Utilization of the modified Kama scoring system for predicting bail-out cholecystectomy: a valuable tool in the era of rising laparoscopic surgery prevalence.

PURPOSE: Recently, bail-out cholecystectomy (BOC) during laparoscopic cholecystectomy to avoid severe complications, such as vasculobiliary injury, has become widely used and increased in prevalence. However, current predictive factors or scoring systems are insufficient. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to test the validity of existing scoring systems and determine a suitable cutoff value for predicting BOC. METHODS: We retrospectively assessed 305 patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy and divided them into a total cholecystectomy group (n = 265) and a BOC group (n = 40). Preoperative and operative findings were collected, and cutoff values for the existing scoring systems (Kama's and Nassar's) were modified using a prospectively maintained database. RESULTS: The BOC rate was 13% with no severe complications. A logistic regression analysis revealed that the Kama's score (odds ratio, 0.93; 95% confidence interval 0.91-0.96; P < 0.01) was an independent predictor of BOC. A cutoff value of 6.5 points gave an area under the curve of 0.81, with a sensitivity of 87% and a specificity of 67%. CONCLUSIONS: Kama's difficulty scoring system with a modified cutoff value (6.5 points) is effective for predicting BOC.

Radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy enhances local control of the disease in patients with left-sided pancreatic cancer.

BACKGROUND: Radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) was developed to enhance curability in patients with left-sided pancreatic cancer. However, no evidence is available regarding the prognostic superiority of RAMPS compared with conventional distal pancreatectomy (cDP). Here, we aimed to assess the oncological benefit of RAMPS by comparing surgical outcomes between patients who underwent cDP and RAMPS with propensity score (PS) adjustment. METHODS: Clinical data of 174 patients undergoing cDP and RAMPS between 2009 and 2016 at two high-volume centers were analyzed with PS matching. Recurrence-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), and local recurrence rates were compared between patients who underwent cDP and RAMPS. RESULTS: The cDP and RAMPS groups were successfully matched with baseline characteristics. No differences were found in the 3-year RFS and OS rates between the two groups (3-year RFS: cDP 46% vs RAMPS 40%, p = 0.451, 3-year OS: cDP 57% vs RAMPS 53%, p = 0.692). However, the 3-year local recurrence rate was lower in the RAMPS (10%) than that in the cDP group (34%) (hazard ratio 0.275, 95% confidence interval 0.090-0.842, p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: RAMPS is oncologically superior to conventional procedure in achieving local control of the disease in patients with left-sided pancreatic cancer.

Limited Prognostic Value of KRAS in Patients Undergoing Hepatectomy for Colorectal Liver Metastases.

BACKGROUND: RAS mutation status is considered a powerful prognostic factor in patients undergoing hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases (CLM). However, whether its prognostic power is robust regardless of administration of preoperative chemotherapy or tumor burden remains unclear. METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent initial hepatectomy for CLM from April 2010 through March 2017 in two hospitals were included. The prognostic value of KRAS was compared based on whether patients received preoperative chemotherapy and their tumor burden score (TBS). RESULTS: We included 409 patients (median follow-up 38 months). In the preoperative chemotherapy group, patients with mutant KRAS (mt-KRAS) CLM had poorer overall survival (OS) than those with wild KRAS (wt-KRAS; 5-year OS: 37.7% vs 53.8%, p = 0.024), although their OS was not different from patients undergoing upfront surgery. Similarly, patients with mt-KRAS had poorer OS than those with wt-KRAS in TBS of 3-9 (5-year OS: 33.1% vs 63.2%, p = 0.001), although their OS was not different from patients with TBS < 3 or ≥ 9. In multivariate analysis, mt-KRAS was an independent prognostic factor of OS among patients receiving preoperative chemotherapy (hazard ratio [HR] 1.61, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.034-2.491; p = 0.035) and patients with TBS of 3-9 (HR 1.836, 95% CI 1.176-2.866; p = 0.008). However, it was not a prognostic factor in patients who underwent upfront surgery or with TBS > 3 or ≥ 9. CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing hepatectomy for CLM, the prognostic value of KRAS depends on their history of preoperative chemotherapy or tumor burden.

