Stent Graft Sizing for Endovascular Abdominal Aneurysm Repair Using Open Source Image Processing Software.

INTRODUCTION: An important step to reach a favorable outcome of abdominal endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is preoperative sizing of the stent graft using computed tomography angiography (CTA) images of the abdominal aorta. A variety of costly image processing software options is available to obtain the necessary aortic measurements. A package that can be used for EVAR sizing is OsiriX Lite®-an open source, freely downloadable image processing option. This study assesses the concurrent validity of OsiriX Lite® when compared with commercially available 3Mensio Vascular® and Siemens Syngo.via®. METHODS: CTA scans of 20 patients that underwent EVAR for abdominal aneurysm were selected, 10 elective and 10 ruptured. For each scan, 6 observers determined 20 parameters needed for proper stent graft sizing, 2 using Osirix Lite®, 3 using 3Mensio Vascular®, and 1 using Siemens Syngo.via®. For each parameter, an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and a P-value were calculated. Interrater agreement was interpreted using the Koo and Li Guidelines. Time needed to perform EVAR planning was compared. RESULTS: Overall interrater agreement between the 3 sizing options was found to be either "good" or "moderate" for 16 out of 20 parameters (80%). Time needed to perform EVAR planning was not significantly different for Osirix Lite® (568 sec) when compared with 3Mensio Vascular® (603 sec) or Siemens Syngo.via® (659 sec) with a P-value of 0.88. CONCLUSIONS: The authors conclude that Osirix Lite® is an accurate and time-effective image processing option for preoperative sizing of an EVAR stent graft when matched to 3Mensio Vascular® and Siemens Syngo.via®.

Sideways displacement of the endograft within the aneurysm sac is associated with late adverse events after endovascular aneurysm repair.

OBJECTIVE: Previous studies have shown the importance of proximal and distal endograft fixation. There is little information on the middle, unsupported section of endograft within the aneurysm sac. We quantified sideways movement of the endograft within the aneurysm sac and correlated it to late adverse events. METHODS: Patients who underwent endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair with a suprarenal or infrarenal endograft between January 1997 and December 2007 were analyzed for sideways endograft movement. Patients were included if they had a digital preoperative computed tomography angiogram (CTA), a postoperative CTA within 3 months after the index procedure, and at least one follow-up CTA thereafter with a minimal time interval of 6 months. The endograft position within the aneurysm sac was quantitated on cross-sectional images using a fixed vertebral body reference point. Patients with change in endograft position ≥5 mm were placed in the sideways displacement (SD) group and compared with patients with no displacement (ND; <5 mm change in position). The relationship between sideways endograft movement and endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR)-related complications were noted for AAA rupture, AAA-related death, conversion, secondary procedures, AAA growth (≥5 mm), proximal migration (≥10 mm), and new onset of type I or III endoleaks. RESULTS: The study included 144 patients (mean age, 76 ± 7.6 years). Mean follow-up time was 43 ± 27 months. Fifty patients (35%) had sideways endograft movement ≥5 mm during follow-up. Baseline AAA diameter was larger (SD 60 ± 9 mm vs ND 57 ± 9 mm; P < .05) and proximal and iliac endograft fixation lengths were shorter (SD 18 ± 8 mm vs ND 24 ± 11 mm; P < .05 and SD 35 ± 14 vs ND 42 ± 16 mm; P < .05) in patients with sideways endograft displacement. There was no significant difference between the groups in AAA rupture and AAA-related death (one fatal AAA rupture, ND group). SD patients had a higher surgical conversion rate (10% vs 0%; P = .002), more secondary procedures (44% vs 6%; P < .001), more AAA sac enlargement (42% vs 10%; P < .001), more endograft migration (66% vs 5%; P < .001), and more type I or III endoleaks (36% vs 3%; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Positional stability of the endograft within the aneurysm sac is critical for the long-term success of EVAR. Sideways movement of the endograft within the aneurysm sac is associated with an increased risk of late adverse events.

Painless transient paraparesis as the solitary manifestation of aortic dissection.

