaphoid and lunate-can lead to screw loosening, pullout, and fracture. Purpose This study aims to evaluate changes in scaphoid and lunate kinematics following SLIL injury and the effectiveness of an articulating screw at restoring preinjury motion. Materials and Methods The kinematics of the scaphoid and lunate were measured in 10 cadaver wrists through three motions driven by a motion simulator. The specimens were tested intact, immediately following SLIL injury, after subsequent cycling, and after fixation with a screw. Results Significant changes in scaphoid and lunate motion occurred following SLIL injury. Postinjury cycling increased motion changes in flexion-extension and radial-ulnar deviation. The motion was not significantly different from the intact scapholunate joint after placement of the articulating screw. Conclusion In agreement with other studies, sectioning of the SLIL led to significant kinematic changes of the scaphoid and lunate in all motions tested. Compared with intact scapholunate joint, no significant difference in kinematics was found after placement of the screw indicating a correction of some of the changes produced by SLIL transection. These findings suggest that the articulating screw may be effective for protecting a SLIL repair while allowing the physiological rotation to occur between the scaphoid and lunate. Clinical Relevance A less rigid construct, such as the articulating screw, may allow earlier wrist rehabilitation with less screw pullout or failure.

Does Resection of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament Affect the Stability of Cervical Disc Arthroplasty?

BACKGROUND: The need for posterior longitudinal ligament (PLL) resection during cervical total disc arthroplasty (TDA) has been debated. The purpose of this laboratory study was to investigate the effect of PLL resection on cervical kinematics after TDA. METHODS: Eight cadaveric cervical spine specimens were tested in flexion-extension (FE), lateral bending (LB), and axial rotation (AR) to moments of ±1.5 Nm. After testing the intact condition, anterior C5-C6 cervical discectomy was performed followed by PLL resection and implantation of a compressible, 6-degrees-of-freedom disc prosthesis (M6-C, Spinal Kinetics Inc, Sunnyvale, California). Next, a second prosthesis was implanted at C6-C7 with PLL intact. Finally, the C6-C7 PLL was resected while the disc prosthesis remained in place. Segmental range of motion (ROM) and stiffness in the high flexibility zone around the neutral posture were analyzed using repeated measures ANOVA. RESULTS: At C5-C6, following TDA and PLL resection, FE, LB, and AR ROMs decreased significantly. Anterior and posterior disc height, segmental lordosis, and flexion stiffness increased significantly. At C6-C7, TDA with the PLL intact resulted in a significant increase in anterior disc height and segmental lordosis with no change in posterior disc height. FE, LB, and AR ROMs all decreased significantly, while flexion stiffness increased significantly compared to intact. PLL resection at C6-C7 did not result in a notable change compared to TDA with PLL intact. At the same level, flexion stiffness decreased following PLL resection compared to TDA with a value closer to intact. Two-level TDA (C5-C7) with PLL resection did not result in a loss of segmental stability. CONCLUSION: PLL resection did not significantly affect motion segment kinematics following cervical TDA using a prosthesis with inherent stiffness. Motion segment stiffness loss after PLL resection can be compensated for by a TDA design that can provide resistance to angular motion.

Kinematic assessment of an elastic-core cervical disc prosthesis in one and two-level constructs.

INTRODUCTION: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion has been associated with the development of adjacent segment degeneration (ASD), with clinical incidence of approximately 3% per year. Cervical total disc arthroplasty (TDA) has been proposed as an alternative to prevent ASD. HYPOTHESES: TDA in optimal placement using an elastic-core cervical disc (RHINE, K2M Inc., Leesburg, Virginia) will replicate natural kinematics and will improve with optimal vs anterior placement. METHODS: Seven C3-T1 cervical cadaver spines were tested intact first, then after one-level TDA at C5-C6 anterior placement, after TDA at C5-C6 optimal placement, after two-level TDA at C5-C6 and C6-C7 optimal placement, and finally after two-level TDA at C5-C6 lateral placement and C6-C7 optimal placement. The specimens were subjected to: Flexion-Extension moments (+1.5 Nm) with compressive preloads of 0 N and 150 N, lateral bending (LB) and axial rotation (AR) (+1.5 Nm) without preload. RESULTS: C5-C6 TDA in optimal placement resulted in a non-significant increase in flexion-extension ROM compared to intact under 0 N and 150 N preload (P > 0.05). Both LB and AR ROM decreased with arthroplasty (P < 0.01). Optimal placement of C6-C7 TDA resulted in an increase in flexion-extension ROM with preload compared to intact (P < 0.05) while LB and AR ROM decreased with arthroplasty (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: This six degree of freedom elastic-core disc arthroplasty effectively restored flexion-extension motion to intact levels. In LB the TDA maintained 42% ROM at C5-C6 and 60% at C6-C7. In AR 57% of the ROM was maintained at C5-C6 and 70% at C6-C7. These findings are supported by literature which shows cervical TDA results in restoration of approximately 50% ROM in LB and AR, which is a multifactorial phenomenon encompassing TDA design parameters and anatomical constraints. Anterior placement of this viscoelastic TDA device shows motion restoration similar to optimal placement suggesting its design may be less sensitive to suboptimal placement.

