Histological Analysis of the Effect of ATX-101 (Deoxycholic Acid Injection) on Subcutaneous Fat: Results From a Phase 1 Open-Label Study.

BACKGROUND: ATX-101 is approved for submental fat reduction. OBJECTIVE: To characterize the histological effect of ATX-101 injection into subcutaneous fat. METHODS: This Phase 1 open-label study enrolled 14 adults to receive injections of ATX-101 into abdominal fat at varying concentrations (0.5%, 1.0%, 2.0%, or 4.0%), volumes (0.2 or 0.4 mL), spacing (0.7, 1.0, or 1.5 cm), and time points before scheduled abdominoplasty (1, 3, 7, or 28 days). During abdominoplasty, tissue was excised and preserved for histology. RESULTS: All injection paradigms resulted in histological changes confined to the subcutaneous layer, which were more prominent at higher concentrations and independent of volume and spacing. Key features at Day 1 after injection were adipocytolysis, blood vessel injury, neutrophilic inflammation, and lysis of locally present neutrophils. At Day 3, inflammation was reduced versus Day 1, and hemorrhage and lipid lake formation (at higher concentrations) were observed. Day 7 samples exhibited prominent adipocytolysis, mild inflammation, lipid-laden macrophages in the septae, and repair of vascular injury. At Day 28, inflammation was largely resolved and prominent features were septal thickening, neovascularization, and atrophy of fat lobules. CONCLUSION: Subcutaneous injection of ATX-101 induces adipocytolysis and local inflammation with septal thickening and resolution of inflammation by 28 days after injection.

The Hyperhidrosis Disease Severity Measure-Axillary: Conceptualization and Development of Item Content.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with primary axillary hyperhidrosis (AHH) suffer from a variety of symptoms. Improved patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures are needed to better assess and categorize the severity of AHH symptoms experienced by patients because the widely used Hyperhidrosis Disease Severity Scale (HDSS) is a single-item measure that cannot capture the broad scope of disease impact. METHODS: The Hyperhidrosis Disease Severity Measure-Axillary (HDSM-Ax) was developed for determining the severity of excessive sweating in patients with primary focal AHH based on face-to-face concept elicitation interviews with 58 AHH patients, a literature review, and expert clinical input. Two waves of face-to-face cognitive interviews (n=26 and n=27) were conducted to evaluate HDSM-Ax clarity and relevance. Additional interviews (n=5) were conducted to confirm content. Adding Rasch Measurement Theory (RMT) analyses allowed for an iterative streamlined approach to documenting content validity and other cross-sectional measurement properties of the new HDSM-Ax measurement. RESULTS: The 11-item HDSM-Ax PRO scale (0-4 scale per item; 0-44 total scale) represents an AHH symptom range of 0 (no sweating) to 44 (worst possible sweating). Content validity of the HDSM-Ax was documented by showing that chronologically-grouped interviews demonstrated saturation in AHH symptom severity concepts. Cognitive debriefing interviews provided evidence that item content is complete, comprehensible, meaningful, and relevant. RMT-based exploration indicated that targeting of the HDSM-Ax was adequate, suggesting good matching between items and persons; item fit was adequate, suggesting a clinically cohesive scale; and items appeared to be stable between subgroups, thereby supporting a summary score. CONCLUSIONS: The HDSM-Ax is a well-developed measure of AHH severity based on patient-reported signs and symptoms. It is a superior measure to the HDSS and can be used in clinical research and clinical practice to quantify changes in symptom severity in response to treatment. J Drugs Dermatol. 2018;17(7):707-714.

An interrater and intrarater reliability study of 3 photographic scales for the classification of perioral aesthetic features.

