Assessment of distortion of intraoral scans of edentulous mandibular arch made with a 2-step scanning strategy: A clinical study.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Manufacturers of several intraoral scanners have recommended a 2-step strategy for scanning the edentulous mandible. The 2-step technique requires scanning one side first and then moving to the other side. However, whether inconsistency in stitching occurs that results in loss of accuracy or distortion is unclear. PURPOSE: The purpose of this clinical study was to measure the potential distortion of intraoral scans of edentulous mandibular arches made with a 2-step scanning strategy and to assess their differences with conventional impressions. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty mandibular edentulous arches were scanned by 1 investigator with an intraoral scanner using a 2-step scanning strategy, and a corresponding polysulfide conventional impression was obtained. The conventional impression was then immediately scanned with the same intraoral scanner. The obtained standard tessellation language (STL) files were superimposed with a surface-matching software program. After a preliminary alignment, the STL meshes were trimmed and reoriented; then, the final alignment was carried out and meshes moved to a metrology software program where their mean distance was measured. In addition, a surface curve (SIOS) was traced on the intraoral scan from the right to left retromolar pad along the residual ridge and automatically projected onto to the conventional impression scan to obtain a new curve (SC). The mean distance between SIOS and SC was measured and recorded as an indicator of the distortion by considering the X-, Y-, and Z-axes and the overall 3-dimensional (3D) deviation. The analysis was performed for the full curve length and after dividing it into 6 regions of interest. Univariate and multivariate statistical analyses were used to investigate the significance of the extent of the mean 3D distance, as well as the effects of measurement positions (side and region) between and within patients on differences along the X-, Y-, and Z-axes (α=.05). RESULTS: The mean (-0.08 mm; standard error: 0.025) 3D distance between the intraoral scan and conventional impression was significantly different from zero (P=.003). No significant effect of the factor "side" was found by using generalized estimated equation models for the X-, Y-, and Z-axes, and global 3D deviations between SIOS and SC (P>.05), which appeared to exclude distortion. Conversely, a significant effect was found for the factor "region" (P<.05), with no significant differences (P>.05) between corresponding regions on the 2 sides. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoral scans of the edentulous mandibular arch made in a 2-step procedure did not exhibit significant distortion in comparison with conventional impressions.

Accuracy of a chairside intraoral scanner compared with a laboratory scanner for the completely edentulous maxilla: An in vitro 3-dimensional comparative analysis.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Intraoral scanners are promising options for removable prosthodontics. However, analog aids, including occlusion rims, are still used, as a completely digital workflow is challenging and scientific evidence on the topic is scarce. PURPOSE: The purpose of this in vitro study was to assess and compare the trueness and precision of scans obtained from a reference typodont of a completely edentulous maxilla by using an intraoral scanner (TRIOS 3 Pod; 3Shape A/S) with scans obtained by using a laboratory scanner (DScan 3; EGS S.R.L.) from both Type IV stone casts and polysulfide impressions. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The polyurethane resin reference typodont was replicated from a clinical cast and was scanned with a metrological machine to obtain a reference scan. Ten digital casts were obtained by applying standardized scanning strategies to the reference typodont with the intraoral scanner. A device was created to make 10 consistent polysulfide impressions, and a scan of each impression was made with the laboratory scanner and then digitally reversed to obtain 10 digital reversed casts. Ten Type IV stone casts were poured and then scanned with the laboratory scanner to obtain 10 digital extraoral scanner casts. The scans in standard tessellation language (STL) format were imported into a dedicated software program, and the trueness and precision were calculated in µm. In addition to descriptive statistics (confidence interval 95%), 1-way ANOVA followed by the Bonferroni test or the Kruskal-Wallis and the Dunn tests were used to analyze differences among groups (α=.05). RESULTS: The trueness values (95% confidence interval) were digital intraoral scanner cast=48.7 (37.8-59.5), digital reversed cast=249.9 (121.3-378.5), and digital extraoral scanner cast=308.8 (186.6-430.9); significant differences were detected between digital intraoral scanner cast and digital reversed cast (P<.001) and between digital IOS casts and digital extraoral scanner cast (P<.001). The precision values (95% confidence interval) were digital intraoral scanner cast=46.7 (29.7-63.7), digital reversed cast=271.2 (94.6-447.8), and digital extraoral scanner cast=341.4 (175.5-507.3); significant differences were detected between digital intraoral scanner cast and digital reversed cast (P=.003) and between digital intraoral scanner cast and digital extraoral scanner cast (P=.001). CONCLUSIONS: Directly scanning a solid typodont of a completely edentulous maxilla with the intraoral scanner produced better trueness and precision than scanning the polysulfide impressions or the stone casts with a laboratory scanner.

