Acquired Acromion Compromise, Including Thinning and Fragmentation, Is Not Associated With Poor Outcomes After Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Acquired acromial compromise, including thinning (less than 30% of the normal acromion) or fragmentation resulting from acromiohumeral impingement or previous acromioplasty, is a concern in reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). This condition may lead to shoulder pain and difficulties in arm elevation because of acromial insufficiency fracture. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Do patients with acromial compromise (thinning less than 30% of normal acromion or fragmentation) have worse functional outcome scores, ROM, and strength after RSA compared with patients without acromial compromise? (2) Are patients with acromial compromise at a higher risk of complications such as acromial insufficiency fracture after RSA? (3) Do patients who develop acromial insufficiency fracture have predisposing associated factors and worse clinical outcomes? METHODS: Between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2020, we treated 398 patients with RSA, and all patients were considered potentially eligible for this study. Our clinic is part of the orthopaedic department within a tertiary general hospital, serving patients from across the country. Among them, 49% (197 of 398) of patients were excluded for the following reasons: 8% (31 of 398) because of proximal humerus fracture, 5% (19 of 398) because of osteonecrosis, 9% (35 of 398) because of previous infective arthritis, 5% (18 of 398) because of a deformed shoulder, 4% (14 of 398) because of poor general condition after surgery, 3% (12 of 398) because of death, and another 17% (68 of 398) were lost before the minimum study follow-up, leaving 51% (201 of 398) for analysis. A preoperative acromial compromise was defined as follows: (1) thinning of the acromion (< 3 mm), which means a thickness of less than 30% of the normal acromion thickness (8 to 9 mm), and (2) acromial fragmentation. Acromial thickness was measured using a CT scan. The middle portion of the anterolateral acromion, situated lateral to the distal end of the clavicle, was crosschecked using the axial view. Measurements were subsequently performed from both coronal and sagittal views. In all, 29 patients with acromion compromise and 172 without acromion compromise met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. There was no differential loss to follow-up before 2 years between patients with and without acromial compromise in this study (36% [16 of 45] versus 23% [52 of 224]; p = 0.12). We matched patients using propensity score, pairing them in a 1:3 ratio based on gender, age, bone mineral density, diagnosis, previous rotator cuff repair surgery, subscapularis repair or latissimus dorsi transfer performed during surgery, the type of prosthesis used, and follow-up duration. Twenty-three patients with acromial compromise (acromion compromised group) and 69 patients without acromial compromise (normal control group) were matched; the mean ± SD duration of follow-up was 40 ± 22 months in those with acromial compromise and 43 ± 19 months the in normal control group. Pre- and postoperative functional outcome scores, ROM, and shoulder strength were compared. Shoulder scaption refers to lifting the arm in the scapular plane, and scaption strength was measured by applying upward force with the arm at 90° while seated, pushing it as far as possible and measured using a handheld myometer. Complications, including acromial insufficiency fracture, scapular notching, dislocation, periprosthetic infection, and overall risk of complication, were analyzed. Acromial insufficiency fracture was diagnosed based on clinical and radiological findings. Clinically, sudden pain and tenderness at the acromion along with reduced shoulder elevation raised acromial insufficiency fracture suspicion. Radiologically, acromion tilt on plain radiograph or fracture line on coronal CT view confirmed diagnosis of acromial insufficiency fracture. RESULTS: Comparing both groups, patients with a compromised acromion had no difference in American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores (60 ± 12 versus 64 ± 12; mean difference -4 [95% CI -11 to 2]; p = 0.16), Constant scores (48 ± 10 versus 54 ± 12; mean difference -6 [95% CI -13 to 0]; p = 0.06), forward flexion degree (125 ± 24 versus 130 ± 21; mean difference -5 [95% CI -16 to 6]; p = 0.36), and scaption strength (5 ± 3 versus 6 ± 3; mean difference -1 [95% CI -3 to 0]; p = 0.13). Having acromial compromise was not associated with increased risk of overall complications (30% [7 of 23] versus 19% [13 of 69], relative risk 2 [95% CI 1 to 4]; p = 0.26). However, the only complication that was higher in the acromial compromised group was infection (13% [3 of 23] versus 0% [0 of 69], relative risk not available; p = 0.01). Only the lateralized glenoid prosthesis demonstrated negative association with the acromial insufficiency fracture occurrence; no other factors showed an association. The use of lateralized glenoid prostheses was not observed in patients with acromial insufficiency fracture (0% [0 of 7] acromial insufficiency fracture versus 39% [33 of 85] no acromial insufficiency fracture, relative risk 0 [95% CI 0]; p = 0.047). CONCLUSION: In patients with acquired acromial compromise-such as thinning or fragmented acromion because of advanced cuff tear arthropathy or previous acromioplasty-primary RSA resulted in no different functional outcome score, ROM, shoulder strength, and overall complications compared with patients without acromial compromise. Our findings suggest that a thin or fragmented acromion may not necessarily be exclusion criteria for RSA, potentially aiding surgeons in their decision-making process when treating these patients. However, one of the major complications, postoperative infection, is more frequently observed in patients with acquired acromial compromise. Pre- and postoperative caution would be necessary to prevent and detect infection even when short-term outcomes are favorable in this study. Further studies with large cohorts and long-term follow-up durations are needed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.