BACKGROUND: Validated aesthetic rating scales for the perioral area provide objective evaluations for clinical trials and practice. OBJECTIVE: To confirm the reliability of 3 scales for evaluating dermal filler and neurotoxin treatments of the perioral area. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three lip-specific photographic scales were developed from standardized 2-dimensional images to evaluate Perioral Lines at Rest (POL), Oral Commissures (OCS), and Perioral Lines at Maximum Contraction (POLM) severity scales. Each 4-grade scale (none to severe) had 3 representative images per grade. Physician validators rated volunteers on each scale (2 rounds of live review). Volunteers provided 2 series of self-assessments. Physician and subject intrarater reliability were based on the comparison of round 1 and round 2 scores (mean weighted kappa coefficient). Other measures were physician interrater agreement (intraclass correlation) and subject/physician interrater agreement (Pearson correlation). RESULTS: Physician intrarater agreement was almost perfect or substantial (POL, 0.725; OCS, 0.789; POLM, 0.826). Overall, physician interrater agreement was almost perfect for all 3 scales and ranged from moderate to substantial by grade. Subject intrarater agreement and subject/physician interrater agreement were substantial. CONCLUSION: All scales demonstrated a high degree of intrarater and interrater reliability during the validation process. Physician concordance was good; subject ratings were reliable and comparable to physician assessments.

Natrelle saline-filled breast implants: a prospective 10-year study.

BACKGROUND: Natrelle saline-filled breast implants (Allergan, Santa Barbara, CA) are in widespread use in the United States for both breast augmentation and reconstruction. The primary safety concerns are local complications and secondary surgeries. OBJECTIVE: This study provides long-term data on complications and effectiveness. METHODS: The study began as a prospective, multicenter study of 901 augmentation subjects and 237 reconstruction subjects implanted with Natrelle saline breast implants. After completing 5 years of annual visits with physician examinations, subjects were asked to enroll in a survey-based study for follow-up through 10 years. Survey questions encompassed the major safety outcomes of implant deflation, capsular contracture, breast pain, reoperation, and implant removal/replacement as well as subject satisfaction. Safety results were analyzed with Kaplan-Meier cumulative risk rates, and subject satisfaction was measured on a 6-point scale from definitely satisfied to definitely dissatisfied. RESULTS: Of the 876 augmentation subjects and 194 reconstruction subjects who completed the 5-year study, 781 augmentation subjects (89.2%) and 170 reconstruction subjects (87.6%) consented to participate in the survey study. The survey response rate at 10 years was 91.4% for augmentation subjects and 85.9% for reconstruction subjects. Reoperation was the most frequent safety issue for both subject groups, and 90% of the implants remained intact at 10 years. Subject satisfaction was 87.5% for augmentation subjects and 86.3% for reconstruction subjects at 10 years. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the long-term safety and effectiveness of Natrelle saline breast implants. The 10 years of data amassed in the clinical study provide a solid foundation to facilitate the informed decision process.

Juvéderm injectable gel: a multicenter, double-blind, randomized study of safety and effectiveness.

BACKGROUND: A high concentration of crosslinked hyaluronic acid (HA) in a smooth, malleable formulation is the hallmark of the new Juvéderm dermal fillers. OBJECTIVE: To determine the long-term effectiveness and safety of Juvéderm Ultra and Ultra Plus injectable gel. METHODS: In the multicenter study approved by the Food and Drug Administration, subjects were randomized to treatment with Juvéderm Ultra or Ultra Plus in one nasolabial fold (NLF) and Zyplast collagen in the other. After optimal correction was achieved (treatment plus up to 2 touch-ups at 2-week intervals), effectiveness was assessed on a 5-point scale through the 6-month study period. An additional poststudy visit provided long-term effectiveness data. Safety was evaluated through subjects' daily diaries for 14 days after treatment. RESULTS: A total of 292 subjects were randomized and treated, 146 in each cohort. A total of 280 subjects completed the 6-month study, and 227 attended the poststudy visit. Clinically significant mean wrinkle correction (>or= 1 point improvement) was still in evidence at >9 months for both Juvéderm formulations but not for the Zyplast control. At >9 months, 75% of Juvéderm Ultra- and 81% of Juvéderm Ultra Plus-treated NLFs maintained a clinically significant correction. Moreover, 78% of NLFs treated with Juvéderm Ultra Plus still had a clinically significant improvement beyond 1 year. Local treatment site reactions were comparable for Juvéderm and Zyplast. CONCLUSIONS: These next-generation HA dermal fillers can be reliably expected to provide long-term correction, with Juvéderm Ultra lasting more than 9 months and Juvéderm Ultra Plus lasting for a year or more.

