Time-dependent prognostic impact of circumferential resection margin in T3 thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Esophageal cancer presents a clinical challenge due to its high incidence and unfavorable prognosis. The prognostic role of the circumferential resection margin (CRM) remains highly controversial, potentially due to its temporal dynamics coupled with variability in follow-up durations across studies. We aimed to explore the time-dependent prognostic significance of CRM in T3 esophageal squamous cell carcinomas (ESCCs). We systematically reviewed literature from 1990 to 2023 to determine how follow-up duration influences the prognostic role of CRM in esophageal cancer. Concurrently, we performed a retrospective examination of 354 patients who underwent treatment at the National Cancer Center between 2015 and 2018. Integrating a time interaction term in the Cox regression analyses enabled us to not only identify independent risk factors affecting overall survival (OS) but also to specifically scrutinize the potential temporal variations in CRM's prognostic impact. Our literature review suggested that CRM's influence on prognosis diminishes with longer follow-up durations for both classifications, namely the Royal College of Pathologists (RCP) (ß = -0.003, P < 0.001) and the College of American Pathologists (CAP) (ß = -0.007, P < 0.001). Time-dependent multivariate Cox regression analysis emphasized the evolving nature of CRM's prognostic effect, and the inclusion of the time interaction term enhanced model accuracy. In conclusion, CRM is an independent prognostic factor for T3 thoracic ESCC patients. Its influence appears to decrease over extended follow-up periods, shedding light on the heterogeneity seen in previous studies. With the time interaction term, CRM becomes a more precise post-operative prognostic indicator for esophageal cancer.

A novel nomogram predicting the risk of postoperative pneumonia for esophageal cancer patients after minimally invasive esophagectomy.

BACKGROUND: Pneumonia is a common complication after minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE), which prolongs hospital stay, adding to the cost and increasing the risk to patients' lives. This study aimed to identify risk factors and establish a predictive nomogram for postoperative pneumonia (PP). METHODS: This case control study included 609 patients with esophageal cancer who underwent MIE between March 2015 and August 2019 in Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences. We randomly divided the data into training and validation sets in the ratio of 7:3 and performed univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses to acquire independent risk factors of the training set. We constructed a nomogram based on the independent risk factors. The concordance index (C-index), receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, calibration plot, and decision curve analysis (DCA) plots were used to evaluate the discrimination of the nomogram. Validation set was applied to confirm the predictive value of the nomogram. RESULTS: In the univariate analysis, age, gender, abdominal procedure method, thoracic operative time, duration of chest tube placement, anastomotic leakage, and recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy were found to be correlated with the incidence of PP. In multivariate analysis, all variables except thoracic operative time were found to be independent risk factors for PP. A nomogram was constructed based on these independent risk factors. The C-index of the training and validation sets was 0.769 and 0.734, respectively, and the areas under the curve (AUC) of ROC curves of the training and validation sets were 0.769 and 0.686, respectively. The calibration plots and DCA plots of the training and validation sets showed the accuracy and predictive value of the nomogram. CONCLUSION: The nomogram could accurately identify the risk factors for PP. We could predict the occurrence of PP based on this nomogram and take corresponding measures to reduce the incidence of PP.

Oncologic outcomes of segmentectomy vs lobectomy in pathologic stage IA (≤2 cm) invasive lung adenocarcinoma: A population-based study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: For early-stage invasive lung adenocarcinoma, it remains unclear whether segmentectomy can yield outcomes equivalent to those of lobectomy. This study aimed to compare survival outcomes after segmentectomy and lobectomy among patients with stage IA invasive lung adenocarcinoma. METHODS: We identified patients with stage IA (≤2 cm) invasive lung adenocarcinoma who underwent segmentectomy or lobectomy from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2004-2015). Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance the baseline characteristics. Overall survival (OS) and lung cancer-specific survival (LCSS) were compared using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards regression. RESULTS: A total of 5474 patients were included. Before PSM, the 5-year OS was 78.3% for patients undergoing lobectomy vs 76.5% for patients undergoing segmentectomy (P = .166) while LCSS were 86.8% vs 83.0% (P = .015). After PSM, survival analyses showed that segmentectomy had OS (75.8% vs 76.4%; P = .694) and LCSS (82.7% vs 82.9%; P = .604) equivalent to those of lobectomy. Cox regression demonstrated that segmentectomy was equivalent to lobectomy in terms of OS and LCSS before and after PSM. CONCLUSION: For stage IA (≤2 cm) invasive lung adenocarcinoma, segmentectomy may have oncologic outcomes equivalent to those of lobectomy.