Atelocollagen Injection During Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair for Small- to Medium-Sized Subacute or Chronic Rotator Cuff Tears Enhances Radiographic Tendon Integrity: A Propensity Score-Matched Comparative Study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical and structural outcomes of using injectable atelocollagen during arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) for small- to medium-sized rotator cuff tears. METHODS: This retrospective study reviewed patients with small- to medium-sized full-thickness tears who underwent ARCR from 2016 to 2022 with a minimum 1-year follow-up. Propensity score (PS) matching was used to reduce bias. Tendon integrity was evaluated using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at postoperative 6 months. Clinical and structural outcomes were compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS: After PS matching, this study included 181 pairs of patients comparing ARCR with atelocollagen injection and without atelocollagen injection. Range of motion, muscle strength, and functional outcomes were significantly improved in both the atelocollagen group and the control group. Forward elevation and external rotation were significantly worse in the atelocollagen group compared with the control group at 2, 6, and 12 months postoperatively and at the final follow-up. In total, 125 patients (69.1%) in the atelocollagen group and 130 patients (71.8%) in the control group exceeded the minimal clinically important difference in the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score without a significant difference between the 2 groups (P = .509). The mean value of Sugaya grade on postoperative MRI evaluation was 2.03 ± 0.81 for the atelocollagen group and 2.24 ± 0.97 for the control group, with a significant difference between the 2 groups (P = .027). Tendon healing failure was observed in 12 patients (6.6%) in the atelocollagen group and 19 patients (10.5%) in the control group, with no statistical difference between the 2 groups (P = .189). CONCLUSIONS: Atelocollagen injection during ARCR for small- to medium-sized subacute or chronic rotator cuff tears did not show a benefit in clinical outcomes. However, postoperative MRI showed significantly lower Sugaya grade compared with the control group, with no significant difference in retear rate. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective case-control study.

Clinical and Structural Outcomes of Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair in Patients Over 75 Years Are Comparable to Those in Younger Patients: A Propensity Score-Matched Comparative Study.

PURPOSE: To compare clinical and structural outcomes of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) in patients over 75 years and those under 75 years and to analyze the factors associated with retear and clinical outcomes after ARCR. METHODS: This retrospective study reviewed patients who underwent ARCR between 2011 and 2021 with at least 2 years of follow-up. Using propensity score matching for sex, tear size, subscapularis involvement, and follow-up time, this study included 54 patients older than 75 years (group A) and 54 patients younger than 75 years (group B). Cuff integrity was evaluated using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Structural and clinical outcomes were compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS: The mean improvements in external rotation (P = .030) and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score (P = .043) were significantly higher in group A. Visual analog scales for pain and function, ASES score, and Constant score were significantly improved in both groups (all P = .001). On routine postoperative MRI at 6 months, the retear rate was 20.4% (11/54) in group A and 18.5% (10/54) in group B with no statistical difference between the 2 groups (P = .808). Factor analysis in group A showed that follow-up duration (P = .019), tear size in mediolateral dimension (P = .037), occupation ratio (P = .036), and incomplete repair (P = .034) were associated with retear, and mild glenohumeral arthritis (P = .003) and subscapularis involvement (P = .018) were associated with inferior Constant score. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical and structural outcomes after ARCR in patients aged 75 years or older are comparable to those in patients younger than 75 years. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective case-control study.

Diagnostic performance of conventional magnetic resonance imaging for detection and grading of subscapularis tendon tear according to Yoo and Rhee classification system in patients underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff surgery.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the diagnostic accuracy of conventional MRI for detecting and grading subscapularis (SSC) tears by applying the Yoo and Rhee classification. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 179 patients who underwent MRI followed by arthroscopic rotator cuff surgery were enrolled. Two musculoskeletal radiologists evaluated the SSC using axial, oblique sagittal, and oblique coronal MRI according to the Yoo and Rhee classification. Using arthroscopic findings as the reference standard, the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and interobserver agreement of SSC tears were analyzed. RESULTS: Arthroscopy confirmed that the numbers of type I, IIA, IIB, III, IV, and V tears were 35, 70, 35, 9, 9, and 0, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of readers 1 and 2 for the detection of tears (type IIA or higher) were 85%, 75%, and 82%, and 89%, 70%, and 83%, respectively, while those for the detection of surgical candidates (type IIB or higher) were 77%, 75%, and 75%, and 77%, 83%, and 82%, respectively. The interobserver agreement for detecting SSC tear presence was substantial (κ = 0.70) for reader 1 vs. reader 2, and those for detecting the surgical candidate group was substantial (κ = 0.68) for reader 1 vs. reader 2. The interobserver agreement for grading SSC tears was excellent (κ = 0.86) for reader 1 vs. reader 2. CONCLUSION: Conventional MRI showed 82.5% and 78.5% average accuracy in detecting IIA and IIB or higher tears by applying the Yoo and Rhee classification for the diagnosis of SSC tears with an excellent interobserver agreement in tear grading.