Comparison of different intraoral scanning techniques on the completely edentulous maxilla: An in vitro 3-dimensional comparative analysis.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Information about the accuracy of intraoral scanners for the edentulous maxilla is lacking. PURPOSE: The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the accuracy of 3 different intraoral scanner techniques on a completely edentulous maxilla typodont. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Two completely edentulous maxillary typodonts with (wrinkled typodont) and without (smooth typodont) palatal rugae were used as reference and were scanned by using an industrial metrological machine to obtain 2 digital reference scans in standard tessellation language (STL) format (dWT and dST). Three different scanning techniques were investigated: in the buccopalatal technique, the buccal vestibule was scanned with a longitudinal movement ending on the palatal vault with a posteroanterior direction; the S-shaped technique was based on an alternate palatobuccal and buccopalatal scan along the ridge; in the palatobuccal technique, the palate was scanned with a circular movement and then with a longitudinal one along the buccal vestibule. Consecutively, 6 types of scans were obtained (n=10), namely wrinkled typodont/buccopalatal technique, wrinkled typodont/S-shaped technique, wrinkled typodont/palatobuccal technique (wrinkled typodont), smooth typodont/buccopalatal technique, smooth typodont/S-shaped technique, and smooth typodont/palatobuccal technique (smooth typodont). Scans in STL format were imported into a dedicated software program, and trueness and precision were evaluated in µm. In addition to descriptive statistics (95% confidence interval), a 2-factor ANOVA on the data ranks, the Kruskal-Wallis, and the Dunn tests were performed to analyze differences among groups (α=.05). RESULTS: Mean values for trueness (95% confidence interval) were wrinkled typodont/buccopalatal technique=48.7 (37.8-59.5); wrinkled typodont/S-shaped technique=65.9 (54.9-77.4); wrinkled typodont/palatobuccal technique=109.7 (96.1-123.4); smooth typodont/buccopalatal technique=48.1 (42.4-53.7); smooth typodont/S-shaped technique=56.4 (43.9-68.9); smooth typodont/palatobuccal technique=61.1 (53.3-69), with statistically significant differences for wrinkled typodont/buccopalatal technique versus wrinkled typodont/palatobuccal technique (P<.001), buccopalatal technique versus palatobuccal technique (P<.001), and wrinkled typodont versus smooth typodont (P=.002). Mean values for precision (95% confidence interval) were wrinkled typodont/buccopalatal technique=46.7 (29.7-63.7); wrinkled typodont/S-shaped technique=53.6 (37.6-69.7); wrinkled typodont/palatobuccal technique=90 (59.1-120.9); smooth typodont/buccopalatal technique=46 (39.7-52.3); smooth typodont/S-shaped technique=76 (55.5-96.6); smooth typodont/palatobuccal technique=52.9 (41.9-63.8); with statistically significant differences for buccopalatal technique versus palatobuccal technique (P=.032) and wrinkled typodont/buccopalatal technique versus wrinkled typodont/palatobuccal technique (P=.012). CONCLUSIONS: Smooth typodont scans showed better trueness than wrinkled typodont scans. Buccopalatal technique showed better mean values for trueness and precision than palatobuccal technique only in the wrinkled typodont scenario, while the other scanning approaches did not show significant differences in either tested configuration.

Mechanical behavior of conceptual posterior dental crowns with functional elasticity gradient.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the biomechanical behavior of monolithic ceramic crowns with functional elasticity gradient. METHODS: Using a CAD software, a lower molar received a full-crown preparation (1.5 mm occlusal and axial reduction). The monolithic crown was modeled with a resin cement layer of 0.1 mm. Four groups were distributed according to the full crown elastic modulus (E) :(a) Bioinspired crown with decreasing elastic modulus (from 90 to 30GPa); (b) Crown with increasing elastic modulus (from 30 to 90 GPa); (c) Rigid crown (90 GPa) and (d) Flexible crown (30 GPa). The model was exported to the analysis software and meshed into 385.240 tetrahedral elements and 696.310 nodes. Materials were considered isotropic, linearly elastic, and homogeneous, with ideal contacts. A 300-N load was applied at the occlusal surface and the base of the model was fixed in all directions. The results were required in maximum principal stress criterion. RESULTS: Crowns consisting of layers with increasing elastic modulus presented intermediate results between the rigid and flexible crowns. Compared to the flexible crown, the bioinspired crown showed acceptable stress distribution across the structure with lower stress concentration in the tooth. In dental crowns the multilayer structure with functional elasticity gradient modifies the stress distribution in the restoration, with promising results for bioinspired design. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The manufacturing of posterior crowns with functional elasticity gradient should be considered due to its promising results on the stress concentration behavior.