Anatomic Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Prognostic Impact Assessed from Recurrence Treatment.

BACKGROUND: The oncologic advantage of anatomic resection (AR) for primary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical advantages of AR for primary HCC by using propensity score-matching and by assessing treatment strategies for recurrence after surgery. METHODS: The study reviewed data of patients who underwent AR or non-anatomic resection (NAR) for solitary HCC (≤ 5 cm) in two institutions between 2004 and 2017. Surgical outcomes were compared between the two groups in a propensity score-adjusted cohort. The time-to-interventional failure (TIF), defined as the elapsed time from resection to unresectable/unablatable recurrence, also was evaluated. RESULTS: The inclusion criteria were met by 250 patients: 77 patients (31%) with AR and 173 patients (69%) with NAR. In the propensity score-matched populations (AR, 67; NAR, 67), the 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) for AR was better than for NAR (62% vs 35%; P = 0.005). No differences, however, were found in the 5-year overall survival between the two groups (72% vs 78%; P = 0.666). The 5-year TIF rates for the NAR group (60%) also were similar to those for the AR group (66%) (P = 0.413). In the cohort of 67 patients, curative repeat resection or ablation therapy was performed more frequently for the NAR patients (42%) than for the AR patients (10%) (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: For solitary HCC, AR decreases recurrence after the initial hepatectomy. However, aggressive curative-intent interventions for recurrence compensate for the impaired RFS, even for patients undergoing NAR.

Segmental resection with partial mesopancreatic and mesojejunal excision (pMME) for duodenal carcinoma of the third or fourth portion.

INTRODUCTION: Pancreatoduodenectomy is the standard procedure for duodenal carcinoma of the third or fourth portion. As an alternative option, we developed a novel segmental resection (SR) with partial mesopancreatic and mesojejunal excision (pMME) that enhances radicality. In this report, the surgical technique with video and outcomes are described. METHOD: We performed SR with pMME on seven consecutive patients with third or fourth duodenal carcinoma between 2009 and 2021. We divided the procedure into four sections, including (1) wide Kocher's maneuver, (2) supracolic anterior artery-first approach, (3) dissection of the mesopancreas and mesojejunum, and (4) devascularization of the uncinate process and dissection of duodenum. RESULT: Median operative time was 348 min (range, 222-391 min), and median blood loss was 100 mL (range, 30-580 mL). Major complications of Clavien-Dindo classification grade 3a or more occurred in one patient. All patients achieved R0 resections with 10 mm or more proximal margin. Six cases (85%) were alive without recurrence. CONCLUSION: We developed a radical and safe procedure of SR with pMME as an alternative and less invasive approach for duodenal carcinoma of the third or fourth portion.

Parachute technique for portal vein reconstruction during pancreaticoduodenectomy with portal vein resection in patients with pancreatic head cancer.

BACKGROUND: The most appropriate venous reconstruction method remains debatable when a long section of portal vein (PV) and/or superior mesenteric vein (SMV) must be resected in patients undergoing a pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). The aim of the present study was to describe the technical details of the parachute technique, a modified end-to-end anastomotic maneuver that can be used in the above-mentioned circumstances, and to investigate its safety and feasibility. STUDY DESIGN: Patients who underwent venous reconstruction using the parachute technique after receiving a PD with PV resection for pancreatic cancer between January 2014 and March 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. For the parachute technique, the posterior wall was sutured in a continuous fashion while the stitches were left untightened. The stitches were then tightened from both sides after the running suture of the posterior wall had been completed, thereby dispersing the tension applied to the stitched venous wall when the venous ends were brought together and solving any problems that would otherwise have been caused by over-tension. The postoperative outcomes and PV patency were then investigated. RESULTS: Fifteen patients were identified. The median length of the resected PV/SMV measured in vivo was 5 cm (range, 3-6 cm). The splenic vein was resected in all the patients and was reconstructed in 13 patients (87%). The overall postoperative complication rate (≥ Clavien-Dindo grade I) was 60%, while a major complication (≥ Clavien-Dindo grade IIIa) occurred in 1 patient (7%). No postoperative deaths occurred in this series. The PV patency at 1 year was 87%. CONCLUSION: The parachute technique is both safe and feasible and is a simple venous reconstruction procedure suitable for use in cases undergoing PD when the distance between the resected PV and SMV is relatively long.