Preoperative rotator cuff tendon integrity, tear size, and muscle atrophy and fatty infiltration are associated with structural outcomes of arthroscopic revision rotator cuff repair.

PURPOSE: A few studies have focused on factors predisposing to retear after arthroscopic revision rotator cuff repair (ARRCR). This study aimed to retrospectively evaluate (1) the structural and clinical outcomes of ARRCR and (2) pre- and intraoperative factors affecting the integrity of the rotator cuff (RC) tendon by focusing on preoperative RC tendon integrity, tear size, muscle hypotrophy and fatty infiltration. METHODS: Patients who underwent ARRCR between 2006 and 2016 were reviewed. Preoperative variables included demographic data, RC tendon integrity, tear size, and muscle hypotrophy and fatty infiltration on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Intraoperative variables included repair technique and completeness of repair. The visual analog scale for pain (PVAS), functional VAS (FVAS), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores, and shoulder range of motion (ROM) were assessed. Postoperative tendon integrity was evaluated using over 6-month follow-up MRI. Patients were classified into groups A (healed) and B (retear), and their variables were compared. RESULTS: Overall 65 patients with a mean follow-up of 49.5 ± 30.2 (range, 24.0-148.9) months were analyzed. Fifty-six of 65 (86.2%) patients underwent MRI at 9.1 ± 9.7 (range, 4.4-40.2) months after ARRCR, and 20 of 56 (35.7%) patients (group B) exhibited retear. Group A (36/56, 64.3%) showed higher functional scores and ROMs than group B at the final follow-up, with significant differences in the FVAS scores (Group A versus B: FVAS, 7.6 ± 1.8 versus 6.4 ± 1.9, p = 0.036). Intraoperative variables, including preoperative tendon integrity (p = 0.021), tear size (p = 0.007), supraspinatus and infraspinatus muscle hypotrophy and fatty infiltration (p < 0.001 and p = 0.046), and completeness of repair (p = 0.030), differed significantly between the groups. Multivariate analysis revealed that preoperative supraspinatus muscle hypotrophy and fatty infiltration were independent predisposing factors for retear after ARRCR [odds ratio = 7.5, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.1-55.8, p = 0.048]. CONCLUSION: The retear was found in 20/56 patients (35.7%) after ARRCR for less than massive rotator cuff tears in this limited study population. Preoperative tendon integrity, tear size, supraspinatus and infraspinatus muscle hypotrophy and fatty infiltration, and completeness of repair was revealed to be associated with tendon integrity following ARRCR. Among them, preoperative supraspinatus muscle atrophy and fatty infiltration were the independent factors for retear after ARRCR, although generalization is limited. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Microinstability characterised by small and easily overlooked anterior labral or Hill-Sachs lesions can be managed with arthroscopic anterior labral repair.