Comparison of smooth-gel hyaluronic acid dermal fillers with cross-linked bovine collagen: a multicenter, double-masked, randomized, within-subject study.

BACKGROUND: A new family of next-generation non-animal hyaluronic acid (HA) dermal fillers was approved by the FDA in June 2006. Compared with other HA fillers available in the United States at the time of writing, these new fillers have a higher concentration of HA, higher concentration of cross-linked HA, and a smooth consistency--which should promote long-lasting corrections and a smooth, natural look and feel postinjection. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to compare the effectiveness and safety of these smooth-gel HA dermal fillers with bovine collagen for nasolabial fold (NLF) correction. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 439 subjects with moderate or severe NLFs received one of three types of smooth-gel HA dermal filler (in one NLF) and cross-linked bovine collagen (in the other NLF) and were evaluated for or=6 months. Up to 88% of subjects preferred the HA dermal fillers over bovine collagen. All fillers were similarly well tolerated. CONCLUSION: The smooth-gel HA dermal fillers offer longer-lasting correction than bovine collagen-which may lessen the frequency that repeat treatments are needed. Also, they were preferred by the vast majority of subjects-which should promote patient satisfaction.

Microscopy analysis of breast implant rupture caused by surgical instrument damage.

BACKGROUND: The mechanism of breast implant rupture has continued to be an important topic throughout the plastic surgery community and regulatory agencies, such as the US Food and Drug Administration. Retrieved ruptured implants returned to Allergan (Santa Barbara, CA; formerly Inamed Corporation) for analysis exhibit various modes of failure, which can include a small pinhole (approximately 1 to 2 mm in size) in the shell, a ruptured shell, or a severely fragmented shell. OBJECTIVE: The failure mechanisms and associated morphologic features for the modes of implant failure can be quite different. The objective of this study is to analyze and describe the rupture characteristics of silicone gel-filled implants that failed because of surgical instrument damage. METHODS: There are several types of diagnostic techniques available to analyze ruptured implants. Visual inspection, physical examination, and photographic analysis provided an overall description of the implant shape and gross features of the shell failure region. These techniques allowed categorization and documentation of the mode of failure and were quite useful as a supplemental tool in the diagnosis of implant failure mechanisms. Microscopy techniques provided details of the ruptured shell region and could be used to determine the cause of breast implant failure. This study involved the use of optical microscopy and scanning electron microscopy in the analysis of ruptured breast implants. RESULTS: Details of the geometry of ruptured shell regions are described. Illustrations are also presented in which 35-mm photography is used to assist in substantiating the cause of failure. Many of the ruptured regions exhibit striations across the thickness of the shell. Micrographs are presented that clearly show that the striations are due to lines in the cutting surface of the surgical instrument that were formed during the manufacturing process. CONCLUSIONS: This article demonstrates that, with the proper background and experience in analyzing ruptured breast implant shells, the features at the failure site can be correctly interpreted and the corresponding failure mechanisms can be diagnosed. Breast implants are subject to surgical instrument damage during implantation, and this damage can develop into a shell rupture, with the failure mode identifiable via microscopy analysis.

Morphology of breast implant fold flaw failure.

The percent of modern silicone gel breast implants that fail due to shell rupture is quite low, amounting to less than 1% per year. Nonetheless, extensive retrieval and analysis studies are being conducted on failed devices returned to Allergan Medical (formerly Inamed Corporation) in order to determine the modes and causes of failure. With the modes and causes known, solutions can be implemented to eliminate the failure mechanisms. Analyses conducted thus far have demonstrated that there are several causes of breast implant failure. The focus of this paper is on one type of silicone gel breast implant failure, i.e., a failure associated with a fold or wrinkle, which is termed "fold flaw failure." Although fold flaw failure is not a dominant mode of failure for silicone gel breast implants, its failure characteristics must be understood in order for this type of shell rupture to be detected and eventually eliminated. In this study, optical microscopy and scanning electron microscopy are used to describe the morphology of fold flaw failure for explanted silicone gel breast implants with smooth shells. The microscopy analysis demonstrates that there are several different types of shell failure patterns that can be produced by a fold or wrinkle in a silicone gel breast implant.

