RESUMO
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Patient education is critical in ensuring patient compliance and good health outcomes. Fellows must be able to effectively communicate with their patients, delivering enough information for the patient to understand their medical problem and maximize patient compliance. We created an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) with 4 liver disease cases to assess fellows' knowledge and ability to inform standardized patients (SPs) about their clinical condition. METHODS: We developed 4 cases highlighting different aspects of liver disease and created a 4-station OSCE: hepatitis B, acute hepatitis C, new diagnosis of cirrhosis, and an end-stage cirrhotic nontransplant candidate. The SP with hepatitis B was minimizing the fact that she could not read English. The acute hepatitis C SP was a nursing student who is afraid that having hepatitis C might jeopardize her career. The SP with the new diagnosis of alcoholic cirrhosis needed to stop drinking, and the end-stage liver disease patient had to grapple with his advanced directives. Twelve fellows from 4 GI training programs participated. Our focus was to assess the fellows' knowledge about liver diseases and the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education competencies of health literacy, shared decision making, advanced directives, and goals of care. The goal for the fellows was to communicate effectively with the SPs, and acknowledge that each patient had an emotionally charged issue to overcome. The SPs used a checklist to rate fellows' performance. Faculty and the SPs observed the cases and provided feedback. The fellows were surveyed on their performance regarding the case. RESULTS: The majority of fellows were able to successfully summarize findings and discuss a plan with the patient in the new diagnosis of cirrhosis (76.92%) and hepatitis C case (100%), but were less successful in the hepatitis B case (30.77%) and the end-of-life case (41.67%). Overall, a small percentage of fellows reflected that they did a good job (22%-33%), except at the end-of-life case (67%). The fellows' greatest challenge was trying to cover a lot of information in a single outpatient visit. CONCLUSIONS: Caring for patients with liver diseases can be complex and time consuming. The patients and fellows' observations were discordant in several areas: for example, the fellows believed they excelled in the end-of-life case, but the SP thought only a small percentage of fellows were able to successfully summarize and discuss the plan. This discrepancy and others highlight important areas of focus in training programs. OSCEs are important to help the fellows facilitate striking the right balance of information delivery and empathy, and this will lead to better patient education, compliance, rapport, and satisfaction.
Assuntos
Comunicação em Saúde , Hepatopatias/diagnóstico , Hepatopatias/terapia , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto , Competência Profissional , Relações Profissional-Paciente , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , GravidezRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education has described 6 core competencies with which trainees should demonstrate proficiency. Using the Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE), we aimed to assess 4 of these competencies among Pediatric Gastrointestinal (GI) fellows (PGs). METHODS: Eight first-year PGs from 6 medical centers in the New York area participated in a 4-station OSCE with trained standardized patient (SP) actors. The cases included an emergency department (ED) consult, or "ED Consult" for lower gastrointestinal bleeding; "Breaking Bad News" focusing on CF nutritional complications; "Second Opinion" for abdominal pain; "Transition of Care" for inflammatory bowel disease. At each station, attending faculty observed the encounters behind a 1-way mirror. SPs and faculties provided immediate feedback to the examined fellows. Previously validated OSCE checklists were used to assess performance. On completion, fellows attended debriefing sessions and completed surveys about the educational value. RESULTS: Median overall milestone competency scores were 6.9 (PC1), 4.8 (PC2), 5.9 (MK1), 5.7 (MK2), 6.4 (ICS1), 6.9 (Prof1), and 6.7 (Prof3). Overall, fellows score highest (7/9) on the inflammatory bowel disease "Transition of Care" case, found the "Breaking Bad News" Cystic Fibrosis OSCE to be the most challenging, and were most comfortable with the "ED Consult" OSCE, as a commonly encountered scenario. Overall, the fellows rated the educational value of the program highly. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, although the OSCE has been validated in other medical fields, this is the first OSCE program developed for PGs fellows. These OSCEs have included Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education competencies, serving to assess fellows' skills in these areas while exposing them to challenging medical and psychosocial cases that they may not frequently encounter.
