The Financial Burden of Functional Neurological Disorders.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Functional neurological disorder (FND) is a common and severely debilitating condition lacking clinical ownership, existing between neurology and psychiatry. This article reports the findings of recent research investigating the economic costs of FND diagnosis and management. We define what the costs are, why they exist, and suggest actionable steps to reduce them. RECENT FINDINGS: The financial burden of FND exists across the globe characterized by high healthcare utilization resulting in exorbitant direct and indirect costs for the patient, healthcare system, and society. Inadequate medical education and stigmatization of the disorder prolong the time to diagnosis, during which cyclical utilization of inpatient and emergency department services drive up costs. Despite being cost-effective, lack of accessible treatment compounds the issue, leaving patients without a reliable exit. Recent findings support an increased awareness and the need for a cultural shift to overcome the financial burden associated with this underserved population.

Time for Brain Medicine.

Unprecedented knowledge of the brain is inevitably contributing to the convergence of neurology and psychiatry. However, clinical training continues to follow a divergent approach established in the 19th century. An etiological approach will continue to shift more psychiatric patients to the care of neurologists who are untrained in psychiatric management. At the same time, this new era of diagnostic biomarkers and neuroscience-based precision treatments requires skills not readily available to those trained in psychiatry. The challenges in training the next generation of doctors include establishing competence involving aspects of the whole brain, fostering the subspecialized expertise needed to remain current, and developing programs that are feasible in duration and practical in implementation. A new 4-year residency training program proposed in this article could replace existing residency programs. The program includes 2 years of common and urgent training in various aspects of neurology and psychiatry followed by 2 years of elective subspecialty tracks. The concept is similar to internal medicine residencies and fellowships. No changes to existing departmental structures are necessary. In concert with the emerging biological approach to the brain, "brain medicine" is proposed as a new name to denote this practice in the simplest terms: a focus on all aspects of the brain.

Work difficulties, work restrictions, and disability benefits in people with functional seizures: A survey study.

Purpose: Functional seizures (FS) cause significant long-term disability and clinicians offer differing views on proper work restrictions and qualifications for disability benefits in this population. We assess the views and perspectives of experienced disability and work limitations in people living with functional seizures. Methods: Between (4/29/2020-1/13/2021) an open-access 21-item internet survey was conducted via FNDHope.org; allowing for people living with self-reported functional seizures to remark on topics of work difficulties, work restrictions, qualifications for disability benefits, and driving. Demographic information was collected, and univariate and multivariate logistic regressions were used to evaluate potential predictors of current employment status. Results: One hundred eighteen (118) responses were received, of which 92 (84.4%) completed > 50% of the survey; they were predominantly (92%) female. Most respondents (88%) reported some personal difficulty at work and nearly all (99%) believed that others with FS would experience difficulties in the workplace. A majority (71%) felt that work restrictions should apply to people living with active FS, at least in certain lines of work. Most (64%) felt people with FS should qualify for disability benefits; however, 35% stated work accommodations or a new job compatible with FS was more appropriate. Of those who felt people with FS should qualify for disability, 60% thought recipients should remain eligible for disability while symptomatic and 38% felt benefits should be lifelong. In univariate and multivariate logistic regressions, older age was predictive of unemployment (univariate OR 0.95 ± 0.02, 95% CI 0.92-0.98, p-value 0.002). Conclusion: Our results suggest that work difficulties are common in people with FS, with older age being a predictor of unemployment. A majority of people with FS support work restrictions for those with their disorder, at least in some lines of work. In comparison to a prior study of clinicians, a higher percentage of people with FS supported work restrictions. These results may help facilitate productive discussions between people with FS, providers, and policymakers regarding appropriate work and disability limitations.