We present a 62-year-old man with acute and temporary paraparesis of the lower extremities as the solitary symptom of an anterior spinal artery syndrome caused by a type B aortic dissection. Ischemia of the spinal cord was confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging. Neurologic symptoms resolved completely within 6 hours and conservative treatment was successful up to 8 months follow-up. Our report illustrates that painless, transient neurologic deficit can be the only presenting symptom of acute aortic dissection and that aortic dissection should be part of the differential diagnosis of acute paraparesis.

Long-term results of Talent endografts for endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

BACKGROUND: Since the introduction of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR), long-term follow-up studies reporting single-device results are scarce. In this study, we focus on EVAR repair with the Talent stent graft (Medtronic, Santa Rosa, Calif). METHODS: Between July 2000 and December 2007, 365 patients underwent elective EVAR with a Talent device. Patient data were gathered prospectively and evaluated retrospectively. By American Society of Anesthesiologists category, 74% were categories III and IV. Postoperative computed tomography (CT) scanning was performed before discharge, at 3, 12 months, and yearly thereafter. Data are presented according to reporting standards for EVAR. RESULTS: The mean proximal aortic neck diameter was 27 mm (range, 16-36 mm), with a neck length <15 mm in 31% (data available for 193 patients). Deployment of endografts was successful in 361 of 365 patients (99%). Initially, conversion to laparotomy was necessary in four patients. Primary technical success determined by results from computed tomography (CT) scans before discharge was achieved in 333 patients (91%). Proximal type I endoleaks were present in 28 patients (8%) during follow-up, and 14 of these patients needed additional treatment for type I endoleak. The 30-day mortality for the whole Talent group was 1.1% (4 of 365). Follow-up to 84 months is reported for 24 patients. During follow-up, 122 (33%) patients died; in nine, death was abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA)-related (including 30-day mortality). Kaplan-Meier estimates revealed primary clinical success rates of 98% at 1 year, 93% at 2 years, 88% at 3 years, 79% at 4 years, 64% at 5 years, 51% at 6 years, and 48% at 7 years. Secondary interventions were performed in 73 of 365 patients (20%). Ten conversions for failed endografts were performed. Life-table yearly risk for AAA-related reintervention was 6%, yearly risk for conversion to open repair was 1.1%, yearly risk for total mortality was 8.9%, and yearly risk for AAA-related mortality was 0.8%. CONCLUSION: Initially, technical success of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) using the Talent endograft is high, with acceptable yearly risk for AAA-related mortality and conversion. However, a substantial amount of mainly endovascular reinterventions is necessary during long-term follow-up to achieve these results.

The durability of endovascular repair of para-anastomotic aneurysms after previous open aortic reconstruction.

INTRODUCTION: Anastomotic pseudoaneurysms and true para-anastomotic aneurysms after initial open abdominal aortic prosthetic reconstruction often need reintervention because they are at risk for rupture. However, open surgical reinterventions are technically challenging procedures with high mortality and morbidity rates. In the present multicenter study, we describe the long-term clinical course in an expanded number of patients who underwent endovascular repair of para-anastomotic aneurysms after previous open reconstruction. METHODS: The study included all patients who were treated with an endovascular stent graft between July 1999 and July 2009 for an aortoiliac anastomotic pseudoaneurysm or a true para-anastomotic aneurysm after previous aortic prosthetic reconstruction for aneurysmal or occlusive disease in one of the four participating centers. Main outcomes were long-term complications, reinterventions and conversion rate, mortality, and hospital length of stay. RESULTS: An endovascular stent graft was used to treat 58 patients (53 men; mean age, 71 ± 9 years), with 80 aortic or iliac pseudoaneurysms or true para-anastomotic aneurysm, or both. Bifurcated stent grafts were used in 32 patients, endovascular tube grafts in eight, aortouniiliac stent grafts in seven, and iliac extension grafts in 11. Stent graft deployment was successful in 55 patients, for a technical success rate of 95%. Median hospital admission was 3 days (range, 1-122 days). The 30-day and in-hospital mortality rates were 3.4% (n = 2) and 6.9% (n = 4), respectively. The 30-day clinical success rate was 91% (n = 53). Median follow-up was 41 months (range, 0-106 months). The cumulative and procedural-related mortality during follow-up was 19% (n = 11) and 10% (n = 6), respectively. Follow-up computed tomography angiography revealed nine endoleaks (three type I; six type II) in eight patients and endotension in two patients. The overall reintervention and conversion rate during follow-up was 26.9% (n = 15) and 6.9% (n = 4), respectively. Life-table analysis showed reduced freedom from reintervention for aortouniiliac and tube stent grafts. Type I endoleaks were observed in 25% of patients with endovascular aortic tube grafts for proximal anastomotic aneurysms. CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrates that endovascular repair of para-anastomotic aortic and iliac aneurysms after initial prosthetic aortic surgery is safe and durable in patients with an appropriate anatomy. The long-term follow-up showed fewer complications occurred after procedures with bifurcated stent grafts compared with procedures with tube grafts, aortouniiliac, or iliac extension stent grafts.

