Does Early Vasopressin in Septic Shock Improve Outcomes? An Important Piece to This Emerging Puzzle Has Arrived.

In this month's Annals of Pharmacotherapy, the largest observational study assessing the early versus later use of vasopressin has been published. When this new study is combined with the other available observational studies, there are 2 important outcomes to focus on. When all the observational studies are pooled together, no reduction in new onset arrhythmias is seen (odds ratio [OR] = 0.91, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.41-1.95) with early versus late vasopressin use while the reduction in renal replacement therapy just missed statistical significance (OR = 0.56, 95% CI = 0.32-1.00). Early vasopressin likely does not reduce new onset arrhythmias versus later use but might reduce the need for renal replacement therapy.

Eye Drop Quality Issues: Can the FDA See This One Through?

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has long suffered from a lack of resources limiting their inspection capacity. They have fallen behind on proactive surveillance inspections of foreign manufacturing sites, relying instead on for-cause inspections after a problem has been discovered. Over-the-counter (OTC) products are especially vulnerable because the FDA considers them lower priority. This issue recently made big news after improperly manufactured OTC eye drops harmed users across the country, in some cases causing blindness. To prevent future harm to Americans, it is imperative that the FDA receives enough resources to keep up with their routine inspections.

Psychedelics for Patients With Cancer: A Comprehensive Literature Review.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the role of psychedelics in the treatment of anxiety or depression among patients with cancer. DATA SOURCES: PubMed search from inception to March 11, 2022, using the terms anxiety, depression, psychedelics, psilocybin, lysergic acid, methylenedioxymethamphetamine, or ayahuasca. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: Studies assessing patients with cancer receiving psychedelics for the treatment of anxiety or depression. DATA SYNTHESIS: Five unique randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials were conducted. Significant reductions were found in 2 trials with 2 anxiety scales (State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-State, State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-Trait) and in 1 trial with 2 additional anxiety scales (Hamilton Rating Scale-Anxiety, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-Anxiety). Significant reductions were found in 2 trials in 2 depression scales (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-Depression, Beck Depression Inventory) and in 1 trial with an additional depression scale (Hamilton Rating Scale-Depression). Two studies assessed for clinically relevant reductions in anxiety and depression scores, and they occurred much more commonly in psychedelic-treated patients than those given placebo. RELEVANCE TO PATIENT CARE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE: There is a new potential option for treating patients with anxiety and depression along with cancer, which is important given the generally lackluster benefits with traditional antidepressants. Only a few sessions may also provide benefits extending out for 6 to 12 months and possibly beyond that. However, the studies were small, had many methodological limitations, and there were increases in blood pressure and heart rate. CONCLUSIONS: Psychedelics have a unique mechanism of action that might be well suited for treating anxiety and depression associated with cancer. This offers new promise for patients who are not being sufficiently treated with current antianxiety or antidepressant medications.

Mavacamten, a First-in-Class Cardiac Myosin Inhibitor for Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.

OBJECTIVE: To assess mavacamten's role in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy treatment. DATA SOURCES: In addition to clinical guidelines, package inserts, and general reviews, we searched PubMed using the term mavacamten from inception to June 11, 2022. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: English language studies describing mavacamten's mechanism of action, pharmacokinetics, drug interactions, clinical and economic outcomes, and adverse events. DATA SYNTHESIS: Mavacamten reduces left ventricular outflow obstruction and New York Heart Association functional class while improving Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire-Clinical Summary Scores in patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. With an acquisition cost of $245.20 per capsule, it would cost $1.2 million for every additional quality-adjusted life year. In those with unobstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, there were improvements in N-terminal probrain natriuretic peptide and high-sensitivity cardiac troponin biochemical markers. Mavacamten is a substrate for CYP2C19 and CYP3A4, and a CYP enzyme inducer. RELEVANCE TO PATIENT CARE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE: Patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and an ejection fraction ≥55% have a new option if they remain symptomatic despite maximally tolerated ß-blocker or non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker therapy. It is an alternative to disopyramide therapy, which has poor patient tolerance, or septal reduction therapies, which are invasive. However, mavacamten is not cost-effective and its role in nonobstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy is not well established. CONCLUSIONS: Mavacamten is a new option for patients with refractory obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and an ejection fraction ≥55% but its pricing makes therapy not cost-effective. Final health outcomes are not fully elucidated and additional studies are needed to determine long-term effects.