A multicenter, randomized, double-blind trial of tazarotene 0.1% cream in the treatment of photodamage.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies indicate that tazarotene is efficacious in reducing signs of photodamage. Objective We sought to confirm the efficacy and tolerability of tazarotene 0.1% cream in the treatment of facial photodamage. METHODS: A total of 568 patients with at least moderate fine wrinkling or mottled hyperpigmentation applied tazarotene 0.1% cream or vehicle cream to their face once daily for 24 weeks. RESULTS: Tazarotene cream was significantly more effective than vehicle in reducing fine wrinkles, mottled hyperpigmentation, lentigines, irregular depigmentation, apparent pore size, elastosis, tactile roughness, and an overall integrated assessment of photodamage. Significance was achieved as early as week 2 for some parameters and had not plateaued by week 24. The majority of patients reported improvements in their photodamage as early as week 4. Adverse events were predominantly mild or moderate signs or symptoms of skin irritation. CONCLUSION: Once-daily tazarotene 0.1% cream is effective in ameliorating multiple signs of facial photodamage.

Tazarotene does not affect the pharmacokinetics and efficacy of a norethindrone/ethinylestradiol oral contraceptive.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interaction between oral tazarotene and an oral contraceptive containing norethindrone 1mg and ethinylestradiol 0.035 mg (Ortho-Novum 1/35). DESIGN: Two separate open-label, parallel-group, single-centre, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interaction studies. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: Twenty-seven healthy women (age 20-55 years) completed Study I, with a duration of 64 days during three consecutive menstrual cycles. Ortho-Novum 1/35 was taken once daily from study day 0 (first cycle day 1) to day 61 (third cycle day 6), and oral tazarotene 1.1 mg was coadministered daily from study day 34 (second cycle day 7) to day 61. Twenty-nine healthy women (age 20-44 years) completed Study II, with a duration of 75 days during three consecutive menstrual cycles. Ortho-Novum 1/35 was taken once daily from study day 0 (first cycle day 1) to day 74 (third cycle day 19), and oral tazarotene 6 mg was coadministered daily from study day 48 (second cycle day 21) to day 74. In both studies, the pharmacokinetics of tazarotenic acid on study day 61 (third cycle day 6) were evaluated from plasma tazarotenic acid concentrations. Pharmacokinetic parameters of plasma norethindrone and ethinylestradiol were compared before and after tazarotene administration (cycle day 6 of the second and third cycles, respectively). Serum luteinising hormone (LH) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) concentrations were compared before and after tazarotene administration (cycle days 2, 4 and 6 of the second and third cycles, respectively). In Study II, serum progesterone concentrations were also determined on cycle days 18 and 20 of the second and third cycles. Tazarotenic acid was determined by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Ethinylestradiol and norethindrone were determined by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. LH and FSH were assayed by microparticle enzyme immunoassay in Study I and by double-antibody radioimmunoassay in Study II. Progesterone was determined by solid-phase radioimmunoassay. RESULTS: In Study I (tazarotene 1.1 mg), the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from zero to 24 hours (AUC24) and the peak concentration in plasma (Cmax) for tazarotenic acid were 121 +/- 27 microg. h/L and 28.9 +/- 9.4 microg/L (mean +/- SD), respectively. In Study II (tazarotene 6 mg), AUC24 and Cmax for tazarotenic acid were 379 +/- 78 microg. h/L and 111 +/- 37 microg/L (mean +/- SD), respectively. In both studies, for both norethindrone and ethinylestradiol, the 90% CIs of AUC24 and Cmax on cycle day 6 before and after tazarotene administration were within the 80-125% boundary. In Study I, the 90% CIs of serum FSH and LH concentrations on cycle day 4 were within the 80-125% boundary. FSH and LH concentrations on cycle day 6 were marginally/partially outside the 80-125% boundary as a result of high variability. However, the mean FSH and LH serum concentrations on cycle day 6 of the third cycle were lower than those of the second cycle. In Study II, the 90% CIs of serum FSH, LH and progesterone concentrations were all within the 80-125% boundary, except for LH on cycle day 2. LH concentrations on cycle day 2 were marginally/partially outside the 80-125% boundary as a result of high variability. However, the mean serum LH concentration on cycle day 2 of the third cycle was lower than that of the second cycle. CONCLUSIONS: Oral tazarotene up to 6 mg once daily does not affect the pharmacokinetics and efficacy of Ortho-Novum 1/35.