Assuntos
Competência Clínica , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina , Bolsas de Estudo , Gastroenterologia/educação , Pediatria/educação , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Lista de Checagem , Competência Clínica/estatística & dados numéricos , Docentes de Medicina , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feedback Formativo , Humanos , New York , Simulação de Paciente , Projetos PilotoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Bariatric procedures are safe and effective treatments for obesity, inducing rapid and sustained loss of excess body weight. Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) is unique among bariatric interventions in that it is a reversible procedure in which normal gastrointestinal anatomy is maintained. Knowledge regarding how LAGB effects change at the metabolite level is limited. OBJECTIVES: To delineate the impact of LAGB on fasting and postprandial metabolite responses using targeted metabolomics. SETTING: Individuals undergoing LAGB at NYU Langone Medical Center were recruited for a prospective cohort study. METHODS: We prospectively analyzed serum samples from 18 subjects at baseline and 2 months after LAGB under fasting conditions and after a 1-hour mixed meal challenge. Plasma samples were analyzed on a reverse-phase liquid chromatography time-of-flight mass spectrometry metabolomics platform. The main outcome measure was their serum metabolite profile. RESULTS: We quantitatively detected over 4,000 metabolites and lipids. Metabolite levels were altered in response to surgical and prandial stimuli, and metabolites within the same biochemical class tended to behave similarly in response to either stimulus. Plasma levels of lipid species and ketone bodies were statistically decreased after surgery whereas amino acid levels were affected more by prandial status than surgical condition. CONCLUSIONS: Changes in lipid species and ketone bodies postoperatively suggest improvements in the rate and efficiency of fatty acid oxidation and glucose handling after LAGB. Further investigation is necessary to understand how these findings relate to surgical response, including long term weight maintenance, and obesity-related comorbidities such as dysglycemia and cardiovascular disease.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: The American Gastroenterological Association fellowship curriculum identifies geriatric components for gastroenterology (GI) training; however, few tools are available for this purpose. Using an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE), we aimed to assess ACGME competencies of communication, professionalism, and geriatric-specific patient care among GI fellows. METHODS: We developed an informed-consent case involving a geriatric patient who needs surveillance colonoscopy. We used a validated faculty skills checklist to rate fellows across three competency domains. Fifteen fellows from four GI training programs participated. RESULTS: Although the fellows excelled at communication and professionalism, only 51% excelled at geriatric-specific patient-care skills. Fellows were least likely to demonstrate collaboration with the patient, to assess patient understanding, and to explain the limits of the test. Communication and geriatric-specific skills were correlated. CONCLUSIONS: OSCEs are a feasible method for assessing geriatric-related ACGME competencies for fellows. The results highlight the need for curriculum development.
Assuntos
Competência Clínica , Gastroenterologia , Geriatria , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido , Idoso , Lista de Checagem , Comunicação , Humanos , Relações Médico-PacienteRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Gastroenterology (GI) training programs are mandated to teach fellows interpersonal communication and professionalism as basic competencies. We sought to assess important skill sets used by our fellows but not formally observed or measured: handoffs, telephone management, and note writing. We designed an Observed Standardized Clinical Examination (OSCE) form and provided the faculty with checklists to rate fellows' performance on specific criteria. METHODS: We created two new scenarios: a handoff between a tired overnight senior fellow on call and a more junior fellow, and a telephone management case of an ulcerative colitis flare. Fellows wrote a progress notes documenting the encounters. To add educational value, we gave the participants references about handoff communication. Four OSCE stations-handoff communication, telephone management, informed consent, and delivering bad news-were completed by fellows and observed by faculty. RESULTS: Eight faculty members and eight fellows from four GI training programs participated. All the fellows agreed that handoffs can be important learning opportunities and can be improved if they are structured, and that handoff skills can improve with practice. CONCLUSIONS: OSCEs can serve as practicums for assessing complex skill sets such as handoff communication and telephone management.
