RESUMO
PURPOSE: Ixabepilone is a microtubule stabilizer with activity in taxane-refractory metastatic breast cancer and low susceptibility to taxane-resistance mechanisms including multidrug-resistant phenotypes and high ß-III tubulin expression. Since these resistance mechanisms are common in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), ixabepilone may have particular advantages in this patient population. This study evaluated the substitution of ixabepilone for paclitaxel following doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide (AC) in the adjuvant treatment of early-stage TNBC. METHODS: Patients with operable TNBC were eligible following definitive breast surgery. Patients were randomized (1:1) to receive four cycles of AC followed by either four cycles (12 weeks) of ixabepilone or 12 weekly doses of paclitaxel. RESULTS: 614 patients were randomized: 306 to AC/ixabepilone and 308 to AC/paclitaxel. At a median follow-up of 48 months, 59 patients had relapsed (AC/ixabepilone, 29; AC/paclitaxel, 30). The median time from diagnosis to relapse was 20.8 months. The 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates of the two groups were similar [HR 0.92; ixabepilone 87.1% (95% CI 82.6-90.5) vs. paclitaxel 84.7% (95% CI 79.7-88.6)]. The estimated 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were also similar [HR 1.1; ixabepilone 89.7% (95% CI 85.5-92.7) vs. paclitaxel 89.6% (95% CI 85.0-92.9)]. Peripheral neuropathy was the most common grade 3/4 event. Dose reductions and treatment discontinuations occurred more frequently during paclitaxel treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with AC/ixabepilone provided similar DFS and OS in patients with operable TNBC when compared to treatment with AC/paclitaxel. The two regimens had similar toxicity, although treatment discontinuation, dose modifications, and overall peripheral neuropathy were more frequent with AC/paclitaxel. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trials.gov Identifier, NCT00789581.
Assuntos
Ciclofosfamida/administração & dosagem , Doxorrubicina/administração & dosagem , Epotilonas/administração & dosagem , Paclitaxel/administração & dosagem , Neoplasias de Mama Triplo Negativas/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administração & dosagem , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Ciclofosfamida/efeitos adversos , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Doxorrubicina/efeitos adversos , Esquema de Medicação , Epotilonas/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Paclitaxel/efeitos adversos , Análise de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento , Neoplasias de Mama Triplo Negativas/patologia , Adulto JovemRESUMO
PURPOSE: Determination of HER2 status by testing circulating tumor cells (CTCs), compared to sampling tumor biopsies, may improve patient management by allowing ongoing assessment of HER2 status during the disease course. The PRO Onc assay (Prometheus Laboratories; San Diego, CA) is a multiplexed immunoassay that measures the expression and activation of HER2 in CTCs. In this study, we screened patients with metastatic HER2-negative breast cancer with the PRO Onc assay; patients with HER2 overexpression or activation received a trial of HER2-targeted therapy. METHODS: In Part 1 of the trial, patients with HER2-negative breast cancer were screened with the PRO Onc assay to confirm the presence of a cohort that tested HER2-positive. After this finding was confirmed, patients in Part 2 of the study with HER2 abnormalities received a trial of treatment with trastuzumab/pertuzumab. RESULTS: In Part 1, 31 of 57 specimens contained CTCs; of these, 12 (38 %) showed HER2 abnormalities by PRO Onc assay. In Part 2, 129 of 226 patients (57 %) had CTCs; 24 of these patients (19 %) had HER2 abnormalities detected. Fourteen patients were treated with HER2-targeted therapy. Twelve of 14 patients progressed within 6 weeks, one patient had a brief (12 weeks) partial response, and one patient was stable for 12 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: HER2 overexpression or activation was detected by the PRO Onc assay in 22 % of HER2-negative patients with CTCs. However, HER2-targeted therapy was not effective in such patients. FISH and IHC staining remain the standards for HER2 determination.
