Opioid Prescribing Risk Factors in Nonoperative Ankle Fractures: The Impact of a Prospective Clinical Decision Support Intervention.

Opioids are frequently used for acute pain management of musculoskeletal injuries, which can lead to misuse and abuse. This study aimed to identify the opioid prescribing rate for ankle fractures treated nonoperatively in the ambulatory and emergency department setting across a single healthcare system and to identify patients considered at high risk for abuse, misuse, or diversion of prescription opioids that received an opioid. A retrospective cohort study was performed at a large healthcare system. The case list included nonoperatively treated emergency department, urgent care and outpatient clinic visits for ankle fracture and was merged with the Prescription Reporting With Immediate Medication Mapping (PRIMUM) database to identify encounters with prescription for opioids. Descriptive statistics characterize patient demographics, treatment location and prescriber type. Rates of prescribing among subgroups were calculated. There were 1,324 patient encounters identified, of which, 630 (47.6%) received a prescription opioid. The majority of patients were 18-64 years old (60.3%). Patients within this age range were more likely to receive an opioid prescription compared to other age groups (p < .0001). Patients treated in the emergency department were significantly more likely to receive an opioid medication (68.3%) compared to patients treated at urgent care (33.7%) or in the ambulatory setting (16.4%) (p < .0001). Utilizing the PRIMUM tool, 14.2% of prescriptions were provided to patients with at least one risk factor. Despite the recent emphasis on opioid stewardship, 14.2% of patients with risk factors for misuse, abuse, or diversion received opioid analgesics in this study, identifying an area of improvement for prescribers.

Opioid Prescribing and Patient Satisfaction Scores Across Practice Types.

US physicians prescribe opioids at a high rate relative to other countries. Of the US physicians surveyed, almost half report having prescribed an inappropriate opioid due to concerns about patient satisfaction scores. We investigated patterns in controlled substance prescribing practices, patient risk factors, and associated Press Ganey patient satisfaction scores at a sample of orthopaedic surgery and primary care clinics over a 6month time period. Primary care practices had higher proportions of prescriptions, and patient risk profiles varied across sites. However, overall satisfaction was high, with little variation between sites (78.3 81.3%). Satisfaction with pain control was lower and more varied (67.1 78.0%). A total of 4,229 Press Ganey survey responses were received, including 7,232 comments, of which only 10 (0.1%) expressed frustration for not receiving opioids. Opioid prescriptions had minimal association with Press Ganey scores among varied practices and patient populations. Prescribers should prescribe opioids appropriately without fear that this will negatively impact their satisfaction scores. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 29(1):59, 2020).

Opioid Prescribing in the Pediatric Orthopaedic Trauma Population.

The purpose of this article is to describe opioid prescribing patterns for children with orthopaedic injuries. A retrospective chart review was conducted on pediatric orthopaedic trauma patients (n = 124) who were discharged from the hospital or emergency department or had a clinic visit during a 1-month period. Patient demographics, prescription specifics, injury details, and fracture fixation information were collected. Results show that most children received opioids after injury (82.3%). While children undergoing operative fixation typically received opioids, only 39.5% with closed reduction did. Hydrocodone- acetaminophen accounted for 93% of prescriptions, but adolescents were more likely to receive other drugs. There was a significant trend of increasing daily dosage with increased age; 36.73% of adolescents received > 50 morphine milligram equivalents per day. Children with orthopaedic injuries are typically prescribed opioids; older children more commonly receive higher dosages. Further study is needed to define prescribing trends across facility and specialty types to aid in development of standardized prescribing guidelines. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 27(4):269-273, 2018).

Prevalence of Prescription Opioids for Nonoperative Treatment of Rotator Cuff Disease Is High.

PURPOSE: To quantify the prevalence of opioid and benzodiazepine prescriptions for patients with rotator cuff disease across a large health care system and to describe evidence-based risk factors for opioid use within this population. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study at a major health care system of all patients with qualifying diagnostic codes. Emergency department, urgent care, and outpatient encounters between January and December 2016 for an acute rotator cuff tear, listed as the primary diagnosis, were included. Encounters with prescriptions for opioids or benzodiazepines were identified using the Prescription Reporting With Immediate Medication Utilization Mapping (PRIMUM) system. Descriptive statistics and the rate of controlled-substance prescribing were calculated for the population as a whole and among subgroups. RESULTS: We identified 9,376 encounters meeting the inclusion criteria. Of these encounters, 1,559 (16.6%) resulted in 1 or more prescriptions for an opioid or benzodiazepine that were issued during the visit. A total of 2,007 opioid and/or benzodiazepine prescriptions were issued for the 1,559 encounters (rate of 1.29 prescriptions per prescribing encounter). This represented 5,310 patients, of whom 1,096 (20.6%) received a prescription for an opioid or benzodiazepine during at least 1 of their encounters. Of patients who received a prescription, 20.9% had at least 1 risk factor for prescription misuse; 3.6% of patients had more than 1 risk factor. There were no demographic differences between patients with risk factors and patients without them. CONCLUSIONS: The prescribing of opioids for the treatment of pain in patients with rotator cuff disease remains high across multiple locations and specialties within a large health care system. Using alternative pain management pathways as primary prevention for opioid misuse and abuse in high opioid-prescribing locations-and especially for patients identified as having a high risk of opioid misuse-is an important practice to continue in our shift away from opioid use as a health care system. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, case series.

