[Clinical value of p16INK4a immunocytochemistry in cervical cancer screening].

Objective: To evaluate the value of p16INK4a detected by p16INK4a immunostaining as a new generation of cervical cytology for primary screening and secondary screening in population-based cervical cancer screening, and in improving cytological diagnosis. Methods: Between 2016 and 2018, 5 747 non-pregnant women aged 25-65 years with sexual history were recruited and underwent cervical cancer screening via high-risk (HR)-HPV/liquid-based cytological test (LCT) test in Shenzhen and surrounding areas. All slides were immuno-stained using p16INK4a technology, among them, 902 cases were offered p16INK4a detection during primary screening, and the remaining 4 845 cases were called-back by the virtue of abnormal HR-HPV and LCT results for p16INK4a staining. Participants with complete LCT examination, HR-HPV test, p16INK4a staining and histopathological examination results were included in this study. The performance of p16INK4a in primary and secondary screening, and in assisting cytology to detect high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion [HSIL, including cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) Ⅱ or Ⅲ] or worse [HSIL (CIN Ⅱ)+ or HSIL (CIN Ⅲ)+] were analyzed. Results: (1) One-thousand and ninety-seven cases with complete data of p16INK4a and histology were included. Pathological diagnosis: 995 cases of normal cervix, 37 cases of low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL), 64 cases of HSIL and one case of cervical cancer were found. Among them, 65 cases of HSIL (CIN Ⅱ)+ and 34 cases of HSIL (CIN Ⅲ)+ were detected. The positive rate of p16INK4a in HSIL (CIN Ⅱ)+ was higher than that in CINⅠ or normal pathology (89.2% vs 10.2%; P<0.01). (2) p16INK4a as primary screening for HSIL (CIN Ⅱ)+ or HSIL (CIN Ⅲ)+ was equally sensitive to primary HR-HPV screening (89.2% vs 95.4%, 94.1% vs 94.1%; P>0.05), but more specific than HR-HPV screening (89.8% vs 82.5%, 87.7% vs 80.2%; P<0.05). p16INK4a was equally sensitive and similarly specific to cytology (≥LSIL; P>0.05). (3) The specificity of LCT adjunctive p16INK4a for detecting HSIL (CIN Ⅱ)+ or HSIL (CIN Ⅲ)+ were higher than that of LCT alone or adjunctive HR-HPV (P<0.01), while the sensitivity were similar (P>0.05). (4) p16INK4a staining as secondary screening: p16INK4a was significantly more specific (94.1% vs 89.7%, 91.9% vs 87.4%; P<0.01) and comparably sensitive (84.6% vs 90.8%, 88.2% vs 91.2%; P>0.05) to cytology for triaging primary HR-HPV screening. HPV 16/18 to colposcopy and triage other HR-HPV with p16INK4a was equally sensitive (88.2% vs 94.1%; P=0.500) and more specific (88.3% vs 83.0%; P<0.01) than HPV 16/18 to colposcopy and triage other HR-HPV with LCT≥ atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS), and the referral rate decreased (14.0% vs 19.4%; P=0.005). Conclusions: For primary screening, p16INK4a is equally specific to cytology and equally sensitive to HR-HPV screening. p16INK4a alone could be an efficient triage after primary HR-HPV screening. In addition, p16INK4a immunostaining could be used as an ancillary tool to cervical cytological diagnosis, and improves its accuracy in cervical cancer screening.

[The value of p16(INK4a) cytology for early diagnosis of cervical cancer].

Objective: To investigate the use of p16(INK4a) immuno-stained cytology as the primary screening for cervical cancer prevention. Methods: From March to August 2018, 902 women from Shenzhen and surrounding area were recruited for cervical cancer screening with ThinPrep Cytologic Test (TCT), cobas4800 HPV test, and p16(INK4a) co-test. Colpo/biopsies were performed using the point of interest biopsy protocol of directed and random cervical biopsies plus endocervical curettage for all women, any of whose tests was positive. Two senior cytopathologists interpreted TCT and p16(INK4a) test. The performance of p16(INK4a) for early detection of CIN2+ and inter-observer reproducibility of the interpretation of p16(INK4a) were evaluated. Results: The positive rates of HPV test, p16(INK4a) co-test and TCT diagnosed as LSIL/AGC or higher grade were 8.1% (73/902), 6.8% (61/902) and 4.7% (42/902), respectively. Colposcopy referring rate was 79.6% (109/137), among which 10 cases were diagnosed as CIN2+ (5 cases of CIN2 and 5 cases of CIN3). The sensitivity and specificity for CIN2+ of p16(INK4a) test, TCT (LSIL/AGC or higher grade) and HPV test were 90.0%, 80.0%, 100.0% and 90.9%, 91.9%, 82.5%, respectively. Compared to TCT and HPV test, there was no significant difference in sensitivity and specificity between p16(INK4a) and TCT/HPV test (P>0.05). The Kappa value of the 2 cytopathologists in interpreting p16(INK4a) and TCT was 0.944 and 0.425, respectively (P<0.05). Conclusions: p16(INK4a) for cervical cancer screening is equally sensitive to HPV test and specific to TCT while subjective difference of cytopathologists' interpretation of p16(INK4a) is small. Therefore, p16(INK4a) can be used as a new cervical cancer screen method for its better diagnostic performance.

