Stabilization treatment of remitted psychotic depression: the STOP-PD study.

OBJECTIVE: We conducted a 12-week double-blind study of stabilization pharmacotherapy in patients with remitted psychotic depression (PD). METHODS: Seventy-one persons aged 18 years or older who had achieved remission of PD when randomized to either olanzapine plus sertraline or olanzapine plus placebo were continued on the double-blind treatment associated with remission. Symptoms of depression and psychosis, and weight, were measured once every 4 weeks. Cholesterol, triglycerides, and glucose were measured at stabilization phase baseline and Week 12/termination. RESULTS: The effect of treatment did not significantly change with time for depression, weight, or metabolic measures in the stabilization phase. Eight of the 71 participants (11.3%; 95% CI: 5.8, 20.7) experienced a relapse of major depression, psychosis, or both. Treatment groups did not differ in the frequency of relapse. In the entire study group, the adjusted estimate for change in weight was an increase of 1.66 kg (95% CI: 0.83, 2.48) and the adjusted estimate for change in total cholesterol was a decrease of 14.8 mg/dL (95% CI: 3.5, 26.1) during the 12-week stabilization phase; the remaining metabolic measures did not significantly change. CONCLUSION: Continuation of acute treatment was associated with stability of remission.

Rating scales measuring the severity of psychotic depression.

OBJECTIVE: Unipolar psychotic depression (PD) is a severe and debilitating syndrome, which requires intensive monitoring. The objective of this study was to provide an overview of the rating scales used to assess illness severity in PD. METHOD: Selective review of publications reporting results on non-self-rated, symptom-based rating scales utilized to measure symptom severity in PD. The clinical and psychometric validity of the identified rating scales was reviewed. RESULTS: A total of 14 rating scales meeting the predefined criteria were included in the review. These scales grouped into the following categories: (i) rating scales predominantly covering depressive symptoms, (ii) rating scales predominantly covering psychotic symptoms, (iii) rating scales covering delusions, and (iv) rating scales covering PD. For the vast majority of the scales, the clinical and psychometric validity had not been tested empirically. The only exception from this general tendency was the 11-item Psychotic Depression Assessment Scale (PDAS), which was developed specifically to assess the severity of PD. CONCLUSION: In PD, the PDAS represents the only empirically derived rating scale for the measurement of overall severity of illness. The PDAS should be considered in future studies of PD and in clinical practice.

Measuring psychotic depression.

OBJECTIVE: Psychotic depression (PD) is a highly debilitating condition, which needs intensive monitoring. However, there is no established rating scale for evaluating the severity of PD. The aim of this analysis was to assess the psychometric properties of established depression rating scales and a number of new composite rating scales, covering both depressive and psychotic symptoms, in relation to PD. METHOD: The psychometric properties of the rating scales were evaluated based on data from the Study of Pharmacotherapy of Psychotic Depression. RESULTS: A rating scale consisting of the 6-item Hamilton melancholia subscale (HAM-D6 ) plus five items from the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), named the HAMD-BPRS11 , displayed clinical validity (Spearman's correlation coefficient between HAMD-BPRS11 and Clinical Global Impression - Severity (CGI-S) scores = 0.79-0.84), responsiveness (Spearman's correlation coefficient between change in HAMD-BPRS11 and Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) scores = -0.74--0.78) and unidimensionality (Loevinger's coefficient of homogeneity = 0.41) in the evaluation of PD. The HAM-D6 fulfilled the same criteria, whereas the full 17-item Hamilton Depression Scale failed to meet criteria for unidimensionality. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that the HAMD-BPRS11 is a more valid measure than pure depression scales for evaluating the severity of PD.

Influence of serotonin-transporter-linked promoter region polymorphism on platelet activation in geriatric depression.

OBJECTIVE: Depression has been associated with increased platelet activation. Variations in the serotonin-transporter-linked promoter region (5-HTTLPR) polymorphism may influence the degree of activation. The authors examined the association among depression, platelet activation, and 5-HTTLPR genotype. METHOD: Elderly subjects with (N=61) and without (N=12) major depression were assessed for cognitive impairment, cardiovascular disease, and two indices of platelet activation. The depressed subjects were genotyped for the 5-HTTLPR polymorphism. RESULTS: The depressed subjects were older, were more cognitively impaired, and had higher platelet factor 4 and beta-thromboglobulin levels; cardiovascular disease was minimal in both groups. In the depressed group, subjects with the 5-HTTLPR l/l genotype had significantly higher platelet factor 4 and beta-thromboglobulin levels. CONCLUSIONS: Platelet activation is increased in elderly depressed patients, especially those with the 5-HTTLPR l/l genotype. This finding suggests how genetic differences may influence cardiovascular mortality in depressed patients with ischemic heart disease.