Endoscopic resection with adjuvant treatment versus esophagectomy for early-stage esophageal cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the outcome following the strategy of endoscopic R0 resection (ER) plus adjuvant treatment (AT) versus esophagectomy for esophageal squamous cell cancer in T1a invading muscularis mucosa (M3)-T1b stage. METHODS: We evaluated the outcomes of 46 esophageal squamous cell cancer (ESCC) patients with T1aM3-T1b stage who underwent ER + AT from the Esophageal Cancer Endoscopic Therapy Consortium (ECETC) and compared these outcomes to 92 patients who underwent esophagectomy. Propensity score matching (1:2) was used, with overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) being compared between the two groups. RESULTS: During a median follow-up of 32 months, there were no statistical differences (P = 0.226) in OS between the two groups. The 1-, 2-, and 3-year overall survival in the esophagectomy group was 95%, 91%, and 84%, respectively. There were no mortalities within three years in the ER + AT group. The RFS between the two groups was also not significantly different (P = 0.938). The 1-, 2-, and 3-year RFS of patients in the esophagectomy group was 90%, 90%, and 83%, respectively, while it was 97%, 94%, and 74% in the ER + AT group, respectively. The local recurrence rates between the two groups were not significantly different (P = 0.277). CONCLUSIONS: This first multicenter analysis showed similar outcomes were found regarding OS and RFS between the two groups in T1aM3-T1b stage patients. ER + AT may be considered in high-risk patients or for those who refuse esophagectomy.

Association of post-treatment longitudinal symptom severity clusters with subsequent survival in oropharyngeal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Patients with cancer often experience multiple symptoms concurrently. We identified patient clusters based on longitudinal symptom severity trajectories in oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) and evaluated the potential clinical utility of this approach. METHODS: A retrospective OPC patient cluster analysis using 6 months of symptom severity data from radiotherapy initiation. The clinico-demographic characteristics and overall survival of patients were compared between clusters. RESULTS: We identified four clusters of patients differing in longitudinal symptom severity. Cluster A (n = 168) included patients with the mildest longitudinal symptoms, cluster B (n = 59) and cluster C (n = 63) were intermediate, and cluster D (n = 30) included patients with the worst symptoms. The clusters differed in their HPV status, ECOG performance status, smoking history, drinking history, treatment modality, and 5-year survival. These clusters separated symptom severity trajectories more distinctly than individual clinico-demographic characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: Early symptom severity trajectory clustering revealed distinct patient clusters that were prognostic of overall survival.