Second cancers in Hodgkin's lymphoma long-term survivals: A 60-year single institutional experience with real-life cohort of 871 patients.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Appropriate surveillance guidelines for patients after successful treatment of Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) are needed to reduce mortality of iatrogenic secondary cancers (SC). This large single institutional retrospective study analyses the risk of SC in HL patients treated outside of clinical trials over past decades. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Consecutive series of HL patients were analysed with median follow-up 12 years. Standardised incidence ratio (SIR) and absolute excess risk (AER) were calculated for site-specific risk of SC. RESULTS: In total of 871 patients (491 men; median age 34 years), chemotherapy alone, radiotherapy alone, and combined treatment underwent 36%, 40%, and 24% patients. 154 SC were found with significantly increased SIR = 2.9 and AER = 80.8 for all cancers except of nonmelanoma-skin cancer. SC-related death occurred in 71 patients (15% of those who died, 8% of whole cohort). The most common SC were lung (17.5% of all malignancies, SIR = 3.2), breast carcinoma (15.6%, SIR = 4.4), and haematological malignancy (non-Hodgkin's lymphoma SIR = 13.1; leukaemia SIR = 5.8). For SC within radiation field, the highest AER was in breast (AER = 46.9), colorectal (AER = 22.8), and lung cancer (AER = 17). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with HL are generally at great risk of developing SC, which is significantly increased especially by the use of radiotherapy. We suggested special follow-up schema for patients after initial HL treatment suitable for daily real-world clinical practice. The system depends on gender, form of HL treatment and especially the form of radiation therapy in terms of location of radiation fields.

[Cardiovascular complications of cancers and anti-cancer therapy]. / Kardiovaskulární komplikace nádoru a jejich lécby.

In our aging population the incidence of cancer is increasing in the elderly. We are thus facing a new challenge especially considering incidence of cardiovascular diseases (CVD) in this patients population. Overall survival of cancer patients has significantly improved therefore cancer has become in many cases a chronic disease. We are about to be treating patients who either may develop a new CVD or their current CVD may deteriorate. Cancer can cause various cardiovascular conditions locally (pressure in mediastinum, effusions) or systemically (increased risk of pulmonary embolism, arrhythmias, carcinoid heart disease). Medical cancer therapy can lead to congestive heart failure (CHF) per se, by anthracycline or antiHER2 therapy direct cardiac toxicity or by number of other cardiac conditions medical treatment can cause, such as accelerated arterial hypertension due to anti-angiogenic therapy (tyrosine-kinase inhibitors, bevacizumab) or even standard chemotherapy (alkylating agents, cisplatin) or overusing steroids in cancer patients. Atrial fibrillation (AFib) also contributes to CHF development. AFib in cancer patients may develop secondary to ischaemia in anaemic patients, metabolic disorders caused by cancer or treatment, pulmonary embolism, sepsis or even as a result of direct impact of cytotoxic treatment (cisplatin, ifosfamide, gemcitabine, 5-fluorouracil, etoposide). One of major risk factors for CHF is coronary artery disease (CAD), which is a very serious late sequel of cancer therapy mainly in long time cancer survivors (testicular cancer, childhood cancer, hematologic malignancies, breast cancer). CAD may develop secondary to thoracic irradiation, dyslipidemia caused by hormonal treatment or simply as results of endothelial dysfunction caused by alkylating agents. In summary, long time cancer survivors represent a subgroup of patients at great risk of developing CVD in any form. It is crucial to mention that these patients can develop typical CVD much earlier compared to standard population and therefore require special follow-up with active surveillance.Key words: anthracycline - atrial fibrillation - cardiac toxicity - heart failure - pulmonary embolism.

Fine-scale variation in the effect of national border on COVID-19 spread: A case study of the Saxon-Czech border region.

The global extent and temporally asynchronous pattern of COVID-19 spread have repeatedly highlighted the role of international borders in the fight against the pandemic. Additionally, the deluge of high resolution, spatially referenced epidemiological data generated by the pandemic provides new opportunities to study disease transmission at heretofore inaccessible scales. Existing studies of cross-border infection fluxes, for both COVID-19 and other diseases, have largely focused on characterizing overall border effects. Here, we couple fine-scale incidence data with localized regression models to quantify spatial variation in the inhibitory effect of an international border. We take as a case study the border region between the German state of Saxony and the neighboring regions in northwestern Czechia, where municipality-level COVID-19 incidence data are available on both sides of the border. Consistent with past studies, we find an overall inhibitory effect of the border, but with a clear asymmetry, where the inhibitory effect is stronger from Saxony to Czechia than vice versa. Furthermore, we identify marked spatial variation along the border in the degree to which disease spread was inhibited. In particular, the area around Löbau in Saxony appears to have been a hotspot for cross-border disease transmission. The ability to identify infection flux hotspots along international borders may help to tailor monitoring programs and response measures to more effectively limit disease spread.

A Web-Based COVID-19 Tool for Testing Residents in Retirement Homes: Development Study.