Exosomes in esophageal cancer: Promising nanocarriers in cancer progression, diagnosis, prognosis, and therapy.

Esophageal cancer (EC) is one of the most fatal cancers all over the world. Sensitive detection modalities for early-stage EC and efficient treatment methods are urgently needed for the improvement of the prognosis of EC. Exosomes are small vesicles for intercellular communication, mediating many biological responses including cancer progression, which are not only promising biomarkers for diagnosis and prognosis but also therapeutic tools for EC. This review provides an overview of the relationships between exosomes and EC progression, as well as the application of exosomes in the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of EC. This article is categorized under: Therapeutic Approaches and Drug Discovery > Nanomedicine for Oncologic Disease.

Establishment of a survival predictive model for patients with two synchronous multiple primary lung cancers: a multicenter cohort analysis.

Background: The prognostic predictors of the synchronous multiple primary lung cancer (SMPLC) still remain unclear, and there is a lack of studies on the prognosis of SMPLC patients excluding those with multifocal ground-glass/lepidic (GG/L) nodules. The aim of this study is to develop an effective model for predicting survival of SMPLC patients. Methods: In this multicenter cohort study, a total of 831 SMPLC patients presenting for lung cancer resection from January 2004 to January 2018 at five institutions were included for developing and validating a nomogram model. Specifically, 499 patients from the Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, and Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University were served as the training cohort. A total of 332 patients from The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, the First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China, and Beijing Liangxiang Hospital were served as the external validation cohort. The nomogram model was compared with the Tumor Node Metastasis (TNM) system for the overall survival. The C-index, net reclassification improvement (NRI), and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) were used to evaluate the model performance. A user-friendly website for SMPLC survival probability calculation was also provided for a better understanding of prognosis of patients with resected SMPLC. Results: A total of seven independent risk factors were selected by conducting a multivariate analysis on the training set. Further, a nomogram model was developed with these factors. Both the internal and external validations exhibited good discrimination (C-index: internal, 0.827; external, 0.784). The NRI and IDI of this model were 0.33 and 0.21, respectively. The survival rates for 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year were consistent with the actual observed values. A set of cutoff values were determined by grouping the patients into three different groups. For each group, we should expect a significant distinction between survival curves. Conclusions: The novel nomogram model enables accurate survival risk stratification of patients with resected SMPLC and may assist in decision-making that is conducive to patients with SMPLC at high risk.

Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for resectable thoracic esophageal cancer (NST 1502): a multicenter prospective cohort study.

Background: Whether minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) is superior to open esophagectomy (OE) in the treatment of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is still uncertain. Therefore, this multicenter prospective study aimed to compare MIE with OE in postoperative parameters and long-term survival. Methods: All hospitalized patients with cT1b-3N0-1M0 thoracic ESCC treated by MIE or OE were enrolled from 19 selected centers from April 1, 2015 to December 31, 2018. The propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to minimize the selection bias. The basic clinicopathological characteristics and 3-year overall survival (OS) as well as disease-free survival (DFS) of two groups were compared by R version 3.6.2. Results: MIE were performed in 1,387 patients and OE in 335 patients. 335 cases in each group were finally matched by PSM, and no significant differences in the essential demographic characteristics were observed between the MIE and OE groups after PSM. Compared with OE, MIE had significantly less intraoperative bleeding, less total drainage volume, shorter postoperative hospital stay, and harvested significantly more lymph nodes (LNs) (all P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in the major postoperative complications and death rates between MIE and OE. The 3-year OS and DFS were 77.0% and 68.1% in the MIE group versus 69.3% and 60.9% in the OE group (OS: P = 0.03; DFS: P = 0.09), and the rates were 75.1% and 66.5% in the MIE group versus 66.9% and 58.6% in the OE group for stage cII patients (OS: P = 0.04, DFS: P = 0.09), respectively. Conclusions: Compared with OE, MIE is a safe and effective treatment approach with similar mortality and morbidity. It has the advantages in harvesting more LNs, improving postoperative recovery and survival of stage cII ESCC patients.

Mesenchymal cystic hamartoma of the lung: A case report.