Current status on lithium disilicate and zirconia: a narrative review.

BACKGROUND: The introduction of the new generation of particle-filled and high strength ceramics, hybrid composites and technopolymers in the last decade has offered an extensive palette of dental materials broadening the clinical indications in fixed prosthodontics, in the light of minimally invasive dentistry dictates. Moreover, last years have seen a dramatic increase in the patients' demand for non-metallic materials, sometimes induced by metal-phobia or alleged allergies. Therefore, the attention of scientific research has been progressively focusing on such materials, particularly on lithium disilicate and zirconia, in order to shed light on properties, indications and limitations of the new protagonists of the prosthetic scene. METHODS: This article is aimed at providing a narrative review regarding the state-of-the-art in the field of these popular ceramic materials, as to their physical-chemical, mechanical and optical properties, as well as to the proper dental applications, by means of scientific literature analysis and with reference to the authors' clinical experience. RESULTS: A huge amount of data, sometimes conflicting, is available today. Both in vitro and in vivo studies pointed out the outstanding peculiarities of lithium disilicate and zirconia: unparalleled optical and esthetic properties, together with high biocompatibility, high mechanical resistance, reduced thickness and favorable wear behavior have been increasingly orientating the clinicians' choice toward such ceramics. CONCLUSIONS: The noticeable properties and versatility make lithium disilicate and zirconia materials of choice for modern prosthetic dentistry, requiring high esthetic and mechanical performances combined with a minimal invasive approach, so that the utilization of such metal-free ceramics has become more and more widespread over time.

The Functional Implant Prosthodontic Score (FIPS): assessment of reproducibility and observer variability.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to validate the reproducibility and observer variability of the Functional Implant Prosthodontic Score (FIPS), while considering the level of dental experience for intra- and inter-examiner analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 44 examiners (n = 31 undergraduate dental students and n = 13 postgraduate prosthodontic students) applied FIPS to ten sample cases each showing one implant-supported single crown for premolar or molar replacements. Examiners' assessments were carried out twice at an interval of 2 weeks (round A and round B). Pearson's correlations including 95% confidence intervals (CI95) were calculated for intra- and inter-examiner reproducibility testing. Cohen's Kappa score was additionally used to analyze the homogeneity of each FIPS variable. RESULTS: The mean values of the total FIPS scores for round A (7.21 ± 0.91) and round B (7.27 ± 0.86) showed a strong correlation of 0.9374 (CI95 0.9250; 0.9478). No significant difference was identified between undergraduates and postgraduates representing different levels of dental experience. Homogeneity analysis of the defined FIPS variables was not significantly different. CONCLUSIONS: Both intra- and inter-examiner analysis revealed very congruent results for reproducibility testing of FIPS. The findings validated the potential of FIPS as an objective and reliable evaluation instrument in assessing fixed implant restorations in posterior sites independent of the level of dental experience. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: FIPS can be considered as an additional diagnostic tool to classify fixed implant restorations in routine dental practice, to compare follow-up observations, and to identify potential risks of failure.

