Developing Operational Definitions Related to Helicobacter pylori Eradication Therapy.

BACKGROUND: The lack of well-established operational definitions is a major limitation of Helicobacter pylori eradication studies that use secondary databases. We aimed to develop and validate operational definitions related to H. pylori eradication therapy. METHODS: Operational definitions were developed by analyzing a nationwide H. pylori eradication registry and validated using real-world data from hospital medical records. The primary endpoint was the sensitivity of the operational definitions in identifying individuals who received H. pylori eradication therapy. The secondary endpoint was the sensitivity and specificity of the operational definition in identifying successful H. pylori eradication therapy. RESULTS: H. pylori eradication therapy was defined as a prescription for one of the following combinations: 1) proton pump inhibitor (PPI) + amoxicillin + clarithromycin, 2) PPI + amoxicillin + metronidazole, 3) PPI + metronidazole + tetracycline, 4) PPI + amoxicillin + levofloxacin, 5) PPI + amoxicillin + moxifloxacin, or 6) PPI + amoxicillin + rifabutin. In the validation set, the sensitivity of the operational definition for identifying individuals who received H. pylori eradication therapy was 99.7% and 99.8% for the first- and second-line therapies, respectively. Operational definition to determine success or failure of the H. pylori eradication therapy was developed based on a confirmatory test and the prescription of rescue therapy. The sensitivity and specificity of the operational definition for predicting successful eradication were 97.6% and 91.4%, respectively, in first-line therapy and 98.6% and 54.8%, respectively, in second-line therapy. CONCLUSION: We developed and validated operational definitions related to H. pylori eradication therapy. These definitions will help researchers perform various H. pylori eradication-related studies using secondary databases.

Sample Collection Methods in Upper Gastrointestinal Research.

In recent years, significant translational research advances have been made in the upper gastrointestinal (GI) research field. Endoscopic evaluation is a reasonable option for acquiring upper GI tissue for research purposes because it has minimal risk and can be applied to unresectable gastric cancer. The optimal number of biopsy samples and sample storage is crucial and might influence results. Furthermore, the methods for sample acquisition can be applied differently according to the research purpose; however, there have been few reports on methods for sample collection from endoscopic biopsies. In this review, we suggested a protocol for collecting study samples for upper GI research, including microbiome, DNA, RNA, protein, single-cell RNA sequencing, and organoid culture, through a comprehensive literature review. For microbiome analysis, one or two pieces of biopsied material obtained using standard endoscopic forceps may be sufficient. Additionally, 5 mL of gastric fluid and 3-4 mL of saliva is recommended for microbiome analyses. At least one gastric biopsy tissue is necessary for most DNA or RNA analyses, while proteomics analysis may require at least 2-3 biopsy tissues. Single cell-RNA sequencing requires at least 3-5 tissues and additional 1-2 tissues, if possible. For successful organoid culture, multiple sampling is necessary to improve the quality of specimens.

Comparison of long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection and surgery for undifferentiated-type early gastric cancer meeting the expanded criteria: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: There have been concerns over the long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for undifferentiated-type early gastric cancer (UD EGC). We aimed to compare the long-term outcomes of ESD and surgery for patients with UD EGC. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases through March 2021 to identify studies that compared the long-term outcomes of ESD and surgery for UD EGC meeting expanded criteria for curative resection. The risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane tool for non-randomized studies. The risk ratio (RR) was estimated using a fixed-effect model. RESULTS: Overall, 1863 patients from five retrospective cohort studies, including 908 patients with propensity score matching (PSM), were eligible for meta-analysis. ESD was associated with inferior overall survival (OS) compared to surgery in the overall cohort (RR 2.11; 95% CI 1.26-3.55) but not in the PSM cohort (RR 1.18; 95% CI 0.60-2.32). In the PSM cohort, ESD had a lower disease-free survival (DFS) (RR 2.49; 95% CI 1.42-4.35) and higher recurrence (RR 12.61; 95% CI 3.43-46.37), gastric recurrence (RR 11.25; 95% CI 3.06-41.40), and extragastric recurrence (RR 4.23; 95% CI 0.47-37.93). Recurrence outcomes were similar between the overall and PSM cohorts. Disease-specific survival was not significantly different between the two groups in both the overall and PSM cohorts. CONCLUSION: Although OS after curative ESD for UD EGC was not different from that after surgery in the PSM cohort, DFS and recurrence were inferior after ESD. Limitations included a lack of randomized trials. Further prospective studies comparing the long-term outcomes of ESD and surgery for UD EGC are needed (PROSPERO CRD 42021237097).