PURPOSE: Some young individuals present with shoulder pain without a definite history or complaint of instability. However, careful history taking, physical examination, and high-quality magnetic resonance imaging may reveal evidence of instability of which the patient is unaware. Therefore, a clearer definition of these ambiguous patients is needed. This study aimed to report the characteristics and surgical outcomes of patients with microinstability compared to those of patients with classic recurrent anterior shoulder instability. METHODS: From 2005 to 2018, 35 patients with microinstability (group M) underwent arthroscopic anterior labral repair (AALR) and were compared to 35 sex- and age-matched patients with classic recurrent anterior shoulder instability (group C) who also underwent AALR. Baseline characteristics, preoperative apprehension test findings, preoperative imaging for the presence of anterior labral and Hill-Sachs lesions, preoperative and postoperative (over 2 years) range of motion (ROM) and functional scores, final complications, and patient satisfaction were analysed. RESULTS: The most common chief complaints in groups M and C were pain (29/35) and both pain and instability (27/35), respectively. Only pain during the apprehension test was predominant in group M (M vs. C, 27 vs. 1, p < 0.001). High incidence of chronic repetitive injuries (26/35) and acute trauma (28/35) were observed in groups M and C, respectively. Over half of the patients in group M showed anterior labral lesions on magnetic resonance arthrography (MRA, 18/35), and 21 patients had Hill-Sachs lesions on MRA/three-dimensional computed tomography. Finally, 29 patients showed either anterior labral or Hill-Sachs lesions on preoperative imaging. The lesion severity was higher in group C than that in group M. All patients underwent AALR with/without the remplissage procedure, with no significant differences in final clinical outcomes, complications, and patient satisfaction between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Microinstability is diagnostically challenging and can be diagnosed in young patients with ambiguous shoulder pain during motion, without instability. Pain on anterior apprehension test and subtle labral and/or Hill-Sachs lesion on imaging study could be diagnostic clues. This condition can be managed with arthroscopic anterior labral repair with or without the remplissage procedure. The possibility of microinstability in young patients with shoulder pain should always be considered, and small anterior labral or Hill-Sachs lesions should be closely monitored. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Factors affecting internal rotation after reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: The limitation or loss of internal rotation (IR) after the surgery is a major problem in reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). The particular factors associated with postoperative IR remain unclear. We aimed to analyze the predictors of IR after RSA. METHODS: We included primary RSA patients with the following implants and a minimum of 1-year follow-up: Wright Aequalis (n = 25), DJO Encore (n = 29), Biomet Comprehensive (n = 40), and Exactech Equinoxe (n = 29). Age, sex, dominant hand, primary diagnosis, implant type, preoperative critical shoulder angle, pre- and postoperative acromiohumeral distance, lateral offset of implant, glenosphere inclination, peg-glenoid rim distance (PGRD), glenosphere overhang, scapular notching, subscapularis (SSc) repair, pre- and postoperative ROM, and functional scores were assessed. IR was assessed using a 10-point scale based on the following anatomical levels: from the greater trochanter to the buttocks (2 points), from the sacrum to L4 (4 points), from L3 to L1 (6 points), from T12 to T8 (8 points), and from T7 to T1 (10 points). Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to identify the factors affecting the IR after RSA. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-three shoulders (123 patients) with a mean follow-up of 30.59 ± 19.55 (range, 12-83) months were evaluated. In the univariable analysis, preoperative diagnosis [odds ratio (OR) = 0.243, P = 0.001], implant type (P = 0.002), PGRD (OR = 1.187, P = 0.003), and preoperative IR (P < 0.001) were found to be factors associated with postoperative IR. Preoperative IR was the only factor associated with postoperative IR in the multivariable analysis (P < 0.001). Patients with preoperative IR scores of 10 or 8 points showed significantly better IR after RSA than those with preoperative IR scores of 2 or 4 points (10 points vs. 2 or 4 points; OR = 15.433, P = 0.002, 8 points vs. 2 or 4 points; OR = 6.078, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Preoperative IR was the only independent factor for IR after RSA. Patients with excellent preoperative IR had better postoperative IR than those with poor preoperative IR. Preoperative diagnosis, implant type, SSc repair, implant lateralization, glenosphere inferior placement, and scapular notching were not identified as independent predictors of IR after RSA in our sample size.

Humeral stem with low filling ratio reduces stress shielding in primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: Some patients show severe humeral bone stress shielding even one year after press-fit humeral stem, which can be a risk factor for implant durability. This study compared humeral stress shielding and clinical outcomes between high and low filling ratio (HFR and LFR) stems in primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). METHODS: From 2015 to 2020, 104 patients who underwent RSA with a non-cemented standard-length humeral stem were examined. The humeral stems included large press-fit stems (HFR group, 53 patients) or small non-press-fit stems with autogenous cancellous bone grafting (LFR group, 51 patients). The radiologic and clinical outcomes were compared between the groups one year post-operatively. RESULTS: One patient in the LFR group with early infectious dislocation was excluded from the 1-one year evaluation. No stress shielding was observed in 27/50 (54.0%) and 5/53 (9.4%) of patients in the LFR and HFR groups, while 3/50 (6%) and 19/53 (35.8%) patients showed high-stress shielding, respectively. However, the stem alignment change, subsidence, complications and evidence of loosening did not differ between the groups. The final range-of-motion and functional scores were significantly poorer in the LFR group than those in the HFR group, although the difference was minimal. CONCLUSION: Even at one year follow-up, patients receiving LFR stems with autogenous bone grafting had significantly less humeral stress shielding compared to patients with HFR stem with press-fit in primary RSA, without compromising stem stability.

Clinical and structural outcome of intra-articular steroid injection for early stiffness after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.

PURPOSE: Direct comparative results of patients with early stiffness after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) with and without steroid injection are still unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical and structural effect of intra-articular steroid injection for early stiffness after ARCR. METHODS: From 2011 and 2016, a total of 417 patients who underwent ARCR for less than medium-sized tears with 35.8 ± 22.6 months follow-up were retrospectively analyzed. Patients with shoulder stiffness [forward flexion (FF) < 120˚] or pain at 2 months after ARCR were performed intra-articular steroid injection, and four groups were established [+ stiffness/ + injection (SI, 158 patients), + stiffness/-injection (SNI, 92 patients), -stiffness/ + injection (NSI, 33 patients), and -stiffness/-injection (NSNI, 134 patients)]. Shoulder range-of-motion (ROM) and functional score changes for over two years were analyzed, and six month tendon integrity were evaluated using magnetic resonance imaging. RESULTS: Comparing SI and SNI group, ROM (except internal rotation) and functional score changes did not differ during the early period (2-6 and 2-12 months). However, comparing whether steroid injected (SI/NSI) or not (SNI/NSNI), the formers showed significantly higher improvement of both ROM and functional scores during the early and late period (2-24 months). A six month tendon integrity was not different across four groups and whether steroid injected or not. CONCLUSIONS: Intra-articular steroid injections do not appear to have a short-term clinical improving effect by comparing patients with stiff shoulders after ARCR with and without steroid injections. However, intra-articular steroid injection at two months after ARCR did not affect the tendon integrity at post-operative six months.