The complete digital workflow in fixed prosthodontics: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: The continuous development in dental processing ensures new opportunities in the field of fixed prosthodontics in a complete virtual environment without any physical model situations. The aim was to compare fully digitalized workflows to conventional and/or mixed analog-digital workflows for the treatment with tooth-borne or implant-supported fixed reconstructions. METHODS: A PICO strategy was executed using an electronic (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Google Scholar) plus manual search up to 2016-09-16 focusing on RCTs investigating complete digital workflows in fixed prosthodontics with regard to economics or esthetics or patient-centered outcomes with or without follow-up or survival/success rate analysis as well as complication assessment of at least 1 year under function. The search strategy was assembled from MeSH-Terms and unspecific free-text words: {(("Dental Prosthesis" [MeSH]) OR ("Crowns" [MeSH]) OR ("Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported" [MeSH])) OR ((crown) OR (fixed dental prosthesis) OR (fixed reconstruction) OR (dental bridge) OR (implant crown) OR (implant prosthesis) OR (implant restoration) OR (implant reconstruction))} AND {("Computer-Aided Design" [MeSH]) OR ((digital workflow) OR (digital technology) OR (computerized dentistry) OR (intraoral scan) OR (digital impression) OR (scanbody) OR (virtual design) OR (digital design) OR (cad/cam) OR (rapid prototyping) OR (monolithic) OR (full-contour))} AND {("Dental Technology" [MeSH) OR ((conventional workflow) OR (lost-wax-technique) OR (porcelain-fused-to-metal) OR (PFM) OR (implant impression) OR (hand-layering) OR (veneering) OR (framework))} AND {(("Study, Feasibility" [MeSH]) OR ("Survival" [MeSH]) OR ("Success" [MeSH]) OR ("Economics" [MeSH]) OR ("Costs, Cost Analysis" [MeSH]) OR ("Esthetics, Dental" [MeSH]) OR ("Patient Satisfaction" [MeSH])) OR ((feasibility) OR (efficiency) OR (patient-centered outcome))}. Assessment of risk of bias in selected studies was done at a 'trial level' including random sequence generation, allocation concealment, blinding, completeness of outcome data, selective reporting, and other bias using the Cochrane Collaboration tool. A judgment of risk of bias was assigned if one or more key domains had a high or unclear risk of bias. An official registration of the systematic review was not performed. RESULTS: The systematic search identified 67 titles, 32 abstracts thereof were screened, and subsequently, three full-texts included for data extraction. Analysed RCTs were heterogeneous without follow-up. One study demonstrated that fully digitally produced dental crowns revealed the feasibility of the process itself; however, the marginal precision was lower for lithium disilicate (LS2) restorations (113.8 µm) compared to conventional metal-ceramic (92.4 µm) and zirconium dioxide (ZrO2) crowns (68.5 µm) (p < 0.05). Another study showed that leucite-reinforced glass ceramic crowns were esthetically favoured by the patients (8/2 crowns) and clinicians (7/3 crowns) (p < 0.05). The third study investigated implant crowns. The complete digital workflow was more than twofold faster (75.3 min) in comparison to the mixed analog-digital workflow (156.6 min) (p < 0.05). No RCTs could be found investigating multi-unit fixed dental prostheses (FDP). CONCLUSIONS: The number of RCTs testing complete digital workflows in fixed prosthodontics is low. Scientifically proven recommendations for clinical routine cannot be given at this time. Research with high-quality trials seems to be slower than the industrial progress of available digital applications. Future research with well-designed RCTs including follow-up observation is compellingly necessary in the field of complete digital processing.

Complications of endodontically treated teeth restored with fiber posts and single crowns or fixed dental prostheses-a systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: The present systematic review aimed at assessing data from the literature on endodontic and prosthetic complications in endodontically treated teeth restored with fiber posts and single crowns (SCs) or fixed dental prostheses (FDPs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Available randomized controlled clinical trials evaluating endodontic and prosthetic complications in the teeth treated with fiber posts and restored with different prosthetic restorations were reviewed. PubMed, Evidence-Based Dentistry, BMJ Clinical Evidence, Embase, DynaMed, and gray literature restricted to scientific literature were analyzed; also, manual researches were performed. English language and time filters (from 1990 to 2015) were used. RESULTS: The database search produced 4230 records, many of which were duplicates. The manual research did not produce any other relevant article. After duplications were removed, all the selected databases produced 3670 records. Reading titles and abstracts, two independent reviewers excluded 3664 reports. The full-texts of the remaining six reports were read. Only four studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in this systematic review. CONCLUSIONS: The most frequently reported failures in the available studies were as follows: fiber post debonding, loss of retention of single crowns, and marginal gaps. Less frequently, chippings and fractures were recorded in SCs. No studies about complications related to FDPs were found. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: A correlation between the failure rates of fiber posts and the type of prosthetic restorations just like SCs and FDPs cannot be found to date. Further randomized controlled clinical studies are required to achieve evidence-based conclusions, particularly about the use of fiber posts with FDPs.