Effects of tazarotene 0.1 % cream in the treatment of facial acne vulgaris: pooled results from two multicenter, double-blind, randomized, vehicle-controlled, parallel-group trials.

BACKGROUND: Topical retinoids are one of the most effective classes of topical drugs used to treat acne vulgaris. The effects of the gel formulation of the topical retinoid tazarotene have been widely reported, but few data on the cream formulation are available. OBJECTIVE: The primary aim of the 2 studies reported in this article was to determine the effects of tazarotene 0.1 % cream in patients with facial acne vulgaris. METHODS: Two randomized, double-blind, parallel-group studies were performed. The first was conducted at 14 investigational sites across the United States, and the second took place at 15 sites, with 5 of these providing blood samples for analysis of tazarotenic acid. In both studies, patients aged > or =12 years with facial acne vulgaris were randomized to receive tazarotene or vehicle cream QD for 12 weeks. Lesion counts (noninflammatory, inflammatory, and total) and overall clinical and global assessments were made at weeks 0 (baseline), 4, 8, and 12. Adverse events (AEs) were monitored throughout the study In one of the studies, therapeutic drug monitoring was performed at weeks 4 and 8 in members of the study population who gave consent for blood withdrawal. RESULTS: Eight hundred forty-seven patients were enrolled in the 2 studies (430 males, 417 females; mean age,19 years; age range, 11-52 years [1 patient was entered into the study at age 11 years, in violation of the protocol]). At 12 weeks, the median percentage changes from baseline in all 3 lesion counts were significantly lower with tazarotene than with vehicle (all, P < 0.001), as were the overall clinical and global responses (both, P < 0.001). Treatment-related AEs whose incidence was higher with tazarotene than with vehicle included desquamation, dry skin, erythema, a burning sensation on the skin, and skin irritation (all, P < 0.001) and pruritus (P < 0.01); most (83%-98%) were mild or moderate. Systemic exposure to tazarotenic acid was limited (mean, <0.1 ng/mL) and did not increase with time. CONCLUSIONS: In these 2 studies in adolescent and adult patients with facial acne vulgaris, tazarotene 0.1%cream QD for 12 weeks was effective and well tolerated. Systemic exposure to tazarotenic acid was limited.