BACKGROUND: Long-term care facilities have been widely affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. Empirical evidence demonstrated that older people are the most impacted and are at higher risk of mortality after being infected. Regularly testing care facility residents is a practical approach to detecting infections proactively. In many cases, the care staff must perform the tests on the residents while also providing essential care, which in turn causes imbalances in their working time. Once an outbreak occurs, suppressing the spread of the virus in retirement homes (RHs) is challenging because the residents are in contact with each other, and isolation measures cannot be widely enforced. Regular testing strategies, on the other hand, have been shown to effectively prevent outbreaks in RHs. However, high-frequency testing may consume substantial staff working time, which results in a trade-off between the time invested in testing and the time spent providing essential care to residents. OBJECTIVE: We developed a web application (Retirement Home Testing Optimizer) to assist RH managers in identifying effective testing schedules for residents. The outcome of the app, called the "testing strategy," is based on dividing facility residents into groups and then testing no more than 1 group per day. METHODS: We created the web application by incorporating influential factors such as the number of residents and staff, the average rate of contacts, the amount of time spent to test, and constraints on the test interval and size of groups. We developed mixed integer nonlinear programming models for balancing staff workload in long-term care facilities while minimizing the expected detection time of a probable infection inside the facility. Additionally, by leveraging symmetries in the problem, we proposed a fast and efficient local search method to find the optimal solution. RESULTS: Considering the number of residents and staff and other practical constraints of the facilities, the proposed application computes the optimal trade-off testing strategy and suggests the corresponding grouping and testing schedule for residents. The current version of the application is deployed on the server of the Where2Test project and is accessible on their website. The application is open source, and all contents are offered in English and German. We provide comprehensive instructions and guidelines for easy use and understanding of the application's functionalities. The application was launched in July 2022, and it is currently being tested in RHs in Saxony, Germany. CONCLUSIONS: Recommended testing strategies by our application are tailored to each RH and the goals set by the managers. We advise the users of the application that the proposed model and approach focus on the expected scenarios, that is, the expected risk of infection, and they do not guarantee the avoidance of worst-case scenarios.

[Cetuximab and irinotecan for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer--pilot results from Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute]. / Cetuximab a irinotekan v lécbe metastatického kolorektálního karcinomu--pilotní výsledky z Masarykova onkologického ustavu.

BACKGROUND: Combination of cetuximab and irinotecan is an efficacious second- (and further-)-line treatment-alternative in patients with EGFR-positive metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to irinotecan. In this retrospective study we present treatment results of patients treated combination of cetuximab and irinotecan in Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Results were collected on forty-seven patients who started the therapy from July 2005 to February 2008. Primary outcomes were: response rate, time to progression and overall survival. Secondary outcomes were: treatment-related toxicity and identification of any predictive and prognostic markers. P-value was based on Gehan-Wilcoxon test or chi-square test and P-values < or = 0.05 were considered significant. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: Forty-two patients were valuable for the treatment response. Objective response rate (complete and partial remission) was 35.7% (15 patients) and disease control (response and disease stabilization) was achieved in 30 patients (71.4%). The median time to progression was 6, 4 months (range 1, 5-25 months). On the date of statistical processing (median follow-up: 9, 2 months, range 2, 5-27 months) there were 26 patients alive and the median overall survival was 17, 1 months. We have confirmed correlation between the grade of the skin rush and the treatment response (p = 0.05) and time to progression ( p = 0.01), on the other hand there was no association between EGFR expression and these parameters. The therapy was also effective in 8 of 14 patients (57%), who had documented resistance to irinotecan. CONCLUSIONS: We have confirmed the efficacy of cetuximab and irinotecan combination for the therapy of patients with pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer. Our results are optimistic, but have to be validated in the course of time. The existence of nonresponding patients and by reason of pharmacoeconomy, we should give attention to the new molecular predictive and prognostic markers such as: K-ras-mutation and EGFR gene copy number.

Type II hypersensitivity reactions after oxaliplatin rechallenge can be life threatening.

BACKGROUND: Rechallenge with oxaliplatin is common in the treatment of colorectal cancer and increases the risk of a detrimental oxaliplatin-induced immune reaction. Allergic reactions to oxaliplatin may be partially avoided by desensitization protocols involving immune suppressive drugs, slow administration and gradually increasing chemotherapeutic doses. However, non-IgE-mediated immunopathologic reactions to oxaliplatin remain challenging and may be potentially life-threatening. CASE PRESENTATION: Here we report two potentially fatal cases of type II hypersensitivity to oxaliplatin in metastatic colorectal cancer patients. Both patients manifested with severe thrombocytopenia, intravascular haemolysis, and acute kidney injury 4-6 h after oxaliplatin administration in a rechallenge setting. Serology revealed that the reactive entity for immune haemolysis was an IgG oxaliplatin-induced antibody. The course of anti-cancer treatment and severe adverse event after oxaliplatin rechallenge including diagnostic dilemma and the results of detailed routine clinical chemistry and hematology testing are described. Extended immunohaematology/serology testing revealed that the oxaliplatin-induced IgG antibody was present in the circulation prior to the onset of hypersensitivity, persisted for months and elicited cross-reactivity with other platinum agents. CONCLUSION: Development of type II hypersensitivity reaction manifesting as a sudden onset of severe thrombocytopenia and immune haemolysis must be considered in patients treated with oxaliplatin, especially those on long-term therapy or when rechallenged. Step-wise diagnosis involves clinical presentation, detection of haemolysis in patient's blood and/or urine, evaluation of platelet count, and direct anti-globulin Coombs test.