Short-term clinical performance of zirconia single crowns with different framework designs: 3-year clinical trial.

PURPOSE: The present prospective clinical study evaluated the influence of coping design on the fracture resistance of CAD/CAM zirconia single crowns layered with dedicated ceramics. METHODS: 56 subjects were provided with 90 zirconia single crowns in posterior regions. Tooth preparations were standardized and the abutment teeth were randomly distributed into three groups, according to three different coping designs (flat design, FD; porcelain-fused-to-metal-like crowns, PFM; anatomically-guided, AG). The zirconia cores were produced using a CAD/CAM software and then were hand-layered with dedicated ceramics. All crowns were cemented with a self-adhesive resin luting agent and the patients were recalled for follow-up visits after 1 month, 6 months, 1, 2 and 3 years of clinical service. The function, esthetics and marginal adaptation of the restorations were evaluated. Statistical analyses were performed to evaluate survival and success of the restorations. RESULTS: Success rates of 100% were reported in Group 2 and Group 3 while the percentage was 80% in Group 1. Three chippings were noticed in Group 1 (FD) and two crowns needed to be replaced after 3 years, resulting in a survival rate of 93.3%. Group 2 and Group 3 had significantly higher 3-year success rates than Group 1 (P < 0.05). Based on the present clinical results, the following conclusions were drawn: the porcelain-fused-to-metal-like and the anatomically-guided frameworks for zirconia single crowns performed better clinically than the flat designed cores in posterior regions after 3 years; standardized tooth preparations achieved even thicknesses of the bilayered restorations; the proper support given to the veneering ceramic by the correct design of the zirconia framework could significantly reduce the risk of chipping during function.

Effect of 2 impression techniques on the dimensional accuracy of working implant prosthesis models: an in vitro study.

PURPOSE: Implant impressions and working models form integrated precision systems for registration and transmission of clinical data. The components of implant systems have a dimensional tolerance capable of introducing inaccuracies in the impression, thus in the prosthetic framework. This article aimed at comparing 2 repositioning impression techniques: one using impression copings (conventional technique) and the other using the final abutments as impression copings (interceptive technique). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two experimental models, one with 4 parallel implants and the other with 4 nonparallel implants, were used to make silicone impressions. Twenty impressions were made with the conventional technique, and a further 20 were made with the interceptive technique. Three-dimensional images acquired with a three-dimensional scanner were measured using a three-dimensional image analysis software, comparing models obtained from the impressions with the experimental models. Data were statistically analyzed by means of confidence intervals calculated with the mean (α = 0.05), descriptive (box plot), and bivariate analyses. RESULTS: Statistic analysis highlighted significant differences among models obtained using both techniques: the interceptive technique generated working models with less distortion and variability. CONCLUSIONS: For internal-connection implants, the interceptive technique provided significantly more precise working models than did the conventional technique.

Trueness, precision, time-efficiency and cost analysis of chairside additive and subtractive versus lab-based workflows for manufacturing single crowns: An in vitro study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the trueness, precision, time efficiency, and cost of three different workflows for manufacturing single crowns (SCs). METHODS: A plaster model with a prepared tooth (#15) was scanned with an industrial scanner, and an SC was designed in computer-assisted-design (CAD) software. Ten SCs were printed with a hybrid composite (additive chairside) and a stereolithographic (SLA) printer (Dfab®), 10 SCs were milled in lithium disilicate (subtractive chairside) using a chairside milling unit (inLab MC XL®), and 10 SCs were milled in zirconia (lab-based) using a five-axis laboratory machine (DWX-52D®). All SCs were scanned with the same scanner after polymerization/sinterization. Each scan was superimposed to the marginal area of the original CAD file to evaluate trueness: absolute average (ABS AVG), root mean square (RMS), and (90˚-10˚)/2 percentile were calculated for each group. Marginal adaptation and quality of the occlusal and interproximal contact points were also investigated by two prosthodontists on 3D printed and plaster models. Finally, the three workflows' time efficiency and costs were evaluated. RESULTS: Additive chairside and subtractive lab-based SCs had significantly better marginal trueness than subtractive chairside SCs in all three parameters (ABS AVG, p < 0.01; RMS, p < 0.01; [90˚-10˚]/2, p < 0.01). However, the two prosthodontists found no significant differences between the three manufacturing procedures in the quality of the marginal closure (p = 0.186), interproximal (p = 0.319), and occlusal contacts (p = 0.218). Both time efficiency and cost show a trend favoring the chairside additive workflow. CONCLUSIONS: Chairside additive technology seems to represent a valid alternative for manufacturing definitive SCs, given the high marginal trueness, precision, workflow efficiency and low costs. STATEMENT OF CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Additive chairside manufacturing of definitive hybrid composite SCs is now possible and shows high accuracy, time efficiency, and competitive cost.

