Comprehensive molecular phenotyping of ARID1A-deficient gastric cancer reveals pervasive epigenomic reprogramming and therapeutic opportunities.

OBJECTIVE: Gastric cancer (GC) is a leading cause of cancer mortality, with ARID1A being the second most frequently mutated driver gene in GC. We sought to decipher ARID1A-specific GC regulatory networks and examine therapeutic vulnerabilities arising from ARID1A loss. DESIGN: Genomic profiling of GC patients including a Singapore cohort (>200 patients) was performed to derive mutational signatures of ARID1A inactivation across molecular subtypes. Single-cell transcriptomic profiles of ARID1A-mutated GCs were analysed to examine tumour microenvironmental changes arising from ARID1A loss. Genome-wide ARID1A binding and chromatin profiles (H3K27ac, H3K4me3, H3K4me1, ATAC-seq) were generated to identify gastric-specific epigenetic landscapes regulated by ARID1A. Distinct cancer hallmarks of ARID1A-mutated GCs were converged at the genomic, single-cell and epigenomic level, and targeted by pharmacological inhibition. RESULTS: We observed prevalent ARID1A inactivation across GC molecular subtypes, with distinct mutational signatures and linked to a NFKB-driven proinflammatory tumour microenvironment. ARID1A-depletion caused loss of H3K27ac activation signals at ARID1A-occupied distal enhancers, but unexpectedly gain of H3K27ac at ARID1A-occupied promoters in genes such as NFKB1 and NFKB2. Promoter activation in ARID1A-mutated GCs was associated with enhanced gene expression, increased BRD4 binding, and reduced HDAC1 and CTCF occupancy. Combined targeting of promoter activation and tumour inflammation via bromodomain and NFKB inhibitors confirmed therapeutic synergy specific to ARID1A-genomic status. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest a therapeutic strategy for ARID1A-mutated GCs targeting both tumour-intrinsic (BRD4-assocatiated promoter activation) and extrinsic (NFKB immunomodulation) cancer phenotypes.

Pembrolizumab in Asian patients with microsatellite-instability-high/mismatch-repair-deficient colorectal cancer.

The phase 3 KEYNOTE-177 study evaluated pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab or cetuximab in patients with newly diagnosed, microsatellite-instability-high (MSI-H)/mismatch-repair-deficient (dMMR) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) per RECIST v1.1 by blinded independent central review (BICR) and overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints were overall response rate (ORR) per RECIST v1.1 by BICR and safety. Here, we report results from the post hoc analysis of patients who were enrolled in Asia from the final analysis (FA) of KEYNOTE-177. A total of 48 patients from Japan, Korea, Singapore, and Taiwan (pembrolizumab, n = 22; chemotherapy, n = 26) were included. At FA, median time from randomization to data cutoff (February 19, 2021) was 45.3 (range 38.1-57.8) months with pembrolizumab and 43.9 (range 36.6-55.1) months with chemotherapy. Median PFS was not reached (NR; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.9 months-NR) with pembrolizumab versus 10.4 (95% CI 6.3-22.0) months with chemotherapy (hazard ratio [HR] 0.56, 95% CI 0.26-1.20). Median OS was NR (range 13.8 months-NR) versus 30.0 (14.7-NR) months (HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.27-1.55) and ORR was 50% (95% CI 28-72) versus 46% (95% CI 27-67). Grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were reported by two patients (9%) in the pembrolizumab arm and 20 (80%) in the chemotherapy arm. Immune-mediated adverse events or infusion reactions were reported by six patients (27%) and 10 patients (40%), respectively. No deaths due to TRAEs occurred. These data support first-line pembrolizumab as a standard of care for patients from Asia with MSI-H/dMMR mCRC. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02563002.

Clinical outcome and prognostic factors for Asian patients in Phase I clinical trials.

