Trends in cardiac CT utilization for patients with pediatric and congenital heart disease: A multicenter survey study.

BACKGROUND: The use of cardiac CT (CCT) has increased dramatically in recent years among patients with pediatric and congenital heart disease (CHD), but little is known about trends and practice pattern variation in CCT utilization for this population among centers. METHODS: A 21-item survey was created to assess CCT utilization in the pediatric/CHD population in calendar years 2011 and 2021. The survey was sent to all non-invasive cardiac imaging directors of pediatric cardiology centers in North America in September 2022. RESULTS: Forty-one centers completed the survey. In 2021, 98% of centers performed CCT in pediatric and CHD patients (vs. 73% in 2011), and 61% of centers performed >100 CCTs annually (vs. 5% in 2011). While 62% of centers in 2021 utilized dual-source technology for high-pitch helical acquisition, 15% of centers reported primarily performing CCT on a 64-slice scanner. Anesthesia utilization, use of medications for heart rate control, and type of subspecialty training for physicians interpreting CCT varied widely among centers. 50% of centers reported barriers to CCT performance, with the most commonly cited concerns being radiation exposure, the need for anesthesia, and limited CT scan staffing or machine access. 37% (11/30) of centers with a pediatric cardiology fellowship program offer no clinical or didactic CCT training for categorical fellows. CONCLUSION: While CCT usage in the CHD/pediatric population has risen significantly in the past decade, there is broad center variability in CCT acquisition techniques, staffing, workflow, and utilization. Potential areas for improvement include expanding CT scanner access and staffing, formal CCT education for pediatric cardiology fellows, and increasing utilization of existing technological advances.

Medical, Mental Health, and Social Service Linkage Predicts Better HIV Outcomes: A Network Analytic Approach.

This study presents a conceptual and quantitative approach to assess service linkages among people living with HIV (PLWH). We use network analytic techniques to document linkages among service providers based on client reports of service utilization. Data are provided by a cohort study of 1012 PLWH in New York City interviewed up to 8 times from 2002 to 2015. Participants in each interview reported service needs, services received, and location of services for primary care, behavior health, case management, and housing, food, or other social services. Each reported clinic or agency was linked to entries in a database of medical and social service providers, which included details on organizational characteristics. Based on connections indicated by clients' reported referrals, service co-location within a single agency, or service site part of a larger parent organization, we constructed networks of linkages operationally defining which service areas were linked with others. Case management and primary care were services most commonly linked with other services. The most common pairing was case management and housing services. Individuals with more linkages in their care networks, as measured by average number of connections per provider, were associated with greater odds of adherence to antiretroviral medication and suppressed viral load. Further, higher levels of service linkage were associated with reduced emergency department visits and hospital admission rates. This study offers an innovative approach to analyzing linkages and outcomes from the perspective of service users in terms of their care experiences and provides insights into patient self-management of what are often multiple medical and support service needs. Study limitations include the use of data from a single urban setting and gaps in service reports.

Dual Food and Energy Hardship and Associated Child Behavior Problems.

OBJECTIVE: To examine dual food and energy hardship and internalizing and externalizing behavior problems in 9-year-old children. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of the Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study, a prospective national urban birth cohort, when the children were 9 years old. Maternal-reported "food hardship" (ever hungry and/or ever received free food) and "energy hardship" (ever unable to pay utility bill and/or utility shutoff) within the past year, and child behavior using the Child Behavior Checklist for Ages 6-18 were assessed. Multiple logistic regression analyses estimated associations between individual and dual food and energy hardship and child behavior problems, adjusting for a priori covariates (ie, child sex, health insurance, maternal sociodemographic characteristics, poverty, reported health, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, depressive symptoms, smoking, and substance and alcohol abuse). RESULTS: Approximately 10% of households reported dual food and energy hardship. Children experiencing dual food and energy hardship had 3 times greater odds of withdrawn/depressed behaviors (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 2.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.4-5.5), threefold greater odds of somatic complaints (AOR, 3.2; 95% CI, 1.5-6.9), and 4 times greater odds of rule-breaking behavior (AOR, 3.7; 95% CI, 1.5-9.2) in the borderline/clinical range than children with no hardship, and had fourfold greater odds of borderline/clinical range somatic complaints (AOR, 4.2; 95% CI, 1.7-10.3) than children with only energy hardship. CONCLUSIONS: Children experiencing dual food and energy hardship have greater odds of coexisting internalizing and externalizing behaviors after controlling for possible confounders. Providers can consider screening and resource referrals for these addressable hardships alongside behavior assessments in the clinical setting.