RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is one of the most common malignant tumors of the urinary system and accounts for more than 90 % of all renal tumors. Resistance to targeted therapy has emerged as a pivotal factor that contributes to the progressive deterioration of patients with advanced RCC. Metabolic reprogramming is a hallmark of tumorigenesis and progression, with an increasing body of evidence indicating that abnormal lipid metabolism plays a crucial role in the advancement of renal clear cell carcinoma. OBJECTIVES: Clarify the precise mechanisms underlying abnormal lipid metabolism and drug resistance. METHODS: Bioinformatics screening and analyses were performed to identify hub gene. qRT-PCR, western blot, chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assays, and other biological methods were used to explore and verify related pathways. Various cell line models and animal models were used to perform biological functional experiments. RESULTS: In this study, we identified Mesoderm induction early response 2 (MIER2) as a novel biomarker for RCC, demonstrating its role in promoting malignancy and sunitinib resistance by influencing lipid metabolism in RCC. Mechanistically, MIER2 facilitated P53 deacetylation by binding to HDAC1. Acetylation modification augmented the DNA-binding stability and transcriptional function of P53, while deacetylation of P53 hindered the transcriptional process of PGC1A, leading to intracellular lipid accumulation in RCC. Furthermore, Trichostatin A (TSA), an inhibitor of HDAC1, was found to impede the MIER2/HDAC1/P53/PGC1A pathway, offering potential benefits for patients with sunitinib-resistant renal cell cancer. CONCLUSION: Our findings highlight MIER2 as a key player in anchoring HDAC1 and inhibiting PGC1A expression through the deacetylation of P53, thereby inducing lipid accumulation in RCC and promoting drug resistance. Lipid-rich RCC cells compensate for energy production and sustain their own growth in a glycolysis-independent manner, evading the cytotoxic effects of targeted drugs and ultimately culminating in the development of drug resistance.
RESUMO
Background: As an important kidney-sparing treatment for upper urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), whether endoscopic excision can be performed without sacrificing oncologic outcomes remains indefinite. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence and efficacy of endoscopic excision, in patients with non-muscle invasive UTUC (NMIUTUC) and compare them to those of radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). Methods: Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database, we reviewed 4347 cases with NMIUTUC (cTis/Ta/T1-N0-M0,≤ 5.0 cm) between 2004 and 2020. Surgical treatment modalities included endoscopic excision and RNU. Propensity score matching analysis was used to minimize the selection bias between endoscopic excision and RNU, selecting 1:1 matched patients in the two group. Results: A total of 794 patients with NMIUTUC were included after matching (397:397). Patients who underwent endoscopic excision had worse survival outcomes compared with those of patients who underwent RNU (5-year OS: 65.3 % vs. 80.3 %, p < 0.0001; 5-year DSS: 83.2 % vs. 94.0 %, p = 0.00021). After stratification by anatomical sites, the effect of endoscopic excision for NMI renal pelvis cancer was worse than RNU (5-year OS, 62.9 % vs. 82.8 %; 5-year DSS, 78.8 % vs. 91.6 %), while in NMI ureteral cancer, there is no statistically significant difference in OS and DSS between endoscopic excision and RNU. Further stratification according to tumor grade revealed equivalent tumor control effects of endoscopic excision and RNU in low-grade NMI ureteral cancer (5-year OS: 67.7 % vs. 72.5 %, p = 0.23; 5-year DSS: 87.2 % vs. 93.1 %, p = 0.17); while for renal pelvis tumor and high-grade ureteral tumor, endoscopic excision was related with significantly inferior prognosis. Conclusions: Only for low-grade NMI ureteral cancer, endoscopic excision and RNU are oncologically equivalent, indicating that endoscopic excision might be an effective option for low-grade NMI ureteral cancer. This result needs to be further verified in randomized controlled trials.