BACKGROUND: Patient selection is key in Phase I studies, and prognosis can be difficult to estimate in heavily pre-treated patients. Previous prognostic models like the Royal Marsden Hospital (RMH) score or using the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) have not been validated in current novel therapies nor in the Asian Phase I population. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of 414 patients with solid tumours participating in Phase I studies at our centre between October 2013 and December 2020. RESULTS: The RMH model showed poorer prognosis with increasing scores [RMH score 1, HR 1.28 (95% CI: 0.96-1.70); RMH score 2, HR 2.27 (95% CI: 1.62-3.17); RMH score 3, HR 4.14 (95% CI: 2.62-6.53)]. NLR did not improve the AUC of the model. Poorer ECOG status (ECOG 1 vs. 0: HR = 1.59 (95% CI = 1.24-2.04), P < 0.001) and primary tumour site (GI vs. breast cancer: HR = 3.06, 95% CI = 2.16-4.35, P < 0.001) were prognostic. CONCLUSIONS: We developed a NCIS prognostic score with excellent prognostic ability for both short-term and longer-term survival (iAUC: 0.71 [95% CI 0.65-0.76]), and validated the RMH model in the largest Asian study to date.

Clinical relevance of PD-1 positive CD8 T-cells in gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the relevance of PD-1+CD8+ T-cells in gastric cancer (GC) including prognostic significance, association with chemotherapy and immunotherapy sensitivity and correlations with the tumor microenvironment (TME). METHODS: Discovery cohort: GC samples were evaluated for AE1/3, CD8, PD-1, Ki-67 and Granzyme-B expression with fluorescence-based multiplex immunohistochemistry (mIHC). Validation cohorts: we analyzed bulk RNAseq GC datasets from TCGA, the "3G" chemotherapy trial and an immunotherapy phase 2 trial. The cox proportional hazards model was used to identify factors that influenced overall survival (OS). To study the TME, we analyzed single-cell RNAseq performed on GCs. RESULTS: In the discovery cohort of 350 GCs, increased PD-1 expression of CD8 T-cells was prognostic for OS (HR 0.822, p = 0.042). PD-1 expression in CD8 T-cells highly correlated with cytolytic [Granzyme-B+] (r = 0.714, p < 0.001) and proliferative [Ki-67+] (r = 0.798, p < 0.001) activity. Analysis of bulk RNAseq datasets showed tumors with high PD-1 and CD8A expression levels had improved OS when treated with immunotherapy (HR 0.117, p = 0.036) and chemotherapy (HR 0.475, p = 0.017). Analysis of an scRNAseq dataset of 152,423 cells from 40 GCs revealed that T-cell and NK-cell proportions were higher (24% vs 18% and 19% vs 15%, p < 0.0001), while macrophage proportions were lower (7% vs 11%, p < 0.0001) in CD8PD-1high compared to CD8PD-1low tumors. CONCLUSION: This is one of the largest GC cohorts of mIHC combined with analysis of multiple datasets providing orthogonal validation of the clinical relevance of PD-1+CD8+ T-cells being associated with improved OS. CD8PD-1high tumors have distinct features of an immunologically active, T-cell inflamed TME.

Epigenetic promoter alterations in GI tumour immune-editing and resistance to immune checkpoint inhibition.

OBJECTIVES: Epigenomic alterations in cancer interact with the immune microenvironment to dictate tumour evolution and therapeutic response. We aimed to study the regulation of the tumour immune microenvironment through epigenetic alternate promoter use in gastric cancer and to expand our findings to other gastrointestinal tumours. DESIGN: Alternate promoter burden (APB) was quantified using a novel bioinformatic algorithm (proActiv) to infer promoter activity from short-read RNA sequencing and samples categorised into APBhigh, APBint and APBlow. Single-cell RNA sequencing was performed to analyse the intratumour immune microenvironment. A humanised mouse cancer in vivo model was used to explore dynamic temporal interactions between tumour kinetics, alternate promoter usage and the human immune system. Multiple cohorts of gastrointestinal tumours treated with immunotherapy were assessed for correlation between APB and treatment outcomes. RESULTS: APBhigh gastric cancer tumours expressed decreased levels of T-cell cytolytic activity and exhibited signatures of immune depletion. Single-cell RNAsequencing analysis confirmed distinct immunological populations and lower T-cell proportions in APBhigh tumours. Functional in vivo studies using 'humanised mice' harbouring an active human immune system revealed distinct temporal relationships between APB and tumour growth, with APBhigh tumours having almost no human T-cell infiltration. Analysis of immunotherapy-treated patients with GI cancer confirmed resistance of APBhigh tumours to immune checkpoint inhibition. APBhigh gastric cancer exhibited significantly poorer progression-free survival compared with APBlow (median 55 days vs 121 days, HR 0.40, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.93, p=0.032). CONCLUSION: These findings demonstrate an association between alternate promoter use and the tumour microenvironment, leading to immune evasion and immunotherapy resistance.

