A phase 2 study of weekly temsirolimus and bortezomib for relapsed or refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma: A Wisconsin Oncology Network study.

BACKGROUND: Proteasome inhibitors and mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors each have activity in various B-cell malignancies and affect distinct cellular pathways. Their combination has demonstrated synergy in vitro and in mouse models. METHODS: The authors conducted a single-arm, phase 2 trial of combined temsirolimus and bortezomib in patients with relapsed and refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) using a dosing scheme that was previously tested in multiple myeloma. The patients received bortezomib and temsirolimus weekly on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of a 35-day cycle. RESULTS: Of 39 patients who received treatment, 3 achieved a complete response (7.7%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.6%-21%), and 9 had a partial response (PR) (23%; 95% CI, 11%-39%). Thus, the overall response rate (12 of 39 patients) was 31% (95% CI, 17%-48%), and the median progression-free survival was 4.7 months (95% CI, 2.1-7.8 months; 2 months for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma [n = 18], 7.5 months for those with mantle cell lymphoma [n = 7], and 16.5 months for those with follicular lymphoma [n = 9]). Two extensively treated patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma achieved a complete response. There were no unexpected toxicities from the combination. CONCLUSIONS: The current results demonstrate that the combination of a mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor and a proteasome inhibitor is safe and has activity in patients with heavily pretreated B-cell NHL. Further studies with this combination are warranted in specific subtypes of NHL.

Do prophylactic anticonvulsants in patients with brain tumors decrease the incidence of seizures?

The well-done systematic review included a moderate number of patients from randomized controlled trials with an objective diagnosis of a brain tumor. There were mild differences between the 5 studies used in the systematic review with patients in 3 of the studies undergoing surgical resection or debulking of their disease. There was no evidence of seizure prevention overall or in the subgroup analysis. Given the small number of patients in each subgroup, these results should be interpreted with caution. Known adverse effects with anticonvulsant therapy include severe rash (including Stevens-Johnson syndrome), hematologic effects, and drug-drug interactions. Therefore, we should be hesitant to place patients on these medications without a proven benefit. The relatively small number of patients in this meta-analysis means that larger scale studies could show a small clinical benefit from anticonvulsants.