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy after endoscopic trans-papillary gallbladder stenting for acute cholecystitis: a pilot study of surgical feasibility.

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage (PTGBD) is indicated for patients with acute cholecystitis (AC) who are not indicated for urgent surgery, but external tubes reduce quality of life (QOL) while waiting for elective surgery. The objective of the present study was to investigate the feasibility of laparoscopic cholecystectomy after endoscopic trans-papillary gallbladder stenting (ETGBS) comparing with after PTGBD. METHODS: Intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of patients with ETGBS and PTGBD were retrospectively compared. RESULTS: Eighteen ETGBS and ten PTGBD patients were compared. Differences in the duration of ETGBS and PTGBD [median 209 min (range 107-357) and median 161 min (range 130-273), respectively, P = 0.10], median blood loss [ETGBS 2 (range 2-180 ml) and PTGBD 24 (range 2-100 ml), P = 0.89], switch to laparotomy (ETGBS 11% and PTGBD 20%, P = 0.52), and median postoperative hospital stay [ETGBS 8 (range 4-24 days) and ETGBS 8 (range 4-16 days), P = 0.99]. Thickening of the cystic duct that occurred in 60% of the ETGBS patients and none of the PTGBD patients (P = 0.005) interfered with closure of the duct by clipping. No obstruction occurred in ETGBS patients. CONCLUSION: ETGBS did not make laparoscopic cholecystectomy less feasible than after PTGBD. This is a pilot study, and further investigations are needed to validate the results of the present study.

Portal encasement: Significant CT findings to diagnose local recurrence after pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: To demonstrate the utility of portal encasement as a criterion for early diagnosis of local recurrence (LR) after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). METHODS: A total of 61 patients who underwent PD for PDAC were included in this retrospective study. Portal stenosis was evaluated by sequential postoperative computed tomography (CT) scans and correlated with disease recurrence. In addition to the conventional LR diagnostic criterion of a growing soft tissue mass, LR was evaluated using portal encasement as an additional diagnostic criterion. Portal encasement was defined as progressive stenosis of the portal system accompanied by a soft tissue mass, notwithstanding the enlargement of the mass. RESULTS: Benign portal stenosis was found on the first postoperative CT imaging in 16 patients. However, stenosis resolved a median of 81 days later in all but one patient whose stenosis was due to portal reconstruction during PD. Portal encasement could be distinguished from benign portal stenosis based on the timing of emergence of the portal stenosis. Portal encasement developed in 13 of the 19 patients with LR, including 6 patients in whom the finding of portal encasement led to the diagnosis of LR a median of 147 days earlier with our diagnostic criterion compared with the conventional diagnostic criteria. CONCLUSIONS: Portal encasement should be considered as a promising diagnostic criterion for earlier diagnosis of LR after PD for PDAC.

Host MICA Polymorphism as a Potential Predictive Marker in Response to Chemotherapy for Colorectal Liver Metastases.

BACKGROUND: Understanding the genetic background of a tumor is important to better stratify patient prognosis and select optimal treatment. For colorectal liver metastases (CLM), however, clinically available biomarkers remain limited. METHODS: After a comprehensive sequencing of 578 cancer-related genes in 10 patients exhibiting very good/poor responses to chemotherapy, the A5.1 variant of the MICA gene was selected as a potential biomarker for CLM. The clinical relevance of MICA A5.1 was then investigated in 58 patients who underwent CLM resection after chemotherapy. RESULTS: The A5.1 variant was observed in 16 (27.6%) patients examined using direct DNA sequencing, and a very high concordance rate (56/58, 96.6%) for the MICA variant was confirmed between tumor tissues and normal liver parenchyma. A multivariate analysis of 38 patients with no history of treatment with anti-EGFR antibodies confirmed that MICA A5.1 was significantly correlated with an optimal CT morphologic response (OR 11.67; 95% CI 2.08-65.60; p = 0.005) and tended to be correlated with a tumor viability of < 20% after chemotherapy (OR 5.91; 95% CI 0.97-36.02; p = 0.054). MICA A5.1 was also associated with a decreased risk of progression after CLM resection. CONCLUSION: The MICA A5.1 polymorphism was associated with a better CT morphologic response to chemotherapy and a reduced risk of relapse after CLM resection. Given the high concordance rate in MICA variants between normal liver tissue and CLM, the genetic background of the host could be a new biomarker for CLM.