Outcomes of a Phase II Study of Intraperitoneal Paclitaxel plus Systemic Capecitabine and Oxaliplatin (XELOX) for Gastric Cancer with Peritoneal Metastases.

BACKGROUND: Adding intraperitoneal paclitaxel (IP-PTX) to paclitaxel/5-fluoropyrimidine has shown promising results in patients with gastric cancer peritoneal metastases (GCPM) but has not been studied with standard-of-care platinum/fluoropyrimidine combinations. Our goal to was evaluate IP-PTX with capecitabine/oxaliplatin (XELOX) in GCPM. METHODS: Forty-four patients with GCPM received IP PTX (40 mg/m2, Days 1, 8), oral capecitabine (1000 mg/m2 twice daily, Days 1-14) and intravenous oxaliplatin (100 mg/m2, Day 1) in 21-day cycles. Patients with synchronous GCPM underwent conversion surgery if they had good response after chemotherapy, conversion to negative cytology, no extraperitoneal metastasis, and no peritoneal disease during surgery. The primary endpoint was overall survival and secondary endpoints were progression-free survival and safety. Outcomes from the trial were compared against a matched cohort of 39 GCPM patients who received systemic chemotherapy (SC) comprising platinum/fluoropyrimidine. RESULTS: The median OS for the IP and SC groups was 14.6 and 10.6 months (hazard ratio [HR] 0.44; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.26-0.74; p = 0.002). The median PFS for the IP and SC group was 9.5 and 4.4 months respectively (HR 0.39; 95% CI 0.25-0.66; p < 0.001). Patients in the SC group were younger (IP vs. SC, 61 vs. 56 years, p = 0.021) and had better performance status (ECOG 0, IP vs. SC, 47.7% vs. 76.9%, p = 0.007) compared with the IP cohort. In IP group, conversion surgery was performed in 36.1% (13/36) of patients, with a median OS of 24.2 (95% CI 13.1-35.3) months and 1-year OS of 84.6%. CONCLUSIONS: IP PTX with XELOX is a promising treatment option for GCPM patients. In patients with good response, conversion surgery was feasible with favourable outcomes.

Choice of PD-L1 immunohistochemistry assay influences clinical eligibility for gastric cancer immunotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are now standard-of-care treatment for patients with metastatic gastric cancer (GC). To guide patient selection for ICI therapy, programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) biomarker expression is routinely assessed via immunohistochemistry (IHC). However, with an increasing number of approved ICIs, each paired with a different PD-L1 antibody IHC assay used in their respective landmark trials, there is an unmet clinical and logistical need for harmonization. We investigated the interchangeability between the Dako 22C3, Dako 28-8 and Ventana SP-142 assays in GC PD-L1 IHC. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, we scored 362 GC samples for PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS), tumor proportion score (TPS) and immune cells (IC) using a multiplex immunohistochemistry/immunofluorescence technique. Samples were obtained via biopsy or resection of gastric cancer. RESULTS: The percentage of PD-L1-positive samples at clinically relevant CPS ≥ 1, ≥ 5 and ≥ 10 cut-offs for the 28-8 assay were approximately two-fold higher than that of the 22C3 (CPS ≥ 1: 70.3 vs 49.4%, p < 0.001; CPS ≥ 5: 29.1 vs 13.4%, p < 0.001; CPS ≥ 10: 13.7 vs 7.0%, p = 0.004). The mean CPS score on 28-8 assay was nearly double that of the 22C3 (6.39 ± 14.5 vs 3.46 ± 8.98, p < 0.001). At the clinically important CPS ≥ 5 cut-off, there was only moderate concordance between the 22C3 and 28-8 assays. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that scoring PD-L1 CPS with the 28-8 assay may result in higher PD-L1 scores and higher proportion of PD-L1 positivity compared to 22C3 and other assays. Until stronger evidence of inter-assay concordance is found, we urge caution in treating the assays as equivalent.

Comparison of out-of-pocket costs and adherence between the two arms of the prospective, randomized abiraterone food effect trial.

