Ligature-induced peri-implantitis and periodontitis in mice.

AIM: Peri-implantitis (PI), inflammation around dental implants, shares characteristics with periodontitis (PD). However, PI is more difficult to control and treat, and detailed pathophysiology is unclear. We aimed to compare PI and PD progression utilizing a murine model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four-week-old male C57BL/6J mice had their left maxillary molars extracted. Implants were placed in healed extraction sockets and osseointegrated. Ligatures were tied around the implants and second molars. Controls did not receive ligatures. Mice were sacrificed 1 week, 1 and 3 months (n ≥ 5/group/time point) post-ligature placement. Bone loss analysis was performed. Histology was performed for: haematoxylin and eosin (H&E), tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP), matrix metalloproteinase-8 (MMP-8), nuclear factor kappa-light-chain enhancer of activated B cells (NF-κB), toluidine blue and calcein. RESULTS: PI showed statistically greater bone loss compared to PD at 1 and 3 months. At 3 months, 20% of implants in PI exfoliated; no natural teeth exfoliated in PD. H&E revealed that alveolar bone surrounding implants in PI appeared less dense compared to PD. PI presented with increased osteoclasts, MMP-8 and NF-κB, compared to PD. CONCLUSION: PI exhibited greater tissue and bone destruction compared to PD. Future studies will characterize the pathophysiological differences between the two conditions.

An unusual case of cluster of differentiation 30-positive T-cell lymphoproliferative disorder manifesting as mandibular gingival ulceration: A case report.

BACKGROUND: Primary cutaneous cluster of differentiation 30-positive (CD30+) T-cell lymphoproliferative disorders are the second most common type of skin T-cell lymphoma. The lesions exhibit an indolent course, with a morphology resembling high-grade T-cell lymphoma. CASE DESCRIPTION: A 67-year-old healthy man sought treatment for a large nonhealing ulcer on the buccal gingiva of the mandibular right premolars. He reported a history of recurrent cutaneous lesions, for which he was seen 1 year earlier at a hospital. Results of incisional biopsy showed a dense lymphoid cell infiltrate composed of atypical CD30+ T-cells intermixed with eosinophils. The diagnosis was updated to CD30+ T-cell lymphoproliferative disorder, which was similar to the cutaneous lesion diagnosis. The lesion area healed completely, and there were no signs of recurrence at 18-month follow-up. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: Oral CD30+ T-cell lymphoproliferative disorder has a favorable outcome, but it is commonly misdiagnosed. Biopsy is crucial and should be combined with clinical examination to avoid chemotherapeutic treatments intended for high-grade lymphoma.

Early intervention of peri-implantitis and periodontitis using a mouse model.

BACKGROUND: Peri-implantitis is an inflammatory response to bacterial biofilm resulting in bone loss and can ultimately lead to implant failure. Because of the lack of predictable treatments available, a thorough understanding of peri-implantitis's pathogenesis is essential. The objective of this study is to evaluate and compare the response of acute induced peri-implantitis and periodontitis lesions after insult removal. METHODS: Implants were placed in one-month-old C57BL/6J male mice eight weeks post extraction of their left maxillary molars. Once osseointegrated, ligatures were placed around the implants and contralateral second molars of the experimental groups. Controls did not receive ligatures. After one week, half of the ligatures were removed, creating the ligature-retained and ligature-removed groups. Mice were sacrificed at two time points, 5 and 14 days, from ligature removal. The specimens were analyzed via micro-computed tomography and histology. RESULTS: By 5 and 14 days after ligature removal, the periodontitis group experienced significant bone gain, whereas the peri-implantitis group did not. Histologically, all implant groups exhibited higher levels of cellular infiltrate than any of the tooth groups. Osteoclast numbers increased in peri-implantitis and periodontitis ligature-retained groups and decreased following insult removal. Collagen was overall more disorganized in peri-implantitis than periodontitis for all groups. Peri-implantitis experimental groups revealed greater matrix metalloproteinase-8 and NF-kB levels than periodontitis. CONCLUSIONS: Implants respond slower and less favorably to insult removal than teeth. Future research is needed to characterize detailed peri-implantitis disease pathophysiology.

Comparing the Healing Potential of Late-Stage Periodontitis and Peri-Implantitis.

Peri-implantitis is defined as an inflammatory disease affecting the tissues around osseointegrated functioning implants. Unfortunately, detailed peri-implantitis pathogenesis is not well understood and current treatments lack predictability. Compare the healing potential of late-stage ligature-induced periodontitis and peri-implantitis after ligature removal. Four-week-old C57BL/6J male mice had their left maxillary molars extracted. After 8 weeks, implants were placed in healed sockets and allowed to osseointegrate. Mice were separated into control (no ligature) and experimental (ligature) groups. In the experimental group, ligatures were placed around the implant and the contralateral second molar. Four weeks later, the ligature group was randomly divided into ligature-retained and ligature-removed groups. Mice were sacrificed at 2 time points: 1 and 2 weeks after ligature removal. The samples were analyzed by microcomputed tomography (micro-CT) and histology. Ligature-induced significant bone loss in peri-implantitis and periodontitis were compared with respective controls. At the 2-week time point, bone formation was observed in the ligature-removed groups compared with respective controls; however, more bone was regained in periodontitis ligature-removed compared with the peri-implantitis ligature-removed group. Histologically, the peri-implantitis ligature-retained group had higher inflammatory levels and a higher number of osteoclasts compared with the periodontitis ligature-retained group. Moreover, in the peri-implantitis ligature-retained group, collagen appeared less organized compared with the periodontitis ligature-retained group at both time points; although collagen tended to reorganize following ligature removal in both conditions. Peri-implantitis does not respond to treatment as well as periodontitis. Future work includes understanding peri-implantitis pathogenesis and developing predictable treatment protocols.