[Relationship between cervical lesions and the type-specific viral load of high risk HPV reflected by the Ct value of Cobas 4800 HPV system].

Objective: To explore the relationship between cervical lesions and high risk HPV (HR-HPV) viral load reflected by the cycle threshold (Ct) values of Cobas 4800 HPV (Cobas 4800) system. Methods: From August 2016 to September 2017, 7 000 women from Shenzhen, were recruited for cervical cancer screening with Cobas 4800 system and cytology co-test. Colposcope biopsies were performed on women who were positive of HPV 16, 18, and positive of HPV types other than 16,18 with cytology [≥ atypical squamous cell of undetermined signification (ASCUS)], or HPV negative but abnormal of cytology [≥ low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL)]. The Ct values of HPV 16, 18 and all combined other types coming from Cobas 4800 system were used as an indicator of viral load to analyze the relationship between type-specific HPV load and the cervical lesions. Results: (1) Among the 7 000 screening women, 370 cases were positive for cervical cancer screening, 325 of them underwent colposcope biopsies, and coloposcopy referred rate was 87.8% (325/370). Among 325 women undergoing cervical biopsy, pathological diagnosis was 119 cases of normal cervical cervix, 151 cases of LSIL, and 55 cases of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) and above (HSIL(+); including 53 cases of HSIL, 1 case of cervical adenocarcinoma, and 1 case of cervical squamous cell carcinoma). (2) The Ct value of HPV 16 was inversely correlated with the upgrading of the lesions (r=-0.617, P=0.000), and significant different among normal cervix,LSIL and HSIL(+) (35.4±4.5 vs 31.0±6.0 vs 26.5±4.0; F=25.537, P=0.000). There was no correlation between Ct value of HPV 18 and cervical lesions (r=-0.021, P=0.902). The Ct value of other 12 HPV types was statistically difference among normal normal cervix, HSIL(+) and cervicitis (33.0±5.3 vs 29.9±7.2 vs 29.8±5.8; F=5.087, P=0.007). Among them, LSIL and HSIL(+) were significantly lower than normal cervix (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference between LSIL and HSIL(+) (P>0.05). Conclusion: The Ct value of HPV 16 detecting in Cobas 4800 system as an indicator of virus load obviously correlates with different grades of cervical lesions, therefore could be a reference of cervical lesion existence and an indicator of lesion prognosis.

Postpartum pelvic floor function performance after two different modes of delivery.

This study investigated the incidences of urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse as well as pelvic floor muscle strength after cesarean section and vaginal delivery. From June 2010 to July 2011, 149 puerpera in Shenzhen Hospital, Peking University, were divided into the cesarean section group (N = 66) and the vaginal delivery group (N = 83). Postpartum urinary incontinence analysis, pelvic examination, and pelvic muscle contraction analysis using the PHENIX neuromuscular therapy instrument were performed to compare urinary incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse, and pelvic floor muscle condition between the 2 groups. The incidences of urinary incontinence in the cesarean and vaginal delivery groups were 9.09% (6/66) and 16.87% (14/83), respectively (P > 0.05); the incidences of pelvic organ prolapse were 53.03% (35/66) and 86.75% (72/83), respectively (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in pelvic muscle pressure or electrophysiological examination results between the 2 groups (P > 0.05). Hence, cesarean section has a protective effect on early postpartum pelvic organ prolapse, but the delivery modes do not differ significantly with respect to the incidence of postpartum urinary incontinence or pelvic muscle floor muscle strength.

Effect of gestational weight gain as well as rehabilitation training on postnatal pelvic muscle strength.

OBJECTIVE: The current study explored the impact of gestational weight gain on postnatal pelvic muscle strength and the effect of low-frequency electrical stimulation combined with biofeedback training on strength recovery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 126 mothers six to eight weeks after term delivery were recruited at Peking University Shenzhen Hospital from August 2010 to July 2011. According to gestational weight gain, they were divided into two groups: the < 15 kg (A) and > or = 15 kg (B) groups. Pelvic floor muscle fibre strength was determined. Target low-frequency electrical stimulation combined with biofeedback training was conducted. After training, pelvic floor muscle fiber strength was determined again for effect evaluation. RESULTS: Before training, types I and II pelvic floor muscle fiber strength of group B was noticeably lower than that of group A (p < 0.05). After rehabilitation, the pelvic floor muscle strength of both groups significantly increased (p < 0.05). However, types I and II pelvic floor muscle fiber strength of group B was still significantly lower than that of group A (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Gestational weight gain negatively influences pelvic floor muscles. Low-frequency electrical stimulation combined with biofeedback training improves postnatal pelvic floor muscle fiber strength. A less gestational weight increase indicates faster postnatal pelvic muscle strength recovery and a better rehabilitative effect.