The Impact of Ketamine for Treatment of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analyses.

BACKGROUND: Ketamine has been used in anesthesia, pain management, and major depressive disorder. It has recently been studied in patients with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of ketamine on PTSD symptomatology and depression scores. METHODS: We conducted a literature search of Medline 1960 to May 20, 2023, and found 6 randomized controlled trials that met our inclusion criteria. We extracted data on the Clinician-Administered PTSD (CAPS), PTSD Checklist (PCL), or Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating (MADRS) scales. RESULTS: The use of ketamine significantly reduced CAPS scores (n = 5, MD: -10.63 [95% CI -14.95 to -6.32]), PCL scores (n = 3, MD: -6.13 [95% CI -8.61 to -3.64]), and MADRS scores (n = 3, MD: -6.33 [95% CI -8.97 to -3.69]) at the maximal follow-up times versus control. Significant benefits were found at day 1 and weeks 1, 2, and 4 for CAPS and PCL scores as well as MADRS scores at day 1, week 1, and week 4 for ketamine versus control. The time to PTSD relapse was prolonged in the patients receiving ketamine versus control (n = 2, 15.74 days [95% CI 3.57 to 29.91 days]). More dry mouth (n = 2, OR 5.85 [95% CI 1.32 to 25.95]), dizziness (n = 2, OR 3.83 [95% CI 1.28 to 11.41]), and blurred vision (n = 2, OR 7.57 [1.00 to 57.10]) occurred with ketamine than control therapy. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Ketamine modestly reduced PTSD and depression scores as early as 1 day of therapy, but the longevity of effect needs to be determined. Given similar magnitude of benefit with SSRIs and venlafaxine, ketamine would not supplant these traditional options for chronic use.

A data-driven quality-score system for rating drug products and its implications for the health care industry.

The quality of drug products in the United States has been a matter of growing concern. Buyers and payers of pharmaceuticals have limited insight into measures of drug-product quality. Therefore, a quality-score system driven by data collection is proposed to differentiate between the qualities of drug products produced by different manufacturers. The quality scores derived using this proposed system would be based upon public regulatory data and independently-derived chemical data. A workflow for integrating the system into procurement decisions within health care organizations is also suggested. The implementation of such a quality-score system would benefit health care organizations by including the consideration of the quality of products while also considering price as a part of the drug procurement process. Such a system would also benefit the U.S. health care industry by bringing accountability and transparency into the drug supply chain and incentivizing manufacturers to place an increased emphasis on the quality and safety of their drug products.

Criminal Action Against Drug Counterfeiters: Assessment of the FDA Office of Criminal Investigation Database 2016 Through 2021.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to describe law enforcement oversight of counterfeit drugs by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in the United States from 2016 through 2021. METHODS: The FDA Office of Criminal Investigation database with hyperlinked press releases of enforcement actions was used to identify legal action against drug counterfeiters. Incidences of counterfeit drugs sold via Internet, how often they were obtained without a prescription, the most prevalent counterfeit drugs, the countries where counterfeit operations occurred, and the scale of counterfeit operations were assessed. RESULTS: There were 130 unique enforcement actions against counterfeiting organizations and individuals. Overall, 64.6% of enforcement actions involved counterfeit products sold over the Internet, in 84.6% of actions counterfeit medications could be obtained without a prescription, and in 33.1% of actions the products were sold as dietary supplements. Sexual dysfunction, opioid, stimulant, anabolic muscle building, benzodiazepine, and dermatologic drugs were most counterfeited. China was the most prevalent country to produce counterfeit drugs followed by India, Turkey, Pakistan, and Russia. Counterfeiting operations were large with tens of millions of pills and hundreds of millions of dollars in sales. Health outcomes for counterfeit drugs were rarely discussed in the press releases and not all press releases had data for each parameter of interest. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: This is the first report assessing enforcement actions against drug counterfeiters from the FDA Office of Criminal Investigation. The FDA is actively involved in identifying and prosecuting counterfeit drug rings, but the number of enforcement actions is smaller than the size of the problem.

