Long-term survival in patients with IDH-wildtype glioblastoma: clinical and molecular characteristics.

BACKG ROUND: Glioblastoma is an aggressive tumor that has a dismal prognosis even with multimodal treatment. However, some patients survive longer than expected. The objective of this study was to revisit patients diagnosed with glioblastoma according to the 2021 WHO classification and analyze clinical and molecular characteristics associated with long-term survival (LTS). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 120 IDH-wildtype glioblastomas operated on at our institution between 2013 and 2018. We divided them into LTS patients, surviving more than 3 years, and non-LTS patients, and then compared their features. Additionally, we performed DNA methylation-based brain tumor classification in LTS patients. RESULTS: Sixteen patients were long-term survivors. Age < 70 years, MGMT promoter methylation, extent of resection ≥ 95%, and administration of radiochemotherapy were associated with LTS (P = 0.005, P < 0.001, P = 0.048, and P = 0.008, respectively). In addition, when these factors were combined, the probability of LTS was 74% (95% CI: 62--84). The methylome analysis confirmed the diagnosis of glioblastoma in the majority of the tested LTS patients. Regarding subtypes, 29% of cases were mesenchymal (MES), 43% were RTK1, and 29% were RTK2. Interestingly, RTK1 and RTK2 cases tended to have longer overall survival than MES cases (P = 0.057). Moreover, the only tested LTS patient with an unmethylated MGMT promoter had an "adult-type diffuse high-grade glioma, IDH-wildtype, subtype E" rather than a glioblastoma. This tumor was characterized by multinucleated giant cells and a somatic mutation in POLE. CONCLUSIONS: We suggest that glioblastoma patients with a combination of favorable prognostic factors can achieve LTS in 74% of cases. In addition, methylome analysis is important to ascertain the type of glioma in LTS patients, especially when the MGMT promoter is unmethylated.

Central diabetes insipidus induced by temozolomide: A report of two cases.

INTRODUCTION: Central diabetes insipidus is a heterogeneous condition characterized by decreased release of antidiuretic hormone by the neurohypophysis resulting in a urine concentration deficit with variable degrees of polyuria. The most common causes include idiopathic diabetes insipidus, tumors or infiltrative diseases, neurosurgery and trauma. Temozolomide is an oral DNA-alkylating agent capable of crossing the blood-brain barrier and used as chemotherapy primarily to treat glioblastoma and other brain cancers. CASES: Two men (aged 38 and 54 years) suddenly developed polyuria and polydispsia approximately four weeks after the initiation of temozolomide for a glioblastoma. Plasma and urine parameters demonstrated the presence of a urinary concentration defect. MANAGEMENT: The clinical and laboratory abnormalities completely resolved with intranasal desmopressin therapy, allowing the continuation of temozolomide. The disorder did not relapse after cessation of temozolomide and desmopressin and relapsed in one patient after rechallenge with temozolomide. DISCUSSION: Our report highlights the importance of a quick recognition of this exceptional complication, in order to initiate promptly treatment with desmopressin and to maintain therapy with temozolomide.

Randomized Phase II Study of Cabazitaxel Versus Methotrexate in Patients With Recurrent and/or Metastatic Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck Previously Treated With Platinum-Based Therapy.

LESSONS LEARNED: Cabazitaxel has activity in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) and taxane-resistant cell lines. For the first time, cabazitaxel was investigated in incurable patients with recurrent SCCHN. Patients were randomly assigned to cabazitaxel every 3 weeks or weekly methotrexate.This phase II study did not meet its primary endpoint.Cabazitaxel has low activity in SCCHN.The toxicity profile in this population also was not favorable owing to the high rate of febrile neutropenia observed (17%). BACKGROUND: Cabazitaxel is a second-generation taxane that improves the survival of patients with metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer following docetaxel therapy. Cabazitaxel has activity in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) and taxane-resistant cell lines. In this randomized phase II trial, we investigated cabazitaxel in patients with recurrent SCCHN. METHODS: Patients with incurable SCCHN with progression after platinum-based therapy were randomly assigned to cabazitaxel every 3 weeks (cycle 1, 20 mg/m2, increased to 25 mg/m2 for subsequent cycles in the absence of nonhematological adverse events [AEs] greater than grade 2 and hematological AEs greater than grade 3) or methotrexate (40 mg/m2/week). The patients were stratified according to their performance status and previous platinum-based chemotherapy for palliation versus curative intent. The primary endpoint was the progression-free survival rate (PFSR) at 18 weeks. RESULTS: Of the 101 patients, 53 and 48, with a median age of 58.0 years (range, 41-80), were randomly assigned to cabazitaxel or methotrexate, respectively. The PFSR at 18 weeks was 13.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 5%-25%) for cabazitaxel and 8.3% (95% CI, 2%-20%) for methotrexate. The median progression-free survival was 1.9 months in both arms. The median overall survival was 5.0 and 3.6 months for cabazitaxel and methotrexate, respectively. More patients experienced serious adverse events with cabazitaxel than with methotrexate (54% vs. 36%). The most common drug-related grade 3-4 AE in the cabazitaxel arm was febrile neutropenia (17.3%). CONCLUSION: This study did not meet its primary endpoint. Cabazitaxel has low activity in recurrent SCCHN.