Posterior repair of isolated type 2 superior labrum anterior-posterior lesion prevents external rotation deficiency: long-term outcome study.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of arthroscopic type 2 superior labrum anterior-posterior (SLAP) lesion repair in the general population and compare clinical outcomes according to patient age and repair site. METHODS: Between 2005 and 2018, patients who underwent arthroscopic repair for isolated type 2 SLAP lesions were retrospectively reviewed. Baseline characteristics, pre- and postoperative [1-year and > 2-year (final)] shoulder range-of-motion, and functional scores, comprising the pain visual analogue scale (PVAS), functional VAS, and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, were evaluated. Return to overhead activities and subjective satisfaction were assessed at the final follow-up, and patients were divided by age [group YB (< 40 years] and group OB (≥ 40 years)] and repair site [group P (only posterior labrum repair) and group AP (anterior and posterior labrum repair)]. Overall patient outcomes were analysed and compared between groups. RESULTS: This study included 54 patients (45 men) with a mean age of 37.1 ± 8.3 years. The mean follow-up was 90.8 ± 51.3 months. Two patients experienced early failure, and one patient had a ruptured biceps tendon during the follow-up period. Final functional scores improved compared to their preoperative scores in all patients, except three (all p < 0.001). Fifty patients (98.0%) were satisfied, and 39 patients (76.5%) were able to perform overhead sports without restriction. In 25 patients who attended more than 7 years of follow-up (mean, 11.3 ± 2.7 years), 21 patients (84%) had an ASES score ≥ 80, and all patients had PVAS ≤ 2. There was no significant difference in clinical outcomes between groups YB and OB. The final median external rotation was significantly more restricted in group AP than in group P (40 [25-65] vs. 60 [50-70], p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Arthroscopic type 2 SLAP repair induced good short- and long-term clinical outcomes, return to overhead activities, and subjective satisfaction in the general population, regardless of age, due to the careful evaluation of patient history, physical examination, and imaging studies. However, performing only posterior repair seems sufficient since anterior labral SLAP lesion repair can limit ER. Isolated type 2 SLAP lesion posterior repair only is, thus, recommended to reduce external rotation deficit risk and increase satisfaction, regardless of patient age. STUDY DESIGN: Case series. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Clinical outcome and repair integrity after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair significantly improved during the surgeon's learning curve.

HYPOTHESIS AND BACKGROUND: Whether learning curve could affect the surgical outcome after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair is still unknown. The purpose of this study was to evaluate surgical learning curve for clinical outcome and retear rate after arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs that were performed by the beginner shoulder surgeon. We hypothesized that clinical outcome and retear rate would improve over time with the accumulation of a surgeon's experience. METHODS: This retrospective study consisted of 200 consecutive patients who had arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs, performed by a single surgeon between 2011 and 2018. We included symptomatic rotator cuff tears involving the supraspinatus/infraspinatus and/or subscapularis tendon and follow-up magnetic resonance imaging evaluations of repair integrity 6 months after surgery. Surgeon's learning was evaluated with calculation of cumulative retear rate and cumulative summation (CUSUM) analysis. Clinical outcomes and the retear rates were compared between group A (the first-half 100 patients) and group B (the latter-half of 100 patients). RESULTS: The mean follow-up period was 21 months (range, 12-55). The overall retear rate was 13% (26 patients). The CUSUM analysis showed that after patient number 97, the curve was maintained below the level of acceptable failure rate, suggesting the competency was obtained consistently. Comparing between groups, retear rate showed significant decrease from 18% in group A to 8% in group B (P = .036). Notably, retear rate in small to medium-sized tears (<3 cm) significantly decreased from 26% (12 of 46 patients) in group A to 2% (1 of 49 patients) in group B (P = .001). However, analysis in large to massive tears (≥3 cm) failed to show difference between groups (30%, 6 of 20, in group A and 25%, 6 of 24, in group B; P = .711). In multivariate analysis, higher fatty infiltration of the supraspinatus muscle (P = .008), more severe muscle atrophy of the teres minor (P = .010), and belonging to group A (P = .011) were associated with retear. CONCLUSION: Clinical outcomes and retear rate after arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs significantly improved during the learning curve period of a beginner shoulder surgeon.