PURPOSE: Abiraterone acetate, prescribed for metastatic prostate cancer, has enhanced absorption with food. This effect was exploited in a randomized trial which showed noninferiority of PSA decline for 250 mg abiraterone with a low-fat meal (LOW) compared to 1,000 mg abiraterone fasting (STD). Drug was obtained via patient insurance. Patient out-of-pocket costs and adherence were surveyed. METHODS: Trial participants were randomized to STD or LOW, and surveys of adherence and out-of-pocket costs were administered at baseline and just before coming off study (follow-up). RESULTS: Out-of-pocket costs were available from 20 of 36 STD and 21 of 36 LOW patients. Median out-of-pocket costs for a month of drug were $0 (LOW) and $5 (STD); mean costs were $43.61 (LOW) and $393.83 (STD). The two groups did not differ significantly (p = 0.421). Maximum out-of-pocket cost was $1,000 (LOW) and $4,000 (STD). Monthly out-of-pocket costs > $500 were found in 1 LOW and 5 STD patients. For adherence, only 11 STD and 19 LOW patients had questionnaires completed at both baseline and follow-up. STD adherence was 98.18% at baseline and 91.69% at follow-up, differing significantly (p = 0.0078). LOW adherence was 96.52% at baseline and 97.86% at follow-up, not differing significantly (p = 0.3511). Adherence did not correlate with demographics. At follow-up, increasing adherence correlated significantly with decreasing dose (p = 0.013; rho = - 0.458). CONCLUSIONS: Out-of-pocket costs did not differ significantly in this limited analysis. Adherence was significantly different in STD as the trial progressed, which was not found in LOW. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01543776; registered March 5, 2012.

Iqgap3-Ras axis drives stem cell proliferation in the stomach corpus during homoeostasis and repair.

OBJECTIVE: Tissue stem cells are central regulators of organ homoeostasis. We looked for a protein that is exclusively expressed and functionally involved in stem cell activity in rapidly proliferating isthmus stem cells in the stomach corpus. DESIGN: We uncovered the specific expression of Iqgap3 in proliferating isthmus stem cells through immunofluorescence and in situ hybridisation. We performed lineage tracing and transcriptomic analysis of Iqgap3 +isthmus stem cells with the Iqgap3-2A-tdTomato mouse model. Depletion of Iqgap3 revealed its functional importance in maintenance and proliferation of stem cells. We further studied Iqgap3 expression and the associated gene expression changes during tissue repair after tamoxifen-induced damage. Immunohistochemistry revealed elevated expression of Iqgap3 in proliferating regions of gastric tumours from patient samples. RESULTS: Iqgap3 is a highly specific marker of proliferating isthmus stem cells during homoeostasis. Iqgap3+isthmus stem cells give rise to major cell types of the corpus unit. Iqgap3 expression is essential for the maintenance of stem potential. The Ras pathway is a critical partner of Iqgap3 in promoting strong proliferation in isthmus stem cells. The robust induction of Iqgap3 expression following tissue damage indicates an active role for Iqgap3 in tissue regeneration. CONCLUSION: IQGAP3 is a major regulator of stomach epithelial tissue homoeostasis and repair. The upregulation of IQGAP3 in gastric cancer suggests that IQGAP3 plays an important role in cancer cell proliferation.

Development and validation of a serum microRNA biomarker panel for detecting gastric cancer in a high-risk population.

OBJECTIVE: An unmet need exists for a non-invasive biomarker assay to aid gastric cancer diagnosis. We aimed to develop a serum microRNA (miRNA) panel for identifying patients with all stages of gastric cancer from a high-risk population. DESIGN: We conducted a three-phase, multicentre study comprising 5248 subjects from Singapore and Korea. Biomarker discovery and verification phases were done through comprehensive serum miRNA profiling and multivariant analysis of 578 miRNA candidates in retrospective cohorts of 682 subjects. A clinical assay was developed and validated in a prospective cohort of 4566 symptomatic subjects who underwent endoscopy. Assay performance was confirmed with histological diagnosis and compared with Helicobacter pylori (HP) serology, serum pepsinogens (PGs), 'ABC' method, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and cancer antigen 19-9 (CA19-9). Cost-effectiveness was analysed using a Markov decision model. RESULTS: We developed a clinical assay for detection of gastric cancer based on a 12-miRNA biomarker panel. The 12-miRNA panel had area under the curve (AUC)=0.93 (95% CI 0.90 to 0.95) and AUC=0.92 (95% CI 0.88 to 0.96) in the discovery and verification cohorts, respectively. In the prospective study, overall sensitivity was 87.0% (95% CI 79.4% to 92.5%) at specificity of 68.4% (95% CI 67.0% to 69.8%). AUC was 0.848 (95% CI 0.81 to 0.88), higher than HP serology (0.635), PG 1/2 ratio (0.641), PG index (0.576), ABC method (0.647), CEA (0.576) and CA19-9 (0.595). The number needed to screen is 489 annually. It is cost-effective for mass screening relative to current practice (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio=US$44 531/quality-of-life year). CONCLUSION: We developed and validated a serum 12-miRNA biomarker assay, which may be a cost-effective risk assessment for gastric cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (Registration number: NCT04329299).