RATIONALE: Mesenchymal cystic pulmonary hamartoma is a rare type of hamartoma that has been reported in all cases in the literature. Most patients were reported to have spontaneous pneumothorax and were treated by surgery, and finally confirmed to be caused by rupture of the cystic hamartoma. Here, we report a case of mesenchymal cystic pulmonary hamartoma detected using computed tomography (CT) during a health check-up without obvious symptoms. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 60-year-old woman was detected using CT during her health check-up. She was a non-smoker and had no symptoms or history of specific diseases. DIAGNOSIS: The final pathological examination confirmed that the lesion was a mesenchymal cystic hamartoma of the lung. INTERVENTIONS: A uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery wedge resection was performed for biopsy. OUTCOMES: The patient recovered smoothly and was discharged on postoperative day 3. LESSONS: For cystic pulmonary hamartoma, it is usually difficult to make a correct diagnosis using CT imaging. A chest magnetic resonance imaging examination may be helpful for differentiation diagnosis before video-assisted thoracic surgery biopsy.

GINS4 might be a novel prognostic immune-related biomarker of not only esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and other cancers.

BACKGROUND: Immunotherapy using immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), such as antibody of programmed death-1 (PD-1)/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) has showed as a promising treatment for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), but resistance is unavoidable. This study aimed to find more immune-related genes to promote the efficiency of immunotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three datasets were downloaded from Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. Gene differential analysis was performed to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs), then ceRNA network was constructed based on differentially expressed lncRNAs and mRNAs. Next, Functional enrichment analysis and protein-protein interaction (PPI) network were built to reveal the potential function of mRNAs in ceRNA network. Survival analysis and immune cell infiltration level analysis were utilized to identify prognostic immune-related genes. Finally, pan-cancer analysis was performed to show the role of immune-related genes in other cancers. RESULTS: The data of 215 samples in total were obtained from GEO database (98 normal tissues and 117 tumor tissues), and 1685 differentially expressed mRNAs (176 downregulated and 1509 upregulated) and 3 upregulated lncRNAs (MCM3AP-AS1, HCP5 and GUSBP11, all upregulated) were found. ceRNA network was constructed to reveal some special correlation. Function enrichment showed some potential functions of mRNAs in ceRNA network such as mitotic cell cycle process, negative regulation of DNA-binding transcription factor activity, ossification, VEGFA-VEGFR2 signaling pathway, epithelial to mesenchymal transition, embryonic morphogenesis and so on. PPI network showed the physical interactions between each mRNA in ceRNA network. Through survival analysis and immune cell infiltration level analysis, GINS4 was confirmed as an immune-related prognostic gene in ESCC. GSEA showed some potential functions such as negative regulation of monocyte chemotaxis, antigen processing and presentation of endogenous peptide antigen via MHC class I via ER pathway, positive regulation of antigen processing and presentation, dendritic cell antigen processing and presentation and so on. Finally, pan-cancer analysis revealed that GINS4 might be a novel immune-related prognostic gene in ESCC and other cancers. CONCLUSION: Our study suggested that GINS4 was correlated with prognosis and immune cell infiltration level of ESCC and other cancers. It may deserve further investigation as a potential immune-related prognostic biomarker of ESCC and other cancers.

Pan-Cancer Analysis of B4GALNT1 as a Potential Prognostic and Immunological Biomarker.

Background: Gangliosides act as important roles in tumor progression. B4GALNT1 is a key enzyme in ganglioside biosynthesis. B4GALNT1 expression is linked to tumorigenesis and the prognosis of tumor patients. Nevertheless, the role of B4GALNT1 in pan-cancer remains unclear. Methods: Several databases, including TCGA, GEO, GTEx, NCI-60, and TIMER, were searched. Methods including correlation analysis, Cox regression analysis, and Kaplan-Meier analysis were used to explore the expression pattern, prognosis, tumor infiltration pattern, genetics and epigenetics, and drug sensitivity of B4GALNT1 in pan-cancer patients from the above datasets. Results: B4GALNT1 was found to be aberrantly expressed in multiple types of tumors. The survival status of tumor patients was significantly related to B4GALNT1 expression, but the correlations were tumor-specific. Moreover, the expression of B4GALNT1 was associated with ImmuneScore and StromalScore in 21 and 27 tumor types, respectively. Also, B4GALNT1 was significantly associated with TMB, MSI, MMR, and DNA methylation. Additionally, the sensitivity of 9 drugs was correlated with the expression of B4GALNT1. Conclusion: A correlation of B4GALNT1 expression with prognosis exists in multiple types of cancers. In addition, B4GALNT1 expression may play a role in TME and tumor immunity regulation. Further investigation of the biological mechanisms of its different roles in tumorigenesis and clinical application as a biomarker is still required.