Incidence and risk factors of acromial fracture following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: The occurrence and related predictors of acromial fracture following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) have not been fully elucidated. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence and risk factors of acromial fractures after RTSA. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, retrospective case-control study of 787 cases (29 in acromial fracture group and 758 in control group) that underwent RTSA performed by 6 surgeons. The mean duration of follow-up after RTSA was 31.6 ± 21.8 months (range, 12-136 months). Demographic variables (age, sex, arm dominance, body mass index, working status, bone mineral density [BMD]), clinical variables (preoperative diagnosis, previous operation, implant design, preoperative clinical scores, screw size in glenoid fixation, postoperative rehabilitation), and radiographic variables (acromial thickness, critical shoulder angle, deltoid length, humeral offset to lateral acromion) were investigated. To determine risk correlation, univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis with calculated odds ratios (ORs) were performed. RESULTS: Postoperative acromial fractures occurred in 29 of the 787 shoulders with RTSA (3.7%). Acromial fractures were detected at a mean of 10.0 months (range, 1-66 months) postoperatively. Univariate analysis revealed that the occurrence of an acromial fracture was significantly associated with a previous operation (38% [11 of 29] vs. 21% [156 of 758], P = .025) and BMD (-2.33 vs. -1.74, P = .013). Multivariate logistic regression analysis found that the occurrence of a postoperative acromial fracture was significantly associated with a previous operation (P = .034; OR, 2.91; 95% confidence interval, 1.08-7.84) and deltoid length (P = .004; OR, 1.04; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.07). CONCLUSION: Acromial fracture following RTSA is not an uncommon complication, with an overall incidence of 3.7%. A previous operation, increased deltoid length, and low BMD were risk factors of acromial fracture following RTSA.

Evaluation of analgesic efficacy and opioid sparing effect of pregabalin after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair surgery: A retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Considering the adverse effects of opioids, it is essential to minimize their consumption for postoperative pain control. Studies have reported the opioid sparing effects of pregabalin, with conflicting results. Evidence for administering pregabalin in a multimodal regimen after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair surgery is limited. METHODS: A total of 64 patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair were enrolled in the cohort, and their data were retrospectively analyzed to evaluate the ability of pregabalin for postoperative analgesia and opioid sparing. The pregabalin group (n = 32) received additional pregabalin 75 mg for 2 weeks from the day before the surgery with the standard pain medications; in contrast, the control group (n = 32) was prescribed the standard pain medications alone. The total volume of patient-controlled anesthesia, doses of oral oxycodone and intravenous morphine as rescue analgesics, number of adverse events, and patient satisfaction based on the numeric rating scale (0-10) were assessed. Further, we used the visual analog scale for evaluating pain and function for 6 months in each group. RESULTS: Total patient-controlled anesthesia volume, number of patient-controlled anesthesia attempts on the day of surgery, and total oral oxycodone consumption were significantly lower in the pregabalin group. Visual analog scale scores for pain and function showed no significant differences. Although the total number of adverse effects (nausea, vomiting, dizziness, dry mouth, urinary retention, itching sense, or constipation) was higher in the pregabalin group than in the control group, the difference was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Our multimodal regimen with pregabalin significantly reduced opioid consumption with similar adverse effects. However, there was no significant difference in the pain score. We recommend pregabalin as an additional analgesic for arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs, especially for medium to large sized tears.

Effect of tranexamic acid on blood loss after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty according to the administration method: a prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled study.

BACKGROUND: The ideal method of administering tranexamic acid (TXA) for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) remains unknown. We aimed to evaluate TXA efficacy according to 3 administration methods after RTSA. METHODS: Overall, 102 patients who underwent RTSA using a single implant between September 2016 and November 2018 were randomized to the following groups according to the TXA administration method: intravenous (n = 34; 1 g + 0.9% normal saline 100 mL), topical (n = 33; 2 g + 0.9% normal saline 50 mL), and combined groups (n = 34). Patients were enrolled in 4 tertial referral hospitals for prospective multicenter studies. The primary outcome was a hemoglobin decrease in 24 hours postoperatively; secondary outcomes were total drain volume, transfusion rate, and calculated total blood loss. RESULTS: Demographic data, including preoperative hemoglobin levels, were not different among the 3 groups, but the average age was higher in the combined group (P = .038). Hemoglobin decrease (1.8 ± 1.1 vs. 1.8 ± 1.0 vs. 2.0 ± 1.1 g/dL, P = .769), total drain volume (209.2 ± 147.6 vs. 167.2 ± 102.0 vs. 166.0 ± 118.7, P = .270), and total blood loss (701.1 ± 352.3 vs. 656.5 ± 285.6 vs. 699.0 ± 248.7 mL, P = .810) were not significantly different among the 3 groups (all P > .05). The transfusion rate was higher in the intravenous group (n = 4), whereas only 1 patient had transfusion in the topical group and none in the combined group, although the difference was not statistically significant (P = .084). CONCLUSION: Blood loss did not differ among TXA administration methods after RTSA. However, considering the risk of complication in intravenous TXA, topical TXA after RTSA may be safer, even for patients with normal risk for venous thromboembolic complication.