Low-dose pembrolizumab in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

A dose of 200 mg 3-weekly of pembrolizumab was approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) without oncogenic drivers. This is despite evidence showing no difference in efficacy with 2 mg/kg. Our study aimed to assess the efficacy of a lower fixed dose of 100 mg, which is closer to 2 mg/kg weight-based dose in an average-sized Asian patient. All patients receiving pembrolizumab for advanced NSCLC from January 2016 to March 2020 in National University Hospital, Singapore, were included in this retrospective observational study. The effect of pembrolizumab 100 mg (Pem100) vs 200 mg (Pem200) upon survival outcomes, toxicity and cost were examined. One hundred fourteen patients received pembrolizumab. Sixty-five (57%) and 49 (43%) received Pem100 and Pem200, respectively. There was no difference in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) between Pem100 vs Pem200 as a single agent (PFS: 6.8 vs 4.2 months, hazard ratio [HR] 0.72, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.36-1.46, P = .36; 9 month OS: 58% vs 63%, HR 1.08, 95% CI 0.48-2.41, P = .86) and when combined with chemotherapy (9-month PFS: 60% vs 50%, HR0.84, 95% CI 0.34-2.08, P = .71; 9-month OS: 85% vs 58%, HR 0.27, 95% CI 0.062-1.20, P = .09). No significant difference in response rate or ≥G3 immune-related toxicities between Pem100 and Pem200 was observed. A cost minimisation analysis evaluating the degree of cost savings related to drug costs estimated a within study cost saving of SGD4,290,912 and cost saving per patient of SGD39,942 in the Pem100 group. A 100 mg of pembrolizumab appears to be effective with reduction in cost. A randomised trial should be done to investigate a lower dose of pembrolizumab.

Low-Dose Nivolumab in Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Real-World Experience.

BACKGROUND: The approved doses of the single agent nivolumab - an anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) monoclonal antibody - for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) are 3 mg/kg and a 240-mg flat dose, despite efficacy shown at lower doses in earlier CheckMate trials. In view of financial constraints, the minimum dose of nivolumab required for efficacy remains a critical area of inquiry. METHODS: A retrospective review of RCC patients receiving single-agent anti-PD-1 treatment was conducted. Using the median cutoff of the maximum dose per body weight received, we investigated the effect of lower dosages on overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and immune-related adverse event-free survival (irAE-FS). Survival analysis was made by Kaplan-Meier, by uni- and multivariable Cox models, and by modeling the statistical interaction between dosages and survival. RESULTS: 32 patients were recruited: 8 patients (25%) receiving first-line treatment and 24 (75%) receiving second-line treatment and beyond. A median split at 2.15 mg/kg yielded 16 patients in both the lower-dose (LD) and the higher-dose (HD) cohort. Hazard ratios (HRs) demonstrated no difference in OS after adjustment for gender (HR = 0.22, 95% CI 0.05-1.05, p = 0.054; favoring LD), as well as in PFS after adjustment for gender and concurrent radiation therapy (HR = 0.58, 95% CI 0.25-1.34, p = 0.210; favoring LD). No differences in ORR were observed (50.0 vs. 43.8%, p = 1.00, in the LD and the HD cohort, respectively). Immune-related phenomena were observed in the LD group, including pseudoprogression and increased all-grade immune-related toxicities (irAE-FS: HR = 1.72, 95% CI 0.48-6.14, p = 0.293; favoring HD). Iterative dichotomization of dosages showed no dose-OS or dose-irAE-FS relationship. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests no apparent reduction in efficacy when using a low-dosage nivolumab regimen.

Combined inhibition of PD-1/PD-L1, Lag-3, and Tim-3 axes augments antitumor immunity in gastric cancer-T cell coculture models.