Risk of post-polypectomy bleeding after endoscopic mucosal resection in patients receiving antiplatelet medication: comparison between the continue and hold groups.

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines recommend continuing aspirin and discontinuing clopidogrel for colon polypectomy, but evidence for endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is insufficient. We aimed to assess post-polypectomy bleeding (PPB) in patients receiving antiplatelet agents and underwent EMR for various polyp sizes. METHODS: A single-center, prospective observational study was performed. Patients who underwent at least one EMR for polypectomy and those who received aspirin or clopidogrel were included. We compared PPB between the antiplatelet hold group (stopped antiplatelet therapy at least 5 days before the procedure) and continue group (antiplatelet therapy was maintained or stopped within 5 days before the procedure). RESULTS: Among patients who underwent EMR, 305 took aspirin (hold group 257, continue group 48) and 77 took clopidogrel (hold group 66, continue group 11). The mean number of polyps was four, and the mean size was 8.6 mm. There was no difference in the major PPB rate between the hold and continue groups among aspirin users (2.0% vs. 4.2%, P = 0.30), but it was significantly higher in the continue group than in the hold group among clopidogrel users (18.2% vs. 0%, P = 0.02). In patient- and polyp-based logistic regression analysis of clopidogrel users, the number of EMRs (OR 2.12, 95% CI 1.16-3.88), polyp size (OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.06-1.49), and continuing clopidogrel (OR 9.75, 95% CI 1.99-47.64) were independent risk factors for PPB. CONCLUSION: Continuous administration of antiplatelet agents was significantly associated with higher PPB in clopidogrel users, but not in aspirin users. Endoscopists should consider holding clopidogrel if the EMR includes polypectomy.

Prediction model for curative endoscopic submucosal dissection of undifferentiated-type early gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is an effective treatment for early gastric cancer (EGC); however, its curative resection rate is low for undifferentiated-type EGC. We developed and externally validated a prediction model for curative ESD of undifferentiated-type EGC. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, we included 448 patients who underwent ESD for undifferentiated-type EGC at 18 hospitals in Korea between 2005 and 2015 in the development cohort and 1342 patients who underwent surgery at two hospitals in the validation cohort. A prediction model was developed using the logistic regression model. RESULTS: Endoscopic tumor size 1-2 cm (odds ratio [OR], 2.40; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.54-3.73), tumor size > 2 cm (OR, 14.00; 95% CI 6.81-28.77), and proximal tumor location from the lower to upper third of the stomach (OR, 1.45; 95% CI 1.03-2.04) were independent predictors of non-curative ESD. A six-score prediction model was developed by assigning points to endoscopic tumor size > 2 cm (five points), tumor size 1-2 cm (two points), upper third location (two points), and middle third location (one point). The rate of curative ESD ranged from 70.6% (score 0) to 11.6% (score 5) with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.720 (95% CI 0.673-0.766). The model also showed good performance in the validation cohort (AUC, 0.775; 95% CI 0.748-0.803). CONCLUSIONS: This six-score prediction model may help in predicting curative ESD and making informed decisions about the treatment selection between ESD and surgery for undifferentiated-type EGC.

Long-term outcomes of endoscopic resection followed by additional surgery after non-curative resection in undifferentiated-type early gastric cancer: a nationwide multi-center study.