Efficacy of 0.1% tazarotene cream for the treatment of photodamage: a 12-month multicenter, randomized trial.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy and safety of 0.1% tazarotene cream for the treatment of photodamage. DESIGN: A 24-week multicenter, double-blind, randomized, vehicle-controlled intervention study followed by a 28-week open-label extension. SETTING: Ambulatory patients in private and institutional practice. PATIENTS: Of 563 patients with facial photodamage, 91% and 86% completed the double-blind and open-label phases, respectively. In the double-blind phase, 20 of 283 tazarotene-treated patients and 1 of 280 vehicle-treated patients discontinued treatment owing to adverse events. INTERVENTION: Once-daily application of 0.1% tazarotene cream or nonmedicated vehicle cream to the face for 24 weeks. Then, all continuing patients received treatment with 0.1% tazarotene cream for another 28 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primarily, fine wrinkling and mottled hyperpigmentation. Also, lentigines, elastosis, pore size, irregular depigmentation, tactile roughness, coarse wrinkling, telangiectasia, actinic keratoses, overall integrated assessment of photodamage, global response to treatment, patients' overall assessment of photodamage, and plasma levels of tazarotenic acid. RESULTS: Compared with the vehicle, at week 24 tazarotene resulted in a significantly greater incidence of patients achieving treatment success (>or=50% global improvement) and at least a 1-grade improvement in fine wrinkling, mottled hyperpigmentation, lentigines, elastosis, pore size, irregular depigmentation, tactile roughness, coarse wrinkling, and the overall integrated assessment of photodamage (P<.01). Additional clinical improvement occurred with continued tazarotene treatment and had not plateaued by week 52. Plasma tazarotenic acid concentrations did not exceed 0.71 ng/mL. CONCLUSIONS: Once-daily applications of 0.1% tazarotene cream significantly reduced multiple signs of photodamage. Plasma levels of tazarotenic acid remained below those of endogenous retinoids.

Inamed silicone breast implant core study results at 6 years.

BACKGROUND: Silicone gel-filled breast implants were developed in 1962 but did not fall under the auspices of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration until 1976 and were not classified as class III devices until 1988. This set the stage for a series of Food and Drug Administration advisory panel meetings and a moratorium on the sale of these implants from 1992 until 2006, when sufficient clinical data were presented to demonstrate their safety. METHODS: This study was conducted under the rigorous framework of a Food and Drug Administration-approved investigational device exemption to document the safety and effectiveness of Inamed silicone-filled breast implants through 10 years. Of 940 female subjects, approximately half were augmentation subjects, one-quarter were reconstruction subjects, and one-quarter were revision subjects. Follow-up visits were conducted at 0 to 4 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, and annually thereafter. Approximately one-third of subjects also underwent biennial magnetic resonance imaging evaluation to detect silent rupture. Primary statistical analyses used the Kaplan-Meier product limit method. RESULTS: Data through 6 years are currently available from the 10-year study, with patient follow-up rates for that visit ranging from 78 to 92 percent per cohort. As expected, the most common local complication in all cohorts was capsular contracture, occurring in 15 to 20 percent of subjects. The by-implant rupture rate was 3.5 percent overall at 6 years. Satisfaction with implants was uniformly high throughout the study period, with 6-year rates of 95 percent for augmentation subjects and 94 percent for reconstruction subjects. CONCLUSION: Study results demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of Inamed silicone-filled breast implants through 6 years, including a low rupture rate and high satisfaction rate.

The safety of silicone gel-filled breast implants: a review of the epidemiologic evidence.

Few implantable medical devices have been studied for their safety more extensively than silicone gel-filled breast implants. We summarize the epidemiologic evidence on the safety of breast implants, most of which is drawn from large cohort studies with long-term follow-up. The topics addressed in this report include cancer, breast cancer detection, connective tissue disease, suicide, offspring effects, neurologic disease, implant rupture, and local perioperative complications and additional surgery. We conclude that the weight of the epidemiologic evidence does not support a causal association between breast implants and breast or any other type of cancer, definite or atypical connective tissue disease, adverse offspring effects, or neurologic disease. Women with breast implants do not present with more advanced stages of breast cancer or suffer impaired survival after breast cancer diagnosis. The only study to examine an actual incidence rate of breast implant rupture reported rupture-free survival of 98% at 5 years and 83%-85% at 10 years for newer "third-generation" implants. Future studies are needed to determine whether the consistently observed excess of suicide among women with implants reflects underlying psychiatric illness prior to breast augmentation surgery or other factors.

Style 410 cohesive silicone breast implants: safety and effectiveness at 5 to 9 years after implantation.