SMART Syndrome: Case Report and Review of the Literature.

Stroke-like migraine attacks after radiation therapy (SMART) syndrome is a rare condition characterized by stroke-like deficits, seizures, and headache that can occur years after radiation therapy (RT) to the brain. RT is a cornerstone in the treatment of primary brain tumours and is indicated in more than 90% of patients. It is therefore essential to be aware of this entity to prevent misdiagnosis leading to inappropriate treatment. In this article, typical imaging findings of this condition are presented through a case report and review of the literature.

Impact of depatuxizumab mafodotin on health-related quality of life and neurological functioning in the phase II EORTC 1410/INTELLANCE 2 trial for EGFR-amplified recurrent glioblastoma.

BACKGROUND: In the EORTC 1410/INTELLANCE 2 randomised, phase II study (NCT02343406), with the antibody-drug conjugate depatuxizumab mafodotin (Depatux-M, ABT-414) in patients with recurrent EGFR-amplified glioblastoma, the primary end-point (overall survival) was not met, and the drug had ocular dose-limiting toxicity. This study reports results from the prespecified health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and neurological deterioration-free survival (NDFS) exploratory analysis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients (n = 260) were randomised 1:1:1 to receive either Depatux-M 1.25 mg/kg or 1.0 mg/kg intravenously every 2 weeks with oral temozolomide (TMZ) 150 mg/m2, Depatux-M alone, or TMZ or oral lomustine (CCNU) 110 mg/m2 (TMZ/CCNU). HRQoL outcomes were recorded using the EORTC core Quality of Life QLQ-C30, and brain cancer-specific QLQ-BN20 questionnaires. Questionnaires were completed at baseline, weeks 8 and 16, and month 6, and changes from baseline to each time point were calculated. NDFS was defined as time to first deterioration in World Health Organisation performance status. RESULTS: Compliance with HRQoL was 88.1% at baseline and decreased to 37.9% at month 6. Differences from baseline between Depatux-M arms and TMZ/CCNU in global health/QoL status throughout treatment did not reach clinical relevance (≥10 points). Self-reported visual disorders deteriorated to a clinically relevant extent with Depatux-M arms versus TMZ/CCNU at all timepoints (mean differences range: 24.6-35.1 points). Changes from baseline for other HRQoL scales and NDFS were generally similar between treatment arms. CONCLUSIONS: Depatux-M had no impact on HRQoL and NDFS in patients with EGFR-amplified recurrent glioblastoma, except for more visual disorders, an expected side-effect of the study drug. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02343406.

INTELLANCE 2/EORTC 1410 randomized phase II study of Depatux-M alone and with temozolomide vs temozolomide or lomustine in recurrent EGFR amplified glioblastoma.

BACKGROUND: Depatuxizumab mafodotin (Depatux-M) is a tumor-specific antibody-drug conjugate consisting of an antibody (ABT-806) directed against activated epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and the toxin monomethylauristatin-F. We investigated Depatux-M in combination with temozolomide or as a single agent in a randomized controlled phase II trial in recurrent EGFR amplified glioblastoma. METHODS: Eligible were patients with centrally confirmed EGFR amplified glioblastoma at first recurrence after chemo-irradiation with temozolomide. Patients were randomized to either Depatux-M 1.25 mg/kg every 2 weeks intravenously, or this treatment combined with temozolomide 150-200 mg/m2 day 1-5 every 4 weeks, or either lomustine or temozolomide. The primary endpoint of the study was overall survival. RESULTS: Two hundred sixty patients were randomized. In the primary efficacy analysis with 199 events (median follow-up 15.0 mo), the hazard ratio (HR) for the combination arm compared with the control arm was 0.71 (95% CI = 0.50, 1.02; P = 0.062). The efficacy of Depatux-M monotherapy was comparable to that of the control arm (HR = 1.04, 95% CI = 0.73, 1.48; P = 0.83). The most frequent toxicity in Depatux-M treated patients was a reversible corneal epitheliopathy, occurring as grades 3-4 adverse events in 25-30% of patients. In the long-term follow-up analysis with median follow-up of 28.7 months, the HR for the comparison of the combination arm versus the control arm was 0.66 (95% CI = 0.48, 0.93). CONCLUSION: This trial suggests a possible role for the use of Depatux-M in combination with temozolomide in EGFR amplified recurrent glioblastoma, especially in patients relapsing well after the end of first-line adjuvant temozolomide treatment. (NCT02343406).

Long-term survival after glioblastoma resection: hope despite poor prognosis factors.