RESUMO
Background: For metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa), radical prostatectomy (RP) and radiation therapy (RT) may improve overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). Compared with RT, RP shows significant advantages in improving patient outcomes. External beam radiation therapy (EBRT) even slightly elevates CSM with no statistical difference in OS compared with no local treatment (NLT). Objective: To evaluate OS and CSS after local treatment (LT) (including RP and RT) versus NLT in mPCa. Design, setting, and participants Within the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database (2000-2018), 20098 patients with metastatic prostate cancer were selected in this study, of which 19433 patients had no local treatment, 377 patients with radical prostate treatment, and 288 patients with RT. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Multivariable competing risks regression analysis after propensity score matching (PSM) was used to calculate CSM. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was used to identify the risk factors. Kaplan-Meier methods were used to calculate OS. Results and limitations: A total of 20098 patients were included: NLT (n = 19433), RP (n=377) and RT (n=288). In a competing risk regression analysis after PSM (ratio 1:1), RP resulted in a significantly lower CSM (hazard ratio [HR] 0.36, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.29-0.45) than NLT, while RT showed a slightly lower CSM (HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.63-0.95). In a competing risk regression analysis after PSM (ratio 1:1), RP led to a lower CSM (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.41-0.76) versus RT. As for all-cause mortality (ACM), RP (HR 0.37, 95% CI 0.31-0.45) and RT (HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.56-0.79). also showed a downward trend. In terms of OS, RP and RT significantly improved the survival probability compared with NLT, with the effect of RP being more pronounced. Obviously, older age, Gleason scores ≥8, AJCC T3-T4 stage, AJCC N1, AJCC M1b-M1c were all associated with higher CSM (P <0.05). The same results held true for ACM. The limitation of this article is that it is not possible to assess the effect of differences in systemic therapy on CSM in mPCa patients and clinical trials are needed to verify the results. Conclusions: For patients with mPCa, both RP and RT are beneficial to patients, and the efficacy of RP is better than RT from the perspective of CSM and ACM. Older age, higher gleason scores and the more advanced AJCC TNM stage all put patients at higher risk of dying. Patient summary: A large population-based cancer database showed that in addition to first-line therapy (hormonal treatment), RP and radiotherapy can also benefit patients with mPCa.
RESUMO
Purpose: Little is known about the detailed spectrum of the cause of death associated with prostate cancer (PCa). This study systematically characterized the cause of death among patients with PCa. Methods: Patients aged 40 years and older with primary PCa were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program. Mortality rates were estimated. Standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) of non-cancer deaths were calculated to evaluate the risk of death and to compare with the cancer-free population. Results: This study included 1,170,489 patients with PCa. There were 501,262 deaths, of which 27.4% were due to PCa and 57.0% were due to non-cancer causes. Non-cancer deaths increased over time from 1975 to 2016, and index cancer death decreased continually. The risk of non-cancer deaths was 1.45 times (SMR, 1.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.45-1.46) that of the general population. Cardiovascular disease was the most common non-cancer cause of death, accounting for 30.2% of all deaths among PCa patients. Alzheimer's disease (SMR, 3.92; 95% CI, 3.85-4.00) had the highest risk of death. The mortality rate and SMR of non-cancer deaths increased with increased follow-up after diagnosis. Conclusion: Instead of the index cancer, non-cancer comorbidities were the leading cause of death among patients with PCa, and the risk of non-cancer deaths was much higher than among the general population. Clinicians and researchers should be aware of this trend to conduct timely and targeted interventions.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Duodenal cancer presents an elusive therapeutic challenge for clinicians to treat because of its highly malignant behavior and anatomical complexity. Endoscopic excision has been administered to treat early-stage cancers of upper gastrointestinal tract, especially esophagus and stomach cancer. There is currently a scarcity of data regarding the application and efficacy of endoscopic resection for early duodenal cancer due to its rarity. This study aimed at exploring the prevalence and efficacy of endoscopic excision in treatment for early duodenal cancer in comparison with major surgery. METHODS: This cohort study retrospectively collected patients with primary Tis/T1-N0-M0 duodenal cancer in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database from 2004 to 2017. Prevalence of endoscopic excision in duodenal cancer treatment, overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) of patients who received different tumor-resection procedures