Assuntos
Comunicação , Bolsas de Estudo , Gastroenterologia/educação , Relações Interprofissionais , Competência Profissional/normas , Telefone , Doença Aguda , Adulto , Neoplasias do Colo/diagnóstico , Colonoscopia , Docentes de Medicina/normas , Bolsas de Estudo/métodos , Bolsas de Estudo/normas , Bolsas de Estudo/tendências , Feminino , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal , Geriatria/educação , Humanos , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais , Masculino , Cidade de Nova Iorque , Melhoria de Qualidade , Revelação da VerdadeRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Gastroenterology (GI) training programs must develop the teaching skills of their faculty and provide feedback to their fellows. Many faculty feel uncomfortable offering feedback or identifying specific areas for improvement to the fellows. We developed an Observed Structured Clinical Exam (OSCE) to assess fellows' skills and provided faculty with specific criteria to rate the fellows' performance. We propose that OSCEs can serve as tools for faculty development in delivering effective feedback. METHODS: Faculty completed a Web-based training module and received written guidelines on giving feedback. Four OSCE stations were completed by each fellow with faculty using standardized checklists to assess the fellows' skills. Afterwards, faculty rated each program component and assessed their comfort level with feedback. RESULTS: Eight faculty members and 10 fellows from 5 GI training programs in NYC participated. 100% of the faculty agreed that feedback is an important learning tool, should include the learner's self-assessment, and that feedback skills could improve with practice. Compared to faculty skills prior to the program, 87.5% of the faculty agreed that they focused more on specific behaviors and 75% agreed that giving negative feedback was now easier. CONCLUSIONS: OSCEs can serve as practicums for faculty development in giving constructive feedback.
Assuntos
Educação Baseada em Competências/organização & administração , Currículo , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina/organização & administração , Avaliação Educacional/métodos , Retroalimentação , Gastroenterologia/educação , Comunicação , Instrução por Computador , Docentes de Medicina/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Internet , Masculino , Desenvolvimento de Programas , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de SaúdeRESUMO
BACKGROUND: System based practice (SBP) milestones require trainees to effectively navigate the larger health care system for optimal patient care. In gastroenterology training programs, the assessment of SBP is difficult due to high volume, high acuity inpatient care, as well as inconsistent direct supervision. Nevertheless, structured assessment is required for training programs. We hypothesized that objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) would be an effective tool for assessment of SBP. AIM: To develop a novel method for SBP milestone assessment of gastroenterology fellows using the OSCE. METHODS: For this observational study, we created 4 OSCE stations: Counseling an impaired colleague, handoff after overnight call, a feeding tube placement discussion, and giving feedback to a medical student on a progress note. Twenty-six first year fellows from 7 programs participated. All fellows encountered identical case presentations. Checklists were completed by trained standardized patients who interacted with each fellow participant. A report with individual and composite scores was generated and forwarded to program directors to utilize in formative assessment. Fellows also received immediate feedback from a faculty observer and completed a post-session program evaluation survey. RESULTS: Survey response rate was 100%. The average composite score across SBP milestones for all cases were 6.22 (SBP1), 4.34 (SBP2), 3.35 (SBP3), and 6.42 (SBP4) out of 9. The lowest composite score was in SBP 3, which asks fellows to advocate for cost effective care. This highest score was in patient care 2, which asks fellows to develop comprehensive management plans. Discrepancies were identified between the fellows' perceived performance in their self-assessments and Standardized Patient checklist evaluations for each case. Eighty-seven percent of fellows agreed that OSCEs are an important component of their clinical training, and 83% stated that the cases were similar to actual clinical encounters. All participating fellows stated that the immediate feedback was "very useful." One hundred percent of the fellows stated they would incorporate OSCE learning into their clinical practice. CONCLUSION: OSCEs may be used for standardized evaluation of SBP milestones. Trainees scored lower on SBP milestones than other more concrete milestones. Training programs should consider OSCEs for assessment of SBP.