Therapeutic effects of oxaliplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer: a single-center, retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT) has now become the standard treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). NACRT has decreased local relapse (LR) rate in patients with LARC; however, distant relapse has recently attracted much attention. This study aimed to assess the feasibility and efficiency of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for LARC. METHODS: Data on patients with cT3/4 and N+ rectal cancer who were treated in our institution from April 2010 to February 2016 were reviewed retrospectively. Twenty-seven patients who received 2-9 cycles of oxaliplatin-based NAC and 28 patients who received NACRT (45 Gy delivered in 25 fractions and 5-fluorouracil-based oral chemotherapy) were analyzed. The primary and secondary endpoints of the present study were the 3-year relapse-free survival (RFS) and the local and distant relapse rates, respectively. RESULTS: Regardless of the kind of neoadjuvant therapy, no patient experienced any grade 3-4 therapy-related adverse events. The frequent toxic events were grade 1 diarrhea in patients with NACRT and neutropenia in patients with NAC. A significantly higher proportion of patients with NAC underwent laparoscopic surgery and anterior resection (p = 0.037 and p = 0.003, respectively). The percentages of patients with lymph node yield less than 12 in the NAC group, and those in the NACRT group were 26 and 68%, respectively (p = 0.002). Comparing the NAC with the NACRT groups, the local relapse and distant relapse rates were 7.4 and 7.1% and 7.4 and 18%, respectively. There were no significant differences in 3-year RFS and 4-year overall survival (OS) between NAC and NACRT (3-year RFS 85.2 vs. 70.4%, p = 0.279; 4-year OS 96.3 vs. 89.1%, p = 0.145, respectively). With an analysis excluding patients who received postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy, no patients who received NAC had a distant relapse, and there was a significant difference in 3-year RFS compared with the NACRT groups (94.4 vs. 63.2%, p = 0.043). CONCLUSION: These outcomes suggest that the therapeutic effect of oxaliplatin-based NAC is at least equal to that of NACRT and that NAC is a feasible and promising option for LARC.

Clinical Impact of Preoperative Chemotherapy on Microscopic Cancer Spread Surrounding Colorectal Liver Metastases.

BACKGROUND: A potentially favorable effect of chemotherapy on the incidence of micrometastases has been reported in patients with colorectal liver metastases (CLMs); however, the actual influence of chemotherapy on the distribution of micrometastases and surgical curability remains unclear. METHOD: The clinical impact of preoperative chemotherapy on the incidence and distribution of micrometastases was assessed in 191 patients with 357 CLM nodules. Potential radiologic measures for predicting the extent of microscopic cancer spread and surgical curability were then sought among the size-based and non-size-based radiologic response criteria. RESULTS: Multivariate analysis estimated a reduced incidence of micrometastases in patients receiving preoperative chemotherapy (odds ratio [OR] 0.45, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.26-0.76, p = 0.003). Furthermore, the addition of biologic agents to the preoperative chemotherapy regimen was correlated with a reduced incidence of microscopic cancer spread beyond a width of 1 mm from the margin of the main tumor (OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.11-0.74, p = 0.010 for bevacizumab; and OR 0.29, 95% CI 0.09-0.99, p = 0.048 for anti-epidermal growth factor receptor antibody). Receiver operating characteristic analyses revealed that the computed tomography (CT) morphologic response showed a moderate predictive power for the distribution of micrometastases, with an area under the curve of 0.687, while size-based response criteria were not reliable for estimating the extent of microscopic cancer spread. CONCLUSION: Notwithstanding the potential selection of patients after preoperative chemotherapy, the incidence and distribution of micrometastases may be reduced by preoperative chemotherapy. CT morphologic response may be a reliable predictor of both the degree of microscopic cancer spread and the curability of surgery.

