Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Brain Dev ; 42(2): 121-128, 2020 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31607519

RESUMO

AIMS: We provided 3 special diets to 40 preschool children with autism at lunchtime and detected improvements in diet-related issues in almost all of the children. The children fell into the following 3 groups: those who selected their diet based on: group1 = sensory factors; group2 = visual appearance of foods; and group3 = familiar foods. To identify effective support, we performed developmental and sensory assessments of each group retrospectively. METHOD: There were 7 children in group1, 9 in group2, and 24 in group3. The duration of support was 1-3 years. We performed developmental assessments before and after the support period. RESULTS: We found improvement in diet-related issues in almost all children. Initially, the mean developmental age for language understanding differed among group1 (10.8 months), group2 (14.7 months), and group3 (16.6 months). Furthermore, with respect to basic ability in daily life, the mean developmental age in group1 (19.2 months) was lower than that in group3 (24.8 months). Finally, the mean developmental quotient in group3 (49.6) was higher than that in group1 (36.4) and group2 (40.8). No significant differences were observed in sensory assessment among the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Developmental assessment can be useful for determining the type of support. Group1 support is suitable for children in the pre-language stage. Group2 support is suitable for children who can recognize shapes or understand instructions in simple language. Group3 support is suitable for children who can understand instructions in simple language and a daily routine.


Assuntos
Transtorno Autístico/dietoterapia , Comportamento Alimentar/psicologia , Transtorno Autístico/psicologia , Desenvolvimento Infantil/fisiologia , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos
2.
Jpn J Ophthalmol ; 50(3): 274-6, 2006.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16767384

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To compare the prevalence of glaucoma in adults with Down's syndrome (DS) to that in non-DS control adults. METHODS: Twenty-six patients (14 men and 12 women) with DS and 188 control subjects (105 men and 83 women) were studied. The mean age was 35.1 +/- 6.9 (+/- SD) years in the DS group and 36.9 +/- 5.2 years in the control group. There were no significant differences in age or sex distribution between the two groups. Glaucoma was diagnosed by two glaucoma specialists based on the optic disc findings obtained through dilated pupils. RESULTS: The prevalence of patients with glaucoma in the DS group was 11.5%, significantly higher (P = 0.014) than that in the control group, 1.1%. There was no significant difference in intraocular pressure between glaucomatous eyes (12.2 +/- 3.2 mmHg) and nonglaucomatous eyes (11.1 +/- 4.1 mmHg) in the DS group (P = 0.465). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of glaucoma in adult patients with DS was significantly higher than that in age-matched control subjects.


Assuntos
Síndrome de Down/complicações , Glaucoma/epidemiologia , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Feminino , Glaucoma/complicações , Humanos , Pressão Intraocular , Japão/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA