Immediate versus modified release hydrocortisone in mitotane-treated patients with adrenocortical cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Mitotane induces hepatic CYP3A4 activity, resulting in accelerated cortisol inactivation, and also increases cortisol binding globulin (CBG). Therefore, higher hydrocortisone doses are required in patients with adrenocortical cancer (ACC) on mitotane treatment. Modified release hydrocortisone has not been used in mitotane-treated ACC patients yet. AIM: Case series to compare serum cortisol, calculated free serum cortisol and ACTH levels in ACC patients on mitotane treatment with immediate and modified release hydrocortisone. DESIGN: Pharmacokinetics of immediate and modified release hydrocortisone, each administered at a dose of 40-20-0 mg, in nine patients with ACC and adjuvant mitotane treatment. For comparison, ten patients with secondary adrenal insufficiency (SAI) on three different hydrocortisone regimens and ten healthy males were included. METHODS: Serum cortisol and plasma ACTH were measured by chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay, and CBG by RIA, followed by calculation of free cortisol. RESULTS: Calculated free serum cortisol levels after 40 mg immediate release hydrocortisone in ACC patients (46 ± 14 nmol/l) were similar to those after 10 mg immediate release hydrocortisone intake in men with SAI (64 ± 16 nmol/l) or to the physiological morning free cortisol levels in healthy subjects (31 ± 5 nmol/l). Compared to immediate release hydrocortisone, free cortisol levels after 40 mg modified release hydrocortisone in ACC patients were significantly lower (12 ± 3 nmol/l; P = 0·03) resulting in a generally lower AUC (98 ± 21 vs 149 ± 37 nmol h/l; P = 0·02). CONCLUSIONS: 40-20-0 mg immediate release, but not modified release hydrocortisone, resulted in sufficient glucocorticoid coverage in patients with ACC receiving mitotane treatment. The use of equivalent doses of modified release hydrocortisone preparation should be avoided in patients on mitotane treatment.

Post-saline infusion test aldosterone levels indicate severity and outcome in primary aldosteronism.

OBJECTIVE: The saline infusion test (SIT) is widely used as a confirmatory test for primary aldosteronism (PA). SIT results are judged as follows: post-test aldosterone levels <50 ng/l exclude PA, whereas levels >50 ng/l confirm PA. We hypothesized that post-SIT aldosterone concentrations indicate the severity of PA and might predict outcome. DESIGN: The study includes 256 PA patients of the German Conn's Registry who prospectively underwent SIT. The data of 126 patients with complete follow-up of 1.2±0.3 years after diagnosis were analyzed. The patients were divided into two groups with post-SIT aldosterone levels of 50-100 ng/l (group 1; n=38) and of >100 ng/l (group 2; n=88). RESULTS: Patients in group 2 had a significantly shorter duration of hypertension (7.5 vs 11.7 years (median), P=0.014), higher systolic blood pressure (BP; 151±16 vs 143±17 mmHg, P=0.036), lower serum potassium (3.3±0.6 vs 3.5±0.4 mmol/l, P=0.006), higher 24-h urine protein excretion (7.4 vs 5.4 mg/dl (median), P=0.012), and were more often female (P=0.038). They showed more often unilateral disease (P<0.005) with larger tumors (14±10 vs 7±10 mm, P=0.021), underwent more often adrenalectomy (75% vs 37%, P<0.005), required a lower number of antihypertensive drugs after adrenalectomy (1.2±1.2 vs 2.5±1.4, P=0.001), had a faster normalization of urinary protein excretion (with medical treatment P=0.049; with Adx P<0.005) at follow-up, and more frequently underlying well-characterized mutation (P=0.047). CONCLUSIONS: PA patients with post-SIT aldosterone levels of >100 ng/l have a more rapid development of PA caused more frequently by unilateral disease with larger aldosterone-producing adenomas. However, this group of patients may have a significantly better outcome following specific treatment.

Intranasal loteprednol etabonate in healthy male subjects: pharmacokinetics and effects on endogenous cortisol.

