The nurse-led equitable learning framework for training programs: A framework to grow, bolster and diversify the nursing and public health workforce.

BACKGROUND: Addressing threats to the nursing and public health workforce, while also strengthening the skills of current and future workers, requires programmatic solutions. Training programs should be guided by frameworks, which leverage nursing expertise and leadership, partnerships, and integrate ongoing evaluation. PURPOSE STATEMENT: This article provides a replicable framework to grow, bolster, and diversify the nursing and public health workforces, known as the Nurse-led Equitable Learning (NEL) Framework for Training Programs. The framework has been applied by several multipronged, federally funded training programs led by investigators embedded in an academic nursing institution. METHODS: The NEL framework focuses on: (1) increasing equitable access to the knowledge, skills, and competencies needed to prepare a diverse workforce to deliver effective interventions; (2) fostering academic-practice linkages and community partnerships to facilitate the deployment of newly gained knowledge and skills to address ongoing and emerging challenges in care delivery; and (3) continuously evaluating and disseminating findings to inform expansion and replication of programs. RESULTS: Ten programs using this framework have successfully leveraged $18.3 million in extramural funding to support over 1000 public health professionals and trainees. Longitudinal evaluation efforts indicate that public health workers, including nurses, are benefiting from the programs' workplace trainings, future clinicians are being rigorously trained to identify and address determinants of health to improve patient and community well-being, and educators are engaging in novel pedagogical opportunities to enhance their ability to deliver high quality public health education. CONCLUSIONS: Training programs may apply the NEL framework to ensure that the nursing and public health workforces achieve equitable, sustainable growth and deliver high quality evidence-based care.

Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendation (SBAR) Education for Health Care Students: Assessment of a Training Program.

Introduction: Interprofessional communication failures are estimated to be a factor in two-thirds of serious health care-related accidents. Using a standardized communication protocol during transfer of patient information between providers improves patient safety. An interprofessional education (IPE) event for first-year health professions students was designed using the Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendation (SBAR) tool as a structured communication framework. IPE literature, including a valid measurement tool specifically tailored for SBAR, was utilized to design the Interprofessional Team Training Day (ITTD) and evaluate learner gains in SBAR skills. Methods: Learners from six educational programs participated in ITTD, which consisted of didactics, small-group discussion, and role-play using the SBAR protocol. Individual learners were assessed using the SBAR Brief Assessment Rubric for Learner Assessment (SBAR-LA) on SBAR communication skills before and after the ITTD event. Learners received a written clinical vignette and submitted video recordings of themselves simulating the use of SBAR to communicate to another health care professional. Pre- and postrecordings were scored using the SBAR-LA rubric. Normalized gain scores were calculated to estimate the improvement attributable to ITTD. Results: SBAR-LA scores increased for 60% of participants. For skills not demonstrated before the event, the average learner acquired 44% of those skills from ITTD. Learners demonstrated statistically significant increases for five of 10 SBAR-LA skills. Discussion: The value to patient safety of utilizing structured communication between health care providers is proven; however, evaluating IPE teaching of communication skills effectiveness is challenging. Using SBAR-LA, communication skills were shown to improve following ITTD.

Comparison of Virtual Simulation to Clinical Practice for Prelicensure Nursing Students in Pediatrics.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 (coronavirus disease) pandemic has required a transition from in-person clinical practice to virtual learning. PURPOSE: This study compares the standardized assessment test scores of prelicensure nursing students who completed their pediatric clinical practicum in person for both the clinical and simulation practice settings versus virtually. METHODS: This study included 186 students in a pediatric clinical course. Half the students completed in-person pediatric clinical practice and simulation, and half the students used i-Human to complete their pediatric clinical practicum virtually. Scores on the Assessment Technologies Institute (ATI) Nursing Care of Children examination were compared using independent-samples t tests. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in ATI scores between students who completed their pediatric clinical practicum in the clinical setting compared with virtually (P = .485; 95% confidence interval, -2.24 to 4.71). CONCLUSIONS: Using the i-Human platform, along with prebriefing and debriefing, is an effective pedagogical approach to simulating a pediatric clinical practicum.

SBAR-LA: SBAR Brief Assessment Rubric for Learner Assessment.

Introduction: Structured communication tools are associated with improvement in information transfer and lead to improved patient safety. Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendation (SBAR) is one such tool. Because there is a paucity of instruments to measure SBAR effectiveness, we developed and validated an assessment tool for use with prepractice health professions students. Methods: We developed the SBAR Brief Assessment Rubric for Learner Assessment (SBAR-LA) by starting with a preliminary list of items based on the SBAR framework. During an interprofessional team training event, students were trained in the use of SBAR. Subsequently, they were assigned to perform a simulated communication scenario demonstrating use of SBAR principles. We used 10 videos from these scenarios to refine the items and scales over two rounds. Finally, we applied the instrument on another subset of 10 students to conduct rater calibration and measure interrater reliability. Results: We used a total of 20 out of 225 videos of student performance to create the 10-item instrument. Interrater reliability was .672, and for eight items, the Fleiss' kappa was considered good or fair. Discussion: We developed a scoring rubric for teaching SBAR communication that met criteria for validity and demonstrated adequate interrater reliability. Our development process provided evidence of validity for the content, construct, and response process used. Additional evidence from the use of SBAR-LA in settings where communication skills can be directly observed, such as simulation and clinical environments, may further enhance the instrument's accuracy. The SBAR-LA is a valid and reliable instrument to assess student performance.

The Clinical Instructor Program: Improving Self-efficacy for Nurse Educators.

The purpose of this study was to determine whether an online program, the Clinical Instructor Program (CIP), was helpful in improving feelings of efficacy for nurse clinicians in the role of clinical instructor. In addition, understanding of the clinical instructor role, knowledge of instructional content, and understanding of instructional strategies were evaluated before and after CIP participation. A primary finding of the study was that overall self-efficacy significantly improved.