Lead in Mineral or Multivitamin-Multimineral Products.

OBJECTIVE: Assess the current daily interim reference level of lead and the amount contained in current mineral and multivitamin-multimineral (MVM) products. DATA SOURCES: PubMed search from 1980 to May 15, 2021, limited to the English language, via the search strategy ((mineral OR multivitamin OR calcium OR iron OR magnesium OR copper OR zinc OR chromium OR selenium) AND (heavy metals OR Pb OR lead)). STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: Narrative review of studies assessing lead content in mineral or MVM products. DATA SYNTHESIS: Products containing different calcium forms (dolomite, bone meal, natural carbonate) have historically had higher lead levels than others (refined carbonate, lactate, gluconate, acetate, sevelamer), but the gap has closed considerably since the year 2000. Although only limited assessments of magnesium and zinc supplements have been conducted, no alarming average lead amounts were found. MVM products assessed since 2007 had low median or mean lead concentrations. However, large interproduct differences exist, with many products having very little lead and some products having concerning amounts. RELEVANCE TO PATIENT CARE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE: It is difficult for pharmacists and consumers to know the amount of lead in an actual product unless it is tested in an independent third-party lab. The United States Pharmacopeia and NSF International will provide a seal on the products stating that the products have a low level of lead, but even so, children could receive more lead than the Food and Drug Administration's Interim Reference Level. CONCLUSIONS: The threat from lead exposure in mineral and MVM products have diminsihed considerably over time but some products can still have excessive amounts. Without third-party testing, it is difficult for clinicians and consumers to know which outlier products to avoid.

Inflammation Suppresses Patients' Ability to Metabolize Cytochrome P450 Substrate Drugs.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of inflammation on cytochrome P450 (CYP) drug metabolism in human subjects. DATA SOURCES: A PubMed search was done from 1980 to July 2021 limited to human subjects and English language using a search strategy of (((phase I metabolism) OR (CYP) OR (cytochrome P450)) AND (inflammatory OR inflammation)). STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: Narrative review of human studies assessing the impact of inflammation or inflammatory suppression with biologic drugs on CYP drug metabolism were used. DATA SYNTHESIS: Patients with inflammatory conditions ranging from fungal, viral, or bacterial infections to noninfectious causes (critical illness, surgical procedure, cancer, or transplantation of stem cells or organs) have suppressed drug metabolism. Markers of inflammation such as C-reactive protein or α-1-acid glycoprotein are correlated with reduced clearance through CYP3A4, CYP1A2, and CYP2C19. Elevated interleukin-6 concentrations are also associated or correlated with reduced clearance for CYP3A4 and CYP2C-19 isoenzymes. There was insufficient information to properly assess CYP2D6. RELEVANCE TO PATIENT CARE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE: Health professionals should appreciate that patients with acute or chronic inflammation from infectious or noninfectious causes could have suppressed drug metabolism through CYP3A4, CYP1A2, and CYP2C19. For narrow therapeutic index drugs, such as many of the drugs assessed in this review, that means more judicious drug monitoring to prevent adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Like other types of drug-drug or drug-disease interactions, inflammation can alter the steady-state concentration of CYP metabolized drugs.

Impact of Interferons and Biological Drug Inhibitors of IL-2 and IL-6 on Small-Molecule Drug Metabolism Through the Cytochrome P450 System.