Treatment of a recurrent false aneurysm of the femoral artery by stent--graft placement from the brachial artery.

An anastomotic false aneurysm is a well known complication after femoral artery surgery. Open surgical repair is the treatment of choice for anastomotic femoral aneurysms, but this can be challenging, unsuccessful, or even impossible. Endovascular repair is an alternative in these cases, but the delivery of a stent--graft in the femoral artery can be difficult. We report the case of a patient with a recurrent left femoral artery anastomotic false aneurysm, treated twice by open exclusion, and finally excluded successfully by a stent--graft that was inserted through the left brachial artery.

Long-term follow-up of secondary interventions after endovascular aneurysm repair with the AneuRx endoprosthesis: a single-center experience.

PURPOSE: To evaluate initial and long-term results of secondary interventions after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) with an AneuRx endoprosthesis. METHODS: Between 1996 and 2003, an AneuRx device was used primarily in 212 patients (197 men; mean age 71+/-7.0 years). Sixty-two (29%) patients (58 men; mean age 73+/-7.2 years) required a secondary intervention (percutaneous, endovascular, or open repair) after EVAR and were prospectively followed after their secondary interventions. Data were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: Of the 212 AneuRx patients, 59 (28%) required secondary interventions for endoleaks (28 type Ia, 6 type Ib, 8 type II, and 17 type III) and 3 (1%) for obstruction of the endoprosthesis. The mean interval between primary EVAR and secondary intervention was 39+/-30 months. The yearly risk of requiring a secondary intervention after receiving a primary AneuRx graft was 3.7%. Overall 30-day morbidity after a secondary intervention was 18% (11/62); the 30-day mortality was 5% (3/62). Short endovascular extender cuffs were used for type Ia endoleaks in 23 of 28 patients. Over a mean follow-up of 81+/-34 months after the secondary intervention, the success of short endovascular cuffs for treatment of type Ia endoleak was 52% (12/23); the remaining 11 (48%) patients required additional reinterventions for recurrent endoleak or persistent aneurysm growth. CONCLUSION: Patients with a primary AneuRx stent-graft had an acceptable yearly risk of requiring a secondary intervention following EVAR, but 30-day morbidity and mortality rates were significant and must be taken into account during primary decision making for endovascular or open repair. Proximal extender cuffs may not be a durable treatment for type Ia endoleak.

A mycotic aneurysm of the abdominal aorta caused by Mycobacterium bovis after intravesical instillation with bacillus Calmette-Guérin.

Intravesical administration of bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG), a live attenuated strain of Mycobacterium bovis, plays an important role in adjuvant treatment of superficial bladder cancer. Severe adverse events due to this treatment are rare. Complications of varying character and severity have been described, including rare BCG-related vascular infections. In this writing, we present a case of mycotic abdominal aneurysm caused by M. bovis infection related to prior intravesical BCG instillation.

