Clinic and Emergency Room Evaluation and Testing of Headache.

BACKGROUND: Evaluation of the headache patient in the outpatient clinic and emergency department (ED) has different focuses and goals. The focus of this paper is to review the evaluation of patients in both settings with mention of evaluation in the pediatric and pregnant patient population. The patient's history should drive the practitioner's decision and evaluation choices. We review recommendations made by the American Board of Internal Medicine and American Headache Society through the Choosing Wisely Campaign, which has an emphasis on choosing the right imaging modality for the clinical situation and elimination/prevention of medication overuse headache, as well as the US Headache Consortium guidelines for migraine headache. We will also review focusing on ED evaluation of the pediatric patient and pregnant patient presenting with headache. CONCLUSION: At the end of the review we hope to have provided you with a framework to think about the headache patient and what is the appropriate test in the given clinical setting in order to ensure that the patient gets the right diagnosis and is set on a path to the appropriate management plan.

Evidence-based symptomatic treatment of migraine.

Symptomatic treatment of migraine includes patient education, mainly to avoid medication overuse and known trigger factors, as well as pharmaceutical and nonpharmaceutical interventions. Disease-specific and mechanism-based agents include ergotamine and dihydroergotamine targeting the adrenergic, dopaminergic, and serotoninergic systems followed by triptans, specific agonists for 5-HT1B/1D/1F receptors, the latest being more favorable in terms of safety and documentation of efficacy. Recently, antagonists of calcitonin gene-related peptide (gepants) and selective agonists of the 5-HT1F receptor (ditans) have been added, with promising efficacy and safety. Triptans stay as the first option treatment when attacks are moderate to severe, followed by nonspecific agents, including aspirin and paracetamol/acetaminophen and nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs, ibuprofen and naproxen share the best documentation) for mild-to-moderate migraine attacks. Combinations with caffeine are effective as well, but barbiturates and opioids alone or in combinations should be avoided. Simple analgesics and NSAIDs attenuate cephalic pain via prostaglandin mediated mechanisms and may induce peptic, renal and hepatic adverse effects. Neuromodulation techniques include single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (s-TMS), external trigeminal nerve stimulation (e-TNS), remote electrical neuromodulation (REN) and noninvasive vagus nerve stimulation (nVNS). All share good documentation and safety profile and are worthy of alternative treatment options along with physical therapy when medicines are contradicted or not well tolerated or unwanted by the patients.

Ictal adiponectin levels in episodic migraineurs: a randomized pilot trial.

OBJECTIVE: To assess ictal adiponectin (ADP) levels before and after acute abortive treatment in women episodic migraineurs. METHODS: Peripheral blood specimens were collected from women episodic migraineurs before and after acute abortive treatment with sumatriptan/naproxen sodium vs placebo. Univariate and multivariate models were utilized to examine the relationship between serum total ADP (T-ADP), ADP oligomers (high molecular weight [HMW], middle molecular weight, and low molecular weight [LMW]-ADP), and ADP ratio levels and pain severity. Paired t-tests and random intercept longitudinal models were utilized to assess the mean changes in T-ADP, ADP oligomers, and ratios over time in treatment responders and nonresponders. RESULTS: Twenty participants (11 responders, 9 nonresponders) have been studied to date. In all participants, increases in the HMW : LMW ADP ratio were associated with an increase in pain severity. For every 1 point increase in the HMW : LMW ratio, pain severity increased by 0.22 (Confidence Interval [CI]: 0.07, 0.37; P = .004). In contrast, for every 0.25 µg/mL increase in LMW-ADP, pain severity decreased by 0.20 (CI: -0.41, -0.002; P = .047). In treatment responders, T-ADP levels were reduced at 30 minutes (12.52 ± 3.4; P = .03), 60 minutes (12.32 ± 3.2; P = .017), and 120 minutes (12.65 ± 3.2; P = .016) after treatment as compared with onset (13.48 ± 3.8). Additionally, in responders, the HMW : LMW ratio level was greater at pain onset (3.70 ± 1.9 µg/mL) as compared with nonresponders (2.29 ± 0.71 µg/mL), P = .050. Responders also showed a decrease in the HMW : LMW ratio at 60 minutes (2.37 ± 1.1; P = .002) and 120 minutes (2.76 ± 1.4; P = .02) after treatment as compared with onset (3.70 ± 1.9). These changes in responders remained significant after adjusting for covariates, including measured body mass index (m-BMI). Although nonresponders showed no significant changes in unadjusted T-ADP or ADP oligomer or ratio levels, the HMW : LMW ratio was increased in nonresponders after adjustments (P = .025). CONCLUSION: In this pilot study of women episodic migraineurs, the HMW : LMW ADP ratio level was associated with migraine severity and predictive of acute treatment response. ADP and the HMW : LMW ratio of ADP represent potential novel biomarkers and drug targets for episodic migraine.

Dangerous and thunderclap headaches.

The International Classification of Headache Disorders-II considers dangerous and thunderclap headaches as secondary headaches--in other words due to an underlying cause. Many, but not all of the underlying etiologies, are vascular disorders, and many are potentially life threatening. An especially comprehensive clinical approach is necessary when seeing patients with these potential disorders.

Psychosocial factors of relevance to sex and gender studies in headache.

Sex and gender differences in humans are being increasingly recognized not only in experimental pain paradigms but also clinically. Women experience various chronic pain conditions such as headache more than men and evidence differences in pain threshold and pain tolerance experimentally. In addition to biological underpinnings, psychosocial factors such as gender and social role expectations, coping strategies, and affective variables likely contribute to observed sex- and gender-related differences in headache. The present narrative reviews and summarizes extant literature pertaining to these psychosocial factors. Gender and social role expectations and coping styles differ between men and women who experience headache and pain, in turn affecting differences in responding to pain. Epidemiologic findings that women have higher rates of headache-related disability and psychiatric comorbidity have not been replicated regularly among treatment-seeking headache samples. Awareness of these differences may stimulate further research and enhance therapeutic opportunities for headache patients.

Sex matters: evaluating sex and gender in migraine and headache research.

Significant sex differences exist in migraine and other headache disorders. Several hypotheses have been proposed to explain these differences, including fluctuations in sex hormones and receptor binding, genetic factors, differences in exposure to environmental stressors, as well as differences in response to stress and pain perception; but how valid are some of these findings and can we improve the quality of research in this field? It is notable that the preponderance of animal pain studies use male subjects to study a predominantly female disorder. Furthermore, with respect to headache and migraine sex differences, limited data have been derived from animal models. Additionally, although sex differences (based on the categorization of male vs female) may be more routinely evaluated in clinical headache research than in the basic science research, greater attention to potential differences across the life cycle of women (ie, premenopausal vs postmenopausal differences) and menstrual cycle is warranted. In this manuscript we define the differences between "sex" and "gender" and highlight the importance of their application and use in headache research. The enhanced recognition and implementation of attention to sex differences throughout the hormonal and life-cycle phase in both human and animal research will only help to strengthen and further our understanding of migraine and may help guide the direction of future headache research.