Assuntos
Competência Clínica/normas , Avaliação Educacional/métodos , Gastroenterologia/educação , Internato e Residência/métodos , Modelos Educacionais , Lista de Checagem , Competência Clínica/estatística & dados numéricos , Avaliação Educacional/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos de Viabilidade , Gastroenterologia/normas , Gastroenterologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Internato e Residência/normas , Internato e Residência/estatística & dados numéricos , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Inquéritos e Questionários/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
BACKGROUND AIMS: Objective structured clinical encounters (OSCEs) are used widely to educate and assess the competence of medical students and residents; they generally are absent from fellowship training. The Accreditation Council for Graduate Education has cited OSCEs as a best practice for assessing the 6 core competencies. This article reports on the use of an OSCE to assess the competence of second-year gastroenterology fellows in the difficult-to-assess core competencies: interpersonal and communication skills and professionalism. METHODS: We developed a 4-station, faculty-observed OSCE with 4 standardized patients. Information gathering, relationship development, patient education, and counseling skills were assessed. Professionalism skills assessed included obtaining informed consent, delivering bad news, managing difficult situations, and showing interdisciplinary respect. In each station, faculty and standardized patients completed an 18- to 24-item checklist evaluating fellows' performance and provided feedback to the fellows. Nine fellows and 5 faculty from 4 gastroenterology training programs in NYC participated. RESULTS: Fellows and faculty generally highly rated the realism of the OSCE and favorably rated the OSCE for its difficulty and their overall experience. Across all cases, fellows were rated as receiving "well dones" for 56.4% of the communication items (SD, 18.3%) and for 79.1% of the professionalism items (SD, 16.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Integrating OSCEs into gastroenterology fellowship training may help enhance communication skills and prepare fellows for dealing with difficult clinical situations and provides mechanisms for constructive feedback. OSCEs developed collaboratively can assist in program self-evaluation and reduce costs by sharing resources, in addition to fulfilling Accreditation Council for Graduate Education mandates.
Assuntos
Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina/métodos , Gastroenterologia/educação , Competência Profissional/estatística & dados numéricos , Avaliação Educacional/métodos , HumanosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: We hypothesized that laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) reduces weight and modulates ghrelin production, but largely spares gastrointestinal endocrine function. To examine this hypothesis, we determined plasma concentrations of appetite-control, insulinotropic, and digestive hormones in relation to LAGB. METHODS: Twenty-four patients undergoing LAGB were prospectively enrolled. Body mass index (BMI) was measured and blood samples obtained at baseline and 6 and 12 months post-surgery. Plasma concentrations of leptin, acylated and total ghrelin, pancreatic polypeptide (PP), insulin, glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide (GIP), active glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), gastrin, and pepsinogens I and II were measured using enzyme-linked immunoassays. RESULTS: Median percent excess weight loss (%EWL) over 12 months was 45.7% with median BMI decreasing from 43.2 at baseline to 33.8 at 12 months post-surgery (p < 0.001). Median leptin levels decreased from 19.7 ng/ml at baseline to 6.9 ng/ml at 12 months post-surgery (p < 0.001). In contrast, plasma levels of acylated and total ghrelin, PP, insulin, GIP, GLP-1, gastrin, and pepsinogen I did not change in relation to surgery (p > 0.05). Pepsinogen II levels were significantly lower 6 months after LAGB but returned to baseline levels by 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: LAGB yielded substantial %EWL and a proportional decrease in plasma leptin. Our results support the hypothesis that LAGB works in part by suppressing the rise in ghrelin that normally accompanies weight loss. Unchanged concentrations of insulinotropic and digestive hormones suggest that gastrointestinal endocrine function is largely maintained in the long term.