Novel model to analyze the effect of a large compressive follower pre-load on range of motions in a lumbar spine.

A 3-D finite element model (FEM) of the lumbar spine (L1-S1) was used to determine the effect of a large compressive follower pre-load on range of motions (ROM) in all three planes. The follower load modeled in the FEM produced minimal vertebral rotations in all the three planes. The model was validated by comparing the disc compression at all levels in the lumbar spine with the corresponding results obtained by compressing 10 cadevaric lumbar spines (L1-S1) using the follower load technique described by Patwardhan et al. [1999. A follower load increases the load-carrying capacity of the lumbar spine in compression. Spine 24(10), 1003-1009]. Further validation of the model was performed by comparing the lateral bending and torsion response without pre-load and the flexion-extension response without pre-load and with an 800 N follower pre-load with those obtained using cadaver lumbar spines. Following validation, the FEM was subjected to bending moments in all three planes with and without compressive follower pre-loads of up to 1200 N. Disc compression values and the flexion-extension range of motion under 800 N follower pre-load predicted by the FEM compared well with in vitro results. The current model showed that compressive follower pre-load decreased total as well as segmental ROM in flexion-extension by up to 18%, lateral bending by up to 42%, and torsion by up to 26%.

Biomechanics of an Expandable Lumbar Interbody Fusion Cage Deployed Through Transforaminal Approach.

INTRODUCTION: A novel expandable lumbar interbody fusion cage has been developed which allows for a broad endplate footprint similar to an anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF); however, it is deployed from a minimally invasive transforaminal unilateral approach. The perceived benefit is a stable circumferential fusion from a single approach that maintains the anterior tension band of the anterior longitudinal ligament.The purpose of this biomechanics laboratory study was to evaluate the biomechanical stability of an expandable lumbar interbody cage inserted using a transforaminal approach and deployed in situ compared to a traditional lumbar interbody cage inserted using an anterior approach (control device). METHODS: Twelve cadaveric spine specimens (L1-L5) were tested intact and after implantation of both the control and experimental devices in two (L2-L3 and L3-L4) segments of each specimen; the assignments of the control and experimental devices to these segments were alternated. Effect of supplemental pedicle screw-rod stabilization was also assessed. Moments were applied to the specimens in flexion-extension (FE), lateral bending (LB), and axial rotation (AR). The effect of physiologic preload on construct stability was evaluated in FE. Segmental motions were measured using an optoelectronic motion measurement system. RESULTS: The deployable expendable TLIF cage and control devices significantly reduced FE motion with and without compressive preload when compared to the intact condition (p<0.05). Segmental motions in LB and AR were also significantly reduced with both devices (p<0.05). Under no preload, the deployable expendable TLIF cage construct resulted in significantly smaller FE motion compared to the control cage construct (p<0.01). Under all other testing modes (FE under 400N preload, LB, and AR) the postoperative motions of the two constructs did not differ statistically (p>0.05). Adding bilateral pedicle screws resulted in further reduction of ROM for all loading modes compared to intact condition, with no statistical difference between the two constructs (p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The ability of the deployable expendable interbody cage in reducing segmental motions was equivalent to the control cage when used as a stand-alone construct and also when supplemented with bilateral pedicle screw-rod instrumentation. The larger footprint of the fully deployed TLIF cage combined with preservation of the anterior soft-tissue tension band may provide a better biomechanical fusion environment by combining the advantages of the traditional ALIF and TLIF approaches.

Interpolation of three dimensional kinematics with dual-quaternions.