Effect of histology on the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Little is known about the effect of histology on the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the potential differences in the efficacy of ICIs between squamous NSCLC (SQ-NSCLC) and non-squamous NSCLC (non-SQ-NSCLC). Methods: Systematic searches of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases were conducted. All randomized clinical trials of ICIs with available hazard ratios (HR) for progression-free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS) according to histology were included. The primary endpoint was to assess the difference in the efficacy of ICIs between SQ-NSCLC and non-SQ-NSCLC, measured by the ratio of the HR in SQ-NSCLC to the HR in non-SQ-NSCLC (RHR). Results: A total of 40 trials were included in the meta-analysis. ICI monotherapy could improve OS in both SQ-NSCLC (OS-HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.65-0.77) and non-SQ-NSCLC (OS-HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.73-0.87) while OS benefit was larger in SQ-NSCLC (OS-RHR 0.89, 95% CI 0.80-0.99). In terms of PFS, ICI monotherapy could reduce the risk of progression by 35% (PFS-HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.56-0.77) in SQ-NSCLC while the PFS benefit was smaller (10%) and not statistically significant in non-SQ-NSCLC (PFS-HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.76-1.07). Similarly, ICI-based combination treatments could reduce the risk of both progression and death in SQ-NSCLC (OS-HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.61-0.80; PFS-HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.48-0.65) and non-SQ-NSCLC (OS-HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.74-0.83; PFS-HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.57-0.69) while the survival benefits were larger in SQ-NSCLC (OS-RHR 0.83, 95% CI 0.70-0.99; PFS-RHR 0.82, 95% CI 0.70-0.96). Conclusions: ICIs could deliver survival benefits in both SQ-NSCLC and non-SQ-NSCLC while the magnitude of survival benefits was histology-dependent. Future researches should consider the effect of histology on the efficacy of ICIs. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier [CRD42022299603].

Efficacy and safety of esophagectomy via left thoracic approach versus via right thoracic approach for middle and lower thoracic esophageal cancer: a multicenter randomized clinical trial (NST1501).

Background: Left thoracic approach (LTA) has been a favorable selection in surgical treatment for esophageal cancer (EC) patients in China before minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) is popular. This study aimed to demonstrate whether right thoracic approach (RTA) is superior to LTA in the surgical treatment of middle and lower thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (TESCC). Methods: Superiority clinical trial design was used for this multicenter randomized controlled two-parallel group study. Between April 2015 and December 2018, cT1b-3N0-1M0 TESCC patients from 14 centers were recruited and randomized by a central stratified block randomization program into LTA or RTA groups. All enrolled patients were followed up every three months after surgery. The software SPSS 20.0 and R 3.6.2. were used for statistical analysis. Efficacy and safety outcomes, 3-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were calculated and compared using the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test. Results: A total of 861 patients without suspected upper mediastinal lymph nodes (umLN) were finally enrolled in the study after 95 ineligible patients were excluded. 833 cases (98.7%) were successfully followed up until June 1, 2020. Esophagectomies were performed via LTA in 453 cases, and via RTA in 408 cases. Compared with the LTA group, the RTA group required longer operating time (274.48±78.92 vs. 205.34±51.47 min, P<0.001); had more complications (33.8% vs. 26.3% P=0.016); harvested more lymph nodes (LNs) (23.61±10.09 vs. 21.92±10.26, P=0.015); achieved a significantly improved OS in stage IIIa patients (67.8% vs. 51.8%, P=0.022). The 3-year OS and DFS were 68.7% and 64.3% in LTA arm versus 71.3% and 63.7% in RTA arm (P=0.20; P=0.96). Conclusions: Esophagectomies via both LTA and RTA can achieve similar outcomes in middle or lower TESCC patients without suspected umLN. RTA is superior to LTA and recommended for the surgical treatment of more advanced stage TESCC due to more complete lymphadenectomy. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02448979.

Comparison of Two Proposed Changes to the Current Nodal Classification for Non--small Cell Lung Cancer Based on the Number and Ratio of Metastatic Lymph Nodes.

