Legislating for public accountability in universal health coverage, Thailand.

Sustaining universal health coverage requires robust active public participation in policy formation and governance. Thailand's universal coverage scheme was implemented nationwide in 2002, allowing Thailand to achieve full population coverage through three public health insurance schemes and to demonstrate improved health outcomes. Although Thailand's position on the World Bank worldwide governance indicators has deteriorated since 1996, provisions for voice and accountability were embedded in the legislation and design of the universal coverage scheme. We discuss how legislation related to citizens' rights and government accountability has been implemented. Thailand's constitution allowed citizens to submit a draft bill in which provisions on voice and accountability were successfully embedded in the legislative texts and adopted into law. The legislation mandates registration of beneficiaries, a 24/7 helpline, annual public hearings and no-fault financial assistance for patients who have experienced adverse events. Ensuring the right to health services, and that citizens' voices are heard and action taken, requires the institutional capacity to implement legislation. For example, Thailand needed the capacity to register 47 million people and match them with the health-care provider network in the district where they live, and to re-register members who move out of their districts. Annual public hearings need to be inclusive of citizens, health-care providers, civil society organizations and stakeholders such as local governments and patient groups. Subsequent policy and management responses are important for building trust in the process and citizens' ownership of the scheme. Annual public reporting of outcomes and performance of the scheme fosters transparency and increases citizens' trust.

Maintenir la couverture sanitaire universelle exige une forte participation publique à l'élaboration des politiques et à la gouvernance. En Thaïlande, le régime de couverture universelle a été mis en œuvre dans tout le pays en 2002, permettant de couvrir l'ensemble de la population grâce à trois régimes publics d'assurance maladie et d'améliorer les résultats de santé. Bien que la position de la Thaïlande concernant les Indicateurs de gouvernance mondiaux de la Banque mondiale se soit détériorée depuis 1996, des dispositions en matière d'expression et de reddition de comptes ont été intégrées à la législation et à la structure du régime de couverture universelle. Nous discutons ici de la mise en œuvre de la législation relative aux droits des citoyens et à la reddition de comptes du gouvernement. En vertu de la constitution de la Thaïlande, les citoyens ont pu soumettre un projet de loi dont les dispositions en matière d'expression et de reddition de comptes ont été intégrées aux textes législatifs et transposées dans la loi. La législation rend obligatoire l'enregistrement des bénéficiaires, une assistance téléphonique 24h/24 et 7 j/7, des auditions publiques annuelles et une aide financière systématique pour les patients qui ont été victimes d'événements indésirables. Pour garantir le droit à des services de santé, permettre aux citoyens de faire entendre leur voix et s'assurer que des mesures soient prises, les institutions doivent être en mesure d'appliquer la législation. Par exemple, la Thaïlande devait pouvoir enregistrer 47 millions de personnes et les rattacher au réseau de prestataires de soins du district où elles vivaient, et réenregistrer les personnes qui changeaient de district. Les auditions publiques annuelles doivent faire participer les citoyens, les prestataires de soins, les organisations de la société civile et les parties prenantes telles que les collectivités locales et les groupes de patients. Les réponses qui en découlent au point de vue des politiques et de la gestion sont importantes pour instaurer la confiance dans le processus et permettre aux citoyens de se l'approprier. Les rapports annuels publics sur les résultats du régime de couverture permettent d'accroître la transparence et de renforcer la confiance des citoyens.