Loteprednol etabonate (LE) is a glucocorticoid soft drug that is currently in development for intranasal use. The main objectives of this study were to examine the pharmacokinetics and potential effects on systemic cortisol of two intranasal suspension formulations of LE and to compare these findings with placebo and fluticasone propionate (FP, Flonase) control treatments. In this randomized, double-blind (except for FP), parallel-group study (n = 8/group), all subjects received for 14 days once daily in the morning two puffs of the following nasal spray formulations into each nostril: LE 0.1% (400 microg/day), LE 0.2% (800 microg/day), FP 0.05% (200 microg/day), and placebo. Drug trough levels were determined on days 1, 5, 12, 13, and 14, and a full pharmacokinetic profile was established on day 14, and 24-hour serum cortisol profiles were assessed prior to treatment (i.e., at baseline) and after the last dose. All subjects completed the protocol without treatment-emergent adverse findings. All formulations were rapidly absorbed (t(max) less than 1 h). The rather short mean terminal half-lives of 2.2 +/- 1.5 hours and 1.8 +/- 1.0 hours for LE 400 microg and LE 800 microg, respectively, and 4.2 +/- 1.8 hours for the 200-microg FP treatment explained the lack of any accumulation. Mean peak concentrations (C(max)) were 139 +/- 57 pg/mL with LE 400 microg and 164 +/- 54 pg/mL with LE 800 microg and thus fairly independent from dose. The 200-microg FP treatment resulted in a C(max) of only 15.5 +/- 5.9 pg/mL. Mean measured AUC(0-t) values (193 +/- 87 pg/h/mL(-1), 300 +/- 183 pg/h/mL(-1), and 40 +/- 34 pg/h/mL(-1) for LE 400 microg, LE 800 microg, and FP 200 microg, respectively) showed high variability and suggested nonlinear pharmacokinetics for the LE formulations, indicative of a less complete systemic uptake of LE from the 0.2% concentration. None of the treatments (LE 400 microg, LE 800 microg, and FP 200 microg) showed evidence for serum cortisol suppression when compared with placebo, respectively. The uptake and systemic exposure appears less complete from the 0.2% LE concentration, which principally favors this formulation for further clinical development.

Therapeutic equivalence of epoetin zeta and alfa, administered subcutaneously, for maintenance treatment of renal anemia.

INTRODUCTION: The primary objective of the trial was to prove the therapeutic equivalence of epoetin zeta to epoetin alfa when administered subcutaneously for maintaining target hemoglobin (Hb) in patients with renal anemia on chronic hemodialysis. Additional information was provided on the safety and tolerability of epoetin zeta with particular focus on the formation of anti-erythropoietin antibodies. METHODS: A total of 462 patients were randomized to either epoetin zeta or alfa for 28 weeks after an open period of dose adjustment of 12-16 weeks with only epoetin zeta. The aim of treatment was to maintain Hb between 10.0-12.0 g/dL with constant epoetin dosage. Primary endpoints were the mean Hb level and the mean weekly epoetin dosage during the last 4 weeks of treatment. Safety endpoints were the occurrence of anti-erythropoietin antibodies, incidence of Hb levels above 13 g/dL, ratings of tolerability, and adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: The mean Hb level (+/-SD) during the last 4 weeks of treatment was 10.94+/-0.84 g/dL (epoetin zeta) and 11.02+/-0.94 g/dL (epoetin alfa). The 95% confidence interval (CI) (''C0.28 g/dL to 0.12 g/dL) was entirely within the predefined equivalence range (+/-0.5 g/dL). The mean weekly epoetin dosage per body weight over the last 4 weeks of treatment was 97.0+/-94.3 IU/kg/week (epoetin zeta) and 86.0+/-78.0 IU/kg/week (epoetin alfa). The 95% CI (''C8.06 IU/kg/week to 29.96 IU/kg/week) was also within the predefined equivalence range of +/-45 IU/kg/week. The most common AEs were infections and infestations (15.1% of patients on epoetin zeta and 14.8% of patients on epoetin alfa). None of the patients developed anti-erythropoietin antibodies. CONCLUSIONS: Epoetin zeta, administered subcutaneously, is equivalent to epoetin alfa in respect of its clinical efficacy. The safety profile of both products is similar: no unexpected AEs were observed, no patients developed anti-erythropoietin antibodies, and both epoetin preparations were well tolerated.