BACKGROUND: Immunotherapy targeting PD-1 provides a limited survival benefit in patients with unresectable advanced or recurrent gastric cancer (GC). Beside PD-L1, the expression of inhibitory ligands such as CEACAM-1 and LSECtin on GC cells account for this limitation. Here we assessed their expression and immune suppressive effect in GC patients. METHODS: Using multiplexed immunohistochemistry staining, we evaluated the distribution of different inhibitory ligands, including PD-L1, CEACAM-1, LSECtin, and MHC class II, in 365 GC patients. We analyzed their correlations and overall survival (OS) based on the expression of each inhibitory ligand and the independent prognostic factors that affect OS. Subsequently, we evaluated the additive effect of anti-PD-1 mAb or anti-PD-L1 mAb with/without anti-Lag-3 mAb with/without anti-Tim-3 mAb in cytotoxic assay using tumor-antigen specific CTL clones against GC cell lines. RESULTS: Co-expression of the inhibitory ligands for PD-1, Tim-3, and Lag-3 was observed in the largest proportion (34.7%). CEACAM-1, LSECtin, and MHC class II expression showed significant correlation with PD-L1 expression and OS. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that CEACAM-1 low is an independent prognostic factor. Furthermore, combining dual and triple ICIs yielded additive effect on cytotoxicity of CTL clones against each immune inhibitory ligand positive GC cell lines. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggested that the expression of inhibitory ligands for Tim-3 and Lag-3 on GC cells serve as potential biomarkers to predict the response to anti-PD-1 therapy and the combinatorial immunotherapy with ICIs targeting for PD-1, Tim-3, and Lag-3 has a therapeutic potential for GC patients.

A randomized phase II trial evaluating the addition of low dose, short course sunitinib to docetaxel in advanced solid tumours.

BACKGROUND: We previously reported that low-dose, short-course sunitinib prior to neoadjuvant doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide (AC) normalised tumour vasculature and improved perfusion, but resulted in neutropenia and delayed subsequent cycles in breast cancer patients. This study combined sunitinib with docetaxel, which has an earlier neutrophil nadir than AC. METHODS: Patients with advanced solid cancers were randomized 1:1 to 3-weekly docetaxel 75 mg/m2, with or without sunitinib 12.5 mg daily for 7 days prior to docetaxel, stratified by primary tumour site. Primary endpoints were objective-response (ORR:CR + PR) and clinical-benefit rate (CBR:CR + PR + SD); secondary endpoints were toxicity and progression-free-survival (PFS). RESULTS: We enrolled 68 patients from 2 study sites; 33 received docetaxel-sunitinib and 35 docetaxel alone, with 33 breast, 25 lung and 10 patients with other cancers. There was no difference in ORR (30.3% vs 28.6%, p = 0.432, odds-ratio [OR] 1.10, 95% CI 0.38-3.18); CBR was lower in the docetaxel-sunitinib arm (48.5% vs 71.4%, p = 0.027 OR 0.37, 95% CI 0.14-1.01). Median PFS was shorter in the docetaxel-sunitinib arm (2.9 vs 4.9 months, hazard-ratio [HR] 2.00, 95% CI 1.15-3.48, p = 0.014) overall, as well as in breast (4.2 vs 5.6 months, p = 0.048) and other cancers (2.0 vs 5.3 months, p = 0.009), but not in lung cancers (2.9 vs 4.1 months, p = 0.597). Median OS was similar in both arms overall (9.9 vs 10.5 months, HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.51-1.67, p = 0.789), and in the breast (18.9 vs 25.8 months, p = 0.354), lung (7.0 vs 6.7 months, p = 0.970) and other cancers (4.5 vs 8.8 months, p = 0.449) subgroups. Grade 3/4 haematological toxicities were lower with docetaxel-sunitinib (18.2% vs 34.3%, p = 0.132), attributed to greater discretionary use of prophylactic G-CSF (90.9% vs 63.0%, p = 0.024). Grade 3/4 non-haematological toxicities were similar (12.1% vs 14.3%, p = 0.792). CONCLUSIONS: The addition of sunitinib to docetaxel was well-tolerated but did not improve outcomes. The possible negative impact in metastatic breast cancer patients is contrary to results of adding sunitinib to neoadjuvant AC. These negative results suggest that the intermittent administration of sunitinib in the current dose and schedule with docetaxel in advanced solid tumours, particularly breast cancers, is not beneficial. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered ( NCT01803503 ) prospectively on clinicaltrials.gov on 4th March 2013.