OBJECTIVE: Assess the impact of interferons and interleukin (IL)-2 and IL-6 inhibitors on cytochrome P450 (CYP) drug metabolism in human subjects. DATA SOURCES: PubMed search from 1980 to March 31, 2021, limited to human subjects and English language via search strategy: (biological drug names) [AND] (cytochrome [OR] CYP metabolism). STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: Narrative review of human studies assessing biological drugs in select classes that affect CYP drug metabolism. DATA SYNTHESIS: Exogenous interferons suppress CYP1A2 (theophylline, caffeine, antipyrone) clearance by 20% to 49% in patients; have minimal impact on CYP3A4 (midazolam and dapsone), CYP2C9 (tolbutamide), or CYP2C19 (mephenytoin) metabolism; and increase CYP2D6 (debrisoquine, dextromethorphan) metabolism. Biological IL-2 inhibitors (basiliximab, daclizumab) have no effect on metabolism via CYP1A2 (caffeine), CYP2C9 (s-warfarin), CYP2C19 (omeprazole), CYP2D6 (dextromethorphan), and CYP3A4 (midazolam, tacrolimus) but may enhance CYP3A4 (cyclosporin) metabolism over time. IL-6 inhibitors (sirukumab, tocilizumab, sarilumab) significantly enhance metabolism via CYP2C9 (s-warfarin), CYP2C19 (omeprazole), and CYP3A4 (simvastatin, midazolam) and reduce metabolism via CYP1A2 (caffeine). RELEVANCE TO PATIENT CARE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE: Patients using interferons, IL-2, or IL-6 blocking drugs at steady state with CYP substrates could have altered drug metabolism and experience adverse events. With interferons and biological anti-inflammatory drugs, some isoenzymes will be inhibited, whereas others will be enhanced, and the magnitude of the effect can sometimes be significant. In clinical practice, clinicians may consider these metabolic changes as an additive effect to a patient's entire disease and medication profile when determining risk/benefit of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Interferon therapy or inflammatory suppression via IL-2 or IL-6 can alter steady-state concentrations of CYP-metabolized small-molecule drugs.

Innovative partnership in Connecticut to expand health professional eligibility to administer COVID-19 vaccines.

BACKGROUND: On December 7, 2020, the Acting Commissioner of the Connecticut Department of Public Health (DPH) issued an order authorizing eligible health professionals to administer coronavirus disease (COVID-19) vaccines provided they complete a vaccination training program. The University of Connecticut (UConn) School of Pharmacy was approached to collaborate with DPH to create a certification program to meet the needs of this order. OBJECTIVES: To use a unique, pharmacist-led practice model to increase the number of competent vaccinators to administer the COVID-19 vaccine and to reduce vaccine hesitancy with timely vaccine information. PRACTICE DESCRIPTION: A didactic and in-person training program was developed, with an evaluation completed by a vaccination-certified pharmacist. In addition, faculty members, staff, and students developed short videos answering questions about COVID-19 vaccines. PRACTICE INNOVATION: We are aware of no other such programs using pharmacists and student pharmacists as primary creators of training and certification of health professionals to administer the COVID-19 vaccine. EVALUATION METHODS: Success was gauged by the rapid increase in the number of eligible health professionals who completed the developed training program and became certified as COVID-19 vaccinators. When addressing vaccine hesitancy, success was defined by the number of videos created and the number of views and likes the videos received. RESULTS: As of April 30, 2021, 1834 health professionals registered to administer the COVID-19 vaccine. A total of 1195 (65%) participants completed the online training developed by pharmacists, and 872 participants (48%) attended pharmacist-led, in-person competencies. As of July 29, 2021, efforts resulted in 14,972 views and 257 "Likes" for 79 videos promoted through social media platforms. CONCLUSION: A partnership between the Connecticut DPH and the UConn School of Pharmacy allowed the rapid increase in capacity to administer the COVID-19 vaccine to citizens of Connecticut. Patients are receptive to accessing health information that pharmacists create on social media.