BACKGROUND: Undifferentiated-type early gastric cancer (UD EGC) shows lower curative resection rates after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). Additional surgery is recommended after non-curative resection. We evaluated the long-term outcomes of ESD followed by additional surgery after non-curative resection in UD EGC compared to those for surgery as initial treatment. METHODS: We reviewed 1139 UD EGC patients who underwent ESD at 18 hospitals and 1956 patients who underwent surgery at two hospitals between February 2005 and May 2015. We enrolled 636 patients with non-curative ESD and 1429 surgery subjects beyond the curative ESD criteria. Among them, 133 patients with additional surgery after ESD (ESD + OP group) and 252 patients without additional surgery (ESD-only group) were matched 1:1 using propensity scores to patients with surgery as initial treatment (surgery group). Overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were compared. RESULTS: Signet ring cell carcinoma and poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma (PDA) were observed in 939 and 1126 cases, respectively. OS was significantly longer in the surgery group than in the ESD + OP group, especially for PDA. However, RFS was shorter in the ESD-only group than those in the ESD + OP and surgery groups. RFS did not differ significantly between the ESD + OP and surgery groups. Compared to the surgery group, the ESD-only and ESD + OP groups had an overall hazard ratio for RFS of 3.58 (95% confidence interval 1.44-8.88) and 0.46 (0.10-2.20), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: ESD followed by additional surgery after non-curative resection showed comparable cancer-specific outcomes to initial surgery in UD EGC.

Clinical outcomes of endoscopic resection for undifferentiated intramucosal early gastric cancer larger than 2 cm.

BACKGROUND: This study investigated the long-term clinical outcomes of endoscopic resection (ER) for undifferentiated-type (UD) early gastric cancer (EGC), with tumor size > 2 cm as the only non-curative factor. METHODS: From among 1123 patients who underwent ER for UD EGC at 18 tertiary hospitals in Korea between 2005 and 2014, we identified 216 patients with UD intramucosal EGC > 2 cm, which was completely resected, with negative resection margins, and absence of ulceration and lymphovascular invasion. The patients were divided into the additional surgery (n = 40) or observation (n = 176) groups, according to post-ER management and were followed up for a median duration of 59 months for recurrence and 90 months for overall survival. RESULTS: Lymph node (LN) or distant metastasis or cancer-related mortality was not observed in the surgery group. In the observation group, two (1.1%) patients developed LN or distant metastasis with a 5-year cumulative risk of 0.7%, and one (0.6%) patient died of gastric cancer. The 5- and 8-year overall survival rates were 94.1% and 89.9%, respectively, in the observation group and 100.0% and 95.2%, respectively, in the surgery group (log-rank P = 0.159). Cox regression analysis did not reveal an association between the observation group and increased mortality. CONCLUSION: The risk of LN or distant metastasis was not negligible, but as low as 1% for patients undergoing non-curative ER for UD EGC, with tumor size > 2 cm as the only non-curative factor. Close observation may be an alternative to surgery, especially for older patients or those with poor physical status.

Comparison between endoscopic submucosal resection and surgery for the curative resection of undifferentiated-type early gastric cancer within expanded indications: a nationwide multi-center study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for undifferentiated early gastric cancer (UD EGC) has debate due to the risk of lymph node metastasis. We investigated the outcomes of ESD compared to those of surgery for the UD EGC within expanded indication. METHODS: We reviewed 971 UD EGC patients performed ESD across 18 hospitals in Korea and 1812 patients who underwent surgical resection in two hospitals between February 2005 and May 2015. Of these cases, we enrolled a curative resected ESD group of 328 patients and surgery group of 383 cases within an expanded indication. Overall outcomes and one-to-one propensity score-matched (218 ESD group vs 218 surgery group cases) outcomes for these two groups were analyzed. RESULTS: Over the 75.6 month median follow-up period for the 711 enrolled cases, recurrences occurred in 22 patients (6.7%) in the ESD group but not in the surgery group. Overall survival (OS) was higher in the surgery group (p = 0.0316) in all cases, but there was no significant difference after propensity score matching (p = 0.069). According to the histologic type in propensity score matching, the OS of signet ring cell carcinoma and poorly differentiated carcinoma patients did not differ between the ESD and surgery groups (p = 0.1189 and p = 0.3087, respectively). In the surgery group involving expanded criteria, lymph node metastasis was found in six cases (1.56%). CONCLUSIONS: Although ESD shows comparable outcomes to surgery for the UD EGC within expanded indications, appropriate patient selection is needed for the ESD due to the possibility of lymph node metastasis.