Long-term single-center results with AneuRx endografts for endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the long-term single-center results with the AneuRx stent-graft in endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair (EVAR). METHODS: Between December 1996 and August 2003, 212 patients (197 men; mean age 71.3+/-7.0 years) were treated with the AneuRx stent-graft for an infrarenal AAA. Postoperatively, patients were enrolled in a fixed surveillance protocol, and data were prospectively captured into a database. RESULTS: Graft deployment was successful in 98.6% (209/212). Thirty-day mortality was 2.4%. Median hospital stay was 4.3+/-5.5 days. Median follow-up was 52.0 months (range 1-109); only 1 patient was lost to follow-up. At 9 years, patient survival was 56% and freedom from secondary interventions was 48%. In 68% of cases, these reinterventions were needed for a fixation-related complication, and most of these complications (75%) encompassed the area of the proximal aneurysm neck. Primary clinical success was 37% at 9 years. After secondary interventions, the assisted primary clinical success improved to 73% at 9 years. Freedom from aneurysm-related death was 97% at 1 year and 90% at 9 years. CONCLUSION: As an alternative to open repair, EVAR with the AneuRx device has low perioperative mortality. Reinterventions are mostly due to fixation-related complications. While the overall mortality risk in this population was 5% per year, annual aneurysm-related death was only 1%. The focus should be on surveillance and reducing the rate of long-term complications, which might be possible with improved proximal stent-graft fixation.

Aneurysm diameter and proximal aortic neck diameter influence clinical outcome of endovascular abdominal aortic repair: a 4-year EUROSTAR experience.

Our objective was to evaluate the effect of preoperative aneurysm and aortic neck diameter on clinical outcome after infrarenal abdominal endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). Data of patients in the European Collaborators Registry on Stent-Graft Techniques for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair (EUROSTAR) registry base who underwent EVAR with Talent stent grafts were analyzed. Patient characteristics and clinical outcomes were compared among four groups defined by preoperative abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) and proximal aortic neck diameter: A, AAA < or =60 mm and neck < or =26 mm; B, AAA >60 mm and neck < or =26 mm; C, AAA < or =60 mm and neck >26 mm; and D, AAA >60 mm and neck >26 mm. Over a 7-year period, 1,317 patients underwent EVAR. Patients in groups B and D were significantly older and had a higher American Society of Anesthesiologists score compared with groups A and C (p=0.002 and 0.003, respectively). Mortality rate was highest in group D (p=0.002), as were rupture and conversion rates (p=0.015 and 0.037, respectively). This study demonstrates that patients with an AAA >60 mm and a proximal aortic neck >26 mm have worse clinical outcome after EVAR.

Endovascular repair of paraanastomotic aneurysms after previous open aortic prosthetic reconstruction.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of endovascular repair of anastomotic and true aortic and iliac aneurysms occurring after prior polyester graft repair for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) or aortoiliac obstructive disease. Between July 1999 and January 2003, 14 patients underwent endovascular treatment of aortic pseudoaneurysms (n = 6) or iliac aneurysms (2 patients with pseudoaneurysms and 6 patients with true aneurysms) occurring 4 to 18.4 years (mean, 8.8 years) after open aortic surgery. No patient had symptoms or positive parameters for infection of the original polyester graft. Eleven patients, including one patient with both a proximal anastomotic and a true iliac aneurysm, were treated with AneuRx (n = 8), Talent (n = 2), or Quantum LP (n = 1) bifurcated stent grafts. Three patients with an infrarenal anastomotic pseudoaneurysm were treated with a tube stent graft (Talent [n = 2] and AneuRx [n = 1]). Endovascular stent grafts were successfully inserted in all patients. Procedure-related complications or death was not seen. During a median follow-up of 12 months (range, 3-40) all anastomotic and/or true aneurysms treated with bifurcated stent grafts maintained excluded. However, two out of three patients, treated with a tube graft for proximal aneurysm exclusion, were converted. In both patients the tube stent graft did not migrate from the level of the renal arteries but fixation failed between the stent graft and the previous polyester graft, creating endotension in the thrombus of the aneurysm sac. In one of these patients the old anastomotic aneurysm ruptured 16 months after stent graft placement and the patient died 1 day after conversion because of mesenterial ischemia. At 1 year follow-up the second patient was converted successfully after enlargement of his anastomotic aneurysm due to similar disconnection between the stent graft and the polyester graft. From this experience with endovascular stent grafts, we conclude that these can be used successfully to exclude anastomotic or true aneurysms after open aortic surgery. Exclusion of aneurysms at the proximal anastomosis with tube stent grafts is apparently not durable because of the insecure distal fixation in polyester grafts. Endovascular repair with bifurcated stent grafts, however, seems to be effective at midterm follow-up.