Trueness and precision of an intraoral scanner on abutments with subgingival vertical margins: An in vitro study.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of an intraoral scanner (IOS - Medit i700) on tooth abutments with vertical preparations at 2 depths below the free gingival margin, and to determine if the IOS can reproduce the area beyond the finish surface of the tested preparation geometry. METHODS: Two abutments for a maxillary first molar were designed by means of CAD software, with vertical preparations set at 1 and 2 mm below the gingiva. These abutments were subsequently printed in resin and placed on a reference model. The reference files consisted of scans made using a metrological machine on these abutments. Ten scans were made with the tested IOS on each sample, resulting in two study groups. The scans from the experimental groups were labeled "V-1″ for vertical preparation at 1 mm below the gingival margin and "V-2″ for 2 mm below. The analysis of these scans was performed using Geomagic Control X (3D SYSTEMS) to assess their trueness and precision in µm. Descriptive statistics with a 95 % confidence interval were employed, alongside independent sample tests, to ascertain any differences between the groups (α=0.05). RESULTS: Statistically significant differences were not found both for trueness (p=.104) and precision (p=.409), between the tested geometries. The mean values for trueness were V-1 = 37.5[31.4-43.6]; V-2 = 32.6[30.6-34.6]. About the precision, the mean values were V-1 = 20.5[8.4-32.5]; V-2 = 18.4[8.2-28.5]. In both the study groups, it was possible to detect the surface beyond the finish area. CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitations of this study, vertical preparation design allows for registration of the tooth anatomy beyond the finish area with IOS. Moreover, the mean accuracy values were clinically acceptable at both 1 and 2 mm below the gingival margin.

A 13- to 17-year Retrospective Evaluation of the Clinical Performances of Anterior and Posterior Lithium Disilicate Restorations onto Teeth and Implants.

This retrospective study aimed at evaluating the clinical outcomes of lithium disilicate prostheses onto teeth and implants. A total of 860 restorations were delivered to 312 patients, including crowns, veneers and onlays. Patients with uncontrolled gingival inflammation and/or periodontitis were excluded, whilst subjects with occlusal parafunctions were included. The retrospective observational period ranged between 13 to 17 years. The mechanical and esthetic performances of the restorations were rated according to the modified CDA criteria. The recorded data were analyzed statistically. In total, 26 mechanical complications were noticed: 17 ceramic chippings, 5 core fractures and 4 losses of retention. Mechanical complications occurred predominantly in posterior areas; monolithic prostheses showed the lowest percentage of structural problems. The clinical scores of layered and monolithic restorations were fully satisfactory according to the modified CDA rating. The cumulative survival and success rates ranged between 95.46-100% and 93.75-100% respectively up to 17 years of follow-up. Although patient selection and the rigorous application of validated clinical protocols were considered paramount, the use of lithium disilicate prostheses onto teeth and implants was reported to be a viable and reliable treatment option in the long-term.

Influence of different palatal morphologies on the accuracy of intraoral scanning of the edentulous maxilla: A three-dimensional analysis.

PURPOSE: This study investigated the influence of different palatal morphologies on the accuracy of intraoral scanning (TRIOS 4) of edentulous maxillae. METHODS: Six typodonts were fabricated for different palatal morphologies with flat (F), medium (M), and deep (D) palates, with palatal wrinkles (W), or smooth palates (S), resulting in six groups: WF, WM, WD and SF, SM, SD. Ten scans were performed for each group; standard tessellation language files obtained were imported into a software to measure trueness and precision in micrometer. Trueness was calculated as the mean of the standard deviation values obtained by superimposing each scan onto the reference scan. Precision was achieved by overlapping each scan with that with the best trueness in the group. Descriptive and post-hoc analyses were conducted. RESULTS: The mean values for trueness were as follows: WM=48.7±4.7, WD=161.7±18.4, WF=85.9±16, SM=48.1±2.4, SD=349.9±8.8, and SF=349.1±25.5. The precision values were as follows: WM=46.7±7.3, WD=46.9±9, WF=48.9±6.7, SM=46±2.7, SD=105.9±17.4, SF=72.6±10.8. Significant differences were observed for trueness between SM and SD (P < 0.001), SM and SF (P < 0.001), and WF and SF (P = 0.003); whereas for precision, significant differences were reported between WD and SD (P = 0.015). Regarding trueness and precision, no difference was found between WM and SM (P = 1.0). CONCLUSIONS: Medium palatal depth showed the best accuracy. The mean accuracy values were within the clinical acceptability thresholds for all palatal morphologies. The presence of rugae improved the precision of deeper palates and the trueness of flat palates. No differences were observed in the medium palates with or without rugae.

