RESUMO
The trigeminal nucleus caudalis (TNc) receives extensive afferent innervation from peripheral sensory neurons of the trigeminal ganglion (TG), and is the first central relay in the circuitry underpinning orofacial pain. Despite the initial characterization of the neurons in the superficial laminae, many questions remain. Here we report on electrophysiological properties of 535 superficial lamina I/II TNc neurons. Based on their firing pattern, we assigned these cells to five main groups, including (1) tonic, (2) phasic, (3) delayed, (4) H-current, and (5) tonic-phasic neurons, groups that exhibit distinct intrinsic properties and share some similarity with groups identified in the spinal dorsal horn. Driving predominantly nociceptive TG primary afferents using optogenetic stimulation in TRPV1/ChR2 animals, we found that tonic and H-current cells are most likely to receive pure monosynaptic input, whereas delayed neurons are more likely to exhibit inputs that appear polysynaptic. Finally, for the first time in TNc neurons, we used unsupervised clustering analysis methods and found that the kinetics of the action potentials and other intrinsic properties of these groups differ significantly from one another. Unsupervised spectral clustering based solely on a single voltage response to rheobase current was sufficient to group cells with shared properties independent of action potential discharge pattern, indicating that this approach can be effectively applied to identify functional neuronal subclasses. Together, our data illustrate that cells in the TNc with distinct patterns of TRPV1/ChR2 afferent innervation are physiologically diverse, but can be understood as a few major groups of cells having shared functional properties.
Assuntos
Neurônios/fisiologia , Núcleos do Trigêmeo/citologia , Potenciais de Ação/fisiologia , Vias Aferentes/fisiologia , Animais , Análise por Conglomerados , Fenômenos Eletrofisiológicos , Potenciais Evocados/fisiologia , Feminino , Masculino , Potenciais da Membrana/fisiologia , Camundongos Knockout , Neurônios Aferentes/fisiologia , Lâmina Nuclear/fisiologia , Optogenética/métodos , Técnicas de Patch-Clamp , Estimulação Luminosa/métodos , Sinapses/fisiologia , Canais de Cátion TRPV/fisiologia , Núcleos do Trigêmeo/fisiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Multidrug resistance transporters (MDRs) are transmembrane proteins that efflux metabolites and xenobiotics. They are highly conserved in sequence and function in bacteria and eukaryotes and play important roles in cellular homeostasis, as well as in avoidance of antibiotics and cancer therapies. Recent evidence also documents a critical role in reproductive health and in protecting the ovary from environmental toxicant effects. The most well understood MDRs are MDR-1 (P-glycoprotein (P-gp) also known as ABCB1) and BCRP (breast cancer resistance protein) and are both expressed in the ovary. We have previously shown that MDR-1 mRNA steady state expression changes throughout the murine estrous cycle, but expression appears to increase in association with the surge in estradiol during proestrus. METHODS: Here we test the model that MDR-1 and BCRP are regulated by estrogen, the major hormonal product of the ovary. This was performed by administering 6-week-old female mice either sesame oil (vehicle control) or oral ethinyl estradiol at 1 µg, 10 µg, and 100 µg or PROGESTERONE at 0.25mg, 0.5 mg or 1 mg or a combination of both for 5 days. The mice were then sacrificed, and the ovaries were removed and cleaned. Ovaries were used for qPCR, immunoblotting, and immnunolabeling. RESULTS: We found that oral ethinyl estradiol did not influence the steady state mRNA of MDR-1 or BCRP. Remarkably, the effect on mRNA levels neither increased or decreased in abundance upon estrogen exposures. Conversely, we observed less MDR-1 protein expression in the groups treated with 1 µg and 10 µg, but not 100 µg of ethinyl estradiol compared to controls. MDR-1 and BCRP are both expressed in pre-ovulatory follicles. When we tested progesterone, we found that MDR-1 mRNA increased at the dosages of 0.25 mg and 0.5 mg, but protein expression levels were not statistically significant. Combined oral ethinyl estradiol and progesterone significantly lowered both MDR-1 mRNA and protein. CONCLUSIONS: Progesterone appears to influence MDR-1 transcript levels, or steady state levels. This could have implications for better understanding how MDR-1 can be modulated during times of toxic exposure. Understanding the normal physiology of MDR-1 in the ovary will expand the current knowledge in cancer biology and reproduction.