BACKGROUND: The current nodal classification is unsatisfactory in distinguishing the prognostically heterogeneous N1 or N2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). RESEARCH QUESTION: Is the combination of the current N category and the number of metastatic lymph nodes (N-#number) or the combination of the current N category and the ratio of the number of positive to resected lymph nodes (N-#ratio) better than the current N category alone? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We identified 2,162 patients with N1 or N2 NSCLC from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2004-2016). We classified these patients into three N-#number categories (N-#number-1, N-#number-2a, N-#number-2b) and three N-#ratio categories (N-#ratio-1, N-#ratio-2a, N-#ratio-2b). Lung cancer-specific survival (LCSS) were compared using the Kaplan-Meier method. The prognostic significance of the new nodal classifications was validated across each tumor size category (≤3 cm, 3-5 cm, 5-7cm, >7 cm). Cox proportional hazards regression was used to evaluate the association between each nodal classification and LCSS. RESULTS: The survival curves showed clear differences between each pair of N-#number and N-#ratio categories. A significant tendency toward the deterioration of LCSS from N-#number-1 to N-#number-2b was observed in all tumor size categories. However, the differences between each pair of N-#ratio categories were significant only in tumors from 3 to 7 cm. Although all three nodal classifications were independent prognostic indicators, the N-#number classification provided more accurate prognostic stratifications compared with the N-#ratio classification and the current nodal classification. INTERPRETATION: The N-#number classification followed by the N-#ratio classification might be better prognostic determinants than the current nodal classification in prognostically heterogeneous N1 or N2 NSCLC.

Identification of Tumor Microenvironment-Related Prognostic lncRNAs in Lung Adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) is the most common type of lung cancer and is a severe threat to human health. Although many therapies have been applied to LUAD, the long-term survival rate of patients remains unsatisfactory. We aim to find reliable immune microenvironment-related lncRNA biomarkers to improve LUAD prognosis. METHODS: ESTIMATE analysis was performed to evaluate the degree of immune infiltration of each patient in TAGA LUAD cohort. Correlation analysis was used to identify the immune microenvironment-related lncRNAs. Univariate cox regression analysis, LASSO analysis, and Kaplan Meier analysis were used to construct and validate the prognostic model based on microenvironment-related lncRNAs. RESULTS: We obtained 1,178 immune microenvironment-related lncRNAs after correlation analysis. One hundred and eighty of them are independent prognostic lncRNAs. Sixteen key lncRNAs were selected by LASSO method. This lncRNA-based model successfully predicted patients' prognosis in validation cohort, and the risk score was related to pathological stage. Besides, we also found that TP53 had the highest frequency mutation in LUAD, and the mutation of TP53 in the high-risk group, which was identified by our survival model, has a poor prognosis. lncRNA-mRNA co-expression network further suggested that these lncRNAs play a vital role in the prognosis of LUAD. CONCLUSION: Here, we filtered 16 key lncRNAs, which could predict the survival of LUAD and may be potential biomarkers and therapeutic targets.

Identification of Prognostic miRNAs Associated With Immune Cell Tumor Infiltration Predictive of Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

BACKGROUND: A detailed means of prognostic stratification in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is urgently needed to support individualized treatment plans. Recently, microRNAs (miRNAs) have been used as biomarkers due to their previously reported prognostic roles in cancer. This study aimed to construct an immune-related miRNA signature that effectively predicts NSCLC patient prognosis. METHODS: The miRNAs and mRNA expression and mutation data of NSCLC was obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Immune-associated miRNAs were identified using immune scores calculated by the ESTIMATE algorithm. LASSO-penalized multivariate survival models were using for development of a tumor immune-related miRNA signature (TIM-Sig), which was evaluated in several public cohorts from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and the CellMiner database. The miRTarBase was used for constructing the miRNA-target interactions. RESULTS: The TIM-Sig, including 10 immune-related miRNAs, was constructed and successfully predicted overall survival (OS) in the validation cohorts. TIM-Sig score negatively correlated with CD8+ T cell infiltration, IFN-γ expression, CYT activity, and tumor mutation burden. The correlation between TIM-Sig score and genomic mutation and cancer chemotherapeutics was also evaluated. A miRNA-target network of 10 miRNAs in TIM-Sig was constructed. Further analysis revealed that these target genes showed prognostic value in both lung squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma. CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that the immune-related miRNAs demonstrated a potential value in clinical prognosis.