Obstruction in the third portion of the duodenum due to a diospyrobezoar: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Duodenal obstruction occurs mainly due to physical lesions such as duodenal ulcers or tumors. Obstruction due to bezoars is rare. We describe an extremely rare case of obstruction in the third portion of the duodenum caused by a diospyrobezoar 15 months after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer. CASE PRESENTATION: A 73-year-old man who underwent laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer 15 months before admission experienced abdominal distension and occasional vomiting. The symptoms worsened and ingestion became difficult; therefore, he was admitted to our department. Computed tomography (CT) performed on admission revealed a solid mass in the third portion of the duodenum and dilatation of the oral side of the duodenum and remnant stomach. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) revealed a bezoar deep in the third portion of the duodenum. We could neither remove nor crush the bezoar. At midnight on the day of EGD, he experienced sudden abdominal pain. Repeat CT revealed that the bezoar had vanished from the duodenum and was observed in the ileum. Moreover, small bowel dilatation was observed on the oral side of the bezoar. Although CT showed neither free air nor ascites, laboratory data showed the increase of leukocyte (8400/µL) and C-reactive protein (18.1 mg/dL), and abdominal pain was severe. Emergency surgery was performed because conservative treatment was considered ineffective. We tried advancing the bezoar into the colon, but the ileum was too narrow; therefore, we incised the ileum and removed the bezoar. The bezoar was ocher, elastic, and hard, and its cross-section was uniform and orange. The postsurgical interview revealed that the patient loved eating Japanese persimmons (Diospyros kaki); therefore, he was diagnosed with a diospyrobezoar. His postoperative progress was good and without complications. He left the hospital 10 days after surgery. EGD performed 4 weeks after surgery revealed no abnormal duodenal findings. CONCLUSIONS: We describe a rare case of obstruction in the third portion of the duodenum caused by a diospyrobezoar 15 months after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with Billroth I reconstruction for early gastric cancer.

KRAS Mutation Status Predicts Site-Specific Recurrence and Survival After Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastases Irrespective of Location of the Primary Lesion.

BACKGROUND: The KRAS mutation status is reportedly correlated with poor survival outcome in patients with colorectal liver metastases (CLM); however, its true prognostic impact and the reason for the poor prognosis remain unclear. METHODS: Data on 163 patients with a known KRAS mutation status who underwent curative resection for CLM were retrospectively reviewed. The long-term survival and site-specific incidence of recurrence were then compared between patients with a KRAS mutation (mtKRAS) and those without a mutation (wtKRAS). RESULTS: The mtKRAS group had a poorer 3-year disease-specific survival (DSS) rate (59.8 vs. 83.6 %, p = 0.016), 3-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) rate (0 vs. 20.2 %, p = 0.069), and median time to surgical failure (TSF) [18.8 vs. 39.7 months, p = 0.001] than the wtKRAS group. The cumulative incidences of liver recurrence and lung recurrence at 3 years were also higher in the mtKRAS group (76.2 vs. 54.7 %, p = 0.060; and 71.9 vs. 37.3 %, p < 0.001, respectively). A multivariate analysis confirmed that an mtKRAS status had a significant effect on the DSS rate (hazard ratio [HR] 2.9, p = 0.006), RFS (HR 2.0, p = 0.004), TSF (HR 2.4, p < 0.001), liver recurrence (HR 1.7, p < 0.001), and lung recurrence (HR 2.6, p < 0.001). Lung-related unresectable recurrences were more frequent (41 vs. 18 %, p = 0.048) and were associated with an earlier TSF (9.6 vs. 14.0 months, p = 0.14) in the mtKRAS group, regardless of the location of the primary lesions. CONCLUSIONS: mtKRAS is associated with poor survival outcome after CLM resection because of a relatively high incidence of lung recurrence and a relatively short TSF.

Prognostic risk factors for recurrence after resection of colorectal liver metastases.

Surgical resection is the only potentially curative treatment for colorectal liver metastases (CLM). Although long-term survival after resection of CLM, with a 5-year overall survival of more than 50 %, has been reported recently, high recurrence rate up to 80 % with a short interval after resection still remains the key problem of CLM treatment. Several clinicopa- thological prognostic risk factors after resection of CLM has been reported, such as short disease free interval, primary nodal status, number and size of CLM, preoperative serum carcinoembryonic antigen level, etc., and currently, RAS mutation status has been also con- sidered as the important prognostic factor. However, these factors do not preclude the surgical indication for CLM. Re-resection of the recurrence plays an important role for achieving the long-term survival.