Hydroxychloroquine or Chloroquine for Treatment or Prophylaxis of COVID-19: A Living Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine have antiviral effects in vitro against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). PURPOSE: To summarize evidence about the benefits and harms of hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine for the treatment or prophylaxis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). DATA SOURCES: PubMed (via MEDLINE), EMBASE (via Ovid), Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, bioRxiv, Preprints, ClinicalTrials.gov, World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and the Chinese Clinical Trials Registry from 1 December 2019 until 8 May 2020. STUDY SELECTION: Studies in any language reporting efficacy or safety outcomes from hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine use in any setting in adults or children with suspected COVID-19 or at risk for SARS-CoV-2 infection. DATA EXTRACTION: Independent, dually performed data extraction and quality assessments. DATA SYNTHESIS: Four randomized controlled trials, 10 cohort studies, and 9 case series assessed treatment effects of the medications, but no studies evaluated prophylaxis. Evidence was conflicting and insufficient regarding the effect of hydroxychloroquine on such outcomes as all-cause mortality, progression to severe disease, clinical symptoms, and upper respiratory virologic clearance with antigen testing. Several studies found that patients receiving hydroxychloroquine developed a QTc interval of 500 ms or greater, but the proportion of patients with this finding varied among the studies. Two studies assessed the efficacy of chloroquine; 1 trial, which compared higher-dose (600 mg twice daily for 10 days) with lower-dose (450 mg twice daily on day 1 and once daily for 4 days) therapy, was stopped owing to concern that the higher dose therapy increased lethality and QTc interval prolongation. An observational study that compared adults with COVID-19 receiving chloroquine phosphate, 500 mg once or twice daily, with patients not receiving chloroquine found minor fever resolution and virologic clearance benefits with chloroquine. LIMITATION: There were few controlled studies, and control for confounding was inadequate in observational studies. CONCLUSION: Evidence on the benefits and harms of using hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine to treat COVID-19 is very weak and conflicting. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.

Developing Criteria and Associated Instructions for Consistent and Useful Quality Improvement Study Data Extraction for Health Systems.

BACKGROUND: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) could devote resources to collate and assess quality improvement studies to support learning health systems (LHS) but there is no reliable data on the consistency of data extraction for important criteria. METHODS: We identified quality improvement studies and evaluated the consistency of data extraction from two experienced independent reviewers at three time points: baseline, first revision (where explicit instructions for each criterion were created), and final revision (where the instructions were revised). Six investigators looked at the data extracted by the two systematic reviewers and determined the extent of similarity on a scale of 0 to 10 (where 0 represented no similarity and 10 perfect similarity). There were 42 assessments for baseline, 42 assessments for the first revision, and 42 assessments for the final revision. We asked two LHS participants to assess the relative value of our criteria. RESULTS: The consistency of extraction improved from 1.17 ± 1.85 at baseline to 6.07 ± 2.76 after revision 1 (P < 0.001) and to 6.81 ± 1.94 out of 10 for the final revision (P < 0.001). However, the final revision was not significantly improved over the first revision (P = 0.14). One key informant rated the difficulty in finding and using quality improvement studies a 6 (moderately difficult) while the other a 4 (moderately difficult). When asked how valuable it would be if AHRQ found and collated the demographic information about the health systems and the interventions used in published quality improvement studies, they rated it a 9 (highly valuable) and a 6 (moderately valuable). CONCLUSION: Creating explicit instructions for extracting data for quality improvement studies helps enhance the consistency of data extraction. This is important because it is difficult for LHS to vet these quality improvement studies on their own and they would value AHRQ's support in that regard.

Generic Drugs Not as Safe as FDA Wants You to Believe.

Food and Drug Administration (FDA) rules for the production of prescription drugs are very rigorous and, if followed, guarantees a safe drug supply. For many years, foreign manufacturers have produced substandard generic products and active pharmaceutical ingredients and shipped them into the United States. If the FDA had inspected them with the same rigor as they do domestic manufacturers, they would have found many of these egregious deviations from ethical manufacturing much earlier. Although the FDA is finally stepping up the number of inspections, their current processes still rely on preannounced inspections with long time horizons, so quality issues can be temporarily corrected and documents altered or destroyed.