Devising patient-specific kinematic assessment techniques are critical for both patient diagnosis and treatment evaluation of complex biomechanical joints within the body. New non-invasive kinematic assessment techniques, such as bi-planar fluoroscopic registration, provide improved insight on joint biomechanics compared to traditional techniques, but at the expense of higher radiation exposure to the patient. The purpose of this study was to minimize the x-ray sample size required for evaluating spine kinematics, ultimately reducing radiation exposure, while maintaining a high degree of accuracy by improving upon existing 3D kinematic interpolation techniques. Existing interpolation methods were improved to account for non-uniformly sampled control points and applied to new motion descriptors, thus creating a new approach to 3D kinematic interpolation utilizing dual-quaternions. Interpolation reconstruction methods were applied to decimated gold standard ex vivo spinal kinematic data originally acquired at 30Hz. The effects of interpolation method and variables (motion descriptor, sample spacing, sampling correction factors) on accuracy were compared. Dual-quaternion interpolation methods and equal interval angular sampling showed superior reconstruction results. Accuracy also improved when using temporal correction factors. Less than 1% normalized root-mean-squared error and less than 2% normalized maximum error were achieved from 0.36% of the original data set. The new approach also demonstrated its scalability for larger movements. However, accuracy may vary when interpolating more complex motion patterns. Overall, multiple interpolation methods and factors were evaluated in reconstructing 3D spine kinematics. High accuracy at low sample sizes and advantageous scalability to motions with larger total displacement illustrate its viability for bi-planar fluoroscopy.

Biomechanical Stability Analysis of a Stand-alone Cage, Static and Rotational-dynamic Plate in a Two-level Cervical Fusion Construct.

OBJECTIVE: To test the following hypotheses: (i) anterior cervical discetomy and fusion (ACDF) using stand-alone interbody spacers will significantly reduce the range of motion from intact spine; and (ii) the use of a static or a rotational-dynamic plate will significantly augment the stability of stand-alone interbody spacers, with similar beneficial effect when compared to each other. METHODS: Eleven human cadaveric subaxial cervical spines (age: 48.2 ± 5.4 years) were tested under the following sequence: (i) intact spine; (ii) ACDF at C4 -C5 using a stand-alone interbody spacer; (iii) ACDF at C5 -C6 and insertion of an interbody spacer (two-level construct); and (iv) randomized placement of either a two-level locking static plate or a rotational-dynamic plate. RESULTS: Insertion of stand-alone cage at C4 -C5 and C5 -C6 caused a significant decrease in the range of motion compared to intact spine (P < 0.05). Placement of both the locking and the rotational dynamic plate further reduced the range of motion at C4 -C5 and C5 -C6 compared to stand-alone cage (P < 0.01). No significant differences in range of motion restriction at either C4 -C5 or C5 -C6 were found when the two plating systems were compared (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Cervical stand-alone interbody spacers caused significant restriction in the range of motion. Both plates significantly augmented the stability of stand-alone interbody spacers, with similar stabilizing effect.

Cervical Spine Muscle-Tendon Unit Length Differences Between Neutral and Forward Head Postures: Biomechanical Study Using Human Cadaveric Specimens.

BACKGROUND: Forward head posture (FHP) may be associated with neck pain and poor health-related quality of life. Literature describes only qualitative muscle length changes associated with FHP. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to quantify how muscle-tendon unit lengths are altered when human cadaveric specimens are placed in alignments representing different severities of FHP. DESIGN: This biomechanical study used 13 fresh-frozen cadaveric cervical spine specimens (Occiput-T1, 54±15 y). METHODS: Specimens' postural changes simulating increasing FHP severity while maintaining horizontal gaze were assessed. Specimen-specific anatomic models derived from computed tomography-based anatomic data were combined with postural data and specimen-specific anatomy of muscle attachment points to estimate the muscle length changes associated with FHP. RESULTS: Forward head posture was associated with flexion of the mid-lower cervical spine and extension of the upper cervical (sub-occipital) spine. Muscles that insert on the cervical spine and function as flexors (termed "cervical flexors") as well as muscles that insert on the cranium and function as extensors ("occipital extensors") shortened in FHP when compared to neutral posture. In contrast, muscles that insert on the cervical spine and function as extensors ("cervical extensors") as well as muscles that insert on the cranium and function as flexors ("occipital flexors") lengthened. The greatest shortening was seen in the major and minor rectus capitis posterior muscles. These muscles cross the Occiput-C2 segments, which exhibited extension to maintain horizontal gaze. The greatest lengthening was seen in posterior muscles crossing the C4-C6 segments, which exhibited the most flexion. LIMITATIONS: This cadaver study did not incorporate the biomechanical influence of active musculature. CONCLUSIONS: This study offers a novel way to quantify postural alignment and muscle length changes associated with FHP. Model predictions are consistent with qualitative descriptions in the literature.