Risk factors of lymph node metastasis after non-curative endoscopic resection of undifferentiated-type early gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to investigate risk factors for lymph node (LN) or distant metastasis after non-curative endoscopic resection (ER) of undifferentiated-type early gastric cancer (EGC). METHODS: Of 1124 patients who underwent ER for undifferentiated-type gastric cancer at 18 tertiary hospitals across six geographic areas in Korea between 2005 and 2014, 634 with non-curative ER beyond the expanded criteria were retrospectively enrolled. According to the treatment after ER, patients were divided into additional surgery (n = 270) and follow-up (n = 364) groups. The median follow-up duration was 59 months for recurrence and 84 months for mortality. RESULTS: LN metastasis was found in 6.7% (18/270) of patients at surgery. Ulcer [odds ratio (OR) 3.83; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.21-12.13; p = 0.022] and submucosal invasion (OR 10.35; 95% CI 1.35-79.48; p = 0.025) were independent risk factors. In the follow-up group, seven patients (1.9%) developed LN or distant recurrence. Ulcer [hazard ratio (HR) 7.60; 95% CI 1.39-35.74; p = 0.018], LVI (HR 6.80; 95% CI 1.07-42.99; p = 0.042), and positive vertical margin (HR 6.71; 95% CI 1.28-35.19; p = 0.024) were independent risk factors. In the overall cohort, LN metastasis rates were 9.6% in patients with two or more risk factors and 1.2% in those with no or one risk factor. CONCLUSIONS: LVI, ulcer, submucosal invasion, and positive vertical margin are independently associated with LN or distant metastasis after non-curative ER of undifferentiated-type EGC. Surgical resection is strongly recommended for patients with two or more risk factors.

Usefulness of narrow-band imaging for the detection of remnant sessile-serrated adenoma (SSA) tissue after endoscopic resection: the KASID multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: A sessile-serrated adenoma (SSA) has a high risk for incomplete resection. Little is known regarding how to immediately detect remnant SSA tissue after endoscopic resection. We investigated the usefulness of narrow-band imaging (NBI) to detect remnant SSA tissue after endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR). METHODS: We performed a prospective randomized study on 138 patients who had suspicious SSA on colonoscopy at five centers. After EMR on the suspected SSA determined on the endoscopic morphology, all lesions were randomized into two inspection methods, NBI and white light endoscopy (WLE), to detect remnant tissue on the resected margin. If remnant tissue was detected, an additional resection was performed. Finally, we obtained quadrant biopsies on the resection margin to evaluate the incomplete resection. The proportion of incomplete resection was calculated by combining the detection of remnant tissue and the positivity of SSA cells on the final quadrant biopsies. The primary outcome was the proportion of remnant tissue detection, and the secondary outcome was the proportion of incomplete resection of SSA. RESULTS: In all, 145 lesions from 138 patients were removed. The diagnostic rate of SSA was 87.6% (127/145). After randomization, NBI inspection was performed on 69 lesions, and WLE inspection was performed on 76 lesions. The histologic diagnostic rate of SSA was 89.9% (62/69) in the NBI group and 85.5% (65/76) in the WLE group (p > 0.05). There were no significant differences in the detection of remnant tissue (12.9% (8/62) vs. 15.4% (10/65), p > 0.05), the proportion of SSA in remnant tissue (11.3% (7/62) vs. 12.3% (8/65), p > 0.05), or the proportion of incomplete resection (6.5 (4/62) vs. 10.8 (7/65), p > 0.05) between the NBI and WLE inspection groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: NBI was not superior to WLE for detecting remnant SSA tissue after EMR and could not decrease the proportion of incomplete resection of SSA.