Assuntos
Hormônios Gastrointestinais/sangue , Gastroplastia , Laparoscopia , Obesidade Mórbida/sangue , Obesidade Mórbida/cirurgia , Hormônios Peptídicos/sangue , Adulto , Regulação do Apetite/fisiologia , Índice de Massa Corporal , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Tempo , Redução de Peso/fisiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The laparoscopic adjustable gastric band (LAGB) has been widely used to treat morbid obesity. There is conflicting data on its long-term effect on esophageal function. Our aim was to assess the long-term impact of the LAGB on esophageal motility and pH-metry in patients who had LAGB who had normal and abnormal esophageal function at baseline. METHODS: Consecutive patients referred for bariatric surgery were prospectively enrolled. A detailed medical history was obtained, and esophageal manometric and 24-h pH evaluations were performed in standard fashion preoperatively and 6 and 12 months postoperatively; patients served as their own controls. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients completed manometric evaluation. Ten patients had normal manometric parameters at baseline; at 6 months, mean lower esophageal sphincter (LES) residual pressure increased significantly from baseline (3.9 +/- 2 vs. 8.9 +/- 4 mmHg, p = 0.014). At 12 months, the mean peristaltic wave duration increased from 3.6 +/- 1 at baseline to 6.8 +/- 2 s, p = 0.025 and wave amplitude decreased during the same period (98.7 +/- 22 vs. 52.3 +/- 24, p = 0.013). LES pressure and percent peristalsis did not differ significantly pre- and post-LAGB. Twelve patients had one or more abnormal manometric findings at baseline; at 12 months, LES pressure in these 12 patients decreased significantly (31.1 +/- 10 vs 23.6 +/- 7, p = 0.011) and wave amplitude was significantly reduced (125.9 +/- 117 vs 103 +/- 107, p = 0.039). LES residual pressure did not change significantly pre- and post-LAGB. Twenty-two individuals were evaluated for impact of Lap-Band on esophageal acid exposure. Sixteen of these patients had normal esophageal pH-metry values at baseline and had no significant changes in 12 months in any pH-metry measurement. Six patients had abnormal pH-metry values at baseline. Among these patients, time with pH < 4.0 and Johnson/DeMeester score did not change significantly during follow-up. There was a significant decrease in the number of reflux episodes from baseline to 6 months (159 +/- 48 vs. 81 +/- 61, p = 0.016). CONCLUSIONS: Abnormal manometric findings are frequently encountered post-LAGB. Increases in LES residual pressure and peristaltic wave duration were the most significant changes. LAGB is not associated with an increase in total esophageal acidification time. Further evaluation of the clinical significance of manometric abnormalities is warranted.
Assuntos
Esfíncter Esofágico Inferior/fisiopatologia , Gastroplastia/instrumentação , Obesidade Mórbida/fisiopatologia , Obesidade Mórbida/cirurgia , Monitoramento do pH Esofágico , Feminino , Seguimentos , Refluxo Gastroesofágico/epidemiologia , Refluxo Gastroesofágico/fisiopatologia , Refluxo Gastroesofágico/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Masculino , Manometria , Obesidade Mórbida/complicações , Projetos Piloto , Resultado do Tratamento , Redução de PesoRESUMO
AIM: To assess first-year gastroenterology fellows' ability to address difficult interpersonal situations in the workplace using objective structured clinical examinations (OSCE). METHODS: Two OSCEs ("distracted care team" and "frazzled intern") were created to assess response to disruptive behavior. In case 1, a fellow used a colonoscopy simulator while interacting with a standardized patient (SP), nurse, and attending physician all played by actors. The nurse and attending were instructed to display specific disruptive behavior and disregard the fellow unless requested to stop the disruptive behavior and focus on the patient and procedure. In case 2, the fellow was to calm an intern managing a patient with massive gastrointestinal bleeding. The objective in both scenarios was to assess the fellows' ability to perform their duties while managing the disruptive behavior displayed by the actor. The SPs used checklists to rate fellows' performances. The fellows completed a self-assessment survey. RESULTS: Twelve fellows from four gastrointestinal fellowship training programs participated in the OSCE. In the "distracted care team" case, one-third of the fellows interrupted the conflict and refocused attention to the patient. Half of the fellows were able to display professionalism despite the heated discussion nearby. Fellows scored lowest in the interprofessionalism portion of post-OSCE surveys, measuring their ability to handle the conflict. In the "frazzled intern" case, 68% of fellows were able to establish a calm and professional relationship with the SP. Despite this success, only half of the fellows were successfully communicate a plan to the SP and only a third scored "well done" in a domain that focused on allowing the intern to think through the case with the fellow's guidance. CONCLUSION: Fellows must receive training on how to approach disruptive behavior. OSCEs are a tool that can assess fellow skills and set a culture for open discussion.
