RESUMO
In Switzerland, tobacco smoking is a major public health problem, especially among pregnant women. Health problems encountered by pregnant women and their fetuses require specific care to assist smoking cessation. A specific consultation to support smoking cessation during pregnancy was created in May 2019 at the maternity ward of the University Hospitals of Geneva, with the support of the Fondation Privée des Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève and Carrefour addictionS/CIPRET-Genève. The creation of a network of health professionnals trained in smoking cessation is an important step to support women during their cessation process.
Le tabagisme en Suisse, et particulièrement chez la femme enceinte, est un problème majeur de santé publique. Les problèmes de santé que rencontrent les femmes enceintes et leurs fÅtus nécessitent une prise en soins spécifique pour le soutien à l'abstinence tabagique. Une consultation spécifique d'aide au sevrage tabagique durant la grossesse a été créée en mai 2019 à la maternité des HUG, avec le soutien de la Fondation privée des HUG et de Carrefour addictionS/Centre d'information pour la prévention du tabagisme de Genève. La création d'un réseau d'aide par les professionnels formés en tabacologie de base constitue une étape importante pour soutenir les femmes durant le sevrage tabagique.
Assuntos
Ginecologia/métodos , Obstetrícia/métodos , Assistência Perinatal/métodos , Complicações na Gravidez/prevenção & controle , Gestantes , Abandono do Hábito de Fumar/métodos , Prevenção do Hábito de Fumar/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Gravidez , SuíçaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To assess the acceptability and impact of anti-smoking policies in three prisons in Switzerland. METHODS: A before-after intervention study in A) an open prison for sentenced prisoners, B) a closed prison for sentenced prisoners, and C) a prison for pretrial detainees. Prisoners and staff were surveyed before (2009, n=417) and after (2010-2011, n=228) the interventions. Medical staff were trained to address tobacco dependence systematically in prisoners. In prison A, a partial smoking ban was extended. No additional protection against second-hand smoke was feasible in prisons B and C. RESULTS: In prison A, more prisoners reported receiving medical help to quit smoking in 2011 (20%) than in 2009 (4%, p=0.012). In prison A, prisoners and staff reported less exposure to second-hand smoke in 2011 than in 2009: 31% of prisoners were exposed to smoke at workplaces in 2009 vs 8% in 2011 (p=0.001); in common rooms: 43% vs 8%, (p<0.001). No changes were observed in prisons B and C. CONCLUSIONS: Reinforcement of non-smoking rules was possible in only one of the three prisons but had an impact on exposure to tobacco smoke and medical help to quit. Implementing anti-smoking policies in prisons is difficult in the absence of appropriate legislation.