Diabetes mellitus is associated with an increased risk of gastric cancer: a cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Diabetes mellitus (DM) has been considered a potential risk factor for gastric cancer, but the evidence is conflicting. We evaluated the association of DM with incident gastric cancer in a large cohort of men and women with endoscopic assessment at baseline and during follow-up. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of 195,312 adult men and women who underwent upper endoscopy at baseline and during follow-up between 2003 and 2014. DM was defined as fasting serum glucose ≥ 126 mg/dL, self-reported history of DM or current use of antidiabetic medications. Gastric cancer was confirmed histologically. RESULTS: The prevalence of DM at baseline was 3.0% (n = 5774). Over 865,511 person-years of follow-up, 198 participants developed gastric cancer. The fully adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for incident gastric cancer comparing participants with and without DM at baseline was 1.76 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.04-2.97; P = 0.033). When we evaluated DM as a time-varying covariate, the fully adjusted HR was 1.66 (95% CI 1.04-2.68; P = 0.036). The association between DM and incident gastric cancer did not differ by the presence of intestinal metaplasia (P for interaction = 0.61). CONCLUSIONS: In this large cohort with endoscopic follow-up, DM was independently associated with increased gastric cancer incidence. The increased risk was independent of mucosal atrophy and intestinal metaplasia and was consistent in participants with newly developed DM during follow-up. Patients with DM may require more intensive endoscopic follow-up for gastric cancer screening.

Skeletal muscle mass and risk of advanced adenoma in surveillance colonoscopy.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Sarcopenia has been suggested to be associated with chronic inflammation and insulin resistance. This study aimed to evaluate whether low muscle mass is associated with the incidence and recurrence of advanced colorectal adenoma. METHODS: We conducted a cohort study including 14 701 participants who underwent first-time screening colonoscopy between 2003 and 2012 and follow-up colonoscopy until 2017. Skeletal muscle mass was measured using a bioelectrical impedance analyzer and divided by body weight to calculate the skeletal muscle mass index (SMI). RESULTS: During a median 47 (interquartile range, 35-58) months of follow-up, overall and advanced adenoma developed in 2988 (20.3%) and 207 (1.41%) participants, respectively. In multivariate analysis using models adjusted for baseline adenoma risk, lifestyle factors, markers for insulin resistance and chronic inflammation, and metabolic syndrome, decreasing SMI quartiles were associated with increased risk of occurrence of advanced adenoma and overall adenoma. The adjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) comparing SMI quartiles 3, 2, and 1 to quartile 4 were 1.57 (1.03-2.41), 1.22 (0.78-1.92), and 1.77 (1.13-2.76), respectively, for advanced adenoma (P for trend = 0.049) and 1.05 (0.95-1.17), 1.09 (0.98-1.21), and 1.26 (1.13-1.41), respectively, for overall adenoma (P for trend < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In this large cohort with long-term colonoscopy follow-up, low relative muscle mass was associated with increased risk of occurrence of advanced adenoma and overall adenoma at follow-up colonoscopy, independent of metabolic and inflammatory markers. Timely and thorough surveillance colonoscopy may be emphasized in such populations.

Simple proxies for detection of clinically significant serrated polyps and data for their benchmarks.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Serrated polyp detection rate (SDR) is a potential quality indicator for preventing colorectal cancer associated with the serrated pathway. Using clinically significant SDR (CSSDR) has been suggested based on clinically significant serrated polyp's ability to be colorectal cancer precursors. Correlations between CSSDR and simpler SDRs, other than proximal SDR, have not yet been studied. We aimed to investigate which simpler SDR indicator is most relevant to CSSDR or adenoma detection rate (ADR) and provide benchmark data. METHODS: We analyzed 26 627 colonoscopies performed by 30 endoscopists. Clinically significant serrated polyps were defined as any sessile serrated adenoma/polyp or traditional serrated adenoma, hyperplastic polyps ≥ 5 mm in the proximal colon, or hyperplastic polyps ≥ 10 mm anywhere in the colon. Correlation of CSSDR and ADR with other simple SDRs, SDR-pathology (sessile serrated adenoma/polyp or traditional serrated adenoma), SDR-size (≥ 10 mm), and SDR-location (proximal location) was analyzed using Pearson's correlation test and Steiger's z-test. RESULTS: The CSSDR was 1.7% to 13.2% (mean = 6.1%). The correlation coefficient of CSSDR/SDR-size was 0.91 (P < 0.01), which was higher than that of CSSDR/SDR-location (0.64, P < 0.01) (0.91 vs 0.61, P < 0.01). The correlation coefficient of ADR/CSSDR and ADR/SDR-location was 0.41 (P < 0.01) and 0.81 (P < 0.01), respectively. For ADR ≥ 25%, endoscopists' median screening CSSDR was 5.4%, while SDR-location and SDR-size were 10.9% and 2.2%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Large SDR could be a simple proxy for CSSDR, in addition to proximal SDR. Large SDR and proximal SDR benchmarks of 2.2% and 10.9% may guide adequate serrated polyp detection with uniform definitions and simpler calculations.

Association between waist circumference and risk of colorectal neoplasia in normal-weight adults.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Abdominal obesity, measured using waist circumference (WC), is associated with the colorectal neoplasia (CRN) risk. We examined whether WC is associated with the CRN risk even in normal-weight individuals. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was performed on asymptomatic normal-weight (body mass index 18.5-23 kg/m2 ) individuals who underwent colonoscopy as health checkups. RESULTS: Of 63 057 examinees, 30 498 were men (mean age, 41.1 years) and 32 559 were women (mean age, 41.7 years). The prevalence of overall CRN in WC quartiles 1, 2, 3, and 4 was 14.2%, 15.5%, 15.5%, and 18.7%, respectively, in men and 7.4%, 8.9%, 9.4%, and 11.5%, respectively, in women. The prevalence of advanced CRN (ACRN) in WC quartiles 1, 2, 3, and 4 was 1.5%, 1.3%, 1.6%, and 2.1%, respectively, in men and 1.0%, 1.3%, 1.2%, and 1.3%, respectively, in women. Among men, the overall CRN risk in quartile 4 (> 82 cm) was higher than that in quartiles 1, 2, and 3 (adjusted odds ratio, OR [95% confidence interval, CI], 1.22 [1.11-1.34], 1.12 [1.05-1.23], and 1.18 [1.07-1.29], respectively); the ACRN risk in quartile 4 was also higher than that in quartiles 1, 2, and 3 (adjusted OR [95% CI], 1.41 [1.09-1.81], 1.56 [1.19-2.03], and 1.50 [1.16-1.94], respectively). Among women, the overall CRN risk in quartile 4 (> 77 cm) was higher than that in quartiles 1 and 3; the ACRN risk was not different among all groups. CONCLUSIONS: Even with a normal weight, a large WC was associated with the CRN risk, especially with the ACRN risk in men.

Novel sulfate tablet PBK-1701TC versus oral sulfate solution for colon cleansing: A randomized phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: PBK-1701TC is a novel sulfate tablet-based that contains 320 mg of simethicone and delivers 90% of the salt and water delivered by oral sulfate solution (OSS) preparation. This study evaluated the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of PBK-1701TC compared with OSS in bowel preparation for colonoscopy. METHODS: This randomized, multicenter, phase 3 non-inferiority trial included adults aged 19 years or older with a body mass index of 19-30 kg/m2 undergoing colonoscopy at five university hospitals in Korea. The primary efficacy endpoint was successful bowel-cleansing rate, defined as Harefield Cleansing Scale grade A or B as evaluated by blinded central readers. Secondary endpoints included the presence of residual air bubbles. Adverse events and laboratory evaluations were monitored to assess safety. Tolerability was assessed via participant interview. RESULTS: Overall, 235 participants were randomized, and 224 were included in the per-protocol analysis (PBK, 112; OSS, 112). Successful bowel cleansing was achieved for 95.5% (107/112) in the PBK group, which was non-inferior to the OSS group (98.2%, 110/112) with a difference of -2.7% (one sided 97.5% confidence limit, -8.1%). The participants in the PBK group had fewer intraluminal bubbles (0.9% vs 81.3%, P < 0.001) and reported a lower incidence of nausea and vomiting, with better acceptance, taste, and willingness to repeat the regimen than those in the OSS group (all P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The novel sulfate tablet, PBK-1701TC, was non-inferior to OSS with respect to bowel-cleansing efficacy and exhibited better safety and tolerability in adults undergoing colonoscopy.

Impact of Endoscopists' Personality Traits on Adenoma and Polyp Detection Rates in Colonoscopy: A KASID Multicenter Study.

BACKGROUND: The personality traits of endoscopists have been suggested to affect the adenoma detection rate (ADR). We thus evaluated the relationship between endoscopists' personality traits and the ADR during colonoscopy using the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2). METHODS: In total, 1230 patients (asymptomatic and aged 50-80 years) who underwent screening or surveillance (≥ 5 years) colonoscopy were recruited from 13 university hospitals by 20 endoscopists between September 2015 and December 2017. We retrospectively measured the ADR, polyp detection rate (PDR), and number of adenomas per colonoscopy (APC). All 20 endoscopists completed all 567 true/false MMPI-2 items. RESULTS: The overall mean colonoscopy withdrawal time, PDR, ADR, and APC were 7.3 ± 2.8 min, 55%, 45.3%, and 0.97 ± 1.58, respectively. No significant difference was observed in the MMPI-2 clinical scales (e.g., hypochondriasis and psychasthenia), content scales (e.g., obsessiveness and type A character), or supplementary scales (e.g., dominance and social responsibility) between the high ADR group (ADR ≥45%, n = 10) and the low ADR group (ADR < 45%, n = 10). In multivariate logistic regression analysis, the ADR was associated significantly with patient age and sex. The ADR was related significantly to endoscopists' colonoscopy experience and the per-minute increase in the colonoscopy withdrawal time (OR 1.21, 95% CI 1.06-1.38, p = 0.005). In a logistic regression analysis adjusted for patient factors, the ADR was associated significantly with ego strength (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.00-1.09, p = 0.044), as measured by the MMPI-2. CONCLUSIONS: With the exception of ego strength, the endoscopists' personality traits were not associated with adenoma or polyp detection.

Prevalence of and Risk Factors for Colorectal Neoplasia in Asymptomatic Young Adults (20-39 Years Old).

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The incidence of colorectal cancer is increasing among persons 50 years old or younger. However, data on the epidemiology of young-onset colorectal neoplasia (CRN) are limited. Although some studies have investigated the epidemiology of CRN in persons younger than 50 years, most have focused on persons 40 years or older. We evaluated the prevalence of and risk factors for CRN in adults younger than 40 years. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional analysis of 72,356 asymptomatic individuals, 20-39 years old, who underwent colonoscopies as participants in the Kangbuk Samsung Health Study in South Korea, from August 2004 through December 2015. Data on medical history and health-related behavior were collected from self-administered questionnaires. Patients were divided into groups based on age (20-29 years, n = 7340 or 30-39 years, n = 65,016), and χ2 tests were used to compare categorical variables between groups. A multivariate logistic regression model was used to assess the risk factors for overall and advanced CRN. RESULTS: The prevalence of overall CRN in group of 20-29 years was 5.9% and in the group of 30-39 years was 9.5% (P < .001); prevalence values for advanced CRN were 0.6% and 0.9%, respectively (P = .005). In the group of 30-39 years, age, smoking, alcohol intake, obesity, and abdominal obesity were independent risk factors for overall and advanced CRN. Additionally, male sex and metabolic syndrome were independent risk factors for overall CRN, whereas regular exercise reduced risk of overall CRN. Even in the 20-29 years group, obesity, abdominal obesity, and increased levels of triglycerides were independent risk factors for overall and advanced CRN, whereas age, increased blood pressure, and increased fasting blood glucose level were independent risk factors for overall CRN. CONCLUSION: In a retrospective analysis of 72,356 asymptomatic persons under 40 years of age evaluated by colonoscopy in Korea, we found modifiable factors, such as smoking, alcohol intake, obesity, and metabolic syndrome, to be significant risk factors for CRN-even in persons of 20-39 years old. Colorectal cancer screening strategies should consider these risk factors.

Relationship between the endoscopic withdrawal time and adenoma/polyp detection rate in individual colonic segments: a KASID multicenter study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Appropriate colonoscopy withdrawal times for individual colonic segments are not well known. The relationship between withdrawal time and adenoma detection rate (ADR)/polyp detection rate (PDR) in individual colonic segments was examined in this study. METHODS: This was a prospective observational study involving 724 patients who underwent colonoscopy screening or surveillance colonoscopy from October 2015 to February 2017 at 10 university hospitals. RESULTS: In the right side of the colon, the ADR (33.2% vs 13.7%, P < .001), PDR, serrated polyp detection rate, and number of adenomas per colonoscopy (APC) were significantly higher when the colonoscopy withdrawal time was ≥2 minutes compared with <2 minutes. When the withdrawal time was ≥4 minutes in the proximal colon and ≥3 minutes in the left segment of the colon, the ADR, PDR, and APC were significantly higher compared with withdrawal times of <4 minutes and <3 minutes, respectively. Multivariate analyses showed that the ADR was significantly associated with withdrawal times of ≥2 minutes in the right side of the colon (odds ratio [OR], 2.98; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.72-5.15; P < .001), ≥4 minutes in the proximal colon (OR, 4.48; 95% CI, 3.15-6.36; P < .001), and ≥3 minutes in the left segment of the colon (OR, 2.92; 95% CI, 1.74-4.91; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The PDR and ADR appeared to be significantly increased when the withdrawal time was ≥2 minutes in the right-sided colon segment, ≥4 minutes in the proximal colon, and ≥3 minutes in the left-sided colon segment compared with shorter withdrawal times.