Long-term safety and tolerability of epoetin zeta, administered intravenously, for maintenance treatment of renal anemia.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this trial was to gather data on the long-term safety of a new erythropoietin preparation (epoetin zeta), focusing on the formation of anti-erythropoietin antibodies, when administered intravenously for maintenance of target hemoglobin concentration in anemic patients with end-stage renal failure receiving chronic hemodialysis. In addition, we aimed to provide information on the efficacy of epoetin zeta under open, noncontrolled conditions. METHODS: Patients received epoetin zeta intravenously, 1-3 times/week for 56 weeks (overall patient group, n=745) or 108 weeks (Bulgarian subgroup, n=164). The aim of treatment was to maintain hemoglobin values between 10.5 and 12.5 g/dL with constant epoetin dosage. Primary (safety) endpoints were the occurrence of anti-erythropoietin antibodies and the evaluation of adverse events (AEs). Secondary (efficacy) endpoints included the mean weekly dose of epoetin per kg of body weight and mean hemoglobin concentrations. RESULTS: No patients developed neutralizing anti-erythropoietin antibodies. The most commonly reported AEs were infections and infestations (34.1%); followed by injury, poisoning, and procedural complications (25.8%); and gastrointestinal disorders (21.9%); 37.3% of patients reported serious AEs. The hemoglobin values remained stable, with mean values after 56 weeks of 11.3-11.6 g/dL for the overall group and 11.1-11.6 g/dL for the Bulgarian subgroup. The dosage of epoetin zeta was stable throughout the course of the trial. No cases of lack of (or loss of ) efficacy were observed in the course of the trial. CONCLUSIONS: The evaluation of the primary endpoints provided data supporting the intravenous administration of epoetin zeta in patients with chronic renal failure. Neutralizing antibodies against erythropoietin were not detected, and there were no reports of patients with increasing erythropoietin resistance. Our results suggest that intravenous administration of epoetin zeta is effective regarding its ability to maintain stabilized hemoglobin levels within the target range of 10.5-12.5 g/dL.

Evaluation of the pharmacokinetics of two recombinant human erythropoietin preparations: epoetin zeta and epoetin alfa. 1st Communication: A monocentric, open, randomized, single dose, two-period crossover trial in healthy volunteers.

The pharmacokinetic properties of a new recombinant erythropoietin preparation (epoetin zeta, CAS 604802-70-2) compared to a reference product (epoetin alfa, CAS 113427-24-0) were analyzed after a single intravenous bolus injection of 10,000 IU in a two-period crossover design in 24 healthy volunteers. Peripheral venous blood samples were obtained pre-dose, and 0:05, 0:20, 0:40, 1:00, 1:20, 1:40, 2:00, 3:00, 4:00, 6:00, 8:00, 12:00, 24:00, 36:00, 48:00, and 72:00 hours post dosing. Samples of 24 volunteers were analyzed by means of a specific immunoassay (ELISA). Three volunteers were excluded from statistical analysis due to a paravasal injection in one of both study periods with resulting low plasma levels of epoetin. Comparison of both preparations showed nearly identical pharmacokinetic properties after intravenous administration. The usual bioequivalence limits were fulfilled for all relevant pharmacokinetic parameters.

Evaluation of the pharmacokinetics of two recombinant human erythropoietin preparations: epoetin zeta and epoetin alfa. 2nd Communication: A monocentric, double-blind, randomized, single dose, three-period crossover trial in healthy volunteers.

The subcutaneous bioavailability of a new recombinant erythropoietin preparation (epoetin zeta, CAS 604802-70-2) and the pharmacokinetic properties of this drug compared to a reference product (epoetin alfa, CAS 113427-24-0) were analyzed after a single intravenous bolus injection or subcutaneous injection of 10,000 IU in a three-period crossover design in 48 healthy volunteers. Peripheral venous blood samples were obtained pre-dose, and 0:05, 0:20, 0:40, 1:00, 1:20, 1:40, 2:00, 3:00, 4:00, 6:00, 8:00, 12:00, 24:00, 36:00, 48:00, and 72:00 h post dosing. Samples from 48 volunteers were analyzed by means of a specific immunoassay (ELISA). The systemic bioavailability of epoetin zeta after subcutaneous administration is approximately 24%. Comparison of both preparations showed nearly identical pharmacokinetic properties after subcutaneous administration. The usual bioequivalence limits were fulfilled for all relevant pharmacokinetic parameters.