Lobe-specific Lymph Node Dissection in Clinical Stage IA Solid-dominant Non-small-cell Lung Cancer: A Propensity Score Matching Study.

BACKGROUND: Lobectomy with systematic lymph node dissection (SND) remains the standard procedure for resectable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), whereas lobe-specific lymph node dissection (LSND) was reported to have more advantages in perioperative recovery and complication reduction in treating early-stage diseases. Survival outcomes after LSND remains controversial compared with SND. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 2014 to 2017, data of 546 patients with clinical stage IA solid-dominant NSCLC and who underwent curative lobectomies with LSND (n = 100) or SND (n = 446) at our institution were collected. Propensity score matching was conducted to eliminate the biases. Five-year disease-free survival and overall survival were compared between the groups. Perioperative parameters and postoperative complications were also analyzed. RESULTS: Lobectomies with LSND or SND were performed in 100 patients and 446 patients, respectively. After matching, there were 100 patients in each group and no significant differences in 5-year overall survival (P = .473) and disease-free survival (P = .789) were found between the groups. Recurrence patterns were also similar (P = .733). Perioperative parameters were similar, whereas the incidence of postoperative complications in the SND group was found to be significantly higher than that in the LSND group (P = .003). CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrated that LSND has similar efficiency to SND in terms of survival, recurrence, lymph node dissection, and perioperative recovery of patients with clinical stage IA solid-dominant NSCLC, as well as significant advantages in reducing postoperative complications. Therefore, curative lobectomies with LSND may be more suitable and practical for clinical stage IA solid-dominant patients with NSCLC.

Intraoperative frozen section for identifying the invasion status of lung adenocarcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: For early-stage lung adenocarcinoma, determining the extent of surgical resection and lymphadenectomy according to the invasion status of the tumour may be more reliable. Intraoperative frozen section (FS) is a potentially effective method to identify the invasion status while its accuracy is still unknown. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the accuracy of FS for the invasion status of lung adenocarcinoma. METHODS: We conducted a systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Scopus and Cochrane Library databases (from inception to October 26, 2018) to identify studies investigating the accuracy of FS for the invasion status of lung adenocarcinoma. The accuracy of FS was evaluated by calculating the pooled concordance rates (CCR) between FS and final pathology and the pooled sensitivity, specificity, and other parameters of FS for discriminating pre-/minimally invasive adenocarcinoma from invasive adenocarcinoma (IAC). The negative predictive value (NPV) of FS for diagnosing IAC was also calculated to evaluate the chance of underestimation. RESULTS: Six eligible studies were included. The pooled CCR for differentiating pre-invasive adenocarcinoma, minimally invasive adenocarcinoma and IAC was 88% (95% CI, 84%-93%). When pre-invasive adenocarcinoma and minimally invasive adenocarcinoma were classified as a group, the pooled CCR, sensitivity, specificity of FS for differentiating pre-/minimally invasive adenocarcinoma from IAC were 95% (95% CI, 94%-97%), 95% (95% CI, 92%-97%), 95% (95% CI, 80%-99%), respectively. The pooled NPV of FS for diagnosing IAC was 95% (95% CI, 92%-97%). CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative FS is reliable for identifying the invasion status of lung adenocarcinoma, with high diagnostic accuracy for differentiating pre-/minimally invasive adenocarcinoma from IAC.

[Advance of Treatment for Superior Sulcus Tumor of the Lung].

Superior sulcus tumor of the lung is a bronchogenic tumor occurred in the apex of the upper lobe of the lung and is a unique clinical subtype of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), which account for less than 5% of all bronchogenic carcinomas. It often involves the first rib, brachial plexus, subclavian vessels, sympathetic chain, stellate ganglion or vertebra. A lot of progress has been achieved in the treatment of superior sulcus tumor over the past decades. Several clinical trials reported in recent years have confirmed that concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by surgical resection can improve the rate of complete resection, local control and pathological remission of the tumor, and prolong the total-survival time. It has become the most effective treatment mode for the superior sulcus tumor, and recommended as a standard treatment mode for superior sulcus tumor by National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) and American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) guidelines. This article reviews relevant literatures at home and abroad, and briefly introduces the advances in surgical treatment and comprehensive treatment of superior sulcus tumor.
.