BACKGROUND: Inamed introduced a fourth-generation implant, the Style 410 cohesive silicone breast implant, in 1993. To date, little has been published on this implant despite its widespread use in Europe, and no data are available on its long-term rupture rate. METHODS: Women implanted with Style 410 implants between 1995 and 1999 at Akademikliniken Hospital in Stockholm were eligible to participate in the study. One hundred forty-four of 302 potential subjects received a physical examination, underwent magnetic resonance imaging screening for silent rupture, and completed a quality-of-life survey. The majority of subjects were Caucasian (96 percent), with a median age of 39 years. The study population consisted of subjects with cosmetic augmentation (86 percent) or revision of previous breast implantation (14 percent). Median time elapsed between physical examination and magnetic resonance imaging was 2 days. RESULTS: The 144 subjects provided 286 implants for magnetic resonance imaging assessment, with a median implantation time of 6 years (range, 5 to 9 years). Overall, 99.0 percent of implants showed no evidence of rupture, 0.3 percent showed evidence of rupture, and 0.7 percent were indeterminate. The most common complication noted at physical examination was capsular contracture (5.6 percent). All other complications occurred in less than 3 percent of subjects. Quality-of-life results found an improvement in overall sense of well-being for 87 percent of subjects. Most compelling is that 97 percent stated an overall feeling that their breast implantation had been advantageous. CONCLUSIONS: The authors' findings support the long-term safety and effectiveness of Inamed Style 410 cohesive breast implants and demonstrate a low prevalence of rupture.

Prevalence of rupture in inamed silicone breast implants.

BACKGROUND: Silicone breast implants have been used for decades and are arguably the most studied implantable device. However, the vast body of scientific literature has been unable to establish a definitive rupture rate. Various studies have evaluated implant rupture, but the meaningfulness of these data was confounded by the inclusion of different generations of implants and multiple manufacturers' implants and the selection of subjects who were already suspected of having ruptured implants. The authors' study was designed to acquire long-term rupture data specific to Inamed's third-generation silicone breast implants using magnetic resonance imaging technology. METHODS: A total of 106 women with at least one Inamed silicone breast implant (styles 40, 110, and 120) were enrolled in this multicenter, cross-sectional study. The majority received implants for cosmetic augmentation (n = 77, 72.6 percent), with a smaller number having undergone breast reconstruction (n = 11, 10.4 percent) or revision of previous breast implant operations (n = 18, 17.0 percent). Most subjects were Caucasian (n = 99, 93.4 percent) with a median age at implantation of 34 years (range, 18 to 70 years). Enrolled subjects underwent a physical examination and magnetic resonance imaging screening at one of five sites to determine the prevalence of asymptomatic rupture. RESULTS: A total of 199 implants were evaluated, with a median implantation time of 10.9 years (range, 9.5 to 13.2 years). Overall, 183 implants (92.0 percent) showed no evidence of rupture, 12 (6.0 percent) showed evidence of rupture, and four (2.0 percent) were indeterminate. All indeterminate evaluations were considered ruptures, providing a worst-case rupture prevalence of 8.0 percent. CONCLUSION: The study results establish a rupture prevalence rate of 8.0 percent at 11 years for Inamed's silicone breast implants.

Tazarotene cream in the treatment of psoriasis: Two multicenter, double-blind, randomized, vehicle-controlled studies of the safety and efficacy of tazarotene creams 0.05% and 0.1% applied once daily for 12 weeks.

BACKGROUND: Tazarotene in a gel formulation is widely used in the treatment of psoriasis. OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy and safety of tazarotene 0.1% and 0.05% creams in the treatment of psoriasis. METHODS: A total of 1303 patients participated in 2 clinical trials. Patients applied tazarotene creams 0.1% and 0.05% or vehicle once daily to all psoriatic lesions for 12 weeks followed by a 12-week posttreatment period. RESULTS: Both creams were significantly more effective than vehicle on the basis of an overall assessment of psoriasis, a global response to treatment, and reduction in plaque elevation and scaling. Therapeutic effect was maintained during the posttreatment period. Common adverse events included signs and symptoms of skin irritation. CONCLUSION: Tazarotene creams were associated with significant reductions in the severity of the clinical signs of psoriasis and were found to be safe with acceptable tolerability. Tazarotene cream 0.1% was generally more effective, although slightly less well tolerated, than the 0.05% cream.