Para mantener la cobertura sanitaria universal se requiere una sólida participación activa del público en la formulación de políticas y la gobernanza. El plan de cobertura universal de Tailandia se implementó en todo el país en 2002, lo que permitió a Tailandia lograr una cobertura completa de la población a través de tres planes de seguro médico público y demostrar mejores resultados en materia de salud. Aunque la posición de Tailandia respecto de los Indicadores mundiales de gobernanza del Banco Mundial ha disminuido desde 1996, las disposiciones relativas a la voz y la rendición de cuentas estaban incorporadas en la legislación y en el diseño del plan de cobertura universal. Se discute cómo se ha implementado la legislación relacionada con los derechos de los ciudadanos y la rendición de cuentas del gobierno. La Constitución de Tailandia permitía a los ciudadanos presentar un proyecto de ley en el que las disposiciones sobre la voz y la rendición de cuentas se incorporaban con éxito en los textos legislativos y se aprobaban como ley. La legislación exige el registro de los beneficiarios, una línea telefónica de ayuda 24 horas al día los 7 días de la semana, audiencias públicas anuales y asistencia financiera gratuita para los pacientes que han sufrido eventos adversos. Para garantizar el derecho a los servicios de salud y que se escuche la voz de los ciudadanos y se adopten medidas, es necesario contar con la capacidad institucional para aplicar la legislación. Por ejemplo, Tailandia necesitaba la capacidad de inscribir a 47 millones de personas y ponerlas en contacto con la red de proveedores de servicios de salud del distrito en el que viven, y de volver a inscribir a los miembros que se trasladan fuera de sus distritos. Las audiencias públicas anuales deben incluir a los ciudadanos, los proveedores de servicios de salud, las organizaciones de la sociedad civil y las partes interesadas, como los gobiernos locales y los grupos de pacientes. Las respuestas políticas y de gestión subsiguientes son importantes para generar confianza en el proceso y en la apropiación del plan por parte de los ciudadanos. El informe público anual sobre los resultados y el rendimiento del plan fomenta la transparencia y aumenta la confianza de los ciudadanos.

Southeast Asia Strategic Multilateral Dialogue on Biosecurity.

A strategic multilateral dialogue related to biosecurity risks in Southeast Asia, established in 2014, now includes participants from Singapore, Malaysia, Indonesia, Thailand, Philippines, and the United States. This dialogue is conducted at the nonministerial level, enabling participants to engage without the constraints of operating in their official capacities. Participants reflect on mechanisms to detect, mitigate, and respond to biosecurity risks and highlight biosecurity issues for national leadership. Participants have also identified factors to improve regional and global biosecurity, including improved engagement and collaboration across relevant ministries and agencies, sustainable funding for biosecurity programs, enhanced information sharing for communicable diseases, and increased engagement in international biosecurity forums.

Toward a Common Secure Future: Four Global Commissions in the Wake of Ebola.

Lawrence Gostin and colleagues offer a set of priorities for global health preparedness and response for future infectious disease threats.

UICC International Session: What are the implications of sharing the concept of Universal Health Coverage for cancer in Asia?

The Japan National Committee for the Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) and UICC - Asia Regional Office organized an international session as part of the 74th Annual Meeting of the Japanese Cancer Association on the topic "What are the implications of sharing the concept of Universal Health Coverage for cancer in Asia?" Universal Health Coverage (UHC) is included in the United Nations' Sustainable Development Goals and aims to ensure that all people can receive high-quality medical services, are protected from public health risks, and are prevented from falling into poverty due to medical costs or loss of income arising from illness. The session discussed the growing cost of cancer and the challenges that this poses to the establishment and deployment of UHC in the Asian region, where countries face budgetary and other systemic constraints in tackling and controlling cancer. It was noted how sharing concepts on UHC will assist mutual learning among Asian countries and help in the formation of guidelines that can be adapted to national and regional realities. Presentations included a status report on UHC for cancer control in Thailand, and a report from the WHO Kobe Centre concerning prospects for collaborative research on UHC. Also discussed were the current status of cancer burden and control in China and Korea and Japan's progress in systemizing cost-effectiveness evaluation. The final presentation highlighted the importance of gathering social and economic data across Asia in order to build a picture of commonalities and differences in the region.

Contextual attributes associated with public participation in environmental impact assessments in Thailand: Perspectives obtained from authorities and academics.

Context can enhance or hinder public participation (PP) in environmental impact assessments (EIAs). This study aimed to investigate and discuss how PP-related contextual attributes influence the quality of PP in Thai EIA processes. The study adopted the qualitative approach and interviewed 20 key informants with insightful PP-associated experience in Thai EIAs. The results showed that four major groups of contextual attributes are believed to influence PP in Thai EIAs: the legal and political frameworks, the capacities of key actors, environmental awareness and the right to participate in decision-making processes, and cultural context. The greatest strength of PP in Thai EIAs is that PP is mandated by law, followed by increased environmental awareness and the right to participate in the decision-making process. Different key actors such as project owners, consultants, non-governmental organizations, and reviewing agencies encounter difficulties in discharging their prescribed functions, which affects the quality of PP. The authoritarian culture of Thai society also prevents PP in EIAs. The study offers certain recommendations, including public communication about how civic inputs can influence decision-making processes, the employment of social sector specialists to facilitate PP in EIA, and the application of appropriate participation techniques associated with the prevailing culture.