A unique CDK4/6 inhibitor: Current and future therapeutic strategies of abemaciclib.

Cell cycle dysregulation, characterised by aberrant activation of cyclin dependent kinases (CDKs), is a hallmark of cancer. After years of research on the first and second generations of less selective CDK inhibitors with unfavourable clinical activity and toxicity profiles, CDK4/6 inhibitors become the first and only class of highly specific CDK inhibitors being approved for cancer treatment to date. CDK4/6 inhibitors have transformed the treatment paradigm of estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer, dramatically improving the survival outcomes of these patients when incorporated with conventional endocrine therapies in both the first and later-line settings. Currently, the efficacies of CDK4/6 inhibitors in other breast cancer subtypes and cancers are being actively explored. All three CDK4/6 inhibitors have demonstrated very similar clinical efficacies. However, being the least similar structurally, abemaciclib is the only CDK4/6 inhibitor with single agent activity in refractory metastatic ER + breast cancer, the ability to cross the blood brain barrier efficiently, and a distinct toxicity profile of lower myelosuppression such that it can be dosed continuously. Here, we further discuss the distinguishing features of abemaciclib as compared to the other two CDK4/6 inhibitors, palbociclib and ribociclib. Besides being the most potent inhibitor of CDK4/6, abemaciclib exhibits a wider selectivity towards other CDKs and kinases, and functions through additional mechanisms of action besides inducing G1 cell cycle arrest, in a dose dependent manner. Hence, abemaciclib has the potential to act independently of the CDK4/6-cyclin D-RB pathway, resulting in crucial implications on the possibly expanded clinical indications and predictive biomarkers of abemaciclib, in contrast to the other CDK4/6 inhibitors. The current status of preclinical evidence and clinical studies of abemaciclib as a single agent and in combination treatment in breast and other cancers, together with its potential predictive biomarkers, is also summarised in this review.

Immune suppression caused by PD-L2 expression on tumor cells in gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: Gastric cancer (GC) patients with PD-L1-negative tumor occasionally have a favorable response to anti-PD-1 mAb. The aim of the present study was to investigate the regulatory mechanism and immunosuppressive role of PD-L2 in GC. METHODS: We used immunohistochemistry to evaluate the expression of PD-L2 in primary tumors from 194 patients with GC. The mechanism of PD-L2 expression was assessed in TCGA stomach adenocarcinoma tissue dataset and in vitro assay using GC cell lines. The immunosuppressive role of PD-L2 was evaluated by cytotoxicity of CTL clone against PD-L2 expressing GC cells. RESULTS: PD-L2 was expressed on tumor cells (TCs) of 28.4% patients and PD-L2 expression on TCs was significantly associated with tumor progression. TCGA dataset revealed that IFN-γ and, to a lesser extent, IL-4 signature significantly correlated with PD-L2 expression. In vitro assay showed that IFN-γ and, also to a lesser extent, IL-4 can upregulate PD-L2 expression on GC cells. Anti-PD-L2 mAb significantly enhanced the cytotoxicity of CTL clone against GC cell lines expressing PD-L2. CONCLUSIONS: PD-L2 is expressed on GC cells and PD-1/PD-L2 interaction are functionally involved in anti-tumor CTL activities. PD-L2 expression should be considered when determining the optimal immunotherapy for GC.

An Open-Label, Multicenter, Phase I, Dose Escalation Study with Phase II Expansion Cohort to Determine the Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Preliminary Antitumor Activity of Intravenous TKM-080301 in Subjects with Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