The current optimal multimodality treatments for oesophageal squamous-cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Multimodality treatments including definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) or chemotherapy (nCT) followed by surgery (S) are frequently used to improve prognosis in locally advanced oesophageal squamous-cell carcinoma (LAESCC), while the optimal multimodality regimen has yet to be defined; therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to find out the current best multimodality regimen for LAESCC. METHODS: We conducted a systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Ovid and Cochrane Library databases for studies comparing nCRT + S with nCT + S or dCRT. The primary outcome was overall survival. The secondary outcomes were the rates of R0 resection, pathologic complete response (pCR), tumor-free lymph nodes (pN0) and postoperative recurrence. RESULTS: Five studies comparing nCRT + S with nCT + S and fourteen studies comparing nCRT + S with dCRT were finally included. Meta-analysis showed that nCRT + S had higher rates of R0 resection (OR 1.84, 95% CI 1.03-3.29), pCR (OR: 2.90 95% CI 1.37-6.14) and pN0 (OR: 2.55 95% CI 1.54-4.24) with a significant survival advantage (HR 0.72; 95% CI 0.52-0.99) when compared with nCT + S in LAESCC. When nCRT + S was compared with dCRT, nCRT + S yielded a significant survival benefit (HR 0.65; 95% CI 0.56-0.76) and had a significantly lower rate of local recurrence (OR: 0.35 95% CI 0.22-0.57). CONCLUSION: Current evidence suggests that CRT + S may be the optimal potential curative treatment mode for patients with LAESCC as long as they are suitable for this multimodality regimen.

Predictors of lymph node metastasis and possible selective lymph node dissection in clinical stage IA non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: The pathologic stages of lymph nodes usually differ from preoperatively predicted in lung cancers and it is difficult to predict the metastasis of lymph nodes for the patients diagnosed as clinical stage IA non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC). This study aimed to investigate the patterns of lymph node metastasis and the risk factors predicting lymph node metastasis in the patients with clinical stage IA NSCLCs. METHODS: All patients diagnosed as clinical stage IA NSCLC from July 2013 to June 2017 in our center were retrospectively reviewed, and a total number of 1,543 patients who underwent anatomical lobectomy with systematic lymph node dissection were enrolled in this study. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the risk factors predicting lymph node metastasis, and Fisher's exact test was used to confirm the lymph node spread mode according to the locations of primary tumors. RESULTS: Totally, lymph node metastases presented in 131 patients (8.5%) in this series. Sixty-three patients presented N1 diseases, 17 patients showed only skipped N2 diseases, and 51 patients had simultaneous N1 and N2 positive lymph nodes. No lymph node metastasis was found in the patients with pure ground grass opacity (GGO). When patients were arbitrarily divided into six groups by the longest tumor diameter of ≤0.5, 0.6-1, 1.1-1.5, 1.6-2.0, 2.1-2.5, 2.6-3 cm, the lymph node metastasis rates of each group were 0% (0/20), 1.5% (4/264), 4.7% (20/429), 8.6% (29/336), 13.1% (38/290), 19.6% (40/204), respectively. When the patients with pure GGO were excluded, the lymph node metastasis rates in the patients with partial or total solid tumors were 0% (0/10), 2.4% (4/164), 6.6% (20/303), 11.7% (29/249), 16.0% (38/238) and 23.1% (40/173). The cut off value showed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for tumor size was 1.95 cm, and the area under the curve (AUC) was measured as 0.681 (P<0.001, 95% CI: 0.630-0.726). Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that male patients [odds ratio (OR) =3.34, P=0.012], smoking history (OR =14.12, P<0.001), solid components (OR =3.34, P=0.01), large tumor size (OR =1.9, P<0.001), poor differentiation (OR =2.25, P=0.013), lymphovascular invasion (OR =58.45, P<0.001), visceral pleural invasion (OR =48.37, P<0.001) were significantly associated with lymph node metastasis in clinical stage IA NSCLC. The rate of non-lobe specific lymph node metastasis was 15.8-40.0% when any of the lobe specific lymph nodes was positive, while it was only 0-2.2% when all lobe specific lymph nodes were negative. CONCLUSIONS: Tumor size, solid components, poor differentiation, lymphovascular invasion, visceral pleural invasion and smoking history were significant factors predicting lymph node metastasis of clinical stage IA NSCLC. Patients with negative lobe-specific lymph node have very low risk of metastasis to the non-lobe specific lymph nodes. Lobe-specific lymph node dissection may become an alternative lymph node dissection mode for clinical stage IA NSCLC, especially for tumors ≤2 cm.