Full Digital Workflow for Mandibular Ameloblastoma Management: Showcase for Technical Description.

This is a showcase for technical description of a full digital workflow aimed to reconstruct and prosthetically rehabilitate the mandible after surgical resection. The surgery was performed following a computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) guided workflow, using 3D reconstruction of the mandible and the fibula. After 2 years, when the ossification of the flap was reached and verified by a computed tomography (CT) scan, surgery was performed using a two-step implant rehabilitation, with successful outcomes.

Clinical longevity of direct and indirect posterior resin composite restorations: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To answer the PICO(S) question: Is there a difference in clinical longevity between direct and indirect resin composite restorations placed on permanent posterior teeth? DATA: Randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) investigating direct and indirect resin composite restorations in posterior permanent teeth were considered. SOURCES: Several electronic databases were searched, with no language or date restrictions. The revised Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias (RoB-2) was used to analyze the studies; meta-analyses were run and the certainty of evidence was assessed by the GRADE tool. A subgroup meta-analysis was performed for resin composite restorations placed on posterior worn dentition. STUDY SELECTION: Twenty-three articles were included in qualitative synthesis, while 8 studies were used for meta-analyses. According to the RoB-2 tool, 5 studies were ranked as "low risk", 7 had "some concerns", while 11 papers were rated as "high risk" of bias. There were no statistically significant differences in short-term (p = 0.27; RR=1.54, 95% CI [0.72, 3.33]), medium-term (p = 0.27; RR=1.87, 95% CI [0.61, 5.72]) and long-term longevity (p = 0.86; RR=0.95, 95% CI [0.57, 1.59]). The choice of restorative technique had no influence on short-term survival of resin composite restorations placed on worn dentition (p = 0.13; RR=0.46, 95% CI [0.17, 1.25]). The certainty of evidence was rated as "very low". CONCLUSIONS: Direct and indirect resin composite restorations may show similar clinical longevity in posterior region, regardless of the observation period or substrate (wear-affected and non-affected dentition). The very low quality of evidence suggests that more long-term RCTs are needed to confirm our results.

Five-year prospective clinical study of posterior three-unit zirconia-based fixed dental prostheses.

This prospective clinical trial aimed at evaluating the clinical performance of three-unit posterior zirconia fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) after 5 years of clinical function. Thirty-seven patients received 48 three-unit zirconia-based FDPs. The restorations replaced either a premolar or a molar. Specific inclusion criteria were needed. Tooth preparation was standardized. Computer-aided design/computer-assisted manufacturing frameworks with a 9-mm(2) cross section of the connector and a 0.6-mm minimum thickness of the retainer were made. The restorations were luted with resin cement. The patients were recalled after 1, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months. The survival and success of the ceramics and zirconia were evaluated. The technical and aesthetic outcomes were examined using the United States Public Health Service criteria. The biologic outcomes were analyzed at abutment and contralateral teeth. Descriptive statistics were performed. All FDPs completed the study, resulting in 100% cumulative survival rate and 91.9% and 95.4% cumulative success rates for patients wearing one and two FDPs, respectively. No losses of retention were recorded. Forty-two restorations were rated alpha in all measured parameters. A minor chipping of the ceramics was detected in three restorations. No significant differences between the periodontal parameters of the test and control teeth were observed. Five-year clinical results proved that three-unit posterior zirconia-based FDPs were successful in the medium term for both function and aesthetic. Zirconia can be considered a promising substitute of metal frameworks for the fabrication of short-span posterior prostheses.