Assuntos
Comunicação , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina , Gastroenterologia/educação , Relações Interpessoais , Comportamento Problema , Lista de Checagem , Competência Clínica , Colonoscopia , Bolsas de Estudo , Humanos , Masculino , Corpo Clínico Hospitalar , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , New York , Simulação de Paciente , Projetos Piloto , Inquéritos e Questionários , Local de TrabalhoAssuntos
Comunicação , Continuidade da Assistência ao Paciente , Bolsas de Estudo , Gastroenterologia/educação , Relações Interprofissionais , Avaliação de Processos em Cuidados de Saúde , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina , Grupos Focais , Gastroenterologia/normas , Humanos , Internato e Residência , Corpo Clínico Hospitalar , Cidade de Nova Iorque , Cultura Organizacional , Carga de TrabalhoRESUMO
AIM: To assess and teach cultural competency skills at the fellowship training level through the use of objective structured clinical examinations (OSCEs). METHODS: We revised four scenarios to infuse a specific focus on cross-cultural care, and to render them appropriate for gastroenterology fellows. Three are discussed here: (1) Poor Health Literacy; (2) Disclosing/Apologizing for a Complication to a Patient Who Mistrusts the Healthcare System; and (3) Breaking Bad News to a Fatalistic Patient. A fourth case emphasizing shared decision-making will be described elsewhere. Four stations were completed by fellows and observed live by four faculty members, and the fellows' performance was assessed. RESULTS: Eleven fellows from four programs participated in the four OSCE. In the "Poor Health Literacy" case, 18% (2/11) of participants recognized that the standardized patient (SP) had below-basic health literacy. None successfully evaluated the SP's reading skills in a culturally-sensitive manner. In "Disclosing/Apologizing for a Complication", 4/11 (36%) personally apologized for the complication. 1/11 recognized the SP's mistrust of the medical system. With "Breaking Bad News", 27% (3/11) explored the patient's values to identify her fatalistic beliefs. CONCLUSION: OSCEs can be used to assess deficiencies in culturally-competent care at the fellowship level. OSCEs also afford fellowships the opportunity to inform future training curricula.
Assuntos
Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Competência Cultural , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina/métodos , Bolsas de Estudo , Gastroenterologia/educação , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Internato e Residência , Adulto , Lista de Checagem , Comunicação , Características Culturais , Currículo , Feminino , Letramento em Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Cidade de Nova Iorque , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto , Relações Médico-Paciente , Religião e Medicina , Inquéritos e Questionários , Análise e Desempenho de Tarefas , Ensino/métodos , Gravação em VídeoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Experiential learning in medical education, as exemplified by objective structured clinical examinations (OSCEs), is a well-validated approach for improving trainee performance. Furthermore, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education has identified OSCEs as an ideal method for assessing the core competency of interpersonal and communication skills. Here, we describe a novel educational tool, the inflammatory bowel disease OSCE (IBD OSCE), to assess and improve this clinical skill set in Gastroenterology fellows. METHODS: We developed a 4-station IBD OSCE that assessed shared decision making, physician-physician communication, and physician-patient consultative skills specifically related to the care of patients with IBD. Each station was videotaped and observed live by faculty gastroenterologists. Behaviorally anchored checklists were scored independently by a faculty observer and the standardized patient/physician, who both provided feedback to the fellow immediately after each case. Post-OSCE, fellows attended a debriefing session on patient communication and were surveyed to assess their perspective on the examination's educational value. RESULTS: Twelve second-year gastroenterology fellows from 5 fellowship programs participated in the IBD OSCE. Fellows performed well in all measured domains and rated the experience highly for its educational value. Fellows cited IBD as an area of relative deficiency in their education compared with other knowledge areas within gastroenterology. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the first OSCE designed specifically for the evaluation of skills as they relate to IBD management. Using OSCEs for IBD education provides an opportunity to robustly assess core competencies and the role of the physician as an educator.