LESSONS LEARNED: TKM-080301 showed a favorable toxicity profile at the studied dose.TKM-080301 targeting PLK1 through small interfering RNA mechanism did not demonstrate improved overall survival in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma compared with historical control. Preliminary antitumor activity as shown in this early-phase study does not support further evaluation as a single agent. BACKGROUND: Polo-like kinase 1 (PLK1) is overexpressed in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Knockdown of PLK1 expression by PLK1 small interfering RNA (siRNA) in an HCC cell line showed reduced expression in RNA-induced silencing complex and a reduction in cell proliferation. METHODS: A 3 + 3 dose escalation plus expansion cohort at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was implemented. Patients with HCC, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status ≤2, and Child-Pugh score A received TKM-080301 as an intravenous infusion once every week for 3 consecutive weeks, repeated every 28 days. RESULTS: The study enrolled 43 patients. The starting dose of TKM-080301 was 0.3 mg/kg, and MTD was declared at 0.75 mg/kg. Following the development of grade 4 thrombocytopenia in two subjects on the expansion cohort, the MTD was redefined at 0.6 mg/kg. Four patients did not have any evaluable postbaseline scan. Of the other 39 subjects who had received at least 0.3 mg/kg, 18 subjects (46.2%) had stable disease (SD) by independent RECIST 1.1 criteria. By Choi criteria, eight subjects (23.1%) had a partial response (PR). For 37 assessable subjects, with 2 subjects censored, median progression-free survival (PFS) was 2.04 months. Median survival for the whole study population was 7.5 months. CONCLUSION: TKM-080301 was generally well tolerated. In this early-phase study, antitumor effect for TKM 080301 was limited. Further evaluation as a single agent in large randomized trials is not warranted.

Value of a molecular screening program to support clinical trial enrollment in Asian cancer patients: The Integrated Molecular Analysis of Cancer (IMAC) Study.

The value of precision oncology initiatives in Asian contexts remains unresolved. Here, we review the institutional implementation of prospective molecular screening to facilitate accrual of patients into biomarker-driven clinical trials, and to explore the mutational landscape of advanced tumors occurring in a prospective cohort of Asian patients (n = 396) with diverse cancer types. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) and routine clinicopathological assays, such as immunohistochemistry, copy number analysis and in situ hybridization tests, were performed on tumor samples. Actionable biomarker results were used to identify eligibility for early-phase, biomarker-driven clinical trials. Overall, NGS was successful in 365 of 396 patients (92%), achieving a mean depth of 1,943× and coverage uniformity of 96%. The median turnaround time from sample receipt to return of genomic results was 26.0 days (IQR, 19.0-39.0 days). Reportable mutations were found in 300 of 365 patients (82%). Ninety-one percent of patients at study enrollment indicated consent to receive incidental findings and willingness to undergo genetic counseling if required. The most commonly mutated oncogenes included KRAS (19%), PIK3CA (16%), EGFR (5%), BRAF (3%) and KIT (3%); while the most frequently mutated tumor suppressor genes included TP53 (40%), SMARCB1 (12%), APC (8%), PTEN (6%) and SMAD4 (5%). Among 23 patients enrolled in genotype-matched trials, median progression-free survival was 2.9 months (IQR, 1.5-4.0 months). Nine of 20 evaluable patients (45%; 95% CI, 23.1-68.5%) derived clinical benefit, including 3 partial responses and 6 with stable disease lasting ≥ 8 weeks.

PD-L1 expression is mainly regulated by interferon gamma associated with JAK-STAT pathway in gastric cancer.

Despite multidisciplinary treatment for patients with advanced gastric cancer, their prognosis remains poor. Therefore, the development of novel therapeutic strategies is urgently needed, and immunotherapy utilizing anti-programmed death 1/-programmed death ligand-1 mAb is an attractive approach. However, as there is limited information on how programmed death ligand-1 is upregulated on tumor cells within the tumor microenvironment, we examined the mechanism of programmed death ligand-1 regulation with a particular focus on interferon gamma in an in vitro setting and in clinical samples. Our in vitro findings showed that interferon gamma upregulated programmed death ligand-1 expression on solid tumor cells through the JAK-signal transducer and activator of transcription pathway, and impaired the cytotoxicity of tumor antigen-specific CTL against tumor cells. Following treatment of cells with anti-programmed death ligand-1 mAb after interferon gamma-pre-treatment, the reduced anti-tumor CTL activity by interferon gamma reached a higher level than the non-treatment control targets. In contrast, programmed death ligand-1 expression on tumor cells also significantly correlated with epithelial-mesenchymal transition phenotype in a panel of solid tumor cells. In clinical gastric cancer samples, tumor membrane programmed death ligand-1 expression significantly positively correlated with the presence of CD8-positive T cells in the stroma and interferon gamma expression in the tumor. The results suggest that gastric cancer patients with high CD8-positive T-cell infiltration may be more responsive to anti-programmed death 1/-programmed death ligand-1 mAb therapy.