Assuntos
Biomarcadores Tumorais , Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico , Neoplasias da Mama/metabolismo , Imunoensaio/métodos , Células Neoplásicas Circulantes/metabolismo , Células Neoplásicas Circulantes/patologia , Receptor ErbB-2/metabolismo , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antineoplásicos Imunológicos/farmacologia , Antineoplásicos Imunológicos/uso terapêutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Resistencia a Medicamentos Antineoplásicos/genética , Feminino , Expressão Gênica , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modelos Biológicos , Terapia de Alvo Molecular , Metástase Neoplásica , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Receptor ErbB-2/antagonistas & inibidores , Receptor ErbB-2/genética , Retratamento , Transdução de Sinais/efeitos dos fármacos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: AR is a targetable pathway with AR modulation inhibiting estrogen- and androgen-mediated cell proliferation. Orteronel is an oral, selective, nonsteroidal inhibitor of 17, 20-lyase, a key enzyme in androgen biosynthesis. This study evaluated single-agent orteronel in AR+ metastatic breast cancer (MBC). METHODS: Male/female patients with AR+ MBC were grouped in Cohort 1: AR+ TNBC with l-3 prior chemotherapy regimens or Cohort 2: AR+ HR+ (estrogen [ER+]/ progesterone receptor [PR+] positive) HER2+/- with 1 to 3 prior hormonal and at least 1 prior chemotherapy regimen. Patients with HER2+ MBC must have received at least 2 lines of HER2-targeted therapy. Orteronel was administered at 300 mg BID; response rate was the primary endpoint. RESULTS: Seventy patients were enrolled (Cohort 1, n = 26 and Cohort 2, n = 44). Median treatment duration was 7.1 weeks. Seven patients were on treatment for ≥6 months. One of the 21 evaluated patients in Cohort 1 (4.8%) had an objective response. In Cohort 2, none of the first 23 patients to be evaluated had a response and accrual was stopped. Median progression-free and overall survival were 1.8 and 8.3 months, respectively. Toxicities were predominantly Grade 1 or 2 nausea/vomiting (36%) and fatigue (31%). Grade 3 or 4 events in ≥5% of patients included increased amylase/lipase (10%) and hypertension (6%). CONCLUSIONS: Orteronel demonstrated limited clinical activity in heavily pre-treated AR+ MBC. Further development of orteronel in MBC is not recommended. Further efforts to validate the AR as a therapeutic target should focus on identifying new markers predictive of sensitivity to AR-targeted agents.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama , Receptores Androgênicos , Androgênios/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Estrogênios/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Humanos , Imidazóis , Masculino , Naftalenos , Receptores Androgênicos/metabolismoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Therapies targeting estrogen receptor signaling are standard for patients with hormone receptor (HR)-positive (HR+) metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Dysregulation of the phosphoinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/protein kinase B (AKT)/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway is associated with treatment resistance. Addition of the mTOR inhibitor, everolimus, to exemestane doubled progression-free survival (PFS) in HR+/HER2- MBC patients whose disease had previously progressed during endocrine therapy. In this phase II study, we used everolimus in addition to the most recent endocrine therapy during which a patient's disease progressed, in an attempt to restore and extend the benefit of the antiestrogen therapy in patients with HR+/HER2- MBC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with HR+ MBC who progressed on antiestrogen therapy received everolimus (10 mg orally daily) in combination with the antiestrogen therapy most recently administered. Treatment was administered in 4-week cycles and continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Blood and archival tumor specimens were collected for VeriStrat (Biodesix, Inc) and Foundation One (Foundation Medicine) assays, respectively. Accrual of 42 evaluable patients allowed detection of improvement in median PFS from 2.8 months (expected with hormonal treatment alone) to 5 months (power 80%, α = 5%). RESULTS: Forty-seven patients were enrolled and treated. After a median follow-up of 22.2 months, median PFS was 6.6 months. Secondary efficacy end points included: overall response rate, 6%; clinical benefit rate, 40%; and median overall survival, 21.1 months. No unexpected toxicity was observed. Efficacy could not be correlated with PI3K/AKT/mTOR alterations or VeriStrat (Biodesix, Inc) prognostic signatures. CONCLUSION: After progression during antiestrogen therapy, the addition of everolimus, without changing the hormonal therapy, resulted in a median PFS of 6.6 months, suggesting efficacy in patients with HR+/HER2- MBC.