Pancreatoduodenectomy With Systematic Mesopancreas Dissection Using a Supracolic Anterior Artery-first Approach.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the details of the surgical technique of pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) with systematic mesopancreas dissection (SMD-PD), using a supracolic anterior artery-first approach. BACKGROUND: An artery-first approach in PD has been advocated in pancreatic cancer to judge resectability, clear the superior mesenteric artery margin from invasion, or reduce blood loss. However, the efficacy of an artery-first approach in mesopancreas dissection remains unclear. METHODS: This study involved 162 consecutive patients who underwent PD with curative intent. The patients were divided into 82 SMD-PDs and 80 conventional PDs (CoPD) and then stratified further according to the dissection level, that is, level 1 was applied to 24 simple mesopancreas divisions for early inflow occlusion including 11 SMD-PDs, level 2 for 63 en bloc mesopancreas resections (26 SMD-PDs), and level 3 for 75 patients who underwent a hemicircumferential superior mesenteric artery plexus resection to keep the margin free from cancer invasion (45 SMD-PDs). The clinical and imaging results were collected to assess the feasibility and validity of SMD-PD with an artery-first approach. RESULTS: Blood loss and operation duration were significantly less in the SMD-PD group than in the CoPD group among the total 162 patients. The imaging analysis showed that four fifths of pancreatic arterial branches came from the right dorsal aspect of the superior mesenteric artery and cancer abutment occurred exclusively from the same direction indicating the validity of an artery-first approach. CONCLUSIONS: SMD-PD using an SAA is feasible across PD cases, with acceptable short-term outcomes, and we propose this procedure as a promising option for PD.

Introduction of robotic pancreatoduodenectomy following phase 2a IDEAL guidelines.

BACKGROUND: Robotic pancreatoduodenectomy (RPD) is a newly introduced procedure, which is still evolving and lacks standardization. An objective assessment is essential to investigate the feasibility of RPD. The current study aimed to assess our initial ten cases of RPD based on IDEAL (Idea, Development, Exploration, Assessment, and Long-term study) guidelines. METHODS: This was a prospective phase 2a study following the IDEAL framework. Ten consecutive cases of RPD performed by two surgeons with expertise in open procedures at a single center were assigned to the study. With objective evaluation, each case was classified into four grades according to the achievements of the procedures. Errors observed in the previous case were used to inform the procedure in the next case. The surgical outcomes of the ten cases were reviewed. RESULTS: The median total operation time was 634 min (interquartile range [IQR], 594-668) with a median resection time of 363 min (IQR, 323-428) and reconstruction time of 123 min (IQR, 107-131). The achievement of the whole procedure was graded as A, "successful", in two patients. In two patients, reconstruction was performed with a mini-laparotomy due to extensive pneumoperitoneum, probably caused by insertion of a liver retractor from the xyphoid. Major postoperative complications occurred in two patients. One patient, in whom the jejunal limb was elevated through the Treitz ligament, had a bowel obstruction and needed to undergo re-laparotomy. CONCLUSIONS: RPD is feasible when performed by surgeons experienced in open procedures. Specific considerations are needed to safely introduce RPD.

A patient alive without disease 32 months after conversion surgery following lenvatinib treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma with a tumor thrombus originating in the middle hepatic vein and reaching the right atrium via the suprahepatic vena cava: a case report.

Conversion surgery for initially unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma appears to be increasing in incidence since the advent of new molecular target drugs and immune checkpoint inhibitors; however, reports on long-term outcomes are limited and the prognostic relevance of this treatment strategy remains unclear. Herein, we report the case of a 75-year-old man with hepatocellular carcinoma, 108 mm in diameter, accompanied by a tumor thrombus in the middle hepatic vein that extended to the right atrium via the suprahepatic vena cava. He underwent conversion surgery after preceding lenvatinib treatment and is alive without disease 51 months after the commencement of treatment and 32 months after surgery. Just before conversion surgery, after 19 months of lenvatinib treatment, the main tumor had reduced in size to 72 mm in diameter, the tip of the tumor thrombus had receded back to the suprahepatic vena cava, and the tumor thrombus vascularity was markedly reduced. The operative procedure was an extended left hepatectomy with concomitant middle hepatic vein resection. The tumor thrombus was removed under total vascular exclusion via incision of the root of the middle hepatic vein. Histopathological examination revealed that more than half of the liver tumor and the tumor thrombus were necrotic.

