Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Assunto da revista
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Intensive Care Med ; 38(10): 975-982, 2023 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37264611

RESUMO

Background and Objectives: In lactic acidosis, lactate can only explain 30% of the variance in the anion gap (AG), and the elevated AG not explained by lactate is due to unmeasured organic anions (UOAs). Some studies using less precise surrogates for UOA have suggested that UOA may predict clinical outcomes better than lactate. The aim of this study was to determine whether UOA predicts clinical outcomes better than lactate levels. Design, Setting, Participants, & Measurements: This was a retrospective cohort study of adult ICU patients with sepsis. Baseline AG and albumin measurements were obtained. An albumin-corrected delta AG was calculated. UOAs were estimated using the formula: Delta AG - serum lactate. A multivariate logistic regression model with its respective ROC curve was constructed to explore the relationship between in-hospital mortality, UOA, and lactate. Results: 526 patients were included. In the combined model examining both lactate and UOA, the odds ratio (OR) [95% CI] for predicting ICU length of stay (LOS) was 1.050 [1.029-1.072] and 1.022 [1.009-1.035], respectively; the OR [95% CI] for predicting in-hospital mortality was 1.224 [1.104-1.358] and 0.997 [0.943-1.054], respectively. The ROC curve for in-hospital mortality demonstrated that the Area Under the Curve (AUC) for lactate, UOA, and combined lactate and UOA was 0.7726, 0.7486, and 0.7732, respectively. The AUC for combined lactate and UOA were not statistically significantly higher than the AUC for lactate alone (P .9193). Conclusions: As expected, serum lactate predicted both ICU LOS and in-hospital mortality. UOA did predict ICU LOS, although the reason for this association is not known. UOA did not predict in-hospital mortality based on the OR and the ROC curve's AUC, contrary to some previous studies. However, our study used a more precise quantitative estimate of UOA, including the use of baseline albumin-corrected AG. Prior studies attempting to identify UOA have identified Krebs cycle intermediates including citrate and isocitrate, suggesting that in our study these anions associated with the Krebs cycle contributed to the UOA.


Assuntos
Acidose Láctica , Sepse , Adulto , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Ânions , Ácido Láctico , Albuminas , Sepse/complicações , Curva ROC
2.
Clin Kidney J ; 15(11): 2056-2062, 2022 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36320364

RESUMO

Background: Patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) are highly susceptible to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection and its complications. Remdesivir has improved outcomes in COVID-19 patients but its use has been limited among ESKD patients due to insufficient data regarding safety outcomes. We sought to evaluate the safety of remdesivir among dialysis patients hospitalized with COVID-19. Methods: This retrospective cohort study was conducted among patients age ≥18 years on maintenance dialysis and hospitalized with COVID-19 between 1 May 2020 and 31 January 2021 within an integrated health system who were treated or not treated with remdesivir. The primary outcome was 30-day all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes were intensive care unit (ICU) stay, and transaminitis (AST/ALT >5× normal). Pseudo-populations were created using inverse probability of treatment weights with propensity scoring to balance patient characteristics among the two groups. Multivariable Poisson regression with robust error was performed to estimate 30-day mortality risk ratio. Results: A total of 486 (407 hemodialysis and 79 peritoneal dialysis) patients were hospitalized with COVID-19, among which 112 patients (23%) were treated with remdesivir [median treatment four days (interquartile range 2-5)]. The 30-day mortality rate was 24.1% among remdesivir-treated and 27.8% among non-treated patients. The estimated 30-day mortality rate was 0.74 (95% confidence interval 0.52-1.05) among remdesivir treated compared with non-treated patients. Liver injury and ICU admission rates were 1.8% and 14.3% among remdesivir-treated patients compared with 2.4% and 16% among non-treated patients. Conclusion: Among dialysis patients hospitalized with COVID-19, remdesivir was not associated with higher rates of liver injury or ICU admissions, and demonstrated a trend toward lower 30-day mortality.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA