Accelerated national lot release on COVID-19 vaccines in Republic of Korea.

Independent quality testing of samples from vaccine lots is part of quality assurance, especially to ensure the consistency of production lot by lot. Effective national lot release system that ensures the quality of each lot of vaccine before it is on the market is important because vaccines are intended to healthy people. In order to respond more quickly to public health crises such as the COVID-19 pandemic, the MFDS implements accelerated national lot release for rapid vaccination in Republic of Korea. For the accelerated system, improvement has been made in terms of timing of application for lot release and required documents. In addition, the processing period has been shortened and sampling method and test items have been streamlined. A thorough preparation for accelerated lot release has been developed by establishing test methods for a new platform in advance. As a result, a total of 43.88 million doses have been released within eight days on average. The accelerated lot release system has contributed significantly to rapid COVID-19 vaccination in Korea.

Points to consider for COVID-19 vaccine quality control and national lot release in Republic of Korea: focus on a viral vector platform.

Due to the global public health crisis caused by the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the importance of vaccine development has increased. In particular, a rapid supply of vaccines and prompt deployment of vaccination programs are essential to prevent and overcome the spread of COVID-19. As a part of the vaccine regulations, national lot release is regulated by the responsible authorities, and this process involves the assessment of the lot before a vaccine is marketed. A lot can be released for use when both summary protocol (SP) review and quality control testing are complete. Accelerated lot release is required to distribute COVID-19 vaccines in a timely manner. In order to expedite the process by simultaneously undertaking the verification of quality assessment and application for approval, it is necessary to prepare the test methods before marketing authorization. With the prolonged pandemic and controversies regarding the effectiveness of the COVID-19 vaccine against new variants, public interest for the development of a new vaccine are increasing. Domestic developers have raised the need to establish standard guidance on the requirements for developing COVID-19 vaccine. This paper presents considerations for quality control in the manufacturing process, test items, and SP content of viral vector vaccines.

Implementation of Complementary Model using Optimal Combination of Hematological Parameters for Sepsis Screening in Patients with Fever.

The early detection and timely treatment are the most important factors for improving the outcome of patients with sepsis. Sepsis-related clinical score, such as SIRS, SOFA and LODS, were defined to identify patients with suspected infection and to predict severity and mortality. A few hematological parameters associated with organ dysfunction and infection were included in the score although various clinical pathology parameters (hematology, serum chemistry and plasma coagulation) in blood sample have been found to be associated with outcome in patients with sepsis. The investigation of the parameters facilitates the implementation of a complementary model for screening sepsis to existing sepsis clinical criteria and other laboratory signs. In this study, statistical analysis on the multiple clinical pathology parameters obtained from two groups, patients with sepsis and patients with fever, was performed and the complementary model was elaborated by stepwise parameter selection and machine learning. The complementary model showed statistically better performance (AUC 0.86 vs. 0.74-0.51) than models built up with specific hematology parameters involved in each existing sepsis-related clinical score. Our study presents the complementary model based on the optimal combination of hematological parameters for sepsis screening in patients with fever.

[Evaluation of the Abbott Cell-Dyn Sapphire hematology analyzer].

BACKGROUND: The performance of Cell-Dyn Sapphire (Abbott Diagnostic, USA) was compared to the Bayer Advia 2120 (Bayer Diagnostics, USA), Sysmex XE-2100 (Sysmex Corporation, Japan), and reference microscopy. METHODS: Three hundred samples for routine CBC and WBC differentials were randomly chosen for a comparison analysis. The Cell-Dyn Sapphire system was evaluated according to the linearity, imprecision, inter-instrument correlations, and white blood cell differential. RESULTS: The CBC parameters (WBC, RBC, hemoglobin and platelet) showed a significant linearity with correlation coefficients greater than 0.99 (P<0.0001). Coefficients of variation (CV) for within-run and differential count of WBC were less than 5% except for Total CV for monocytes, eosinophils, and basophils and within-run CV for low valued eosinophils. The correlation coefficients with manual count were lower in monocytes, eosinophils, and basophils than in neutrophils and lymphocytes. The correlation with other hematology anlayzers was significant exclusive of basophils. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate that the Cell-Dyn Sapphire has a good linearity, an acceptable reproducibility, a minimal carryover, and a comparable performance with the sysmex XE-2100 and Advia 2120.