Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Cancer Med ; 13(1): e6897, 2024 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38164654

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Among high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT), those with positive minimal residual disease (MRD) are susceptible to poor outcomes. Therefore, it is necessary to determine the most suitable preparatory regimen for these patients. METHODS: Data were analyzed from 141 patients who received allo-HSCT and were diagnosed with high-risk ALL. These patients underwent intensified conditioning regimens, including either total marrow and lymphoid irradiation (TMLI)-etoposide (VP16)-cyclophosphamide (CY) or busulfan (BU)-VP16-CY between October 2016 and November 2022. A total of 141 individuals were in complete remission (CR) before transplantation and, among all patients, 90 individuals exhibited a negative MRD status and 51 patients had a positive MRD status. RESULTS: In patients who tested negative for MRD, the incidence of relapse within a 2-year timeframe was 25.0% (24.8%-25.5%), compared with 32.2% (31.2%-33.2%) in MRD-positive patients; however, this difference was not statistically significant. There were no significant differences in the 2-year disease-free survival (DFS) and 2-year overall survival (OS) rates between the MRD-negative and MRD-positive groups (DFS: 67.2% (57.9%-78.1%) vs. 55.5% (42.6%-72.3%); OS: 69.0% (61.9%-88.2%) vs. 66.7% (53.9%-82.5%)). Furthermore, no notable variations were observed in the occurrence of transplant-related mortality (TRM) and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) across the two groups. CONCLUSION: This study reveals the benefits of TMLI-VP16-CY and BU-VP16-CY conditioning regimens in high-risk ALL patients with CR and MRD-positive status. A large-scale prospective clinical trial is warranted in the future.


Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Bussulfano , Ciclofosfamida , Etoposídeo , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Neoplasia Residual , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras , Indução de Remissão , Condicionamento Pré-Transplante , Humanos , Feminino , Masculino , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras/terapia , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras/mortalidade , Ciclofosfamida/administração & dosagem , Ciclofosfamida/uso terapêutico , Etoposídeo/administração & dosagem , Etoposídeo/uso terapêutico , Bussulfano/administração & dosagem , Bussulfano/uso terapêutico , Condicionamento Pré-Transplante/métodos , Adulto , Adolescente , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/métodos , Adulto Jovem , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Criança , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Pré-Escolar , Transplante Homólogo , Resposta Patológica Completa
3.
Front Biosci (Landmark Ed) ; 29(6): 216, 2024 Jun 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38940040

RESUMO

The treatment options for multiple myeloma (MM) have undergone significant transformation with the advent of immunotherapy. Novel therapies that focus on tumor antigens now drive advances in MM research. Bispecific antibodies (bsAbs) leverage revolutionary advances in bioengineering techniques and embody the second generation of antibody-based tumor therapy. Recent studies on bsAbs in relapsed/refractory MM cases have revealed remarkable efficacy and acceptable safety profiles. The approval of elranatamab and teclistamab represents the next step in the development of bsAbs for the treatment of MM. This review article addresses the antigen targeting, efficacy, safety, and strategies in the application of bsAbs against treatment-resistant MM, with a focus on clinical trials and real-world data.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Biespecíficos , Mieloma Múltiplo , Mieloma Múltiplo/imunologia , Mieloma Múltiplo/terapia , Anticorpos Biespecíficos/uso terapêutico , Anticorpos Biespecíficos/imunologia , Humanos , Imunoterapia/métodos , Antígenos de Neoplasias/imunologia , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/uso terapêutico , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/imunologia , Antineoplásicos Imunológicos/uso terapêutico , Antineoplásicos Imunológicos/imunologia
4.
MedComm (2020) ; 5(7): e619, 2024 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38938286

RESUMO

Studies on the associations of blood pressure (BP) and the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) had been performed neither among pregnant women nor in Chinese population. This study included participants of pregnant women from a retrospective multicenter cohort, between May 2020 and April 2023. Systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) of the participants were measured in the third trimester. The incidences of VTE (including deep venous thrombosis and/or pulmonary embolism) at 42 days postpartum were followed. With regards to SBP, pregnant women in the Q1 (≤114 mmHg), Q2 (115-122 mmHg), and Q4 group (≥131 mmHg) had increased risk of VTE than those in Q3 group (123-130 mmHg), with ORs 4.48 [1.69, 11.85], 3.52 [1.30, 9.59], and 3.17 [1.12, 8.99], respectively. Compared with pregnant women with the Q4 of DBP (≥85 mmHg), women of Q1 (≤71 mmHg) were found to have elevated risk of VTE (OR 2.73 [1.25, 5.96]). A one standard deviation decrease of DBP (9 mmHg) was related with 37% elevated risk of VTE (OR 1.37 [1.05, 1.79]). This study demonstrated a U-shaped association of SBP in the third trimester and VTE postpartum and inverse association of DBP in the third trimester and VTE postpartum.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA