Prevalence of Poststroke Neurocognitive Disorders Using National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke-Canadian Stroke Network, VASCOG Criteria (Vascular Behavioral and Cognitive Disorders), and Optimized Criteria of Cognitive Deficit.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The prevalence of poststroke neurocognitive disorder (NCD) has yet to be accurately determined. The primary objective of the present study was to optimize operationalization of the criterion for NCD by using an external validity criterion. METHODS: The GRECOG-VASC cohort (Groupe de Réflexion pour l'Évaluation Cognitive Vasculaire) of 404 stroke patients with cerebral infarct (91.3%) or hemorrhage (18.7%) was assessed 6 months poststroke and 1003 healthy controls, with the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke-Canadian Stroke Network standardized battery. Three dimensions of the criterion for cognitive impairment were systematically examined by using the false-positive rate as an external validity criterion. Diagnosis of mild and major NCD was based on the VASCOG criteria (Vascular Behavioral and Cognitive Disorders). The mechanisms of functional decline were systematically assessed. RESULTS: The optimal criterion for cognitive impairment was the shortened summary score (ie, averaged performance for action speed, executive functions, and language) because it was associated with the highest (P=0.0001) corrected true-positive rate (43.5%) and a false-positive rate ≤5%. Using this criterion, the mean (95% confidence interval) prevalence of poststroke NCD was 49.5% (44.6-54.4), most of which corresponded to mild NCD (39.1%; 95% confidence interval, 34.4-43.9) rather than dementia (10.4%; 95% confidence interval, 7.4-13.4). CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first to have optimized the operationalization of the criterion for poststroke cognitive impairment. It documented the prevalence of poststroke NCD in the GRECOG-VASC cohort and showed that mild cognitive impairment accounts for 80% of the affected patients. Finally, the method developed in the present study offers a means of harmonizing the diagnosis of NCD. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01339195.

Neuroimaging determinants of cognitive impairment in the memory clinic: how important is the vascular burden?

While neurodegenerative and vascular neurocognitive disorder (NCD) often co-occur, the contribution of vascular lesions, especially stroke lesions identified on MRI, to global cognition in a real-life memory clinic population remains unclear. The main objective of this retrospective study was to determine NCD neuroimaging correlates: the GM atrophy pattern and vascular lesions (especially stroke lesion localization by voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping, VLSM) in a memory clinic. We included 336 patients with mild or major NCD who underwent cerebral MRI and a neuropsychological assessment. The GM atrophy pattern (obtained by voxel-based morphometry, VBM) and the stroke lesion localization (obtained by VLSM) associated with G5 z-score (a global cognitive score), were included as independent variables with other neuroimaging and clinical indices in a stepwise linear regression model. The mean age was 70.3 years and the mean MMSE score 21.3. On MRI, 75 patients had at least one stroke lesion. The G 5 z-score was associated with GM density in the pattern selected by the VBM analysis (R2 variation = 0.166, p < 0.001) and the presence of a stroke lesion in the region selected by the VSLM analysis (mainly in the right frontal region; R2 variation = 0.018, p = 0.008). The interaction between the two factors was insignificant (p = 0.374). In conclusion, in this first study combining VBM and VLSM analysis in a memory clinic, global cognition was associated with a specific GM atrophy pattern and the presence of a stroke lesion mainly in the right frontal region.

Functional Outcome and Hemorrhage Rates After Bridging Therapy With Tenecteplase or Alteplase in Patients With Large Ischemic Core.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: IV tenecteplase is an alternative to alteplase before mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in patients with large-vessel occlusion (LVO) ischemic stroke. Little data are available on its use in patients with large ischemic core. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of both thrombolytics in this population. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with anterior circulation LVO strokes and diffusion-weighed imaging Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (DWI-ASPECTS) ≤5 treated with tenecteplase or alteplase before MT from the TETRIS (tenecteplase) and ETIS (alteplase) French multicenter registries. Primary outcome was reduced disability at 3 months (ordinal analysis of the modified Rankin scale [mRS]). Safety outcomes were 3-month mortality, parenchymal hematoma (PH), and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH). We used propensity score overlap weighting to reduce baseline differences between treatment groups. RESULTS: We analyzed 647 patients (tenecteplase: n = 194; alteplase: n = 453; inclusion period 2015-2022). Median (interquartile range) age was 71 (57-81) years, with NIH Stroke Scale score 19 (16-22), DWI-ASPECTS 4 (3-5), and last seen well-to-IV thrombolysis and puncture times 165 minutes (130-226) and 260 minutes (203-349), respectively. After MT, the successful reperfusion rate was 83.1%. After propensity score overlap weighting, all baseline variables were well balanced between both treatment groups. Compared with patients treated with alteplase, patients treated with tenecteplase had better 3-month mRS (common odds ratio [OR] for reduced disability: 1.37, 1.01-1.87, p = 0.046) and lower 3-month mortality (OR 0.52, 0.33-0.81, p < 0.01). There were no significant differences between thrombolytics for PH (OR 0.84, 0.55-1.30, p = 0.44) and sICH incidence (OR 0.70, 0.42-1.18, p = 0.18). DISCUSSION: Our data are encouraging regarding the efficacy and reassuring regarding the safety of tenecteplase compared with that of alteplase in bridging therapy for patients with LVO strokes and a large ischemic core in routine clinical care. These results support its consideration as an alternative to alteplase in bridging therapy for patients with large ischemic cores. TRIALS REGISTRATION INFORMATION: NCT03776877 (ETIS registry) and NCT05534360 (TETRIS registry). CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class III evidence that patients with anterior circulation LVO stroke and DWI-ASPECTS ≤5 treated with tenecteplase vs alteplase before MT experienced better functional outcomes and lower mortality at 3 months.