Research on treatment and mechanism of salicylhydroxamic acid flotation wastewater by O3-BAF process.

Salicylhydroxamic acid is an effective and selective collector for tungsten and molybdenum ores. However, the salicylhydroxamic acid flotation wastewater discharge may cause damage to the water environment for the residual processing reagents with poor biodegradability. Combined O3 and biological aerated filter (BAF) has a well-known potential for removing refractory or toxic organic pollutants. Combined process of O3 and BAF (O3-BAF) was applied to treat the simulated wastewater from W-Mo mineral processing in this study. Compared single ozonation to O3-BAF, various influencing factors were discussed like O3 dosage, reaction time, initial pH value, gas-water ratio and organic loading. Meanwhile, degradation mechanism of salicylhydroxamic acid was reduced. Under the optimal experiment conditions as pH value 8, O3 dosage 1.3 mg·L-1, reaction time 15 min, the five-day biochemical oxygen demand (BOD5)/chemical oxygen demand of potassium dichromate (CODCr) value increased to from 0.19 to 0.35. The effluent was pumped to the following BAF process, when the optimal experiment conditions was organic load = 0.82 kgCODCr (m-3·d-1), gas-water ratio = 6:1, CODCr concentration of effluent was 28.92 mg·L-1 and the removal ratio was 86.26%, while the removal ratio could higher to 91.12% for the O3-BAF combined process. The effluent could meet the discharge and reuse emission standards requirements in China. UV-vis absorption spectra and high performance liquid chromatography showed the degradation pathway of salicylhydroxamic acid by ozone oxidation was salicylhydroxamic acid → salicylic acid + hydroxylamine → catechol → maleic → small molecular organic acid → carbon dioxide + water.

Adsorption, boiling or membrane filtration for disinfection by-product removal: How to make our drinking water safer?

Disinfection by-products (DBPs) generated in drinking water have become a global concern due to their potential harm to human health. Nevertheless, there are few studies about different point-of-use water treatments in household drinking water. The study aims to compare the effectiveness of three point-of-use water treatments: adsorption, boiling, and membrane filtration. The experimental results showed that the initial average concentration of volatile DBPs and non-volatile DBPs for tap water were 63.71 µg/L and 6.33 µg/L. The removal efficiency of DBPs for adsorption which were 75.6 % (the filter volumes from 0 L to 20 L) and 45.4 % (the filter volumes from 20 L to 50 L) during the service life of the filter element (50 L). Boiling had a high removal efficiency for volatile DBPs like trihalomethanes (THMs), haloacetaldehydes (HALs), haloacetonitriles (HANs), and haloketones (HKs) (90.5 %, 100 %, 100 %, and 100 %, respectively). However, boiling had a low removal efficiency which was 15 % in removing non-volatile DBPs like haloacetic acids (HAAs). Membrane filtration had a middle removal efficiency for THMs, HAAs, HALs, HKs, and HANs (45.3 %, 75.2 %, 46.5 %, 47.6 %, and 100 %, respectively). Through analysis of the correlation between dissolved organic matter (DOM) removal efficacy and DBP removal efficiency, it was found that the strongest correlation was observed between UV254 and DBP removal efficiency. Boiling showed a lower estimated cytotoxicity of DBPs compared to adsorption and membrane filtration. Cancer risk assessment of DBPs was below the specified risk range for three point-of-use water treatments. This study provides a reference for choosing point-of-use water treatments in household drinking water.

Priority screening of contaminants of emerging concern in drinking water sources of eastern China: Assessing risks based on exposure-activity ratios (EARs).

Increasing and widely detected contaminants of emerging concern (CECs) pose a threat to drinking water safety. Compared with traditional methods, the exposure-activity ratio (EAR) method based on the ToxCast database may have unique advantages in risk assessment of drinking water sources because it provides massive multi-target high-throughput screening toxicity effect data assessment for chemicals with missing traditional toxicity data. In this study, 112 CECs at 52 sampling sites in drinking water sources in Zhejiang Province of eastern China were investigated. Based on EARs and occurrence, priority chemicals were identified as difenoconazole (priority level 1), dimethomorph (priority level 2), acetochlor, caffeine, carbamazepine, carbendazim, paclobutrazol and pyrimethanil (priority level 3). Different from single observable biological effect in traditional methods, a variety of observable biological effects caused by high-risk targets were explored through adverse outcomes pathways (AOPs), revealing ecological risks as well as human health risks, for example, hepatocellular adenomas and carcinomas. Furthermore, the difference between the maximum EAR for a given chemical in a sample (EARmax) and the toxicity quotient (TQ) in priority screening of CECs was compared. The results show that screening priority CECs based on the EAR method is acceptable and more sensitive, suggesting the difference between in vitro and in vivo toxic effects and the necessity of incorporating the harm degree of biological effects into the EAR method to screen priority chemicals in the future.

Perfluorinated compound correlation between human serum and drinking water: Is drinking water a significant contributor?

Perfluorinated compounds (PFASs) are a new artificial chemical. Due to its substantial toxicity and complex degradation in the natural environment, monitoring PFASs has become a hot issue for many researchers. Currently, the relationship between the concentration of PFASs in serum and the concentration of PFASs in drinking water is unclear. This paper aims to study the concentration levels of PFASs in drinking water and residents' serum in a city in northern China and the relationship between them. The results show that the concentration of PFASs in drinking water is low, and the average concentrations of perfluorooctanoate (PFOA) and perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) were 2.57 ± 0.69 ng/L and 0.30 ng/L, respectively, which were lower than the limits specified in China's newly introduced Standards for drinking water quality (GB 5749-2022). In the serum of residents, PFOA and PFOS were the two PFASs with the highest concentration. Spearman correlation analysis showed that perfluorohexane sulfonate (PFHxS) and PFOS concentrations were positively correlated with age, and PFHxS, PFOA, PFNA, and PFOS varied with sex. At the same time, the correlation analysis also showed no correlation between PFAS in drinking water and serum, indicating that drinking water was not the main factor causing the physical burden of PFAS in residents. The HI method was used to assess the health risks of PFASs to human beings. The risk entropy of all PFASs for human hepatotoxicity and reproductive toxicity is below 1.