Assuntos
Competência Clínica , Gastroenterologia/educação , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais , Aprendizagem Baseada em Problemas/métodos , Tomada de Decisões , Bolsas de Estudo , Humanos , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/diagnóstico , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/terapia , Relações Médico-Paciente , Projetos PilotoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The role of upper GI series (UGIS) before bariatric surgery is controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic yield and cost of routine UGIS prior to bariatric surgery. METHODS: The medical records of consecutive obese patients who underwent UGIS before bariatric surgery between April 2001 and October 2002 were reviewed. UGIS reports were reviewed by 2 experienced gastroenterologists, and the findings were divided into 4 groups based on predetermined criteria: group 0 (normal study), group 1 (abnormal findings that neither changed the surgical approach nor postponed surgery), group 2 (abnormal findings that changed the surgical approach or postponed surgery), and group 3 (results which were an absolute contraindication to surgery). Clinically important findings included lesions in groups 2 and 3. The cost of an upper GI series (154.80 USD) was estimated from the published 2002 New York State Medicare reimbursement schedule. RESULTS: During the 18-month study period, 171 patients were evaluated by UGIS prior to bariatric surgery. One or more lesions were identified in 48.0% of patients, with only 5.3% having clinically important findings. The prevalence of radiologic findings using the classification system above was as follows: group 0 (52.0%), group 1 (42.7%), group 2 (5.3%), and group 3 (0.0%). The most common findings identified were esophageal reflux (21.6%) and hiatal hernias (18.7%). The cost of performing routine UGIS on all patients before bariatric surgery was 2,941.20 USD per clinically important finding detected. CONCLUSIONS: Routine preoperative upper GI series before bariatric surgery had a low diagnostic yield, rarely revealing pathology that changed the surgical approach or postponed surgery.
Assuntos
Gastroenteropatias/diagnóstico por imagem , Gastroenteropatias/economia , Obesidade/cirurgia , Trato Gastrointestinal Superior/diagnóstico por imagem , Adulto , Custos e Análise de Custo , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Digestório/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Laparoscopia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios/economia , Radiografia , Trato Gastrointestinal Superior/fisiopatologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The role of upper endoscopy (EGD) in obese patients prior to bariatric surgery is controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic yield and cost of routine EGD before bariatric surgery. METHODS: The medical records of consecutive obese patients who underwent EGD prior to bariatric surgery between May 2000 and September 2002 were reviewed. Two experienced endoscopists reviewed all EGD reports, and findings were divided into 4 groups based on predetermined criteria: group 0 (normal study), group 1 (abnormal findings that neither changed the surgical approach nor postponed surgery), group 2 (abnormal findings that changed the surgical approach or postponed surgery), and group 3 (results that were an absolute contraindication to surgery). Clinically important findings included lesions in groups 2 and 3. The cost of EGD (430.72 US dollars) was estimated using the endoscopist fee under Medicare reimbursement. RESULTS: During the 28-month study period, 195 patients were evaluated by EGD prior to bariatric surgery. One or more lesions were identified in 89.7% of patients, with 61.5% having a clinically important finding. The prevalence of endoscopic findings using the classification system above was as follows: group 0 (10.3%), group 1 (28.2%), group 2 (61.5%), and group 3 (0.0%). Overall, the most common lesions identified were hiatal hernia (40.0%), gastritis (28.7%), esophagitis (9.2%), gastric ulcer (3.6%), Barrett's esophagus (3.1%), and esophageal ulcer (3.1%). The cost of performing routine endoscopy on all patients prior to bariatric surgery was 699.92 US dollars per clinically important lesion detected. CONCLUSIONS: Routine upper endoscopy before bariatric surgery has a high diagnostic yield and has a low cost per clinically important lesion detected.
