RESUMO
A 69-year-old man, with a history of left superficial temporal artery-middle cerebral artery bypass due to cerebral infarction by left internal carotid artery occlusion, was hospitalized with acute right hemispatial neglect and left hemiparesis. Diffusion-weighted imaging showed a high-intensity lesion in the right insular cortex. Although there seemed to be no arterial occlusion in magnetic resonance angiography (MRA), non-contrast computed tomography (CT) on admission showed calcification in the right Sylvian fissure. As hyperacute ischemic stroke within 4.5 hours after onset, we used an intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator, and his symptoms improved. Follow-up MRA revealed recanalization of the right M2 branches with distal migration of calcification. Although calcification was identified on non-contrast CT in the initial assessment, the diagnosis of middle cerebral artery occlusion was missed. Therefore, arterial occlusion should be considered when calcification is observed in the brain sulcus. This case also illustrated that intravenous thrombolysis may be effective even in calcified cerebral emboli with major vessel occlusion.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND AND AIM: The differentiation of isolated cortical venous thrombosis (ICVT) from cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) can be difficult because both diseases share similar neurological symptoms and imaging findings. N-methyl-11C-2-(4'-methylaminophenyl)-6-hydroxybenzo-thiazole (11C-PiB) positron emission tomography (PET) functions as a diagnostic modality for CAA by detecting amyloid deposition. The present prospective study evaluated amyloid deposition using 11C-PiB-PET in consecutive patients with suspected ICVT. METHOD: This study was a prospective observational study. Patients who attended or were hospitalized between May 2019 and March 2020 were included in the analysis. Consecutive patients who met the criteria for suspicion of ICVT were enrolled in the study, and the clinical course, symptoms, imaging findings (including magnetic resonance imaging), and the 11C-PiB-PET findings of each case were analyzed. RESULTS: The study cohort included four patients (64-82 years of age, all women). In one younger patient, 11C-PiB-PET afforded no findings suggestive of CAA, whereas the remaining three patients exhibited 11C-PiB-PET findings suggestive of CAA. CONCLUSION: Although 11C-PiB-PET would be a reasonable modality for distinguishing ICVT from CAA, especially in younger patients, it might be difficult to differentiate ICVT from CAA in elderly patients because of the potential deposition of amyloid. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/ Unique identifier: UMIN 000037101.