Understanding and Preventing (N-Nitrosodimethylamine) NDMA Contamination of Medications.

N-nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA) is a hepatotoxic agent and carcinogen contaminant in commonly used medications such as valsartan, losartan, irbesartan, and ranitidine. NDMA can be produced during manufacture, introduced from contaminated ingredients procured elsewhere, or introduced from contaminated solvents and catalysts. The Food and Drug Administration has established a maximum dose of NDMA that is permissible per tablet and guidance for manufacturers. However, many unanswered questions about NDMA contamination need rigorous investigation.

Dietary Supplements Pose Real Dangers to Patients.

The Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act led to a flood of poor-quality dietary supplements. The Food and Drug Administration's (FDA's) jurisdiction is limited to removing products proven unsafe, rather than prospectively assessing them for quality manufacturing. With so many products available, there is very little FDA oversight until reports of patient harm occur. Microbial and heavy metal contamination, adulteration with synthetic drugs (including drugs banned from the United States), substituting herbs, and fraudulently specifying ingredients on the label have all occurred. Clinicians should collectively advocate for legislative change, only recommend products tested by outside laboratories for quality, and educate consumers about the risks of using unverified products.

Current System of Overseeing Drug Trials in Developing Countries by the FDA Is Dangerous.

Clinical research used to substantiate Food and Drug Administration (FDA) drug approval is increasingly being conducted overseas. One of the enticements to move overseas is unequal oversight by the FDA, and these differences can result in poor quality research and human subject risk. Downstream, patients, clinicians, and payers of health care can be harmed by inaccuracies in the new drug approval process. The need of the hour is to bridge the gap in the standards by ensuring that the investigators in the developing countries adhere to the same quality standards as the domestic investigators.

The Role of Suppressing Inflammation in the Treatment of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease.

OBJECTIVE: To review the 3 anti-inflammatory drugs, canakinumab, colchicine, and methotrexate, that have been investigated in major clinical trials for treating patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). DATA SOURCES: An Ovid MEDLINE literature search (1946 to February 2, 2020) was performed using search strategy [(C-reactive protein OR ASCVD OR cardiac disease OR cardiovascular disease) AND (canakinumab OR methotrexate OR Colchicine)]. Additional references were identified from the citations. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: English-language studies assessing the impact of these 3 drugs on inflammation as measured by high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) or the association with reducing ASCVD events were included. DATA SYNTHESIS: Canakinumab and colchicine significantly reduced ASCVD events in high-risk patients with median baseline hs-CRP levels of ~4.0 mg/L. Methotrexate was ineffective at reducing ASCVD events in high-risk patients, but their baseline hs-CRP concentrations were a median of <2 mg/L. In subgroup analyses of the Canakinumab Antiinflammatory Thrombosis Outcome Study (CANTOS), patients whose baseline hs-CRP was 2 to 4 mg/L had benefits from canakinumab therapy similar to those with baseline levels exceeding 4. RELEVANCE TO PATIENT CARE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE: Even with the best current drug therapies, patients with underlying inflammation can benefit from the addition of both colchicine and canakinumab to further lower CV events. Given its cost, colchicine is a more attractive option. CONCLUSIONS: Patients at high risk of recurrent cardiovascular disease events with an hs-CRP of 2 mg/L or greater can reduce the occurrence of ASCVD events with canakinumab or colchicine therapy. Colchicine is the preferable option, in particular for those with myocardial infarction, given its more reasonable cost.

