Look for the POLESTAR (POsteroLateral Engagement of Soft Tissue And Radial head) while navigating around elbow dislocation.

BACKGROUND: Elbow dislocation is frequently associated with bony and osteochondral posterolateral capitellar lesions that are often under-reported. We aim to examine the radiologic signs of posterolateral lesions on computed tomography (CT). METHODS: A retrospective analysis of CT scans was performed. Patients were classified into 4 groups: (1) simple elbow dislocation, (2) elbow dislocation with a fracture of the coronoid tip, (3) elbow dislocation with coronoid tip fracture and a radial head fracture inferior or equal to the anterior third, and (4) terrible triad defined as elbow dislocation with concomitant coronoid and radial head fracture with a more important involvement. Patients with a more complex fracture pattern were excluded. The presence of POsteroLateral Engagement of Soft Tissue And Radial head (POLESTAR) patterns was analyzed and subclassified as impaction type or fragmentation type. RESULTS: Fifty-one CT scans met the inclusion criteria. POLESTAR lesions were identified in 48 cases (94%): 46% impaction-type and 54% fragmentation-type POLESTAR. Analyzing patients from grade 1 to 4, impaction-type POLESTAR was found, respectively, from 40% to 57%, whereas fragmentation type was present from 60% to 43%. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows a high incidence of POLESTAR lesions (94%) that can be present as impaction type or fragmentation type. Based on our preliminary results, impaction type is more common in grades 3 and 4, whereas fragmentation type is more frequent in grades 1 and 2.

Novel Radiographic Indexes for Elbow Stability Assessment: Part A-Cadaveric Validation.

INTRODUCTION: Elbow bony stability relies primarily on the high anatomic congruency between the humeral trochlea and the ulnar greater sigmoid notch. No practical tools are available to distinguish different morphotypes of the proximal ulna and herewith predict elbow stability. The aim of this study was to assess inter-observer reproducibility, evaluate diagnostic performance and determine responsiveness to change after simulated coronoid process fracture for three novel elbow radiographic indexes. METHODS: Ten fresh-frozen cadaver specimens of upper limbs from human donors were available for this study. Three primary indexes were defined, as well as two derived angles: Trochlear Depth Index (TDI); Posterior Coverage Index (PCI); Anterior Coverage Index (ACI); radiographic coverage angle (RCA); olecranon-diaphisary angle (ODA). Each index was first measured on standardized lateral radiographs and subsequently by direct measurement after open dissection. Finally, a type II coronoid fracture (Regan and Morrey classification) was created on each specimen and both radiographic and open measurements were repeated. All measurements were conducted by two orthopaedic surgeons and two dedicated musculoskeletal radiologists. RESULTS: All three indexes showed good or moderate inter-observer reliability and moderate accuracy and precision when compared to the gold standard (open measurement). A significant change between the radiographic TDI and ACI before and after simulated coronoid fracture was observed [TDI: decrease from 0.45 ± 0.03 to 0.39 ± 0.08 (p = 0.035); ACI: decrease from 1.90 ± 0.17 to 1.58 ± 0.21 (p = 0.001)]. As expected, no significant changes were documented for the PCI. Based on these data, a predictive model was generated, able to identify coronoid fractures with a sensitivity of 80% and a specificity of 100%. CONCLUSION: New, simple and easily reproducible radiological indexes to describe the congruency of the greater sigmoid notch have been proposed. TDI and ACI change significantly after a simulated coronoid fracture, indicating a good responsiveness of these parameters to a pathological condition. Furthermore, combining TDI and ACI in a regression model equation allowed to identify simulated fractures with high sensitivity and specificity. The newly proposed indexes are, therefore, promising tools to improve diagnostic accuracy of coronoid fractures and show potential to enhance perioperative diagnostic also in cases of elbow instability and stiffness. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Basic science study. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The newly proposed indexes are promising tools to improve diagnostic accuracy of coronoid fractures as well as to enhance perioperative diagnostic for elbow instability and stiffness.

Novel Radiographic Indexes for Elbow Stability Assessment: Part B-Preliminary Clinical Study.

INTRODUCTION: The coronoid process plays a key-role in preserving elbow stability. Currently, there are no radiographic indexes conceived to assess the intrinsic elbow stability and the joint congruency. The aim of this study is to present new radiological parameters, which will help assess the intrinsic stability of the ulnohumeral joint and to define normal values of these indexes in a normal, healthy population. METHODS: Four independent observers (two orthopaedic surgeons and two radiologists) selected lateral view X-rays of subjects with no history of upper limb disease or surgery. The following radiographic indexes were defined: trochlear depth index (TDI); anterior coverage index (ACI); posterior coverage index (PCI); olecranon-coronoid angle (OCA); radiographic coverage angle (RCA). Inter-observer and intra-observer reproducibility were assessed for each index. RESULTS: 126 subjects were included. Standardized lateral elbow radiographs (62 left and 64 right elbows) were obtained and analysed. The mean TDI was 0.46 ± 0.06 (0.3-1.6), the mean ACI was 2.0 ± 0.2 (1.6-3.1) and the mean PCI was 1.3 ± 0.1 (1.0-1.9). The mean RCA was 179.6 ± 8.3° (normalized RCA: 49.9 ± 2.3%) and the mean OCA was 24.6 ± 3.7°. The indexes had a high-grade of inter-observer and intra-observer reliability for each of the four observers. Significantly higher values were found for males for TDI, ACI, PCI and RCA. CONCLUSION: The novel radiological parameters described are simple, reliable and easily reproducible. These features make them a promising tool for radiographic evaluation both for orthopaedic surgeons and for radiologists in the emergency department setting or during outpatient services. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Basic Science Study (Case Series). CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The novel radiological parameters described are reliable, easily reproducible and become handy for orthopaedic surgeons as well as radiologists in daily clinical practice.

Validation of a Practical Forearm Supination Strength Measurement Technique in the Large Sample Cohort.

INTRODUCTION: The strength of forearm in pronation and supination (P/S) is an important clinical assessment during pre-operative examination as well as in post-operative evaluation. Many clinical trials concerning the measurement of forearm P/S strength were performed using a dynamometer fixed on the wall. The aim of this study was to bring out a simple and reliable technique for the measurement of P/S strength using a dynamometer manually supported and stabilized by an examiner. We hypothesized that there are no differences in evaluation of elbow P/S strength using the dynamometer fixed or the dynamometer stabilized by an operator in healthy people. METHODS: The study was performed on a cross-sectional cohort of 100 healthy subjects without any history of injuries or previous surgery of the upper limbs. Isometric forearm P/S strengths were measured on the dominant and non-dominant forearms, using the dynamometer fixed on a table, and using the same dynamometer kept by an operator. The measurements were repeated in triplicate at 45°, 90° and 120° of elbow flexion in both upper limbs for all patients. RESULTS: A total of 100 subjects (50 females, 50 males) were included in the study group. The mean age was 46.5 years (range 25-52 years). Female and male subjects showed no significant differences concerning the mean age (F/M ratio 0.50/0.50). The mean body mass index of all participants was 24.34 ± 3.66 kg/m2.No significant statistics difference was reported between the P/S strength measured using the two detection methods in our study group (45°, 90° and 120° of elbow flexion and both upper limbs). CONCLUSION: The manually stabilized technique is a valid and reliable technique to assess the P/S strength of the forearm. This is a simple and effective method that may be reproduced in our daily clinical practice as well as in sportive practice.