Biomechanics of posterior dynamic stabilizing device (DIAM) after facetectomy and discectomy.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Lumbar fusion has been associated with inconsistent clinical outcomes and significant complications. Posterior dynamic devices have been developed to stabilize painful diseased lumbar motion segments while avoiding fusion. The Device for Intervertebral Assisted Motion (DIAM) is a silicone interspinous process "bumper" that is being clinically implanted for varied indications. PURPOSE: We analyzed the effects of the DIAM device on the biomechanical response of the lumbar spine in flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation after partial facetectomy and discectomy; the clinical situations in which its use might be considered. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: A biomechanical study was performed using whole lumbar spine specimens (L1-sacrum). Surgical interventions were simulated at the L4-L5 level, and motions were measured at the operated and adjacent segments. PATIENT SAMPLE: Six fresh human lumbar spine specimens were used. METHODS: The lumbar spines were subjected to moments in flexion-extension (+/-6 Nm), lateral bending (+/-5 Nm), and axial rotation (+/-4 Nm). The specimens were tested under the following conditions: 1) intact; 2) after unilateral hemifacetectomy at L4-L5; 3) #2 and discectomy; and 4) #3 with DIAM. The angular motion values at the operated and adjacent segments were analyzed using analysis of variance and multiple comparisons with Bonferroni correction. RESULTS: Unilateral hemifacetectomy did not increase angular motion. Subsequent discectomy increased L4-L5 angular motion (degrees) from 9.2+/-1.6 to 11.7+/-2.0 in flexion-extension (p=.01), from 6.7+/-1.1 to 8.5+/-1.5 in lateral bending (p=.01), and from 2.6+/-0.7 to 3.8+/-0.8 in axial rotation (p=.00). Insertion of the DIAM device after discectomy restored the angular motion to below the level of the intact segment in flexion-extension (6.7+/-0.7 vs. 9.2+/-1.6, p=.02). In lateral bending, DIAM reduced the increased motion induced by discectomy (7.8+/-1.0 vs. 8.5+/-1.5, p<.05), but not to the intact level (7.8+/-1.0 vs. 6.7+/-1.1, p=.05). DIAM insertion did not reduce the increased axial rotation induced by discectomy, and the axial rotation remained larger than the intact value (4.1+/-0.6 vs. 2.6+/-0.7, p=.00). CONCLUSIONS: The DIAM device is effective in stabilizing the unstable segment, reducing the increased segmental flexion-extension and lateral bending motions observed after discectomy. In flexion-extension the DIAM restored postdiscectomy motion to below the intact values (p<.05). Interestingly, the DIAM device did not reduce the increased axial rotation motion observed after discectomy. These biomechanical effects must be considered when evaluating the clinical applications of the DIAM.

Bilateral posterior cervical cages provide biomechanical stability: assessment of stand-alone and supplemental fixation for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.

INTRODUCTION: Supplemental posterior instrumentation has been widely used to enhance stability and improve fusion rates in higher risk patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). These typically involve posterior lateral mass or pedicle screw fixation with significant inherent risks and morbidities. More recently, cervical cages placed bilaterally between the facet joints (posterior cervical cages) have been used as a less disruptive alternative for posterior fixation. The purpose of this study was to compare the stability achieved by both posterior cages and ACDF at a single motion segment and determine the stability achieved with posterior cervical cages used as an adjunct to single- and multilevel ACDF. METHODS: Seven cadaveric cervical spine (C2-T1) specimens were tested in the following sequence: intact, C5-C6 bilateral posterior cages, C6-C7 plated ACDF with and without posterior cages, and C3-C5 plated ACDF with and without posterior cages. Range of motion in flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation was measured for each condition under moment loading up to ±1.5 Nm. RESULTS: All fusion constructs significantly reduced the range of motion compared to intact in flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation (P<0.05). Similar stability was achieved with bilateral posterior cages and plated ACDF at a single level. Posterior cages, when placed as an adjunct to ACDF, further reduced range of motion in both single- and multilevel constructs (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: The biomechanical effectiveness of bilateral posterior cages in limiting cervical segmental motion is comparable to single-level plated ACDF. Furthermore, supplementation of single- and multilevel ACDF with posterior cervical cages provided a significant increase in stability and therefore may be a potential, minimally disruptive option for supplemental fixation for improving ACDF fusion rates.