Pharmacist intervention in colorectal cancer screening initiative.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the novel approach of using the community pharmacist as the primary health care team member to facilitate colorectal cancer (CRC) risk counseling and screening in socioeconomically disadvantaged populations. SETTING: A collaborative effort between the UConn Health Colon Cancer Prevention Program and UConn School of Pharmacy in conjunction with large independent chain pharmacies (medium to medium-high volume) located in metropolitan areas of Connecticut, including Hartford, Bridgeport, New Haven, and Stamford. Pharmacies located in hospitals, across the street from a large physician practice, or within the community. PRACTICE DESCRIPTION: The study involved 2 phases. The first phase involved education and training for community pharmacists regarding counseling approaches for patients on the topic of CRC. The second phase of the study involved patient recruitment and counseling with subsequent fecal immunohistochemical testing (FIT). PRACTICE INNOVATION: A community pharmacist provided face-to-face counseling on CRC risk factor reduction and provided CRC screening to patients who were without insurance or underinsured. No CRC screening or education program existed beforehand. EVALUATION: A target sample size of 60 participants was needed with a type 1 error rate of 5% and a power of 80%. Exploration of variables using multivariate logistic regression model included any variable with a univariate P < 0.2. Multivariate P values < 0.05 were considered independent predictors. RESULTS: After approaching 312 consumers, 16 of them consented to the study. The majority of participants (88%) were African American or Latino, and 69% were currently unemployed. Eight participants agreed to complete FIT, and 88% of participants completed FIT correctly. Only 1 positive FIT result was observed, but a subsequent colonoscopy was negative. Of the 12 questions that assessed baseline CRC knowledge in the initial survey, 16 participants answered an average of 2.6 (range, 0-6, SD, 1.6) questions incorrectly. Only 4 participants completed the follow-up survey of CRC knowledge and program satisfaction; thus, exploration of variables was not conducted. Patients indicated high satisfaction with the program of education and FIT dispensing. CONCLUSION: This study faced difficulty in recruiting pharmacists to participate, with the main reason being lack of compensation and disruption to workflow. Patient participation in the trial was also low because of a lack of time or interest in participation. Of the patients who did participate, the level of satisfaction in having the pharmacist speak to them about CRC screening was high. This service is an excellent example of how the pharmacist can provide a more accessible, convenient, and responsive approach to patients' needs while improving health equity. Future studies that employ a revenue model to build the infrastructure and capacity necessary to offer this service efficiently and consistently are needed.

Effects of intermittent versus continuous dieting on weight and body composition in obese and overweight people: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Intermittent dieting may be an alternative to continuous dieting for weight reduction. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of intermittent dieting versus continuous dieting on weight and body composition in overweight or obese adults. DESIGN: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Five databases were searched until February 2018 for RCTs comparing intermittent versus continuous dieting. Intermittent dieting consisted of two types: regular intermittent was caloric restriction interspersed with days of weight maintenance or ad libitum eating; intensified intermittent was caloric restriction interspersed with days of even lower caloric restriction. Continuous was continual caloric restriction. Primary outcomes were weight, body fat, lean mass, waist circumference, hip circumference, and energy expenditure. Data were pooled by the inverse variance method using random-effects models and expressed as mean differences (MD) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: Nine trials met the inclusion criteria (n = 782), six comparing regular intermittent vs continuous (n = 553), and three comparing intensified intermittent vs continuous (n = 229). Populations were heterogeneous: obese only in five studies, and overweight or obese (mixed) in four studies. Lean mass was significantly lower in regular intermittent vs continuous (MD -0.86 kg; 95% CI -1.62 to -0.10; p = 0.03). No differences were found for the remaining outcomes for both comparisons (regular intermittent or intensified intermittent vs continuous). There was low heterogeneity of effects across trials. Subgroup effects by time to follow-up, gender, per-protocol versus intention-to-treat, enforced exercise, and diabetes were similar to main analyses. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review in obese and overweight individuals showed that regular intermittent dieting decreased lean mass compared to continuous dieting. There were no differences in effects for either intermittent vs continuous interventions across all other outcomes. In contrast to previous systematic reviews, this study suggested that lean mass is better preserved in continuous dieting compared to regular intermittent dieting.