Superior Trunk Block Provides Noninferior Analgesia Compared with Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block in Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Interscalene brachial plexus block of the C5-C6 roots provides highly effective postoperative analgesia after shoulder surgery but usually results in hemidiaphragmatic paresis. Injection around the superior trunk of the brachial plexus is an alternative technique that may reduce this risk. The authors hypothesized that the superior trunk block would provide noninferior postoperative analgesia compared with the interscalene block and reduce hemidiaphragmatic paresis. METHODS: Eighty patients undergoing arthroscopic shoulder surgery were randomized to receive a preoperative injection of 15 ml of 0.5% ropivacaine and 5 µg · ml epinephrine around either (1) the C5-C6 nerve roots (interscalene block group) or (2) the superior trunk (superior trunk block group). The primary outcome was pain intensity 24 h after surgery measured on an 11-point numerical rating score; the prespecified noninferiority limit was 1. Diaphragmatic function was assessed using both ultrasonographic measurement of excursion and incentive spirometry by a blinded investigator before and 30 min after block completion. RESULTS: Seventy-eight patients completed the study. The pain score 24 h postoperatively (means ± SDs) was 1.4 ± 1.0 versus 1.2 ± 1.0 in the superior trunk block (n = 38) and interscalene block (n = 40) groups, respectively. The mean difference in pain scores was 0.1 (95% CI, -0.3 to 0.6), and the upper limit of the 95% CI was lower than the prespecified noninferiority limit. Analgesic requirements and all other pain measurements were similar between groups. Hemidiaphragmatic paresis was observed in 97.5% of the interscalene block group versus 76.3% of the superior trunk block group (P = 0.006); paresis was complete in 72.5% versus 5.3% of the patients, respectively. The decrease in spirometry values from baseline was significantly greater in the interscalene block group. CONCLUSIONS: The superior trunk block provided noninferior analgesia compared with interscalene brachial plexus block for up to 24 h after arthroscopic shoulder surgery and resulted in significantly less hemidiaphragmatic paresis.

Editorial Commentary: New Kid on the Block: Rotator Cuff Patch Augmentation Requires Rigorous Scrutiny.

There is still plenty of room for improvement in surgical rotator cuff repair healing as well as in nonsurgical cases. Adding an implant or patch to improve results has been a subject of much discussion for a couple of decades. The main problem has been that the surgical procedures are so difficult, with added time and its effect, and therefore are controversial. Many surgeons are reluctant to go the surgical route. As we have advanced technically, we are at a turning point, with newer implants that can be easily augmented. Therefore, recently many surgeons have been using implants, and preliminary reports seem promising. New implants must withstand vigorous challenges, and future extensive and long-term studies can enable improved implants using human tissue.

A novel diagnostic method to predict subscapularis tendon tear with sagittal oblique view magnetic resonance imaging.

PURPOSE: To find novel measurement guidelines correlating with known tear size on two sagittal oblique views (en-face view and Y-view). METHODS: From a series of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair cases between 2012 and 2015, 50 patients were randomly selected from each of six subscapularis tear classifications. Due to rarity of type IV lesions, 272 shoulders were included. En-face view and Y-view in sagittal plane MRI were selected. Image evaluation was retrospectively performed by two researchers independently. In en-face view, anatomical line connecting the coracoid tip to the glenoid base designated as the base-to-tip line was used for thickness measurement and classification. Grading according to base-to-tip line, overlapped segment of base-to-tip line, thickness of subscapularis, and fluid accumulation were measured. In Y-view, a tangent line was drawn through the scapular spine and the coracoid. Parallel lines were then made. Grading according to tangent line, vertical length, cephalic width, caudal width, and fluid accumulation was measured. RESULTS: In en-face view, grading according to base-to-tip line and overlapped segment of base-to-tip line showed differences in subscapularis tendon tear types IIB, III, and IV compared to the normal group. Thickness of subscapularis showed differences in types III and IV. No significant difference was observed in fluid accumulation. In Y-view, grading according to tangent line, vertical length, cephalic width, and fluid accumulation showed significant differences in types III and IV. Caudal width in Y-view was significantly different only in type IV. CONCLUSION: Several measurement parameters in two additional views in sagittal-oblique MRI (en-face view and Y-view) showed different degrees of subscapularis tendon tears. Grading of base-to-tip line is easy to use and helps diagnose partial subscapularis tear. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Does creating a trough on the anterior glenoid rim make a difference in Arthroscopic Bankart repair using suture anchors? A mid-term follow-up retrospective study.