BACKGROUND: In spite of aggressive multimodal treatment, survival for patients with glioblastoma (GBM) remains short. Nevertheless, some patients survive much longer than expected and become long-term survival patients. The extent of resection (EoR), Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS), age and methyl-guanine methyltransferase gene (MGMT) methylation are well-defined prognostic factors, but the characteristics of patients with long-term survival (LTS, survival of at least three years after diagnosis) has not been fully determined yet. That is the reason why we analyzed the GBM patients with LTS at our center. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all consecutive patients who underwent surgery for GBM between January 2002 and November 2011, including patients treated with surgical resection under neuronavigation with or without intraoperative MRI (ioMRI) and those who had stereotactic biopsy. We identified and further analyzed those patients with LTS. RESULTS: A total of 127 patients underwent surgery for GBM during the study period. 101 (79.6%) of whom had surgical resection and 26 (20.4%) of whom had stereotactic biopsy. Of the 101 patients who were treated with surgical resection, 12 had LTS. After two other pathologists reviewed the patients' cases, they confirmed that 11 (11%) of the 12 patients had a GBM (female/male ratio 4.5; average age 50 years; preoperative Karnofsky Score 82%), and one patient had an anaplastic glioma. The mean survival in the LTS patients with confirmed GBM was 74 (36-150) months. Seven of the LTS patients (63.6%) had a gross total resection (GTR), including two with an additional resection after ioMRI. Three (27.3%) had a near total resection (NTR: residue ≤5%) and one (9.1%) had a partial resection. Ten (90.9%) patients had a methylation of MGMT, only two (18.8%) had an IDH1 mutation, and seven (63.6%) received a full Stupp protocol. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with a GBM who were treated with one or more resections, 11% had LTS with 90.9% with at least a near total resection (36% with ioMRI) and a methylated MGMT. 50% of the patients with a second surgery survived at least two years postoperatively. Those encouraging observations emphasize the importance of maximizing the resection by using, if possible, an intraoperative guidance method like ioMRI with an analysis of biomarkers such as MGMT and if necessary, multiple surgical procedures.

HER2-positive breast cancer: from trastuzumab to innovatory anti-HER2 strategies.

Overexpression of HER2 is encountered in approximately 20% of invasive breast cancers. It is an independent adverse prognostic factor and, more importantly, it is currently the best predictive factor for the activity of trastuzumab, an anti-HER2 monoclonal antibody (MoAb), which has revolutionized the treatment of this breast cancer subgroup. Increasing knowledge of molecular pathways involving the HER family of growth factor receptors has paved the way toward new efficient targeted therapies. Herein, we will review the targeted therapies of clinical importance for HER2-positive breast cancer, which include anti-HER2 MoAbs and tyrosine kinase inhibitors that directly interfere at the receptor level. Clinicians are still facing many uncertainties concerning the optimal use of these new agents, and scientists are working on dissecting the mechanisms of resistance developed by HER2-positive cancer cells. Interesting perspectives in the treatment of HER2-positive breast cancer will be discussed. They consist of designing HER2 peptide-based vaccines, targeting downstream pathway molecules beyond the membrane receptor, and exploring synergistic antineoplasic strategies.

Safety and pharmacokinetics of sorafenib combined with capecitabine in patients with advanced solid tumors: results of a phase 1 trial.

Sorafenib (twice daily [bid]) plus capecitabine (2 weeks on schedule/1 week off schedule) safety and pharmacokinetics were investigated in patients with advanced solid tumors (N = 35). Cohort 1 (n = 13) included sorafenib 200 mg bid and capecitabine 1050 mg/m(2) bid; cohort 2 (n = 4), sorafenib 400 mg bid and capecitabine 1050 mg/m(2) bid; cohort 3 (n = 6), sorafenib 200 mg bid and capecitabine 1050 mg/m(2) bid (cycles 1 and 2), then 400 mg bid and capecitabine 1050 mg/m(2) bid (cycle 3 onwards); and cohort 4 (n = 12), sorafenib 400 mg bid and capecitabine 850 mg/m(2) bid. The combination of sorafenib and capecitabine was generally well tolerated. Most frequent drug-related adverse events were hand-foot skin reaction (HFSR, 89%), diarrhea (71%), and fatigue (69%). The HFSR was dose-limiting toxicities in 6 patients. Sorafenib exposure (C(max) and AUC(0-12)) was unaffected by concomitant capecitabine. Concomitant sorafenib moderately increased capecitabine and 5-fluorouracil (metabolite) exposure when the capecitabine dose was 1050 mg/m(2) bid. Simultaneous administration of 400 mg bid sorafenib and 850 mg/m(2) bid capecitabine, however, had only minor effects on the exposure to capecitabine and 5-fluorouracil. Based on the overall toxicity profile and pharmacokinetic parameters, the recommended phase 2 doses were therefore sorafenib 400 mg bid and capecitabine 850 mg/m(2) bid, as scheduled above.