Pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of intravenous brivaracetam in pediatric patients with epilepsy: An open-label trial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of brivaracetam (BRV) as 15-min intravenous (IV) infusion and bolus (≤2-min injection). METHODS: EP0065 (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03405714) was a Phase 2, multicenter, open-label trial in patients ≥1 month to <16 years of age with epilepsy. Patients received up to 5 mg/kg/day BRV (not exceeding 200 mg/day). Enrollment was sequential by descending age, depending on safety review. Outcomes included BRV plasma concentrations before and after IV administration, treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), and discontinuations due to TEAEs. RESULTS: Fifty patients were enrolled, received BRV, and completed the trial. Twenty-six patients (52.0%) received 15-min infusions and 24 (48.0%) received bolus injections. Most patients (80.0%) received one IV dose. In the 15-min infusion group, geometric mean (GeoMean) BRV concentrations 15 (±2) min (n = 21) and 3 h (±15 min) (n = 21) post dose were 1903.0 ng/mL (geometric coefficient of variation [GeoCV]: 60.7%) and 1130.3 ng/mL (58.8%), respectively. In the bolus group, GeoMean BRV concentrations 15 (±2) min (n = 19) and 3 h (±15 min) (n = 21) post dose were 1704.8 ng/mL (GeoCV: 74.5%) and 1383.9 ng/mL (85.0%), respectively. Overall, 14 patients (28.0%) had TEAEs (15-min infusion: 8 [30.8%]; bolus: 6 [25.0%]), most commonly (≥5% of patients) somnolence (3 [6.0%]). Ten patients (20.0%) had drug-related TEAEs (15-min infusion: 6 [23.1%]; bolus: 4 [16.7%]). No patients discontinued due to TEAEs, and no deaths occurred. SIGNIFICANCE: IV BRV (up to 200 mg/day) was well tolerated in patients ≥1 month to <16 years of age, regardless of whether BRV was administered as 15-min infusion or bolus. No unexpected safety or pharmacokinetic differences were observed between patients receiving 15-min infusions or bolus, and plasma concentrations were in the expected range. Safety results were consistent with the known safety profile of oral BRV, with no new safety concerns identified.

Pharmacokinetics and safety of brivaracetam in neonates with repeated electroencephalographic seizures: A multicenter, open-label, single-arm study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PK), safety, and tolerability of brivaracetam (BRV) in neonates with repeated electroencephalographic seizures not controlled with previous antiseizure medications (ASMs). METHODS: Phase 2/3, multicenter, open-label, single-arm study (N01349/NCT03325439) in neonates with repeated electroencephalographic seizures (lasting ≥10 s) confirmed by video-electroencephalography, and inadequate seizure control with at least one ASM. A screening period (up to 36 h) was followed by a 48-h evaluation period during which patients received 0.5 mg/kg BRV twice daily (b.i.d) intravenously (IV). Patients who benefitted from BRV (investigator's opinion) could continue 0.5 mg/kg b.i.d (IV or oral solution) in an extension period. Outcomes included plasma concentrations of BRV following the first dose (primary), and incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). RESULTS: Six patients (median [range] postnatal age: 1.5 [1.0, 6.0] days) received ≥1 dose of BRV. All six patients completed the evaluation period; two entered and completed the extension period. Overall (evaluation and extension periods), three patients received one dose of 0.5 mg/kg BRV and three received more than one dose. The median (range) duration of exposure to BRV (IV and oral solution) was 1.5 (1.0, 29.0) days (n = 6). At 0.5-1, 2-4, and 8-12 h following IV BRV administration, the GeoMean (GeoCV) plasma concentrations of BRV were 0.53 mg/L (15.40% [n = 5]), 0.50 mg/L (28.20% [n = 6]), and 0.34 mg/L (13.20% [n = 5]), respectively. Individual and population BRV PK profiles were estimated, and individual PK parameters were calculated using Bayesian feedback. The observed concentrations were consistent with the predicted PK. Three patients experienced four TEAEs, none of which were considered related to BRV. SIGNIFICANCE: BRV plasma concentrations in neonates were consistent with data in older children receiving BRV oral solution, and with data from adults receiving a nominal IV dose of 25 mg b.i.d. BRV was well tolerated, with no drug-related TEAEs reported. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Few drugs are available to treat seizures in newborn babies. Brivaracetam is approved to treat focal-onset seizures in children and adults in Europe (patients 2 years of age and older) and the United States (patients 1 month of age or older). In this study, six newborns with repeated seizures were treated with intravenous brivaracetam. The study doctors took samples of blood from the newborns and measured the levels of brivaracetam. The concentrations of brivaracetam in the newborns' blood plasma were consistent with data from studies in older children and in adults. No brivaracetam-related medical problems were reported.

Patients' perception of Parkinson's disease-associated pain following initiation of rotigotine: a multicenter non-interventional study.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate Parkinson's disease (PD)-associated pain as perceived by the patients (subjective characterization), and how this may change following initiation of rotigotine transdermal patch. METHODS: SP1058 was a non-interventional study conducted in routine clinical practice in Germany and Austria in patients experiencing PD-associated pain (per the physician's assessment). Data were collected at baseline (ie, before rotigotine initiation) and at a routine visit after ≥25 days (-3 days allowed) of treatment on a maintenance dose of rotigotine (end of study [EoS]). Pain perception was assessed using the 12-item Pain Description List of the validated German Pain Questionnaire (each item ranked 0 = 'not true' to 3 = 'very true'). Primary effectiveness variable: change from baseline to EoS in the sum score of the 4 'affective dimension' items of the Pain Description List. Secondary effectiveness variables: change from baseline to EoS in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) II, III, and II+III scores, and Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-8) total score (PD-related quality-of-life). Other variables included scores of the eight 'sensory dimension' items of the Pain Description List. RESULTS: Of 93 enrolled patients (mean [SD] age: 71.1 [9.0] years; male: 48 [52%]), 77 (83%) completed the study, and 70 comprised the full analysis set. The mean (SD) change from baseline in the sum score of the four 'affective dimension' items was -1.3 (2.8) indicating a numerical improvement (baseline: 3.9 [3.4]). In the 'sensory dimension', pain was mostly perceived as 'pulling' at baseline (49/70 [70%]); 'largely true'/'very true'). Numerical improvements were observed in all UPDRS scores (mean [SD] change in UPDRS II+III: -5.3 [10.5]; baseline: 36.0 [15.9]), and in PDQ-8 total score (-2.0 [4.8]; baseline: 10.7 [5.9]). Adverse drug reactions were consistent with dopaminergic stimulation and transdermal administration. CONCLUSION: The perception of the 'affective dimension' of PD-associated pain numerically improved in patients treated with rotigotine. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01606670; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01606670?term=NCT01606670&rank=1.