Recalibrating the notion of modelling for policymaking during pandemics.

COVID-19 disease models have aided policymakers in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs) with many critical decisions. Many challenges remain surrounding their use, from inappropriate model selection and adoption, inadequate and untimely reporting of evidence, to the lack of iterative stakeholder engagement in policy formulation and deliberation. These issues can contribute to the misuse of models and hinder effective policy implementation. Without guidance on how to address such challenges, the true potential of such models may not be realised. The COVID-19 Multi-Model Comparison Collaboration (CMCC) was formed to address this gap. CMCC is a global collaboration between decision-makers from LMICs, modellers and researchers, and development partners. To understand the limitations of existing COVID-19 disease models (primarily from high income countries) and how they could be adequately support decision-making in LMICs, a desk review of modelling experience during the COVID-19 and past disease outbreaks, two online surveys, and regular online consultations were held among the collaborators. Three key recommendations from CMCC include: A 'fitness-for-purpose' flowchart, a tool that concurrently walks policymakers (or their advisors) and modellers through a model selection and development process. The flowchart is organised around the following: policy aims, modelling feasibility, model implementation, model reporting commitment. Holmdahl and Buckee (2020) A 'reporting standards trajectory', which includes three gradually increasing standard of reports, 'minimum', 'acceptable', and 'ideal', and seeks collaboration from funders, modellers, and decision-makers to enhance the quality of reports over time and accountability of researchers. Malla et al. (2018) A framework for "collaborative modelling for effective policy implementation and evaluation" which extends the definition of stakeholders to funders, ground-level implementers, public, and other researchers, and outlines how each can contribute to modelling. We advocate for standardisation of modelling processes and adoption of country-owned model through iterative stakeholder participation and discuss how they can enhance trust, accountability, and public ownership to decisions.

Government use licenses in Thailand: The power of evidence, civil movement and political leadership.

This paper attempts to describe and analyse the policy processes that led to the granting and implementation of the government use licenses to enable the import and production of generic versions of medicines patented in Thailand. The decision to grant the series of government use licenses was taken despite much domestic and international controversy. The paper demonstrates that the policy processes leading to the granting of government use licenses are a successful application of the concept of "the triangle that moves the mountain". This is a well-known conceptualisation of a philosophical and strategic approach to public policy advocacy in Thailand, which propounds that the effective bridging of three powers; a.) Knowledge and evidence generated by research and analysis, b.) Civil society movements and public support, and c.) Leadership of policy makers and politicians; in a synergistic "triangle" can move "mountains", meaning the resolution of seemingly insurmountable problems. The paper provides insights into the policy context for the decision and analyses the roles of key actors, their motivations and the policy processes in the country.

Extension of market exclusivity and its impact on the accessibility to essential medicines, and drug expense in Thailand: analysis of the effect of TRIPs-Plus proposal.

BACKGROUND: In Thailand and the US negotiating FTA, the 'TRIPs-Plus' is one of the US proposal which would result in an extension of market exclusivity of innovative drugs. In addition, it would foreseeably lead to high and unaffordable medicine prices and inaccessibility to essential medicines. OBJECTIVE: To quantify the impact on medicine expense and medicine accessibility. METHODS: Based on 2000 to 2003 Thai Food and Drug Administration (FDA)'s and the Drug & Medical Supply Information Center (DMSIC), costs and accessibility were estimated upon the price and quantity costing between innovative drugs and their generics plus some parameters found from their competitive behaviour. Thereafter, we simulated the 10-year potential additional expense on the 2003 unit price of the patented and monopolized non-patented medicines. RESULTS: In 2003, the availability of generics helped to save 104.5% of actual expense and the accessibility would increase by 53.6%. By extension of market exclusivity, given that there were 60 new items approved annually, the cumulative potential expense was projected to be $US 6.2 million for the first year to $US 5215.8 million in tenth year. CONCLUSION: The TRIPs-Plus proposal would result in a significant increase in the medicine expense; and a delay in the increase in drug accessibility via generics. Several options as well as other related mechanisms to help reduce the negative impact are proposed.