Association Between Cotinine-verified Smoking Status and Risk of Colorectal Neoplasia.

GOALS: We evaluated the association of urinary cotinine-verified smoking status with the risk of colorectal neoplasia (CRN). BACKGROUND: Many studies have reported the association between the risk of CRN and smoking status, based on self-reported questionnaires. Although self-reported smoking status may be inaccurate, to our knowledge, no study has yet assessed the association between objective biomarkers of tobacco exposure and the risk of CRN. STUDY: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 96,806 asymptomatic examinees who underwent colonoscopy and urinary cotinine measurements as part of a health check-up. Cotinine-verified current smokers were participants having a urinary cotinine level ≥50 ng/mL. RESULTS: The mean participant age was 38.4 years, and the proportion of cotinine-verified current smokers was 23.0%. Cotinine-verified current smoking was an independent risk factor for CRN [adjusted odds ratio (AOR), 1.49; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.42-1.56] and advanced CRN (ACRN) (AOR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.57-2.05). Moreover, the risk of CRN and ACRN increased with increasing cotinine levels. Among self-reported never smokers, cotinine-verified current smokers had a higher risk of CRN (AOR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.57-2.00) and ACRN (AOR, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.37-2.74) than cotinine-verified never smokers did, whereas among self-reported current smokers, cotinine-verified never smokers had a lower risk of CRN (AOR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.70-0.87) and ACRN (AOR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.52-0.98) than cotinine-verified current smokers did. CONCLUSIONS: Cotinine-captured smoking status and metabolic variation exhibit associations with CRN more accurately and objectively than self-reporting does, providing clearer evidence for the role of tobacco in the development of CRN.

A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Colonoscopic Enema With Additional Oral Preparation as a Salvage for Inadequate Bowel Cleansing Before Colonoscopy.

GOALS: The goal of this study was to evaluate the noninferiority of colonoscopic enema to additional oral preparation in salvage bowel cleansing for inadequate preparation for a morning colonoscopy. BACKGROUND: Colonoscopic enema, administering additional cathartics into the right colon through the colonoscope accessory channel, is suggested to rescue poor bowel preparation for a colonoscopy but lacking comparative study. STUDY: In this prospective, randomized, actively-controlled, parallel group, noninferiority trial, consecutive outpatients and health checkup recipients aged from 19 to 70 years with inappropriate bowel preparation during an elective colonoscopy were enrolled to receive either a colonoscopic enema of 1 L polyethylene glycol (PEG) (enema group) or additional oral intake of 2 L PEG (oral group). The primary endpoint was the proportion of adequate bowel preparation evaluated using the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale. RESULTS: Overall, 131 participants were randomized. Adequate bowel preparation was achieved in 53% (35/66) of the enema group, which was significantly inferior to the oral group (81.5%; 53/67) with a difference of -28.5% (95% confidence interval, -44.1, -12.9; P=0.001). The largest difference in the proportion of adequate bowel preparation was observed in the right colon (57.8% in the enema group vs. 86.9% in the oral group; P<0.001), followed by the transverse colon (85.9% vs. 98.4%; P=0.017) and the left colon (90.6% vs. 96.7%; P=0.274). CONCLUSIONS: The colonoscopic enema of 1 L PEG was inferior to the additional oral ingestion of 2 L PEG regarding efficacy as a salvage bowel preparation in adults with inadequate bowel cleansing for colonoscopy.