Impact of Transplantation Timing on Renal Graft Survival Outcomes and Perioperative Complications.

Nighttime organ transplantation aims to decrease cold ischemia duration, yet conflicting data exists on its impact on graft function and perioperative complications. This multicenter TRANSPLANT'AFUF study including 2,854 patients, transplanted between 1 January 2011, and 31 December 2022, investigated nighttime kidney transplantation's impact (8:00 p.m.-8:00 a.m.) versus daytime (8:00 a.m.-8:00 p.m.) on surgical complications and graft survival. Overall, 2043 patients (71.6%) underwent daytime graft, while 811 (28.4%) underwent nighttime graft. No impact was observed of timing of graft surgery on graft survival with a median survival of 98 months and 132 months for daytime and nightime grafting, respectively (p = 0.1749). Moreover, no impact was observed on early surgical complications (Clavien I-II = 20.95% for DG and 20.10% for NG; Clavien III-IV-V = 15.42% for DG and 12.94% for NG; p = 0.0889) and late complications (>30 days) (Clavien I-II = 6.80% for DG and 5.67% for NG; Clavien III-IV-V = 12.78% for DG and 12.82% for NG; p = 0.2444). Noteworthy, we found a significant increase in Maastricht 3 donors' rates in nighttime transplantation (5.53% DG vs. 21.45% NG; p < 0.0001). In conclusion, nighttime kidney transplantation did not impact early/late surgical complications nor graft survival.

Photocoagulation with GREENLIGHT© laser in radiation-induced haemorrhagic cystitis: Results of a single-center series.

INTRODUCTION: Radiation-induced haemorrhagic cystitis (RIHC) is one complication of the pelvic radiotherapy. The GREENLIGHT© laser (GL) has been barely studied in the treatment of radiation cystitis. The primary objective was to evaluate the efficacy of GL in refractory RIHC patients (RRC) in a single-centre series. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-nine patients were treated by GL bladder photocoagulation (GLBP). These patients showed signs of refractory haematuria in the context of RIHC. The primary endpoint was the absence of haematuria that would require a subsequent surgical intervention. Secondary endpoints were postoperative hospitalization length of stay, the occurrence of complications according to the Clavien-Dindo classification, the occurrence of functional urinary disorders and the number of cystectomies. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 30 months, 24 (82.7%) patients had no recurrence of haematuria. No postoperative complications were reported. A disabling overactive bladder secondary to the procedure occurred in 9 patients (31.0%). Two patients needed a cystectomy at 1 and 11 months. CONCLUSION: GLBP may constitute an efficient line of treatment for RIHC. Despite overactive bladder it allowed to avoid or delay cystectomy.

Comparison of open and robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy approaches using multicentric data (UroCCR-47 study).

We compared the outcomes of robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy (RPN) and open partial nephrectomy (OPN) using contemporary data to respond to unmet clinical needs. Data from patients included in the registry who underwent partial nephrectomy between January 01, 2014 and June 30, 2017 within 20 centres of the French Network for Research on Kidney Cancer UroCCR were collected (NCT03293563). Statistical methods included adjusted multivariable analyses. Rates of peri- and post-operative transfusion, and of surgical revision, were lower in the RPN (n = 1434) than the OPN (n = 571) group (2.9% vs. 6.0%, p = 0.0012; 3.8% vs. 11.5%, p < 0.0001; 2.4% vs. 6.7%, p < 0.0001, respectively). In multivariable analyses, RPN was independently associated with fewer early post-operative complications than OPN (overall: odds-ratio [95% confidence interval, CI] = 0.48 [0.35-0.66]; severe: 0.29 [0.16-0.54], p < 0.0001 for both) and shorter hospital stays (34% [30%; 37%], p < 0.0001). RPN was also a significantly associated with a decresedrisk of post-operative acute renal failure, and new-onset chronic kidney disease at 3 and 12 months post-surgery. There were no between-group differences in oncological outcomes. In comparison with OPN, RPN was associated with improved peri- and post-operative morbidity, better functional outcomes, and shorter hospital stays. Our results support the use of RPN, even for large and complex tumours.