Regional infectious disease surveillance networks and their potential to facilitate the implementation of the international health regulations.

The International Health Regulations (IHR) 2005 present a challenge and opportunity for global surveillance and control of infectious diseases. This article examines the opportunity for regional networks to address this challenge. Two regional infectious disease surveillance networks, established in the Mekong Basin and the Middle East, are presented as case studies. The public-private partnerships in the networks have led to an upgrade in infectious disease surveillance systems in capacity building, purchasing technology equipment, sharing of information, and development of preparedness plans in combating avian influenza. These regional networks have become an appropriate infrastructure for the implementation of the IHR 2005.

Tobacco and hazardous or harmful alcohol use in Thailand: joint prevalence and associations with socioeconomic factors.

This study estimates the individual and joint prevalence of cigarette smoking and alcohol misuse, and examines the association between these risks and socioeconomic factors in Thailand. The self-reported data on cigarette and alcohol use are from a 2004 nationally representative cross-sectional survey of 39290 individuals aged 15 and over. Substantially more men than women were current smokers (45.8% vs. 2.3%; p<0.001) as well as harmful (5.4% vs. 0.9%, p<0.0001) and hazardous alcohol users (11.2% vs. 1.2%, p<0.001). The strongest predictor of alcohol misuse was smoking, and the strongest predictor of smoking was alcohol misuse in both sexes. There was an inverse relationship between education and family income with the odds of current smoking, whereas average levels of family income (not low or high) were associated with higher odds of harmful or hazardous alcohol use. Tobacco and alcohol misuse could be more effectively addressed by targeting and tailoring programs towards those who are most at risk - joint tobacco and harmful or hazardous alcohol users, and those of lower socioeconomic status.

The need for guidelines and the use of economic evidence in decision-making in Thailand: lessons learnt from the development of the national list of essential drugs.

Since 2004, the Subcommittee for Development of the National List of Essential Drugs (NLED) has embarked upon an historical evolution of applying evidence to the revision, inclusion and exclusion of medicines into and from the list. Then, the revision of the 2008 NLED was the first time in Thai history where the drug selection process in Thailand formally incorporated pharmacoeconomics. At present, the lack of a standard methodology for conducting economic evaluation is a major barrier that diminishes the potential use of economic evidence. The development of national economic evaluation guidelines by a group of national experts was subsequently endorsed by members in the Subcommittee as useful tools for future NLED revision. They emphasize that these guidelines should be applied not only to those evaluations conducted by public institutions but also by private pharmaceutical companies that often use this evidence for their marketing, or even for future requirements of economic information from industry, as complementary evidence for inclusion of health technology.

Responding to the global human resources crisis.

The global community is in the midst of a growing response to health crises in developing countries, which is focused on mobilising financial resources and increasing access to essential medicines. However, the response has yet to tackle the most important aspect of health-care systems--the people that make them work. Human resources for health--the personnel that deliver public-health, clinical, and environmental services--are in disarray and decline in much of the developing world, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa. The reasons behind this disorder are complex. For decades, efforts have focused on building training institutions. What is becoming increasingly clear, however, is that issues of supply, demand, and mobility (transnational, regional, and local) are central to the human-resource problem. Without substantial improvements in workforces, newly mobilised funds and commodities will not deliver on their promise. The global community needs to engage in four core strategies: raise the profile of the issue of human resources; improve the conceptual base and statistical evidence available to decision makers; collect, share, and learn from country experiences; and begin to formulate and enact policies at the country level that affect all aspects of the crisis.

Human resources for health: overcoming the crisis.

In this analysis of the global workforce, the Joint Learning Initiative-a consortium of more than 100 health leaders-proposes that mobilisation and strengthening of human resources for health, neglected yet critical, is central to combating health crises in some of the world's poorest countries and for building sustainable health systems in all countries. Nearly all countries are challenged by worker shortage, skill mix imbalance, maldistribution, negative work environment, and weak knowledge base. Especially in the poorest countries, the workforce is under assault by HIV/AIDS, out-migration, and inadequate investment. Effective country strategies should be backed by international reinforcement. Ultimately, the crisis in human resources is a shared problem requiring shared responsibility for cooperative action. Alliances for action are recommended to strengthen the performance of all existing actors while expanding space and energy for fresh actors.