Effect of the length of glass fiber posts on the fracture resistance of restored maxillary central incisors.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the influence of post length insertion on the fracture resistance of directly restored endodontically treated teeth. METHODS: 30 maxillary central incisors were restored with glass fiber posts and composite cores to produce groups with post lengths of (1) 5 mm, (2) 7 mm, and (3) 9 m. Specimens were loaded at 130 degrees (Instron). Fracture strengths were analyzed with the Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test to verify the normality of the data distribution and with ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc test at P < 0.05. Fracture patterns (restorable or unrestorable) were analyzed (Pearson's Chi-square test). RESULTS: The average fracture resistance was: Group 1 = 366.4 N, Group 2 = 507.4 N and Group 3 = 509.9 N. No significant difference was found among the three groups for fracture resistance or for failure mode. The insertion length did not influence the fracture pattern; more restorable fractures were detected.

Dentin Exposure after Tooth Preparation for Laminate Veneers: A Microscopical Analysis to Evaluate the Influence of Operators' Expertise.

Background: To assess the quantity of dentin exposure detected by 3 operators with different clinical expertise for 2 designs of tooth preparation for laminate veneers: window (WI) and butt joint (BJ). Methods: 20 intact maxillary central incisors were collected and then prepared for laminate veneers to a depth of 0.6 mm, with a cervical mini-chamfer finish line of 0.3 mm. Each prepared tooth was analyzed by 3 operators with different expertise: undergraduate student (ST), general practitioner (GP), and prosthodontist (PR), at sight under magnification. Besides descriptive statistics (CI 95%), 2-way ANOVA and Games−Howell tests were used to analyze differences among groups (α = 0.05). Results: The means of percentage and area of detected dentin exposure were WI = 30.48%, 21.57 mm2; BJ = 30.99%, 21.97 mm2; ST/WI = 22.82%, 16.44 mm2; GP/WI = 58.05%, 40.64 mm2; PR/WI = 10.55%, 7.63 mm2; ST/BJ = 28.99%, 20.83 mm2; GP/BJ = 40.56%, 28.32 mm2; PR/BJ = 23.42%, 16.75 mm2. Significant differences were found between ST/WI vs. GP/WI (p = 0.005) and GP/WI vs. PR/WI (p < 0.001). Conclusions: There was no difference in detection of exposed dentin among operators with different expertise for BJ preparation, whereas differences were found between the general practitioner and the other 2 operators in WI. Moreover, the quantity of exposed dentin was not related to different tooth preparation designs.

Analysis of The Reproducibility of Subgingival Vertical Margins Using Intraoral Optical Scanning (IOS): A Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this randomized controlled trial was to evaluate the capability of an IOS (Intra Oral Scanner) device, used in standardized conditions, to detect margins of abutments prepared with knife-edge finishing line located at three different levels in relation to the gingival sulcus. METHODS: sixty abutment teeth for treatment with full crowns were selected and randomly divided in three groups accordingly to the depth of the finishing line: Group A: supragingival margin; Group B: 0.5-1.0 mm into the sulcus; Group C: 1.5-2.0 mm into the sulcus. Temporary crowns were placed for two weeks and then digital impressions (Aadva IOS 100, GC, Japan) were made of each abutment. As controls, analog impressions were taken, poured, and scanned using a laboratory scanner (Aadva lab scanner, GC, Japan). Two standard tessellation language (STL) files were generated for each abutment, subsequently processed, and superimposed by Exocad software (Exocad GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany), applying the "best-fit" algorithm in order to align the scan of the conventional with the digital impressions. The distances between each preparation margin and the adjacent gingival tissue were measured. Four measures were taken, two interproximally and buccally, for a total of six measures of each abutment considering three modes of impressions. The data were statistically evaluated using two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) for each site and the Bonferroni test. RESULTS: there was no difference between the two kinds of impression in Group A in both sites, in Group B a difference of 0.483 mm and 0.682 mm at interproximal and buccal sites, respectively, and in Group C 0.750 mm and 0.964 mm at interproximal and buccal sites, respectively. The analysis performed on a site level (mesial/distal/vestibular) for the depth of both vertical preparations revealed significant differences (p < 0.0001). After a post hoc analysis (Bonferroni), vestibular sites of the shallow vertical preparations resulted in significantly lower values compared to the other sites prepared deeply. CONCLUSIONS: the results showed that the location of the margin is an important factor in making a precise and complete impression when IOS (Intra Oral Scanner) is used. Moreover, deep preparation into the sulcus is not recommended for IOS (Intra Oral Scanner) impressions.