were estimated. RESULTS: A total of 1354 patients with Tis/T1-stage duodenal cancer were identified. Most patients (69.4%) underwent tumor resection as initial treatments. Among them, 65.7% underwent endoscopic excision, while 34.3% underwent major surgery. The multivariable Cox analyses revealed that endoscopic excision was associated with a significantly favorable OS (HR: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.52-0.95, p = 0.02) and DSS (HR: 0.32; 95% CI: 0.17-0.60, p < 0.001), compared to major surgery, for Tis/T1-stage cancer patients. In addition to cancer-related deaths (p < 0.001), endoscopic resection manifested significantly lower cumulative mortality rate of post-operative infectious diseases (p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Endoscopic resection currently accounted for approximately two-thirds of all procedures to resect Tis/T1-stage duodenal tumor. Endoscopic resection represents a viable therapeutic option in the management of Tis/T1-stage duodenal cancer for its oncological superiorities to major surgery and its capacity to reduce operative traumas and morbidities.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Duodenais , Neoplasias Gástricas , Estudos de Coortes , Neoplasias Duodenais/cirurgia , Endoscopia , Humanos , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Renal cell carcinoma is one of the most common tumors in the urinary system, among which clear cell renal cell carcinoma is the most common subtype with poor prognosis. As one of the tumors closely related to lipid metabolism, the role of fatty acid metabolism in ccRCC was investigated to predict the prognosis and guide treatment strategies. RNA-seq and clinical information of patients with ccRCC and expression microarray of human renal cell carcinoma cell lines were obtained from TCGA and GEO databases. Fatty acid metabolism-related risk signature was established by the univariate Cox regression and LASSO analysis to predict patient prognosis and response to different treatment modalities. Using the fatty acid metabolism risk signature, the risk score for each sample in the TCGA cohort was calculated and divided into high-risk and low-risk groups, with the cutoff point being the median. Patients with higher risk scores had a poorer prognosis than those with lower risk scores. The response of each sample to immunotherapy was predicted from the "TIDE" algorithm, while the sensitivity of each sample to sunitinib was obtained using the "pRRophetic" R package. Patients with lower risk scores had higher expression of PD-L1 and better efficacy for sunitinib than those in the high-risk group and were less likely to develop drug resistance, while patients with high-risk scores had a strong response to the anti-CTLA4 antibody therapy. A nomogram was constructed by independent prognostic factors to predict the 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival. According to the calibration curves, the nomogram had an excellent ability to predict survival for patients with ccRCC. Therefore, the fatty acid metabolism risk signature we established can not only predict the survival of patients with ccRCC but also predict patient response to targeted therapy and immunotherapy to provide optimal treatment strategies for patients.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Although radical cystectomy is considered as the first choice for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC), there are also concerns regarding the cost of long-term morbidity, loss of body image, and compromised quality of life. Transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) is a candidate for bladder sparing treatments, but its viability as a substitute for radical cystectomy is questionable. Therefore, we conducted this population-based study to investigate the prevalence of TURBT in the treatments of T2-stage MIBC in the United States, and to compare its therapeutic efficiency with that of radical cystectomy. METHODS: Information on patients with T2-stage bladder cancer (BC) between 2000 and 2017 was extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program. The overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) of patients with different interventions were fitted. RESULTS: A total of 22,074 patients with T2-stage MIBC were enrolled, of whom 14,021 reached the main endpoint. Only 28% of the patients with T2-stage MIBC chose radical cystectomy as the initial surgical treatment, while TURBT was applied as the primary surgical treatment in 66.6% of the patients. The TURBT rate increased significantly with age at cancer diagnosis (40-44 years, 45.5% to > 85 years, 90.9%). The survival rate of patients undergoing TURBT was significantly lower than for those undergoing radical cystectomy (median OS: 1.5 versus 9.7 years; median DSS: 2.7 years versus not reached). Upon multivariable Cox analyses, the OS (HR: 2.34; p < 0.001) and DSS (HR: 2.68; p < 0.001) of TURBT were found to be significantly worse than those of radical cystectomy. CONCLUSION: Two-thirds of the patients with T2-stage MIBC were treated by TURBT in the United States. However, the long-term follow-up data indicate that the therapeutic efficiency of current TURBT techniques is far less effective than that of radical cystectomy. Further studies are urgently needed to devise the best management strategy for T2 stage bladder cancer.