Repeat hepatectomy for recurrent liver metastasis from gastric carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of repeat hepatectomy for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma and colorectal liver metastases is widely accepted. However, the benefits of such treatment for intrahepatic recurrence of gastric cancer liver metastasis remain unknown. This study sought to clarify the survival benefit for patients undergoing repeat hepatectomy for gastric cancer liver metastasis. METHODS: A total of 73 patients underwent hepatectomy for gastric cancer liver metastasis from January 1993 to January 2011. Macroscopically curative surgery was performed in 64 patients. Among them, repeat hepatectomy was performed in 14 of the 37 patients with intrahepatic recurrence. Among these 14 patients, clinicopathologic factors were evaluated by univariate and multivariate analysis to identify the factors affecting survival. RESULTS: The overall 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates after a second hepatectomy were 71, 47, and 47 %, respectively. The median survival was 31 months. Operative morbidity and mortality rates of repeat hepatectomy were 29 and 0 %, respectively. Multivariate analysis identified the duration of the disease-free interval as the only independent significant factor predicting better survival. CONCLUSIONS: In selected patients, repeat hepatectomy for recurrent gastric cancer liver metastasis may offer the same chance of cure as the primary hepatectomy. Disease-free intervals exceeding 12 months predict good patient survival after repeat hepatectomy.

Long-term results of hepatic resection for non-colorectal, non-neuroendocrine liver metastasis.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The significance of surgical resection for non-colorectal non-neuroendocrine tumor liver metastasis (NCNNLM) remains controversial. The present study sought to clarify the long-term outcomes of surgical resection for NCNNLM and prognostic factors after hepatectomy in a single institution. METHODOLOGY: From 1993 to 2009, 145 patients underwent hepatectomy for NCNNLM. The primary sites of the hepatic tumors were gastrointestinal carcinoma in 80 cases, breast in 30, genitourinary in 12, gastrointestinal stromal tumor in 11, and miscellaneous in 12. RESULTS: The cumulative 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates of those who underwent hepatectomy for NCNNLM were 83.9, 55.4, and 41.0%, respectively, with median overall survival times of 41.8 months. Multivariate analysis revealed that postoperative complication was the only independent poor prognostic factor impacting on survival. Postoperative morbidity and mortality rate were 17.9% and 1.4%. There are 38 cases survived more than 5 years including 21 patients without remnant tumors due to the repeat hepatic and/or pulmonary resection for recurrence. A total of 32 patients survived without tumor and without any kinds of chemotherapy in the latest condition. CONCLUSIONS: Hepatectomy for NCNNLM may be beneficial and might relieve patients from excursive chemotherapy in selected patients. Meticulous surgery avoiding complication may enhance the outcome.

Essential updates 2021/2022: Update in surgical strategy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma.

Resection is the only potential curative treatment for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC); however, complete resection is often technically challenging due to the anatomical location. Various innovative approaches and procedures were invented to circumvent this limitation but the rates of postoperative morbidity (20%-78%) and mortality (2%-15%) are still high. In patients diagnosed with resectable PHC, deliberate and coordinated preoperative workup and optimization of the patient and future liver remnant are crucial. Biliary drainage is recommended to relieve obstructive jaundice and optimize the clinical condition before liver resection. Biliary drainage for PHC can be performed either by endoscopic biliary drainage or percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage. To date there is no consensus about which method is preferred. The volumetric assessment of the future remnant liver volume and optimization mainly using portal vein embolization is the gold standard in the management of the risk to develop post hepatectomy liver failure. The improvement of systemic chemotherapy has contributed to prolong the survival not only in patients with unresectable PHC but also in patients undergoing curative surgery. In this article, we review the literature and discuss the current surgical treatment of PHC.