Assuntos
Testes Diagnósticos de Rotina , Endoscopia Gastrointestinal/economia , Gastroscopia/economia , Necessidades e Demandas de Serviços de Saúde , Obesidade Mórbida/cirurgia , Adulto , Contraindicações , Análise Custo-Benefício , Testes Diagnósticos de Rotina/economia , Endoscopia Gastrointestinal/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Derivação Gástrica/métodos , Gastroplastia/métodos , Gastroscopia/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Obesidade Mórbida/diagnóstico , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios/métodos , Sistema de Registros , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Estados UnidosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Obstructive sleep apnea is commonly associated with metabolic changes and obesity, and changes in body weight by either medical or surgical approaches have been considered to affect the severity of sleep apnea and appetite-controlling hormones. This prospective study evaluated the effect of weight loss induced by laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) surgery on respiratory disturbance during sleep, oxygen saturation levels, sleep architecture, and leptin and ghrelin levels. METHODS: Participants were patients at a university-based medical center surgical weight loss program. All participants with a body mass index > 30 kg/m(2) undergoing LAGB surgery for weight reduction were offered the opportunity to participate in the study. Procedures included overnight polysomnography followed by fasting hormone levels at baseline and 12 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Thirty subjects (10 men, 20 women) of mean age 44.0 ± 12.5 years were recruited. At 12 months postoperatively, mean excess weight loss was 44.4% ± 14%. The apnea-hypopnea index decreased from 34.2 ± 35 to 19.0 ± 21.7 events per hour (P < 0.0001), while leptin levels decreased from 24.5 ± 17.42 pg/mL to 11.6 ± 10.6 pg/mL (P = 0.02). Ghrelin levels did not change substantially. Nadir oxygen saturation levels increased from 81% to 84% at 12 months (P = 0.03). Mean oxygen saturation improved and was positively correlated with ghrelin levels at both time points (r = 0.39, P = 0.07, and r = 0.60, P = 0.01). CONCLUSION: LAGB surgery was associated with 44.4% excess weight loss at 12 months, accompanied by a 33.7% improvement in apnea-hypopnea index as well as a reduction in leptin levels by 31.7% in this group. An association between ghrelin and mean oxygen saturation was seen and deserves further investigation.
RESUMO
AIM: To determine the expression and clinical significance of transcriptional intermediary factor 1 gamma (TIF1γ), Smad4 and transforming growth factor-beta (TGFßR) across a spectrum representing colorectal cancer (CRC) development. METHODS: Tissue microarrays were prepared from archival paraffin embedded tissue, including 51 colorectal carcinomas, 25 tubular adenomas (TA) and 26 HPs, each with matched normal colonic epithelium. Immunohistochemistry was performed using antibodies against TIF1γ, Smad4 and TGFßRII. The levels of expression were scored semi-quantitatively (score 0-3 or loss and retention for Smad4). RESULTS: Overexpression of TIF1γ was detected in 5/26 (19%) HP; however, it was seen in a significantly higher proportion of neoplasms, 15/25 (60%) TAs and 24/51 (47%) CRCs (P < 0.05). Normal colonic mucosa, HP, and TAs showed strong Smad4 expression, while its expression was absent in 22/51 (43%) CRCs. Overexpression of TGFßRII was more commonly seen in neoplasms, 13/25 (52%) TAs and 29/51 (57%) CRCs compared to 9/26 (35%) HP (P < 0.05). Furthermore, there was a correlation between TIF1γ overexpression and Smad4 loss in CRC (Kendall tau rank correlation value = 0.35, P < 0.05). The levels of TIF1γ overexpression were significantly higher in stage III than in stage I and II CRC (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The findings suggest that over-expression of TIF1γ occurs in early stages of colorectal carcinogenesis, is inversely related with Smad4 loss, and may be a prognostic indicator for poor outcome.