Prescribing of Opioids and Benzodiazepines Among Patients With History of Overdose.

OBJECTIVES: Addiction and overdose related to prescription drugs continues to be a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States. We aimed to characterize the prescribing of opioids and benzodiazepines to patients who had previously presented with an opioid or benzodiazepine overdose. METHODS: This was a retrospective chart review of patients who were prescribed an opioid or benzodiazepine in a 1-month time-period in 2015 (May) and had a previous presentation for opioid or benzodiazepine overdose at a large healthcare system. RESULTS: We identified 60,129 prescribing encounters for opioids and/or benzodiazepines, 543 of which involved a patient with a previous opioid or benzodiazepine overdose. There were 404 unique patients in this cohort, with 97 having more than 1 visit including a prescription opioid and/or benzodiazepine. A majority of prescriptions (54.1%) were to patients with an overdose within the 2 years of the documented prescribing encounter. Prescribing in the outpatient clinical setting represented half (49.9%) of encounters, whereas emergency department prescribing was responsible for nearly a third (31.5%). CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, prescribing of opioids and benzodiazepines occurs across multiple locations in a large health care system to patients with a previous overdose. Risk factors, such as previous overdose should be highlighted through clinical decision support tools in the medical record to help prescribers identify patients at higher risk and to mobilize resources for this patient population. Prescribers need further education on factors that place their patients at risk for opioid use disorder and on alternative therapies to opioids and benzodiazepines.

Implementation of a statewide system for coronary reperfusion for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

CONTEXT: Despite 2 decades of evidence demonstrating benefits from prompt coronary reperfusion, registries continue to show that many patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) are treated too slowly or not at all. OBJECTIVE: To establish a statewide system for reperfusion, as exists for trauma care, to overcome systematic barriers. DESIGN AND SETTING: A quality improvement study that examined the change in speed and rate of coronary reperfusion after system implementation in 5 regions in North Carolina involving 65 hospitals and associated emergency medical systems (10 percutaneous coronary intervention [PCI] hospitals and 55 non-PCI hospitals). PATIENTS: A total of 1164 patients with STEMI (579 preintervention and 585 postintervention) eligible for reperfusion were treated at PCI hospitals (median age 61 years, 31% women, 4% Killip class III or IV). A total of 925 patients with STEMI (518 preintervention and 407 postintervention) were treated at non-PCI hospitals (median age 62 years, 32% women, 4% Killip class III or IV). INTERVENTIONS: Early diagnosis and the most expedient coronary reperfusion method at each point of care: emergency medical systems, emergency department, catheterization laboratory, and transfer. Within 5 regions, PCI hospitals agreed to provide single-call catheterization laboratory activation by emergency medical personnel, accept patients regardless of bed availability, and improve STEMI care for the entire region regardless of hospital affiliation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Reperfusion times and rates 3 months before (July to September 2005) and 3 months after (January to March 2007) a year-long implementation. RESULTS: Median reperfusion times significantly improved according to first door-to-device (presenting to PCI hospital 85 to 74 minutes, P < .001; transferred to PCI hospital 165 to 128 minutes, P < .001), door-to-needle in non-PCI hospitals (35 to 29 minutes, P = .002), and door-in to door-out for patients transferred from non-PCI hospitals (120 to 71 minutes, P < .001). Nonreperfusion rates were unchanged (15%) in non-PCI hospitals and decreased from 23% to 11% in the PCI hospitals. For patients presenting to or transferred to PCI hospitals, clinical outcomes including death, cardiac arrest, and cardiogenic shock did not significantly change following the intervention. CONCLUSIONS: A statewide program focused on regional systems for reperfusion for STEMI can significantly improve quality of care. Further research is needed to ensure that programs that result in improved application of reperfusion treatments will lead to reductions in mortality and morbidity from STEMI.