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos Hormonais/uso terapêutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Everolimo/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antineoplásicos Hormonais/farmacologia , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/farmacologia , Biópsia , Mama/patologia , Neoplasias da Mama/mortalidade , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Progressão da Doença , Resistencia a Medicamentos Antineoplásicos/efeitos dos fármacos , Everolimo/farmacologia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prognóstico , Intervalo Livre de Progressão , Receptor ErbB-2/análise , Receptores de Estrogênio/antagonistas & inibidores , Receptores de Estrogênio/metabolismo , Receptores de Progesterona/metabolismo , Transdução de Sinais/efeitos dos fármacos , Serina-Treonina Quinases TOR/antagonistas & inibidores , Serina-Treonina Quinases TOR/metabolismoRESUMO
Inflammation affects tumor immune surveillance and resistance to therapy. Here, we show that production of IL1ß in primary breast cancer tumors is linked with advanced disease and originates from tumor-infiltrating CD11c+ myeloid cells. IL1ß production is triggered by cancer cell membrane-derived TGFß. Neutralizing TGFß or IL1 receptor prevents breast cancer progression in humanized mouse model. Patients with metastatic HER2- breast cancer display a transcriptional signature of inflammation in the blood leukocytes, which is attenuated after IL1 blockade. When present in primary breast cancer tumors, this signature discriminates patients with poor clinical outcomes in two independent public datasets (TCGA and METABRIC).Significance: IL1ß orchestrates tumor-promoting inflammation in breast cancer and can be targeted in patients using an IL1 receptor antagonist. Cancer Res; 78(18); 5243-58. ©2018 AACRSee related commentary by Dinarello, p. 5200.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/metabolismo , Regulação Neoplásica da Expressão Gênica , Proteína Antagonista do Receptor de Interleucina 1/metabolismo , Interleucina-1beta/metabolismo , Transcrição Gênica , Animais , Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Antígeno CD11c/metabolismo , Capecitabina/administração & dosagem , Linhagem Celular Tumoral , Membrana Celular/metabolismo , Feminino , Furanos/administração & dosagem , Humanos , Inflamação , Proteína Antagonista do Receptor de Interleucina 1/administração & dosagem , Cetonas/administração & dosagem , Leucócitos Mononucleares/citologia , Macrófagos/metabolismo , Camundongos , Camundongos SCID , Células Mieloides/metabolismo , Metástase Neoplásica , Transplante de Neoplasias , Paclitaxel/administração & dosagem , Projetos Piloto , Fator de Crescimento Transformador beta/metabolismoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: UFT, a combination of uracil and ftorafur, was developed to combine the cytotoxic effects of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) with convenient oral dosing. Leucovorin is combined with UFT to further potentiate the effect of 5-FU on tumor cells. Orally administered UFT and leucovorin provide higher peak plasma concentrations of 5-FU and prolonged therapeutic 5-FU concentrations compared with continuous infusion of 5-FU. METHODS: Ninety-four patients with metastatic breast cancer who had been previously treated with anthracyclines and/or taxanes were treated with UFT and leucovorin, given orally, for the first 28 days of a 35-day cycle. The total daily dose of UFT was 300 mg/m(2), which was given in 2 divided doses every 12 hours. The primary endpoint was time to disease progression (TTP). Secondary objectives included overall tumor response rate (OR = complete response [CR] + partial response [PR]) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Of the 94 patients enrolled, 68 were evaluable for efficacy. Although no CRs were observed, 9 patients achieved PRs, for an OR of 13.2% in the evaluable population. The median TTP for the evaluable population was 10.3 weeks, and the proportion of patients free of disease progression at 6 months was 17%. The median OS was 61.6 weeks for all patients enrolled. The most common drug-related >or= grade 3 adverse events (graded using the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria version 2) were diarrhea, asthenia, nausea, and dehydration. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of UFT and leucovorin administered orally in a twice-daily regimen was found to have modest activity. Grade 3 toxicities were manageable with appropriate dose adjustments in patients with metastatic breast cancer previously treated with anthracyclines and/or taxanes.