Assuntos
Cistectomia , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Coortes , Cistectomia/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Músculos/patologia , Invasividade Neoplásica/patologia , Prevalência , Qualidade de Vida , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Bexiga Urinária , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/epidemiologia , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/patologia , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/cirurgiaRESUMO
Background: Despite rapid advances in the treatment of prostate cancer (PCa), the optimal treatment for elderly patients with PCa remains unclear due to a lack of high-quality evidence. This study aimed to evaluate whether surgical procedures are beneficial for PCa patients aged 75 years and older and compare the effects of focal ablation and prostatectomy. Methods: Male patients aged 75 years and older who were diagnosed with Tis-T2/N0/M0 PCa between 2000 and 2017 were retrospectively identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program database. Cox regression models were used to test for statistical differences between the overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS). Results: A total of 114,506 patients aged 75 years and older with PCa were included in this study, among which 60,131 died during the study period. The most prevalent surgical procedure for these patients was focal ablation. The local excision rate increased with advancing age, while the prostatectomy rate decreased sharply with age. The proportion of the elderly patients who underwent a focal ablation also increased with the age at diagnosis. The survival rate of patients aged 75 years and older who underwent a focal ablation was significantly worse than that for those who did not undergo any surgical procedures (OS: HR, 1.32, P<0.001; DSS: HR, 1.58, P<0.001). Although only a few of the patients underwent prostatectomy, the procedure was still related to improved OS and DSS (OS: HR, 0.60, P< 0.001; DSS: HR, 0.37, P<0.001) rates. Conclusions: Focal ablation has gradually replaced prostatectomy as the most common surgical procedure for elderly patients with PCa in the United States. However, our results revealed that the procedure might not provide benefits for elderly patients with PCa; instead, we found that focal ablation resulted in increased negative effects on patient prognoses. Elderly patients should have the same opportunity to be treated with standard surgical interventions as younger patients.
RESUMO
During the past decades, manifold ranking has been widely applied to content-based image retrieval and shown excellent performance. However, manifold ranking is computationally expensive in both graph construction and ranking learning. Much effort has been devoted to improve its performance by introducing approximating techniques. In this paper, we propose a fast manifold ranking method, namely Local Bipartite Manifold Ranking (LBMR). Given a set of images, we first extract multiple regions from each image to form a large image descriptor matrix, and then use the anchor-based strategy to construct a local bipartite graph in which a regional k -means (RKM) is proposed to obtain high quality anchors. We propose an iterative method to directly solve the manifold ranking problem from the local bipartite graph, which monotonically decreases the objective function value in each iteration until the algorithm converges. Experimental results on several real-world image datasets demonstrate the effectiveness and efficiency of our proposed method.
RESUMO
Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the most frequent malignant tumor of the kidney. 30% of patients with RCC are diagnosed at an advanced stage. Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is the most common pathological subtype of RCC. Currently, advanced ccRCC lacks reliable diagnostic and prognostic markers. We explored the potential of SAA1 as a diagnostic and prognostic marker for advanced ccRCC. In this study, we mined and analyzed the public cancer databases (TCGA, UALCAN and GEPIA) to conclude that SAA1 was up-regulated at mRNA and protein levels in advanced ccRCC. We further found that hypomethylation of SAA1 promoter region was responsible for its high expression in ccRCC. Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) indicated that high SAA1 levels could distinguish advanced ccRCC patients from normal subjects (p < 0.0001). Kaplan-Meier curve analysis showed that high SAA1 levels predicted poor overall survival time (p < 0.0001) and poor disease-free survival time (p = 0.0003). Finally, the functional roles of SAA1 were examined using a si-SAA1 knockdown method in RCC cell lines. Our results suggest that SAA1 may possess the potential to serve as a diagnostic and prognostic biomarker for advanced ccRCC patients. Moreover, targeting SAA1 may represent as a novel therapeutic target for advanced ccRCC patients.
RESUMO
Invasion and metastasis are the main causes of poor prognosis in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). The homeodomain interacting protein kinases (HIPKs) can regulate cell proliferation and apoptosis. Little is known about the prognostic role of HIPKs in ccRCC. Here we use Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and multivariate analysis to analyze the correlation of overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). ROC curves analyzed the relationship between clinicopathological parameters and HIPK3 expression in ccRCC. Univariate analysis and multivariate analysis confirmed that the expression of HIPK3 was associated with OS (HR, 0.701; P=0.041) and DFS (HR, 0.630; P=0.012). Low HIPK3 expression was a poor prognostic factor and HIPK3 expression was significantly down-regulated in ccRCC cancer tissues when compared with normal renal tissues. In vitro cell results also confirmed that HIPK3 over-expression could inhibit tumor growth and malignant characteristics. The results indicate that low expression of HIPK3 in ccRCC tissues is significantly associated with poor survival rates in tumor patients, and HIPK3 may be used as a valuable biomarker and inhibitor of ccRCC.