PURPOSE: Creating a trough on the anterior glenoid rim is one of the methods used for arthroscopic Bankart repair with suture anchors. The purpose of this study was to analyze clinical and radiological outcomes of arthroscopic Bankart repair with suture anchors; to compare between the outcomes of surgical procedures with and without trough. METHODS: Clinical and radiological outcomes were evaluated for 116 patients who underwent arthroscopic Bankart repair at our institute from 2005 to 2011. The mean follow-up was 5.2 years (range, 2-8.8 years). All data were divided into trough group (n = 62) and non-trough group (n = 71). Clinical and functional outcomes were assessed pre- and postoperatively as range of motion (ROM), pain on the visual analog scale (p-VAS), function on the visual analog scale (f-VAS), and Rowe score. Radiological outcomes were also evaluated. RESULTS: The overall postoperative clinical and functional outcomes improved significantly (P < .001). A total of 8 patients (6.8%) showed recurrent instability. Radiologic findings showed mild arthritis in 27 cases (23.1%), moderate arthritis in 6 cases (5.1%), and no severe arthritis. 32 patients showed anterior apprehension after surgery, and 22 out of those 32 patients were from non-trough group. However, no significant difference between the trough and non-trough groups was found with respect to clinical and functional outcomes (P > .05). CONCLUSION: The additional procedure of creating a trough did not improve clinical outcomes in terms of frank dislocation; however, at the final follow-up, patients with the trough showed less anterior apprehension. Overall, arthroscopic Bankart repair using suture anchors had relatively good clinical outcome, with a redislocation rate of 6.8%. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, Case series.

Tranexamic acid in total shoulder arthroplasty and reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The effects of tranexamic acid (TXA) in the setting of shoulder arthroplasty are unclear. The objective of this study was to examine the effects of TXA in reducing the need for blood transfusions and blood loss in patients undergoing primary total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA). METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and retrospective cohort studies (RCS) that compared outcomes of patients who did and did not receive TXA during TSA or RTSA. We searched Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, EMBASE, and MEDLINE for relevant studies. We assessed the risk of bias of the included studies and calculated pooled risk estimates. The primary outcome was transfusion rate, and secondary outcomes were changes in hemoglobin, estimated total blood loss (ETBL), blood loss via drainage, operative time, hospital stay, overall complications, and thromboembolic events. RESULTS: We identified 3 RCTs and 3 RCS including 677 patients with 680 shoulders (343 TXA and 337 non-TXA). The random-effects model meta-analysis showed that TXA group had a lower transfusion rate (risk ratio (RR) 0.34, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.79), less change in hemoglobin (mean difference (MD) -0.64 g/dl, 95% CI -0.81 to - 0.46), and reduced ETBL (MD -249.24 ml, 95% CI -338.74 to - 159.74). In patients with RTSA, the TXA group had a lower transfusion rate (RR 0.28, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.79), less ETBL (MD -249.15 ml, 95% CI -426.60 to - 71.70), less change in hemoglobin (MD - 0.64 g/dl, 95% CI -0.86 to - 0.42), and less blood loss via drainage (MD - 84.56 ml, 95% CI -145.72.14 to - 23.39) than non-TXA group. CONCLUSIONS: The use of TXA in primary shoulder arthroplasty appears safe, and can reduce transfusion rate, changes in hemoglobin, and perioperative total blood loss, especially in patients with RTSA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Systematic Review and meta-analysis, III.

Arthroscopic Incomplete Repair Using a "Hybrid Technique" for Large to Massive Rotator Cuff Tears: Clinical Results and Structural Integrity.

PURPOSE: The first aim of this study was to introduce the concept of hybrid repair (incomplete repair) for large to massive rotator cuff tears and to report clinical results and structural integrity of patients with a minimum 2-year follow-up. The second aim was to compare arthroscopic hybrid repair with partial repair for large to massive rotator cuff tears. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 65 patients who underwent arthroscopic incomplete (hybrid) repair (45 patients) or partial repair (20 patients) for large to massive cuff tears from March 2011 to January 2015. The pain visual analog scale, function visual analog scale, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, and Constant scores and range of motion (ROM) (active flexion, elevation, abduction, external rotation, and internal rotation) were assessed preoperatively, at first follow-up (approximately 6 months postoperatively), at second follow-up (1 year postoperatively), and at final follow-up (2 years postoperatively). The healing status of the repaired tendon was evaluated with postoperative magnetic resonance imaging, with a focus on tendon integrity. RESULTS: Comparisons of the preoperative values and final follow-up results of hybrid repair showed significant improvement in the mean pain visual analog scale score (5.56 and 0.93, respectively), mean function visual analog scale score (4.77 and 8.59, respectively), and questionnaire results (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, 44.89 and 84.67, respectively; Constant score, 44.27 and 73.46, respectively) (all P ≤ .001). Most shoulder ROM measures showed some improvement compared with presurgical ROM at last follow-up (≥2 years). However, there was no statistical significance. Retears occurred in 9 patients (20%) in the hybrid-repair group. Most of the postoperative clinical outcomes showed excellent results with hybrid repair compared with partial repair. CONCLUSIONS: Arthroscopic incomplete repair (hybrid technique) showed more satisfactory clinical trial outcomes than partial repair of large to massive rotator cuff tears. Therefore, we propose the use of incomplete repair, which provides improvements in both pain and functional outcomes, as another repair option for large to massive rotator cuff tears. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative study.